| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
26 Mar 2006 05:00:26 PM |
| Object: |
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
26 Mar 2006 09:23:25 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan. Are
you sure you understand this?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
27 Mar 2006 05:23:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan. Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term to turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went down.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
28 Mar 2006 09:23:13 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ursg22hq7hp53e88kknfgbkhfta2lh46m4@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan.
Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term to
turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went
down.
How exactly does that compare to Reagan and the Bushes? Hmmmm?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
28 Mar 2006 05:53:46 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:23:13 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ursg22hq7hp53e88kknfgbkhfta2lh46m4@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan.
Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term to
turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went
down.
How exactly does that compare to Reagan and the Bushes? Hmmmm?
Decreasing prosperity under 'rat willie.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
28 Mar 2006 09:27:55 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ursg22hq7hp53e88kknfgbkhfta2lh46m4@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan.
Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term to
turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went
down.
You idiot. It's not Debt VS. % of GDP. It's Debt as a % of GDP.
Down is good. Up is bad.
Really! Get a fucking grip!
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
28 Mar 2006 05:55:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:27:55 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ursg22hq7hp53e88kknfgbkhfta2lh46m4@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan.
Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term to
turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went
down.
You idiot. It's not Debt VS. % of GDP. It's Debt as a % of GDP.
Down is good. Up is bad.
Really! Get a fucking grip!
Done. The curse says decreasing prosperity in 'rat clinton's 2nd term. And
that's exactly what happened - surpluses, dropping prices, closing of production
lives, laying off of workers. Yep, that 'rat clinton for sure.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
29 Mar 2006 05:44:57 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s4jj22td9kl6q1e3ni1kcrrspk5tad9mvn@4ax.com...
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:27:55 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ursg22hq7hp53e88kknfgbkhfta2lh46m4@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:23:25 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:e77e221mqrqp9da5lovqueoovau33rg2gs@4ax.com...
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
This would seem to be an indictment of Republican policies since Reagan.
Are
you sure you understand this?
Yep, 'rat clinton wasn't so wonderful. It took him his entire 1st term
to
turn
things around, then his recession hit. Viola - debt vs % of GDP went
down.
You idiot. It's not Debt VS. % of GDP. It's Debt as a % of GDP.
Down is good. Up is bad.
Really! Get a fucking grip!
Done. The curse says decreasing prosperity in 'rat clinton's 2nd term.
And
that's exactly what happened - surpluses, dropping prices, closing of
production
lives, laying off of workers. Yep, that 'rat clinton for sure.
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
From the very source you cited:
"The national debt peaked at 120% of GDP in 1946 due to the war effort, but
Roosevelt, Truman, Ike, Kennedy, LBJ, Nixon and Carter all did their part to
bring the national debt back to pre-war levels. By the beginning of 1981,
the national debt had fallen to 32.5% of GDP. Then, Reagan took office and
the national debt took off. It rose non-stop for 12 years to 66.3% at the
end of Bush's term, erasing 25 years of progress in paying down the national
debt."
Regarding unemployment, the rate was the lowest under Clinton (3-4%)
since the 50's. It is currently over 5.5.%.
Why are surpluses bad? Either you need surpluses to pay down debt
or you need to raise taxes. US Bonds are now at junk bond status.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
29 Mar 2006 05:46:14 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 09:36:38 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in more
money and accumulate less debt.
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation
was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
The graph does not show expenditures. It is debt as a % of GDP. Whqat
part of this don't you get?
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production
line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
Then why was unemployment the lowest in 40 years?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 09:39:54 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in more
money and accumulate less debt.
<Earl Weber>
La La La La La La La La La La La
</Earl Wbere>
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation
was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
The graph does not show expenditures. It is debt as a % of GDP. Whqat
part of this don't you get?
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production
line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
Then why was unemployment the lowest in 40 years?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2324 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 06:13:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in more
money and accumulate less debt.
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation
was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
The graph does not show expenditures. It is debt as a % of GDP. Whqat
part of this don't you get?
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production
line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
Then why was unemployment the lowest in 40 years?
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January 2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 11:31:33 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3pso225r6ghqbfatksrsffvfet16189rb6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Answer this: What does it mean when national debt increases with respect
to GDP?
Do you think these graphs are an indictment of fiscal policies of all
presidents from Truman with the exception of Reagan, and the Bushes? Au
contraire. What it quite clearly is stating is that Truman through Carter,
the fiscal policies were such that national debt (largely incurred during
WWII) was decreasing as a % of GDP.
