| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rick" |
| Date: |
19 Jul 2006 06:57:21 PM |
| Object: |
O Little Town of Nazareth? |
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
.
|
|
| User: "Llanzlan Klazmon" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 09:16:19 PM |
|
|
"Rick" <pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in
news:7fOdnRPDxdx0WyPZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Funny in two different ways. The myth says Bethlehem but it's even funnier
that Nazareth didn't exist in the first century.
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/nazareth.html
Klazmon.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sr. Rojo" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 11:32:59 PM |
|
|
In article <7fOdnRPDxdx0WyPZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
Go back to the 1st Ward. *****/
--
'Out of the rubbles of Trent Lott's house - he's lost his entire house -
there's going to be a fantastic house. And I'm looking forward to sitting
on the porch.''
--GeeDubya (Mobile, AL)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 07:07:38 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:21 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
* Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament, the Talmud, nor
in the Apocrypha and it does not appear in any early rabbinic
literature.
* Nazareth was not included in the list of settlements of the
tribes of Zebulon (Joshua 19:10-16) which mentions twelve towns and
six villages
* Nazareth is not included among the 45 cities of Galilee that
were mentioned by Josephus (37AD-100AD).
* Nazareth is also missing from the 63 towns of Galilee mentioned
in the Talmud.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 09:28:43 PM |
|
|
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 10:04:08 PM |
|
|
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
- Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Llanzlan Klazmon" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 11:30:30 PM |
|
|
"Rick" <pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in
news:7vWdnb7Q454zbyPZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
- Rick
Who didn't?
Klazmon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
24 Jul 2006 07:19:48 PM |
|
|
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:30 +1200, Llanzlan Klazmon
<Klazmon@llurdiaxorb.govt> wrote in alt.atheism
"Rick" <pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in
news:7vWdnb7Q454zbyPZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
- Rick
Who didn't?
Christians, as usual.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 11:22:37 PM |
|
|
In article <7vWdnb7Q454zbyPZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com says...
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
Yeah, jesus wasn't born anywhere, except in the masturbatory imagination
of some lying scribe.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glorious Guardian of Good" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
20 Jul 2006 07:52:54 AM |
|
|
Rick wrote:
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
And I'm glad you're still out there cross-posting alt.atheism, my
friend. Else I'd never have seen the
<http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/nazareth.html> page, which is really
quite fascinating.
Serious question: How're your hopes for a Hillary/Barak ticket these
days? You still think it might happen?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
21 Jul 2006 01:29:54 AM |
|
|
Glorious Guardian of Good wrote in message <44bf7ca6_2@x-privat.org>...
Rick wrote:
Brian E. Clark wrote in message ...
In article <g9itb2pq6h761p5dci2ejdqosh4iu1b3n7@4ax.com>, Eris
said...
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
I thought he was "oopsing" the fact that the news report listed
Nazareth as Jesus's place of birth.
I'm glad someone got it!
And I'm glad you're still out there cross-posting alt.atheism, my
friend. Else I'd never have seen the
<http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/nazareth.html> page, which is really
quite fascinating.
Serious question: How're your hopes for a Hillary/Barak ticket these
days?
Well, I'm only sort of still hoping...against almost all odds. I think Obama
would be better for a later time, though.
You still think it might happen?
When Toller laces up his skates...
http://www.tollercranston.net/feature_big_2.html
Hillary doesn't stand a chance against the Kos Kids - unless there's a
miracle. If she gets the nomination, they'll suddenly see the light and be
her biggest cheerleaders. And if Obama keeps making sense and holding his
own about reaching out to religious moderates, well, lynching will come back
into fashion. I'm getting really disgusted with the Rockettes Chorus Line of
knee jerk liberals who are beyond clueless when responding to Amy Sullivan,
Jim Wallis, and Obama. Too many of them are looking to identify heretics,
when their supposed colleagues are looking for more allies and converts.
This ideological purge is going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eyelessgame" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
24 Jul 2006 07:45:25 PM |
|
|
Glorious Guardian of Good wrote:
Serious question: How're your hopes for a Hillary/Barak ticket these
days? You still think it might happen?
Barack Obama has to learn a bit more about good debate framing. He's
young, and still inexperienced as a national pol.
A lot of the left's base doesn't much like HRC, primarily because she
hasn't come out against the war. I don't know, at this point, who else
is going to get the nomination in two years. Two years is an eternity
in politics; she could be no one by then, or she could be the entire
party's favorite by then.
My dream ticket doesn't happen till 2016, but it's Spitzer/Obama.
eyelessgame
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
26 Jul 2006 04:52:52 AM |
|
|
eyelessgame wrote in message
<1153788325.643300.240210@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
Glorious Guardian of Good wrote:
Serious question: How're your hopes for a Hillary/Barak ticket these
days? You still think it might happen?
Barack Obama has to learn a bit more about good debate framing.
I think he's got it just right. I liked that he held his own in rejecting
the fixation on framing when interviewed by pastordan at streetprophets.com
He's young, and still inexperienced as a national pol.
