ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS



 Religions > Atheism > ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "johac"
Date: 19 Oct 2007 02:27:17 AM
Object: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS
Ted Rall gets after John McCain and the other "Christian Nation" people.
---
ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS
By Ted Rall Wed Oct 17, 6:11 PM ET
Pols Push U.S. Toward Theocracy
WASHINGTON--A poll finds that 55 percent of Americans think the U.S. was
created as a Christian theocracy. "The strong support for official
recognition of the majority faith appears to be grounded in a belief
that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, in spite of
the fact that the Constitution nowhere mentions God or Christianity,"
says Charles Haynes of the First Amendment Center.
Sadly, these morons are allowed to vote. Tragically, one of them is a
major presidential candidate. "The Constitution established the United
States of America as a Christian nation," John McCain recently told an
interviewer.
Here's an offer that an erstwhile front-running shoe-in, now low on
cash, ought not to refuse. Senator McCain: If you can show me where the
Constitution makes us a Christian nation, I'll donate $10,000 to your
campaign. If you can't, please explain why we should trust your
presidential oath to preserve, protect and defend a document you haven't
read.
Lest you think McCain's comment was an isolated brainfart, check out his
pandering morsel from the same interview: "We were founded as a nation
on Judeo-Christian principles. There's very little debate about that."
Speaking of war criminals, Bush won 80 percent of the Christian
fundamentalist voting bloc in 2004. (If they can show me where Jesus
advocates the murder of hundreds of thousands of people, I've got
another ten grand set aside.) This year, however, the Christian soldiers
are in play, dissatisfied with the entire field of presidential
candidates.
It's not for lack of sucking up.
Mitt Romney is one-upping McCain, misrepresenting Mormonism as well as
the secular nature of American government. "The values of my faith are
much like, or are identical to, the values of other faiths that have a
Judeo-Christian philosophical background," he said in New Hampshire.
"They're American values, if you will." Or if you won't. As The New York
Times notes, "Mormons do not believe in the concept of the unified
Trinity; the Book of Mormon is considered to be sacred text, alongside
the Bible; and Mormons believe that God has a physical body and human
beings can eventually become like God." Also, the Mormon Jesus will
eventually return to Independence, Missouri. "Much like." Right.
McCain, Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Sam
Brownback have all signed up to address this week's right-wing Christian
"Values Voter Summit." So has Democrat Bill Richardson. But when it
comes to indulging the whims of Christianists, these guys have nothing
on the Big Three Dems.
Hillary Clinton has hired an "evangelical consultant" to court the
quarter of voters who tell pollsters that God favors the United States
in foreign affairs. Barack Obama deploys evangelical imagery at campaign
stops in the Bible Belt. At an evangelical church in Greenville, South
Carolina, he said he wants to be an "instrument of God" and expressed
confidence "we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."
"That terminology," said the Rev. Welton Gaddy of the Interfaith
Alliance, "has a very specific, indisputable definition that is
exclusive rather than inclusive." On the campaign trail, Gaddy
continued, Obama "has sounded precisely like George W. Bush."
Even John Edwards, the most reasonable person running, isn't above
whoring his faith for votes. "I think that America is a nation of faith.
I do believe that. Certainly by way of heritage--there's a powerful
Christian thread through all of American history," he told BeliefNet. To
his credit, he doesn't go as far as his opponents. Yet he can't bring
himself to condemn prayer in public schools: "Allowing time for children
to pray for themselves, to themselves, I think is not only okay, I think
it's a good thing."
Between 10 and 14 percent of Americans are atheists. Devoting a "moment
of silence" in schools sends a message to their children: you and your
parents are out of step with American society.
If people want to believe in God, the Great Pumpkin, or a Jesus who
lives in Missouri, that's up to them. But religion has no place in the
public life of a democracy. None.
Right-wing Christians started questioning their support for the GOP last
year, when former White House staffer David Kuo published "Tempting
Faith," a bestselling book that revealed that Bush Administration
officials privately ridiculed evangelicals and ignored them between
elections. Bush betrayed "the millions of faithful Christians who put
their trust and hope in the president and his administration," wrote
Kuo, who was the White House's deputy director of the Office of
Faith-Based and Community Initiatives until 2003.
Who knew? Bush isn't all bad.
McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.
---
http://tinyurl.com/yswnuv
--
John #1782
.

User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 10:22:02 AM
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-F03B18.00271719102007@news.giganews.com...

Ted Rall gets after John McCain and the other "Christian Nation" people.

