"No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in message
news:Xns967E5F16792D8taustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...

"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in
news:UcBue.78733$PR6.50391@tornado.texas.rr.com:

"No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in message
news:Xns967E5C3379AB8taustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...

"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in
news:hTAue.78726$PR6.21321@tornado.texas.rr.com:

"No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in
message
news:Xns967E568B26526taustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...

"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in
news:__mue.48691$j51.31995@tornado.texas.rr.com:

"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ktujb1pbiqft3cero5kg2v6p9p5ddc9e00@4ax.com...

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:51:00 -0000, No 33 Secretary
<taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in
news:Xns967DC5A5C4E19keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4:

No 33 Secretary <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in
news:Xns967DA4B0F9C35taustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50:

[...]

I know you are, but what am I?

it's not entirely clear, but it doesn't look good for
you.

I know you are, but what am I?

Pity.

I'm fixin' to sit you three in a corner......! And I don't
give a

damn

'who' touched 'who' first.

Go for it. You replied, too.

You must not have kids....

I've read that having kids lowers your IQ. You are proof.

First, if that's the case, then what is your excuse for the
stupidity you've displayed thus far? Were you born that stupid, or
did you suffer a severe head trauma?

I know you are, but what am I?

Second, I find it remarkable that you've actually managed to read
anything.

I know you are, but what am I?

Third, when I start at 190, what's a point or two among friends?

Yeah, right, and my IQ is 2,068,886.786,987.

You want to make your stupid remarks, but your panties bunch up when
someone replies in kind.

Do you have some sort of reality conflict?

Fourth, "I'm rubber, you're glue...." That's obviously the level
you understand, since that has been the level of intelligence
you've displayed this far.

I know you are, but what am I?

Pity that you couldn't discern the blatant sarcasm in my message.
Such is the case with the intellectually inferior with delusions of
paranoia.

And why is it, exactly, that you keep replying?
Other than your inability
to stop, of course.

I started with a single remark to try and alleviate what I considered
to be an exchange that was, based on my observations, beneath you and
Somewriter.

I was mistaken. You should converse with Jon Young and Assprey, since
you function at their inferior level.

I reply now because I like to keep making fun of you, and opening the
forum for you to display your ineptitude. You are the Costello to my
Abbott. I set the stage with a 'lead-in', and you ***** it up with your
incompetence.

With your remark, though, one must wonder where you got such a
non-sequitur notion. I never said I wasn't going to respond, so the
delusion is entirely within your realm. It's that 'reality conflict'
thing I mentioned earlier.

I will leave you now to your delusions of grandeur.
<plonk>

No 33 Secretary wrote:

I know you are, but what am I?

--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available

When you communicate with "Somewriter", you are dealing with
alt.abortion's #1 airhead. Take everything with a grain of salt.

No 33 Secretary wrote:

I know you are, but what am I?

--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available

When you communicate with "Somewriter", you are dealing with
alt.abortion's #1 airhead.

No 33 Secretary wrote:

I know you are, but what am I?

--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available

When you communicate with "Somewriter", you are dealing with
alt.abortion's #1 airhead.