A lot of the left's base doesn't much like HRC, primarily because she
hasn't come out against the war. I don't know, at this point, who else
is going to get the nomination in two years. Two years is an eternity
in politics; she could be no one by then, or she could be the entire
party's favorite by then.
My dream ticket doesn't happen till 2016, but it's Spitzer/Obama.
I'm getting anxious already. Last election I was an "Anybody but Kerry"
voter. Next time, barring some miracle, I'll be an "Anybody but a
Republican" voter. I'll reserve the option of a third party, or writing in
Pat Paulson.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
24 Jul 2006 07:00:16 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:07:38 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:21 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
* Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament, the Talmud, nor
in the Apocrypha and it does not appear in any early rabbinic
literature.
* Nazareth was not included in the list of settlements of the
tribes of Zebulon (Joshua 19:10-16) which mentions twelve towns and
six villages
* Nazareth is not included among the 45 cities of Galilee that
were mentioned by Josephus (37AD-100AD).
* Nazareth is also missing from the 63 towns of Galilee mentioned
in the Talmud.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nazareth was determined to be MIA almost two milenia ago.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
19 Jul 2006 09:12:47 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Eris
(vithant@nospamgmail.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:21 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
* Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament, the Talmud, nor
in the Apocrypha and it does not appear in any early rabbinic
literature.
* Nazareth was not included in the list of settlements of the
tribes of Zebulon (Joshua 19:10-16) which mentions twelve towns and
six villages
* Nazareth is not included among the 45 cities of Galilee that
were mentioned by Josephus (37AD-100AD).
* Nazareth is also missing from the 63 towns of Galilee mentioned
in the Talmud.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to my research, Nazareth did not exist as a town until the
third century CE. There were some farming settlements in the area around
the apparent time associated with the birth of "Jesus". That's about it.
Much of the bible was very poorly researched, or they just didn't count
on there being skeptics who would find out these debillatating tidbits.
This one definitely hints that the gospels were not written until some
200 years after the supposed event, doesn't it?
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
The laws that require me to NOT kill people I don't like REALLY bug
me, or there would be many less of YOUR kind.
-John Weatherly
.
|
|
|
| User: "Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
20 Jul 2006 09:58:13 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Eris
(vithant@nospamgmail.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:21 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
* Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament, the Talmud, nor
in the Apocrypha and it does not appear in any early rabbinic
literature.
* Nazareth was not included in the list of settlements of the
tribes of Zebulon (Joshua 19:10-16) which mentions twelve towns and
six villages
* Nazareth is not included among the 45 cities of Galilee that
were mentioned by Josephus (37AD-100AD).
* Nazareth is also missing from the 63 towns of Galilee mentioned
in the Talmud.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to my research, Nazareth did not exist as a town until the
third century CE. There were some farming settlements in the area around
the apparent time associated with the birth of "Jesus". That's about it.
Much of the bible was very poorly researched, or they just didn't count
on there being skeptics who would find out these debillatating tidbits.
This one definitely hints that the gospels were not written until some
200 years after the supposed event, doesn't it?
Actually, for most of the history of this blood soaked book, there were no vocal
skeptics for a very good reason.
It was a death sentence to speak out against the "good book".
The bible is the most enduring book in history alright, it endured by way of the stake and the sword.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
24 Jul 2006 07:02:44 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:58:13 -0700, "Karl E. Taylor"
<ktaylor@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com> wrote in alt.atheism
In alt.atheism Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Eris
(vithant@nospamgmail.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:21 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
http://rpreeves.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/o-little-town-of-nazareth/
Oops.
- Rick
* Nazareth is not mentioned in any historical records or biblical
texts of the time and receives no mention by any contemporary
historian.
* Nazareth is not mentioned in the Old Testament, the Talmud, nor
in the Apocrypha and it does not appear in any early rabbinic
literature.
* Nazareth was not included in the list of settlements of the
tribes of Zebulon (Joshua 19:10-16) which mentions twelve towns and
six villages
* Nazareth is not included among the 45 cities of Galilee that
were mentioned by Josephus (37AD-100AD).
* Nazareth is also missing from the 63 towns of Galilee mentioned
in the Talmud.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to my research, Nazareth did not exist as a town until the
third century CE. There were some farming settlements in the area around
the apparent time associated with the birth of "Jesus". That's about it.
Much of the bible was very poorly researched, or they just didn't count
on there being skeptics who would find out these debillatating tidbits.
This one definitely hints that the gospels were not written until some
200 years after the supposed event, doesn't it?
Actually, for most of the history of this blood soaked book, there were no vocal
skeptics for a very good reason.
It was a death sentence to speak out against the "good book".
The bible is the most enduring book in history alright, it endured by way of the stake and the sword.
Don't forget; the rack, one-legged pony, iron boot, the wheel, iron
maiden, pressing, whip, scourge, hot irons and tongs, the auto-da-fe and
other Christian devices.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: O Little Town of Nazareth? |
20 Jul 2006 02:47:44 AM |
|
|
Uncle Vic wrote:
Much of the bible was very poorly researched, or they just
didn't count on there being skeptics who would find out
these debillatating tidbits.
Considering the context -- as well as all the other evidence --
there seems little doubt that it was written well past the
time events supposedly took place.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