---
ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS

By Ted Rall Wed Oct 17, 6:11 PM ET

Pols Push U.S. Toward Theocracy

WASHINGTON--A poll finds that 55 percent of Americans think the U.S. was
created as a Christian theocracy.

This wouldn't include *well* over the 55 percent of Americans who've never
read the bible in their entire lives, would it?
"The strong support for official

recognition of the majority faith appears to be grounded in a belief
that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, in spite of
the fact that the Constitution nowhere mentions God or Christianity,"
says Charles Haynes of the First Amendment Center.

It is a fact that many a founding father was a 'Christian'. But that's a far
cry from officially declaring the nation a 'Christian' one. In fact, our
founding fathers went *out* of their way to prevent just that! It wasn't
Madalyn Murray O'Hair who came up with the 'Wall of Separation' that is now
instituted. It was an incredibly astute notion and bit of self-preservation
presented to us by none other than our founding fathers!


Sadly, these morons are allowed to vote.

Would 'these morons' be of the 'normal' variety or of the religiously
'brainwashed' kind?
Tragically, one of them is a

major presidential candidate. "The Constitution established the United
States of America as a Christian nation," John McCain recently told an
interviewer.

Desperate times require desperate and often unethical, deceitful measures,
No? The problem here is that almost everyone can sense the degree he's being
completely disingenuous here. He's fooling no one here but fools.


Here's an offer that an erstwhile front-running shoe-in, now low on
cash, ought not to refuse. Senator McCain: If you can show me where the
Constitution makes us a Christian nation, I'll donate $10,000 to your
campaign. If you can't, please explain why we should trust your
presidential oath to preserve, protect and defend a document you haven't
read.

Oh, he's read it all right. It's just that he's just an erstwhile
front-running shoe-in, now low on cash. If the majority of Americans were
atheists or agnostics do you think for a nanosecond such words would come
out of his desperate mouth? He would be smarter to remain true to his
beliefs. If he were to lose because of it, so be it. Don't want no
phony-balonies running things from the White House at this critical juncture
in America's history anyway. We need someone with the heart of a lion and
the morals and ethics of the highest magnitude and this critical time in
America's relatively brief life. We are a sick, dying nation. (Internal
strife and massive corruption is helping bring our nation low. Religious
intolerance on the part of phony-baloney Christians will cripple, then kill
her. And we're all watching it unfold before our very eyes.)

Lest you think McCain's comment was an isolated brainfart, check out his
pandering morsel from the same interview: "We were founded as a nation
on Judeo-Christian principles. There's very little debate about that."

You mean the Judeo-Christian principles that allowed for keeping slaves
devoid of liberty and restricted from participating in the pursuit of
happiness? Those 'Godly' principles?

Speaking of war criminals, Bush won 80 percent of the Christian
fundamentalist voting bloc in 2004. (If they can show me where Jesus
advocates the murder of hundreds of thousands of people, I've got
another ten grand set aside.)

Hey, I've got so-called 'Christians' out my way who have no problem with
starving atheists and stealing their land while at the very same time
practically hugging themselves to death for being so . . . so . . .
*Christian*. Phony-baloney, one-hundred percent pure, 'artificial'
Christians, *have* read those passages in 'scripture' where Jesus admonishes
his followers to 'love thy neighbor as thyself' and to treat others as
*they* would like to be treated. Problem is, they could care less what some
1st-century itinerant Jewish preacher had to say -- *they're* 'Christians'!
This year, however, the Christian soldiers

are in play, dissatisfied with the entire field of presidential
candidates.

It's not for lack of sucking up.

Mitt Romney is one-upping McCain, misrepresenting Mormonism as well as
the secular nature of American government. "The values of my faith are
much like, or are identical to, the values of other faiths that have a
Judeo-Christian philosophical background," he said in New Hampshire.
"They're American values, if you will." Or if you won't. As The New York
Times notes, "Mormons do not believe in the concept of the unified
Trinity; the Book of Mormon is considered to be sacred text, alongside
the Bible; and Mormons believe that God has a physical body and human
beings can eventually become like God." Also, the Mormon Jesus will
eventually return to Independence, Missouri. "Much like." Right.

Ahhh, but the Mormon Christians can *prove* everything they claim is true .
.. . uh . . . can't they?


McCain, Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Sam
Brownback have all signed up to address this week's right-wing Christian
"Values Voter Summit." So has Democrat Bill Richardson. But when it
comes to indulging the whims of Christianists, these guys have nothing
on the Big Three Dems.

