| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
14 Jun 2004 05:11:49 PM |
| Object: |
One nation, under God |
And so it stands.
duke
*****
I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear
it now. When he comes, the Holy Spirit will declare
to you the things that are coming. John 16:12-15.
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 05:22:59 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
And anyone who doesn't believe exactly like Duke does not belong here.
Riiiight.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Solomon Kozanski" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 01:12:24 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:x42dnVKhiI_vuFPdRVn-uQ@io.com...
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
And anyone who doesn't believe exactly like Duke does not belong here.
Riiiight.
uh-oh, does this mean i have to marry my cousin, lose my teeth and move into
a trailer?!
--
Brought to you courtesy of Kozanski's Morgue & Grill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 02:20:38 PM |
|
|
"Solomon Kozanski" <noneofyourdamnbusiness@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:10ct4dfs30g7ce0@corp.supernews.com...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:x42dnVKhiI_vuFPdRVn-uQ@io.com...
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
And anyone who doesn't believe exactly like Duke does not belong here.
Riiiight.
uh-oh, does this mean i have to marry my cousin, lose my teeth and move
into
a trailer?!
Yes. Yes it does. Under penalty of law. :-(
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Solomon Kozanski" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under Fuckwad |
16 Jun 2004 01:24:11 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:zo-dnXtHgICo0VLdRVn-sA@io.com...
"Solomon Kozanski" <noneofyourdamnbusiness@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:10ct4dfs30g7ce0@corp.supernews.com...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:x42dnVKhiI_vuFPdRVn-uQ@io.com...
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
And anyone who doesn't believe exactly like Duke does not belong here.
Riiiight.
uh-oh, does this mean i have to marry my cousin, lose my teeth and move
into
a trailer?!
Yes. Yes it does. Under penalty of law. :-(
gawdallfugginmighty commands it, PRAISE DE LAWWWWWWD!
--
Brought to you courtesy of Kozanski's Morgue & Grill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under Fuckwad |
16 Jun 2004 02:06:22 AM |
|
|
"Solomon Kozanski" <noneofyourdamnbusiness@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:10cvpfetnaof813@corp.supernews.com...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:zo-dnXtHgICo0VLdRVn-sA@io.com...
"Solomon Kozanski" <noneofyourdamnbusiness@localnet.com> wrote in
message
news:10ct4dfs30g7ce0@corp.supernews.com...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:x42dnVKhiI_vuFPdRVn-uQ@io.com...
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
And anyone who doesn't believe exactly like Duke does not belong
here.
Riiiight.
uh-oh, does this mean i have to marry my cousin, lose my teeth and
move
into
a trailer?!
Yes. Yes it does. Under penalty of law. :-(
gawdallfugginmighty commands it, PRAISE DE LAWWWWWWD!
And the Eye of Sauron moves on...
Whew! You are LUCKY!
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "uray" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 09:07:30 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
For now. The SCOTUS wisely decided to leave this issue for a saner time.
They even came up with a good reason. Considering the current political
situation both in the U.S.A. and abroad this is not a good time to bring
this case before the Court. If they rule against the phrase Bush may
declare them anti-American and probably try to have them arrested as
terrorists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 09:32:27 PM |
|
|
And so it stands.
For now. The SCOTUS wisely decided to leave this issue for a saner time.
They even came up with a good reason. Considering the current political
situation both in the U.S.A. and abroad this is not a good time to bring
this case before the Court. If they rule against the phrase Bush may
declare them anti-American and probably try to have them arrested as
terrorists.
That's BS. This is EXACTLY the time this needed to be brought before the court.
Religious terrorism needs to be fought everywhere, no matter if the terrorists
are Al-Qaeda or our own government. The Court when given a chance to fight
terrorism ran and hid, just like the rest of the GOP.
We could have shown ourselves as a country truly committed to fighting the
inherent evil that is government mandated religious fundamentalism. Instead,
the Court embraced it and rejected the principles of the founders.
It is a sad day for America. It is a sad day for freedom. But it is a good day
for terrorists. I'm sure Osama was smiling when he heard the news.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Pepke" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 05:21:42 AM |
|
|
forlornh@aol.complicated (Lord Calvert) wrote in message news:<20040614223227.06113.00001059@mb-m17.aol.com>...
We could have shown ourselves as a country truly committed to fighting the
inherent evil that is government mandated religious fundamentalism. Instead,
the Court embraced it and rejected the principles of the founders.
Um, there's this thingie called "sarcasm."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Red Cloud" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
16 Jun 2004 08:16:48 PM |
|
|
forlornh@aol.complicated (Lord Calvert) wrote in message news:<20040614223227.06113.00001059@mb-m17.aol.com>...
And so it stands.
For now. The SCOTUS wisely decided to leave this issue for a saner time.
They even came up with a good reason. Considering the current political
situation both in the U.S.A. and abroad this is not a good time to bring
this case before the Court. If they rule against the phrase Bush may
declare them anti-American and probably try to have them arrested as
terrorists.
That's BS. This is EXACTLY the time this needed to be brought before the court.