Reagan scared the electorate into believing that debt was out of control
when in fact it was decreasing as a % of GDP. Then when he was elected, the
debt to GDP ratio again began to increase. This is NOT a good thing at all.
The increase continued under Bush and was finally reversed by Clinton. It is
now increasing again under Bush II.
If you don't understand why debt to GDP ratio should be lower then I think
you need a lesson on the chilling effect that a government can have on the
economy when they dominate the bond market. Greenspan commented on this in
the past year before his retirement.
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
Unemployment in Clinton's 2nd term was at or under 4%. It is currently
between 5.5 and 6% and is certainly understated since many people have
exhausted their unemployment and dropped from the roles. That's the fact,
Jack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 07:16:14 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:31:33 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3pso225r6ghqbfatksrsffvfet16189rb6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Answer this: What does it mean when national debt increases with respect
to GDP?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 08:29:47 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:8saq225paf5rc5ai24sfusmplatbd7ittr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:31:33 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3pso225r6ghqbfatksrsffvfet16189rb6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good
thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Answer this: What does it mean when national debt increases with respect
to GDP?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Evasion noted. So you can cut and paste. It says nothing for your
comprehension.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:05:52 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:29:47 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:8saq225paf5rc5ai24sfusmplatbd7ittr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:31:33 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3pso225r6ghqbfatksrsffvfet16189rb6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good
thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Answer this: What does it mean when national debt increases with respect
to GDP?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Evasion noted. So you can cut and paste. It says nothing for your
comprehension.
The experts comprehended for me.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 07:44:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:13:13 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in more
money and accumulate less debt.
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation
was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
The graph does not show expenditures. It is debt as a % of GDP. Whqat
part of this don't you get?
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production
line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
Then why was unemployment the lowest in 40 years?
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January 2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 07:12:44 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January 2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and ....................oops,
decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat willie in his 2nd term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 08:25:22 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:12:44 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January 2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and ....................oops,
decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat willie in his 2nd term.
So, according to you, prosperity does take the form of more debt and
less pay - because that's certainly what's prevalent in Bush's terms
in office.
It's easy to argue any 'point' when you re-define the words. It
doesn't make you right, however.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:02:51 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:25:22 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and ....................oops,
decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat willie in his 2nd term.
So, according to you, prosperity does take the form of more debt and
less pay - because that's certainly what's prevalent in Bush's terms
in office.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It's easy to argue any 'point' when you re-define the words. It
doesn't make you right, however.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
That's what the financial experts said, not me.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:09:48 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:02:51 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:25:22 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and ....................oops,
decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat willie in his 2nd term.
So, according to you, prosperity does take the form of more debt and
less pay - because that's certainly what's prevalent in Bush's terms
in office.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It's easy to argue any 'point' when you re-define the words. It
doesn't make you right, however.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
That's what the financial experts said, not me.
Uh, no, that's not what they said, actually, and I'm still waiting for
you to explain how more debt and less pay is a sign of prosperity, and
how less debt and more pay was a sign of less prosperity when Clinton
was president.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 11:03:48 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
We're looking at the top graph - the one which shows Reagan and the Bushes
massively increased the debt as a proportion of the GDP. Which one are you
looking at?
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and
....................oops, decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat
willie in his 2nd term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:25:38 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:03:48 +0100, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
We're looking at the top graph - the one which shows Reagan and the Bushes
massively increased the debt as a proportion of the GDP. Which one are you
looking at?
The one in his head, of course.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and
....................oops, decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat
willie in his 2nd term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2326 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:35:50 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:03:48 +0100, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
We're looking at the top graph - the one which shows Reagan and the Bushes
massively increased the debt as a proportion of the GDP. Which one are
you looking at?
The one in his head, of course.
He's got something in his head? I wouldn't have known if you hadn't told
me...
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:03:39 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:03:48 +0100, Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com>
wrote:
duke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
We're looking at the top graph - the one which shows Reagan and the Bushes
massively increased the debt as a proportion of the GDP. Which one are you
looking at?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Inflation was down, population was up slightly, and
....................oops, decreasing prosperity was prevalent under 'rat
willie in his 2nd term.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:19:04 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:03:48 +0100, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:44:46 -0500, Adam H <adam@mailinator.com> wrote:
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January
2006, and prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
So, that's why personal debt and bankruptcies are at record levels,
right? That's prosperity in action? Spending money you don't have or
being forced into bankruptcy because you don't have health coverage?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
We're looking at the top graph - the one which shows Reagan and the Bushes
massively increased the debt as a proportion of the GDP. Which one are
you looking at?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
Yes, that's the caption for the *bottom* graph. That's a side issue -
they're explaining that it's not the dollar increase in debt that's the
problem, but the increase in debt as a proportion of the GDP.