Hillary Clinton has hired an "evangelical consultant" to court the
quarter of voters who tell pollsters that God favors the United States
in foreign affairs.

Well, c'mon. She needs to hone her being disingenous skills. She also needs
to explain to the 'simple' people why it takes a politician to do the
'Almighty's' work when it comes to foreign affairs and not the 'Almighty'
himself.
Barack Obama deploys evangelical imagery at campaign

stops in the Bible Belt. At an evangelical church in Greenville, South
Carolina, he said he wants to be an "instrument of God" and expressed
confidence "we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."

Darn tootin'. All it takes is one charismatic religious-right nut to stir
and inflame the passions of the millions of other religious-right nuts into
turning these United States into an earthly 'Kingdom' for Jesus; their
crucified 'King of the Jews' (minus any anti-semitic overtones).


"That terminology," said the Rev. Welton Gaddy of the Interfaith
Alliance, "has a very specific, indisputable definition that is
exclusive rather than inclusive." On the campaign trail, Gaddy
continued, Obama "has sounded precisely like George W. Bush."

A little *too* precise at times for my blood.

Even John Edwards, the most reasonable person running, isn't above
whoring his faith for votes. "I think that America is a nation of faith.
I do believe that. Certainly by way of heritage--there's a powerful
Christian thread through all of American history," he told BeliefNet. To
his credit, he doesn't go as far as his opponents. Yet he can't bring
himself to condemn prayer in public schools: "Allowing time for children
to pray for themselves, to themselves, I think is not only okay, I think
it's a good thing."

Did someone say, '*****'? Kidding aside, he thinks he has to win over
religious fanatics. Well what do you do with them after winning the
election. Turn around and take a healthy ***** on the people you conciously
lied to and deceived? Is *that* how 'real' Christian politicians do things?
(And mind you, being a Christian or pious Jewish politician doesn't preclude
one from being intensely religious *personally*. It matters most that you
follow the Constitution and use common sense and see to the welfare and
well-being of *all* Americans -- well as many as a good heart and noble
conscience; and an amply-filled purse will allow. (And to the detriment of
those corrupt war-profiteers, corrupt businesses, corruption-breeding
lobbyists and the politcally well-connected -- Hell, *every* form of
political, institutionalized corruption a President can do anything about!
It's time to clean up America. The political corruption is just *killing*
us!)


Between 10 and 14 percent of Americans are atheists. Devoting a "moment
of silence" in schools sends a message to their children: you and your
parents are out of step with American society.

And it implies that Christians are utterly incapable of going off to a
secluded area and silently, discreetly, 'pray' like Jesus commands in
Matthew 6:6. It implies that before classes start proper the devout
Christian is incapable of bowing his or her head and saying a 'prayer' to
their God without turning it into a religious spectacle.
Oh, but it's just a moment of 'silence'! Well isn't that what one gets in
public school when a class is told there's going to be surprise math test
given it in short order? And doesn't even a bit of silent prayer ring
silently through the classroom? What a disingenous way of trying to inject
religious-right Christian prayer into the classroom. And notice just how
deceitfully our moral superiors are attempting to do so?


If people want to believe in God, the Great Pumpkin, or a Jesus who
lives in Missouri, that's up to them. But religion has no place in the
public life of a democracy. None.

As something thrown into the public arena for discourse and dissection, I
have no problem. I have a problem, however, when religious leaders have a
bully pulpit from which no one with a dissenting viewpoint can stand
alongside and rebut. Okay. They have an inaliable right to 'preach'. But
when they preach hate and intolerance of others it should be exposed and
refuted with the best and brightest we as a free society can muster. Giving
deference to religious leaders who extol intolerance towards the atheist,
for example, must cease. They should be mercilessly, pitilessly, exposed for
the danger to our country that they are.
If I seem a little *too* impassioned here it's because I am presently
experiencing what it must have felt for a Jew in Hitle'rs pre-war Germany.
And it is *not* pretty!


Right-wing Christians started questioning their support for the GOP last
year, when former White House staffer David Kuo published "Tempting
Faith," a bestselling book that revealed that Bush Administration
officials privately ridiculed evangelicals and ignored them between
elections. Bush betrayed "the millions of faithful Christians who put
their trust and hope in the president and his administration," wrote
Kuo, who was the White House's deputy director of the Office of
Faith-Based and Community Initiatives until 2003.

Parasitic slime, aren't they?


Who knew? Bush isn't all bad.