Religious terrorism needs to be fought everywhere, no matter if the terrorists
are Al-Qaeda or our own government. The Court when given a chance to fight
terrorism ran and hid, just like the rest of the GOP.
They did not brought to the justice when US pionners chrisitan enslaving
million of black slave and massacred Native Indians. They did crime in the
name of god.
We could have shown ourselves as a country truly committed to fighting the
inherent evil that is government mandated religious fundamentalism. Instead,
the Court embraced it and rejected the principles of the founders.
I believe that Osama also believe the inherent evil like you do.
It is a sad day for America. It is a sad day for freedom. But it is a good day
for terrorists. I'm sure Osama was smiling when he heard the news.
I"m sure Osama is not stupid like you to smile at people dying.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dale" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 10:12:51 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com...
And so it stands.
The words stand for now, but only because the Supreme Court ruled that the
father did not have the right to sue on his daughter's behalf. The Court did
not decide on the Constitutionality of the the words.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 05:53:35 PM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:11:49 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
And so it stands.
So why did the pledge not include that phrase when originally
written by a baptist minister?
Hem and haw all you want. Won't make a bit of difference.
And if it's one nation under duke's god, then only duke can live
here.
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 07:48:44 PM |
|
|
"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:bcbsc09hns04t59scurg9ueqghuhbq9r4p@4ax.com...
In alt.atheism on Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:11:49 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
And so it stands.
So why did the pledge not include that phrase when originally
written by a baptist minister?
Hem and haw all you want. Won't make a bit of difference.
And if it's one nation under duke's god, then only duke can live
here.
Actually, Duke believes he IS god.
Or at least he seems to know all the intimate details of the inner workings
of the mind of his god.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 11:12:56 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach Denis Loubet:
<piggybacking>
So why did the pledge not include that phrase when originally
written by a baptist minister?
Because the Baptists are heathens and are hellbound.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
It's my funeral and I'll fry if I want to...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 08:18:13 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:12:56 +0000 in episode
<Xns9508D80092871vicman@204.127.199.17> we saw our hero Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com>:
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach Denis Loubet:
<piggybacking>
So why did the pledge not include that phrase when originally written
by a baptist minister?
Because the Baptists are heathens and are hellbound.
Worse, the pledge was written by a *SOCIALIST*
You'd think the conservatives would be trying to ban it...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
16 Jun 2004 03:17:47 PM |
|
|
Because the Baptists are heathens and are hellbound.
Worse, the pledge was written by a *SOCIALIST*
You'd think the conservatives would be trying to ban it...
Actually, conservatives have tried to ban it for that very reason. It is the
modern neo-conservatives, who themselves are the biggest proponents of
absolutism, who are its biggest supporters.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 11:19:47 AM |
|
|
In article <gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com>, duke says...
And so it stands.
Big deal - Just a bunch of meaningless words. I couldn't care less.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 10:28:50 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:11:49 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> thought
hard and said:
And so it stands.
Temporarily.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rune Børsjø" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 06:12:08 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:11:49 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
And so it stands.
One nation, under god, who is invisible.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 07:24:29 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach duke:
And so it stands.
Because the SCOTUS chickened out. This is the way theists have gotten
their way throughout history. Are you proud, duke?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
It's my funeral and I'll fry if I want to...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elf M. Sternberg" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 10:03:48 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
And so it stands.
On the flimsiest of technicalities.
Right now, there are two separate tracks that are about to climb
to the Supreme Court summit. One of them will be a challenge to the
pledge and the motto that will not have any such technicalities...
... and the other will state that when a lower court issues an
order giving parents joint decision making responsibilities with respect
to a child's religious education, those parents have the right and
responsibility to make those decisions jointly.
I'm actually more furious with the Supremes for saying that
Newdow, as a non-custodial father, had no standing than I am for what
they used that as an excuse!
Elf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
15 Jun 2004 03:29:07 PM |
|
|
Le Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:03:48 -0700, Elf M. Sternberg a écrit :
I'm actually more furious with the Supremes for saying that
Newdow, as a non-custodial father, had no standing than I am for what they
used that as an excuse!
It's indeed quite far-fetched. They're basically stigmatizing
non-custodial parents, telling them they have no right at all in their
kid's education.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Red Cloud" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
16 Jun 2004 08:18:07 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<gk8sc0pvgdhoahal6u9o3bd9nmsq088loh@4ax.com>...
And so it stands.
So is Muslim, altough they use other mean...
duke
*****
I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear
it now. When he comes, the Holy Spirit will declare
to you the things that are coming. John 16:12-15.
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GlennGlenn" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 05:47:33 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
And so it stands.
Nice. Your precious amendment is protected by a legal technicality, and
you feel the desire to gloat?
Sorry, but my blood pressure ain't going up over this.
GlennGlenn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: One nation, under God |
14 Jun 2004 09:52:35 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:47:33 +0000 in episode
<9Wpzc.71654$O27.33338@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> we saw our hero
GlennGlenn <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com>:
duke wrote:
And so it stands.
Nice. Your precious amendment is protected by a legal technicality, and
you feel the desire to gloat?
Weird ennit?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