It's the top graph that's important. That shows that the debt (in real
terms) decreased between WWII and Reagan, then shot up with Reagan and Bush
I, decreased again under Clinton, then increased again under Junior. Since
ever increasing debt is a bad thing, the message is clear - don't vote
Republican.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
30 Mar 2006 11:21:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:13:13 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in more
money and accumulate less debt.
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
LOL! Where is the data in the spread sheet that measures (1) inflation
or (2) population?
Oops, that's right, you're making ***** up. Don't you have some 12 year
old girl you need to go molest or something?
Under 'rat willie, national expenditures fell. Do you see #3? Inflation
was
down, yes, but the population was increasing, and that leaves a decreasing
prosperity.
The graph does not show expenditures. It is debt as a % of GDP. Whqat
part of this don't you get?
'rat willie's surplus meant cheapening prices, excess goods, production
line
shutdown, and worker layoff. Just exactly what happened in 'rat willie's
second term.
Then why was unemployment the lowest in 40 years?
The unemployment rate was 5.0 per cent in the three months to January 2006, and
prosperity is up compared to the 'rat willie years.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2326 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 08:29:03 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:t0fp225nq89pbd1he3spb4me50lfmpgmq0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:13:13 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:36:38 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1s6m229v98rgl287534n35l5fht5hhpu8s@4ax.com...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:44:57 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
You keep saying it but it's not true. The graph shows decreasing
national debt as a % of GDP. This is called prudent governance and
was the goal of every president since Truman with the exception of
last three Republicans.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures
grow
because
of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
It is not a graph of expenditures. It is a graph of debt vs. GDP. If
population
is increasing and the economy is doing well, the Treasury will take in
more
money and accumulate less debt.
Do you think that increasing debt as a proportion of GDP is a good thing?
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
LOL! Where is the data in the spread sheet that measures (1) inflation
or (2) population?
He's quoting directly from the article beside the second chart. Of course,
the
graphs don't support this at all. Not that this isn't true. Increased
expenditures
certainly are a result of inflation and population increases. They can also
be a
result of increased government activity.
I'm not sure where the prosperity angle comes in. How does one accurately
measure prosperity? How does it directly impact national expenditures?
Rather I would think that prosperity would have a negative correlation on
expenditures (unemployment, welfare, Medicaid, food stamps, etc.).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 07:15:38 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:21:45 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
LOL! Where is the data in the spread sheet that measures (1) inflation
or (2) population?
Oops, if you knew anything about econ, little queer yang, you'd know that
Greenspan was madly dropping the prime rate in a mad attempt to stop deflation.
We know that the population is normally always rising. That leaves decreasing
prosperity as 'rat willie's other contribution to his country.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
31 Mar 2006 08:22:52 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:pmaq221bfaadh2o4m7fqn7339t6sni3of4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:21:45 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
LOL! Where is the data in the spread sheet that measures (1) inflation
or (2) population?
Oops, if you knew anything about econ, little queer yang, you'd know that
Greenspan was madly dropping the prime rate in a mad attempt to stop
deflation.
Hah...show what little you know about economics. Decreasing interest rates
in order stop inflation is like hitting the gas pedal when coming to a red
light.
We know that the population is normally always rising. That leaves
decreasing
prosperity as 'rat willie's other contribution to his country.
*****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh - creepy yang will go ballistic. |
01 Apr 2006 09:05:01 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:22:52 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:pmaq221bfaadh2o4m7fqn7339t6sni3of4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:21:45 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
LOL! Where is the data in the spread sheet that measures (1) inflation
or (2) population?
Oops, if you knew anything about econ, little queer yang, you'd know that
Greenspan was madly dropping the prime rate in a mad attempt to stop
deflation.
Hah...show what little you know about economics. Decreasing interest rates
in order stop inflation is like hitting the gas pedal when coming to a red
light.
The law mandates that the Fed seek control of inflation is their dealings.
Read my lips - it's the law.
We know that the population is normally always rising. That leaves
decreasing
prosperity as 'rat willie's other contribution to his country.
*****.
Read my lips: As the graph shows, almost all national expenditures grow
because of (1) inflation, (2) population and (3) increasing prosperity.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