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.

Oh my poor rug! Oh well. That's what happens when you don't keep a barf bag
at the ready.
Greywolf


---
http://tinyurl.com/yswnuv
--
John #1782

.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 06:21:23 PM
In article <13hhj421em6eob2@news.supernews.com>,
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote:

"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-F03B18.00271719102007@news.giganews.com...

Ted Rall gets after John McCain and the other "Christian Nation" people.

---
ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS

By Ted Rall Wed Oct 17, 6:11 PM ET

Pols Push U.S. Toward Theocracy

WASHINGTON--A poll finds that 55 percent of Americans think the U.S. was
created as a Christian theocracy.


This wouldn't include *well* over the 55 percent of Americans who've never
read the bible in their entire lives, would it?

And probably not the Constitution either.


"The strong support for official

recognition of the majority faith appears to be grounded in a belief
that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, in spite of
the fact that the Constitution nowhere mentions God or Christianity,"
says Charles Haynes of the First Amendment Center.


It is a fact that many a founding father was a 'Christian'. But that's a far
cry from officially declaring the nation a 'Christian' one. In fact, our
founding fathers went *out* of their way to prevent just that! It wasn't
Madalyn Murray O'Hair who came up with the 'Wall of Separation' that is now
instituted. It was an incredibly astute notion and bit of self-preservation
presented to us by none other than our founding fathers!

The founders were not dummies. If they intended the US to be a
theocracy, they would have put it in the Constitution.



Sadly, these morons are allowed to vote.


Would 'these morons' be of the 'normal' variety or of the religiously
'brainwashed' kind?

Either or.


Tragically, one of them is a

major presidential candidate. "The Constitution established the United
States of America as a Christian nation," John McCain recently told an
interviewer.


Desperate times require desperate and often unethical, deceitful measures,
No? The problem here is that almost everyone can sense the degree he's being
completely disingenuous here. He's fooling no one here but fools.

I think like Goebbels they believe that if you repeat a lie often
enough, it becomes the truth.



Here's an offer that an erstwhile front-running shoe-in, now low on
cash, ought not to refuse. Senator McCain: If you can show me where the
Constitution makes us a Christian nation, I'll donate $10,000 to your
campaign. If you can't, please explain why we should trust your
presidential oath to preserve, protect and defend a document you haven't
read.


Oh, he's read it all right. It's just that he's just an erstwhile
front-running shoe-in, now low on cash. If the majority of Americans were
atheists or agnostics do you think for a nanosecond such words would come
out of his desperate mouth?

And if America were Muslim, he'd be singing the praises of Allah.

He would be smarter to remain true to his
beliefs. If he were to lose because of it, so be it. Don't want no
phony-balonies running things from the White House at this critical juncture
in America's history anyway. We need someone with the heart of a lion and
the morals and ethics of the highest magnitude and this critical time in
America's relatively brief life. We are a sick, dying nation. (Internal
strife and massive corruption is helping bring our nation low. Religious
intolerance on the part of phony-baloney Christians will cripple, then kill
her. And we're all watching it unfold before our very eyes.)

Well put. If these bastards ever gain control we are in deep you know
what.


Lest you think McCain's comment was an isolated brainfart, check out his
pandering morsel from the same interview: "We were founded as a nation
on Judeo-Christian principles. There's very little debate about that."


You mean the Judeo-Christian principles that allowed for keeping slaves
devoid of liberty and restricted from participating in the pursuit of
happiness? Those 'Godly' principles?

They sweep that under the rug with many other things.


Speaking of war criminals, Bush won 80 percent of the Christian
fundamentalist voting bloc in 2004. (If they can show me where Jesus
advocates the murder of hundreds of thousands of people, I've got
another ten grand set aside.)


Hey, I've got so-called 'Christians' out my way who have no problem with
starving atheists and stealing their land while at the very same time
practically hugging themselves to death for being so . . . so . . .
*Christian*. Phony-baloney, one-hundred percent pure, 'artificial'
Christians, *have* read those passages in 'scripture' where Jesus admonishes
his followers to 'love thy neighbor as thyself' and to treat others as
*they* would like to be treated. Problem is, they could care less what some
1st-century itinerant Jewish preacher had to say -- *they're* 'Christians'!

This year, however, the Christian soldiers

are in play, dissatisfied with the entire field of presidential
candidates.

It's not for lack of sucking up.

Mitt Romney is one-upping McCain, misrepresenting Mormonism as well as
the secular nature of American government. "The values of my faith are
much like, or are identical to, the values of other faiths that have a
Judeo-Christian philosophical background," he said in New Hampshire.
"They're American values, if you will." Or if you won't. As The New York
Times notes, "Mormons do not believe in the concept of the unified
Trinity; the Book of Mormon is considered to be sacred text, alongside
the Bible; and Mormons believe that God has a physical body and human
beings can eventually become like God." Also, the Mormon Jesus will
eventually return to Independence, Missouri. "Much like." Right.


Ahhh, but the Mormon Christians can *prove* everything they claim is true .
. . uh . . . can't they?

Uh, sure. Israelites in the American West? Sure.



McCain, Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Sam
Brownback have all signed up to address this week's right-wing Christian
"Values Voter Summit." So has Democrat Bill Richardson. But when it
comes to indulging the whims of Christianists, these guys have nothing
on the Big Three Dems.

Hillary Clinton has hired an "evangelical consultant" to court the
quarter of voters who tell pollsters that God favors the United States
in foreign affairs.


Well, c'mon. She needs to hone her being disingenous skills. She also needs
to explain to the 'simple' people why it takes a politician to do the
'Almighty's' work when it comes to foreign affairs and not the 'Almighty'
himself.

Barack Obama deploys evangelical imagery at campaign

stops in the Bible Belt. At an evangelical church in Greenville, South
Carolina, he said he wants to be an "instrument of God" and expressed
confidence "we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."


Darn tootin'. All it takes is one charismatic religious-right nut to stir
and inflame the passions of the millions of other religious-right nuts into
turning these United States into an earthly 'Kingdom' for Jesus; their
crucified 'King of the Jews' (minus any anti-semitic overtones).

Yep.


"That terminology," said the Rev. Welton Gaddy of the Interfaith
Alliance, "has a very specific, indisputable definition that is
exclusive rather than inclusive." On the campaign trail, Gaddy
continued, Obama "has sounded precisely like George W. Bush."


A little *too* precise at times for my blood.

He's fishing for votes. Just like the rest of them.


Even John Edwards, the most reasonable person running, isn't above
whoring his faith for votes. "I think that America is a nation of faith.
I do believe that. Certainly by way of heritage--there's a powerful
Christian thread through all of American history," he told BeliefNet. To
his credit, he doesn't go as far as his opponents. Yet he can't bring
himself to condemn prayer in public schools: "Allowing time for children
to pray for themselves, to themselves, I think is not only okay, I think
it's a good thing."



Did someone say, '*****'? Kidding aside, he thinks he has to win over
religious fanatics. Well what do you do with them after winning the
election. Turn around and take a healthy ***** on the people you conciously
lied to and deceived? Is *that* how 'real' Christian politicians do things?
(And mind you, being a Christian or pious Jewish politician doesn't preclude
one from being intensely religious *personally*. It matters most that you
follow the Constitution and use common sense and see to the welfare and
well-being of *all* Americans -- well as many as a good heart and noble
conscience; and an amply-filled purse will allow. (And to the detriment of
those corrupt war-profiteers, corrupt businesses, corruption-breeding
lobbyists and the politcally well-connected -- Hell, *every* form of
political, institutionalized corruption a President can do anything about!
It's time to clean up America. The political corruption is just *killing*
us!)

I wish they'd talk more about that and how they are going to end this
idiotic war, get us affordable health care, fix the economy, etc.



Between 10 and 14 percent of Americans are atheists. Devoting a "moment
of silence" in schools sends a message to their children: you and your
parents are out of step with American society.


And it implies that Christians are utterly incapable of going off to a
secluded area and silently, discreetly, 'pray' like Jesus commands in
Matthew 6:6. It implies that before classes start proper the devout
Christian is incapable of bowing his or her head and saying a 'prayer' to
their God without turning it into a religious spectacle.

Oh, but it's just a moment of 'silence'! Well isn't that what one gets in
public school when a class is told there's going to be surprise math test
given it in short order? And doesn't even a bit of silent prayer ring
silently through the classroom? What a disingenous way of trying to inject
religious-right Christian prayer into the classroom. And notice just how
deceitfully our moral superiors are attempting to do so?

That moment could be better spent in learning something useful.



If people want to believe in God, the Great Pumpkin, or a Jesus who
lives in Missouri, that's up to them. But religion has no place in the
public life of a democracy. None.


As something thrown into the public arena for discourse and dissection, I
have no problem. I have a problem, however, when religious leaders have a
bully pulpit from which no one with a dissenting viewpoint can stand
alongside and rebut. Okay. They have an inaliable right to 'preach'. But
when they preach hate and intolerance of others it should be exposed and
refuted with the best and brightest we as a free society can muster. Giving
deference to religious leaders who extol intolerance towards the atheist,
for example, must cease. They should be mercilessly, pitilessly, exposed for
the danger to our country that they are.

Right. I don't care what the believe themselves, but when they want to
impose it on the rest of us, we must resist.


If I seem a little *too* impassioned here it's because I am presently
experiencing what it must have felt for a Jew in Hitle'rs pre-war Germany.
And it is *not* pretty!

Yes.



Right-wing Christians started questioning their support for the GOP last
year, when former White House staffer David Kuo published "Tempting
Faith," a bestselling book that revealed that Bush Administration
officials privately ridiculed evangelicals and ignored them between
elections. Bush betrayed "the millions of faithful Christians who put
their trust and hope in the president and his administration," wrote
Kuo, who was the White House's deputy director of the Office of
Faith-Based and Community Initiatives until 2003.


Parasitic slime, aren't they?

Yep.


Who knew? Bush isn't all bad.

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


Oh my poor rug! Oh well. That's what happens when you don't keep a barf bag
at the ready.

It's a good thing that I wasn't drinking anything when I read that or I
would have sprayed it all over my computer screen.


Greywolf



---
http://tinyurl.com/yswnuv
--
John #1782

--
John #1782
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 23 Oct 2007 10:30:10 AM
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in alt.atheism

The founders were not dummies. If they intended the US to be a
theocracy, they would have put it in the Constitution.

Indeed. Not a single mention of Christ, or Jesus, or Christianity, is
to be found in the Constitution.
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 25 Oct 2007 04:40:55 PM
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:30:10 GMT, Elroy Willis
<elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in alt.atheism

The founders were not dummies. If they intended the US to be a
theocracy, they would have put it in the Constitution.


Indeed. Not a single mention of Christ, or Jesus, or Christianity, is
to be found in the Constitution.

Or a mention of any god. And the only mention of religion is a
negative one (no religious test).
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"Christians tell us that they love their enemies, and yet all I ask
is - not that they love their friends even, but they treat those
who differ from them , with simple fairness. We do not wish to be
forgiven but we wish Christians to so act that we will not have
to forgive them."
- Robert Ingersoll
.

User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 23 Oct 2007 10:48:23 AM
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:30:10 GMT, Elroy Willis
<elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in alt.atheism

The founders were not dummies. If they intended the US to be a
theocracy, they would have put it in the Constitution.


Indeed. Not a single mention of Christ, or Jesus, or Christianity, is
to be found in the Constitution.

The horrors of the Reformation in Europe, with its slaughters of
Protestants by Catholics and vice versa, were still in recent memory.
They'd also seen similar strife in the colonies.
So they founded the Union with freedom of religious conscience for the
individual, trying to find unambiguous language, and they confirmed
this with the Bill of Rights.

.
User: "Hatter"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 23 Oct 2007 01:13:00 PM
On Oct 23, 11:48 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:30:10 GMT, Elroy Willis

<elroywil...@swbell.net> wrote:

johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in alt.atheism


The founders were not dummies. If they intended the US to be a
theocracy, they would have put it in the Constitution.


Indeed. Not a single mention of Christ, or Jesus, or Christianity, is
to be found in the Constitution.


The horrors of the Reformation in Europe, with its slaughters of
Protestants by Catholics and vice versa, were still in recent memory.
They'd also seen similar strife in the colonies.

So they founded the Union with freedom of religious conscience for the
individual, trying to find unambiguous language, and they confirmed
this with the Bill of Rights.

I find it weird though that an accusation of being an atheist at the
time was scandalous(Thomas Paine in particular suffered from its
effects...Jefferson on occasion did), yet it is quite clear that
concept of religion being mixed in with government was abborhent to
the major players of the FF, even the devoutly Christian ones. It was
only after the last signer of the Declaration was dead when our first
non-nominal Christian, became President, James K Polk. Although
religions claimed many of the Previous ones....only after they were
dead and couldn't object.
Hatter
.





User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 09:53:31 AM
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.

I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"Christians tell us that they love their enemies, and yet all I ask
is - not that they love their friends even, but they treat those
who differ from them , with simple fairness. We do not wish to be
forgiven but we wish Christians to so act that we will not have
to forgive them."
- Robert Ingersoll
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 09:10:17 PM
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:76hhh35mlnurl43etg5fjek9alkv7bqn0c@4ax.com:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

Been there, done that.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

Theists claim that there is a god; atheists do not. Religionists often
challenge atheists to prove that there is no god; but this misses the
point. Atheists claim god is unproved, not disproved. In any argument,
the burden of proof is on the one making the claim.
-Dan Barker
.

User: "Doc Smartass"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 08:46:08 PM
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:76hhh35mlnurl43etg5fjek9alkv7bqn0c@4ax.com:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

Short answers:
http://www.gop.com/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/
www.liberty.edu/
www.focusonthefamily.com/
AND, unfortunately, the Jellyfish themselves:
www.democrats.org/
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
--Edward R. Murrow
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 06:24:42 PM
In article <76hhh35mlnurl43etg5fjek9alkv7bqn0c@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac
<jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

It is idiotic. In 2000 he calls Falwell and Robertson 'agents of
intolerance' now he's kissing up to the religious right wingnuts.
He's just whoring for votes, that's all.
--
John #1782
.

User: "Hatter"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 11:05:05 AM
On Oct 19, 10:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?
--

Unfortunately, the majority of voters. The proof? All the things
mentioned in this article.
Hatter
.

User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 12:24:15 PM
On Oct 19, 10:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?
--

Well, judging by the last election, alot of Americans..
PDW, who is sometimes disgusted by his countrymen.
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 03:11:28 PM
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:24:15 -0700, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Oct 19, 10:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?
--

Well, judging by the last election, alot of Americans..

There should be a poll test - voters should have to prove that they're
mentally adults.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"One man's religion is another man's belly laugh"
- Robert Heinlein
.


User: "Michael Ejercito"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 11:28:07 AM
On Oct 19, 7:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

So all Christians are mental children?
Michael
.
User: "Brian E. Clark"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 09:51:25 PM
In article <1192806081.547128.219710
@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

So all Christians are mental children?

Those who fall for opportunist pretenders like McCain
or Bush?
Yes. Unquestionably.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 03:10:37 PM
On 19 Oct 2007 09:28:07 -0700, Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com>
wrote:

On Oct 19, 7:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?

So all Christians are mental children?

Theism is a mental disorder, so not only Christians. Live with it.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"The man who is thoroughly convinced of the universal operation of the
law of causation cannot for a moment entertain the idea of a being who
interferes in the course of events - provided, of course, that he
takes the hypothesis of causality really seriously."
- Albert Einstein in the New York Times Magazine (November 9, 1930)
.

User: "Hatter"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 11:39:29 AM
On Oct 19, 12:28 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 19, 7:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?


So all Christians are mental children?

Michael

If they actually believe, they are all delusional. They do believe in
a fairy story. So while the term is perhaps unkind, it is essentially
correct. I prefer the terms 'delusional' or 'primitive' as a better
discription of the mental handicap of Christianity.
Hatter
.

User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 12:25:05 PM
On Oct 19, 12:28 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 19, 7:53 am, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:17 -0700, johac

<jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


I'd say that alone is enough to disqualify him for the office. Who
wants a mental child as leader?


So all Christians are mental children?

Michael

Not all.. Just the brain-dead fundimentalist.
PDW
.



User: "skyeyes"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 19 Oct 2007 06:42:24 PM
On Oct 19, 12:27 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
<Snippage>

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.

Hey, who knows? Maybe they'll hold him under a bit too long, and
he'll drown. It's happened before.
Oh...wait <smacks forehead>...I've had a revelation!!! All that so-
called "waterboarding" that they're doing to suspected terrorists
*might* *really* *not* be torture, just as the administration claims.
Why, they're just practicing full-immersion baptism with them-there
prisoners, that's all!
All this fuss over nothing. Sheesh.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 20 Oct 2007 01:30:54 AM
In article <1192837344.877848.33490@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote:

On Oct 19, 12:27 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

<Snippage>

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


Hey, who knows? Maybe they'll hold him under a bit too long, and
he'll drown. It's happened before.

Oh...wait <smacks forehead>...I've had a revelation!!! All that so-
called "waterboarding" that they're doing to suspected terrorists
*might* *really* *not* be torture, just as the administration claims.
Why, they're just practicing full-immersion baptism with them-there
prisoners, that's all!

All this fuss over nothing. Sheesh.

LOL! Now we know the truth! We're converting them one terrorist at a
time. Hallelujah!


Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net

--
John #1782
.

User: "Don Martin"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 20 Oct 2007 11:55:07 AM
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:42:24 -0700, skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote:

On Oct 19, 12:27 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

<Snippage>

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


Hey, who knows? Maybe they'll hold him under a bit too long, and
he'll drown. It's happened before.

Oh...wait <smacks forehead>...I've had a revelation!!! All that so-
called "waterboarding" that they're doing to suspected terrorists
*might* *really* *not* be torture, just as the administration claims.
Why, they're just practicing full-immersion baptism with them-there
prisoners, that's all!

All this fuss over nothing. Sheesh.

And speaking of nothing, the nominee for Attorney General declared last week
that waterboarding was not torture. It seems to me that before he is confirmed
by the Senate, he ought to be subjected to a standard dose of it to see whether
he is firm in the Faith.
WOA (Wicked Old Atheist) #2278
If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheel
http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 21 Oct 2007 12:45:53 AM
In article <2n8kh39jplei477lm52m9e8tdnkmo8jkum@4ax.com>,
Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:42:24 -0700, skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote:

On Oct 19, 12:27 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

<Snippage>

McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


Hey, who knows? Maybe they'll hold him under a bit too long, and
he'll drown. It's happened before.

Oh...wait <smacks forehead>...I've had a revelation!!! All that so-
called "waterboarding" that they're doing to suspected terrorists
*might* *really* *not* be torture, just as the administration claims.
Why, they're just practicing full-immersion baptism with them-there
prisoners, that's all!

All this fuss over nothing. Sheesh.


And speaking of nothing, the nominee for Attorney General declared last week
that waterboarding was not torture. It seems to me that before he is
confirmed
by the Senate, he ought to be subjected to a standard dose of it to see
whether
he is firm in the Faith.

Good idea. Having experienced it in person, he should have a more
enlightened opinion as to whether or not it is torture.
--
John #1782
.

User: "skyeyes"

Title: Re: ONWARD, CHRISTIAN PANDERERS 23 Oct 2007 01:56:37 PM
On Oct 20, 9:55 am, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:42:24 -0700, skyeyes <skye...@dakotacom.net> wrote:

On Oct 19, 12:27 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:


<Snippage>


McCain, meanwhile, is getting ready to get soaked to score Christian
votes. "I've had discussions with the pastor about [undergoing a
full-immersion baptism] and we're still in conversation about it," he
says.


Hey, who knows? Maybe they'll hold him under a bit too long, and
he'll drown. It's happened before.


Oh...wait <smacks forehead>...I've had a revelation!!! All that so-
called "waterboarding" that they're doing to suspected terrorists
*might* *really* *not* be torture, just as the administration claims.
Why, they're just practicing full-immersion baptism with them-there
prisoners, that's all!


All this fuss over nothing. Sheesh.


And speaking of nothing, the nominee for Attorney General declared last week
that waterboarding was not torture. It seems to me that before he is confirmed
by the Senate, he ought to be subjected to a standard dose of it to see whether
he is firm in the Faith.

Excellent suggestion! Let him experience it, and *then* confirm that
it's not torture.
Brenda
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Oops, Christian Clergy Molests Your Kids AND Steals Your Money
Yet another Christian little boy dinker caught
Christian Taliban Extremist Bill Frist
Christian Taliban calls for Chavez's murder
LifeSite Christian hate mongers always amusing
Oops, OR Christian Teacher Sentenced for Molestign Pre-Teen Girl
Christian Jerry Falwell: All Jews Will End Up in Hell
Ark. governor, potential pres. candidate courts Christian right
Andew B Chung Christian of the Day: SD Pastor Sentencded for Rape of 13 YO Girl
J Young Christian Morality: CA Men MURDERED For Being Gay (Praise Jesus!!! Hate the Sin!! Kill Gays!!!)
Sound of Trumpet Christian Morality: Pastor Sentenced for Killing of 6 YO Girl With Car
J Young Christian Morality: 5 Men Brutally Attacked for Being Gay (Praise Jesus! Hallelijah! Hate the Sin! God Hates Fags!)
Sound of Trumpet Christian Morality: Church-Going Man Sentenced for Cleaning Boy.. With a SILVER WIRE SCRUB
David Ford Christian Morality: Racist GOP Senator Excuse of the Day: "I Was Calling the Dude '*****', not '*****'" (GOP-Treason)
J Young Christian Morality: Christian Man sentenced for Selling Drugs
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER