Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages



 Religions > Atheism > Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "quibbler"
Date: 27 Feb 2004 05:21:05 PM
Object: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages
I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside
from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin
Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who are
responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but I
guess that's old news at this point.
--
_____________________________________________________
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: "Newton Joseph"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 07:47:50 PM
Homosexuality is a capital crime in many Moslem countries. With Bush's right
wing beliefs it is evident he too wants to punish homosexuals.
I think Bush shows his true colors as a fascist (Hitler murdered
homosexuals) It is cruel to deny homosexuals the same protection of spouses
in heterosexual marriages. Bush wants to change the constitution to ban same
sex marriages, is like a death sentence for many homosexuals.
Newton Joseph
.
User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 07:14:47 PM
In article <axb0c.1357$rD5.217@twister.socal.rr.com>,
drnjoseph@socal.rr.com says...



Homosexuality is a capital crime in many Moslem countries.

Yes and Mullah Bush apparently apparently thinks that he gets
direct instruction from his biblical god.

With Bush's right
wing beliefs it is evident he too wants to punish homosexuals.

Yes, it was his state of texas that fought to preserve their anti-sodomy
law all the way to the supreme court and lost. Afterward, there was the
predictable republican call to reverse the decision of the court with a
constitutional amendment.

I think Bush shows his true colors as a fascist (Hitler murdered
homosexuals)

Yes, absolutely. The 1935 Nuremberg laws also prohibited the marrying of
Aryans and Jews as well as declaring certain marriages illegal. Bush is
not far from attempting to legislate that all gays wear a pink triangle
when in public.

It is cruel to deny homosexuals the same protection of spouses
in heterosexual marriages.

It's highly discriminatory as well because there are over 1000 federal
laws that give special benefits to married couples.
--
_____________________________________________________
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.


User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 06:45:25 PM
quibbler wrote:

I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside
from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin
Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who are
responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but I
guess that's old news at this point.

So do John Kerry and John Edwards.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 08:18:35 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

So do John Kerry and John Edwards.

Neither support the constitutional amendment.
I'd bet just about anything that Bin Laden does... along
with communist China.
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 10:19:43 PM
JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


So do John Kerry and John Edwards.



Neither support the constitutional amendment.

I'd bet just about anything that Bin Laden does... along
with communist China.

Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 09:13:56 AM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.

So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?
You're a liar, "Fred."
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 09:45:11 AM
JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."

Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 11:22:37 AM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."

Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional,

You base this one.... what?
Go on.
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 12:23:06 PM
JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."



Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional,



You base this one.... what?

Go on.

On how Stupid you are.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 12:33:36 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

You base this one.... what?

Go on.

On how Stupid you are.

So you're saying that Communist China & Bin LAden wouldn't
support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage --
despite their openly homophobic stances -- because you think I'm
stupid?
Well, "Fred," I only hope you remembered to unplug your irony
meter when you typed that...
.
User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 09:56:33 PM
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wNSdnQAqJNoSst_dRVn-vg@comcast.com...


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

You base this one.... what?

Go on.


On how Stupid you are.


So you're saying that Communist China & Bin LAden wouldn't
support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage --
despite their openly homophobic stances -- because you think I'm
stupid?

Well, "Fred," I only hope you remembered to unplug your irony
meter when you typed that...

Fred has taken in irony for years to earn extra money.





.

User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 05:16:49 PM
JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


You base this one.... what?

Go on.



On how Stupid you are.



So you're saying that Communist China & Bin LAden wouldn't
support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage --
despite their openly homophobic stances -- because you think I'm
stupid?

Yep, that's about it. Your Stupid assertion that Osama and/or Communist
China would support *anything* about the US Constitution is just that,
Stupid.

Well, "Fred," I only hope you remembered to unplug your irony
meter when you typed that...




--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 08:43:44 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

Your Stupid assertion that Osama and/or Communist
China would support *anything* about the US
Constitution is just that, Stupid.

We're not talking about anything in the U.S. constitution, you
frigging idiot. And, yeah, China & Bin Laden would support
placing such an amendment in the constitution (where no
such amendment now exists).
Your pathetic "argument" that they wouldn't, because they
don't agree with DIFFERENT parts of the constitution, is
too lame to contemplate.
.





User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 10:56:04 AM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...

JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.

China has a constitution.


--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 12:22:37 PM
Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...

JTEM wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote



Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.

So?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 12:51:29 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...

JTEM wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote



Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.

Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?



So?

--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 05:15:49 PM
Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...


JTEM wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote




Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?

Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 08:41:41 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

Edw wrote:

Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?

Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US.

Dodge. You chickened out, yet again.

Then tell me that China would support anything about the US
Constitution.

We weren't talking about anything in the U.S. constitution. We
were talking about a PROPOSED amendment that, yes, the
Chinese regime would endorse... as would Osama Bin Laden.
And you.
.

User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 05:58:42 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1044skv7busp145@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...


JTEM wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote




Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?


Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.

You said "constitutionally." Small "C" That means you weren't talking
about the US Constitution, which is a proper noun.
Anyway, the suggested out is illogical - why would ANY nation have anything
to do with our Constitution? That says exactly nothing about the point at
issue.


--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 07:01:11 PM
Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1044skv7busp145@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...


Edw wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...



JTEM wrote:




"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote





Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional, you're
just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?


Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.



You said "constitutionally." Small "C" That means you weren't talking
about the US Constitution, which is a proper noun.

We're talking about the US and gay marriage, so that's what I was
talking about.

Anyway, the suggested out is illogical - why would ANY nation have anything
to do with our Constitution?

No *****, Sherlock.

That says exactly nothing about the point at
issue.

Duh.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 09:55:07 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:10452qh3cqihne8@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1044skv7busp145@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:


"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...


Edw wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...



JTEM wrote:




"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote





Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional,

you're

just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?


Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.



You said "constitutionally." Small "C" That means you weren't talking
about the US Constitution, which is a proper noun.


We're talking about the US and gay marriage, so that's what I was
talking about.

Smooove, Fred.


Anyway, the suggested out is illogical - why would ANY nation have

anything

to do with our Constitution?


No *****, Sherlock.

I didn't bring it up, remember?


That says exactly nothing about the point at
issue.


Duh.

And you said it.


--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 10:37:11 PM
Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:10452qh3cqihne8@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1044skv7busp145@news.supernews.com...


Edw wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...



Edw wrote:




"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...




JTEM wrote:





"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote






Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional,


you're

just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?


Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.



You said "constitutionally." Small "C" That means you weren't talking
about the US Constitution, which is a proper noun.


We're talking about the US and gay marriage, so that's what I was
talking about.




Smooove, Fred.

Anyway, the suggested out is illogical - why would ANY nation have


anything

to do with our Constitution?


No *****, Sherlock.



I didn't bring it up, remember?

Correct, so what is the point of saying that Osama would approve of some
Constitutional amendment? You just agreed that no other nation would
have anything to do with our Constitution.

That says exactly nothing about the point at
issue.


Duh.



And you said it.

Duh.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 01 Mar 2004 02:44:10 PM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1045ffetogngt6d@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:10452qh3cqihne8@news.supernews.com...

Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1044skv7busp145@news.supernews.com...


Edw wrote:



"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041n3a8msbrv6e@news.supernews.com...



Edw wrote:




"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1041ds4n858d0aa@news.supernews.com...




JTEM wrote:





"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote






Yes, you're just Stupid enough for that.



So you think Bin Laden would be against a constitutional
ban on gay marriage? Communist China, too?

You're a liar, "Fred."


Since both of those wouldn't support *anything* constitutional,


you're

just being as Stupid as you ever were, JTEM.



China has a constitution.



Begin by analyzing the statement;"...wouldn't support anything
constitutional..." Then, compare that to my statement. See?


Compare China's "constitution" to that of the US. Then tell me that
China would support anything about the US Constitution.



You said "constitutionally." Small "C" That means you weren't talking
about the US Constitution, which is a proper noun.


We're talking about the US and gay marriage, so that's what I was
talking about.




Smooove, Fred.

Anyway, the suggested out is illogical - why would ANY nation have


anything

to do with our Constitution?


No *****, Sherlock.



I didn't bring it up, remember?


Correct, so what is the point of saying that Osama would approve of some
Constitutional amendment? You just agreed that no other nation would
have anything to do with our Constitution.

But, it was you, was it not, who mentioned it first?


That says exactly nothing about the point at
issue.


Duh.



And you said it.


Duh.

--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.













User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 29 Feb 2004 01:28:05 PM

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

Actually, "Fred," you're on record stating again & again that
even "separate but equal" is going too far, because it upsets
the right-wing.

Go right ahead and cite me on that. Put the link right here:

Message-ID: <1042c88er6d6k86@news.supernews.com>
You flat-out lie and state the following:
| Democratic strawman. "his" amendment only defines
| "marriage" as "between a man and a woman" and enjoins
| the Court from ruling otherwise.
Not true in the least, as the amendment you endorse expressly
forbids civil unions.
From a CNN article on the very subject:
"A draft of the amendment, which has been referred to the
House Judiciary Committee, states that "marriage in the
United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a
woman. Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any
state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require
that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred
upon unmarried couples or groups."
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/02/bush.gay/
"...OR THE LEGAL INCIDENTS THEREOF..."
Although I loath playing "dictionary definitions," by all means,
please cake yourself in dishonestly by pretending that this
wording would somehow allow for "Civil Unions" that provide
*Any* of the government-bestowed benefits of marriage:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=incidents
.

User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 07:42:16 PM
In article <103vp4v5js2vdf4@news.supernews.com>,

says...

quibbler wrote:

I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside
from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin
Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who are
responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but I
guess that's old news at this point.


So do John Kerry and John Edwards.

But Kerry supports a civil union that "allows same-sex couples all of the
rights of marriage" you dishonest, Bush worshipping *****. I'm not
surprised that you'd try to elide the rest of the story. Bush not only
doesn't support civil unions but he has defended anti-sodomy laws. Bush
and Osama support discrimination against gays on religious grounds and
they support using government to do it. By voting for bush you undermine
atheism, the right to privacy and civil liberties as well as giving aid
to theocratic, zeig heil ***** like John Ashcroft. If you had any
ball or brains maybe you could break out of your right-wing zombie
trance. But I guess that means you'll be a zombie jackass forever.
--
_____________________________________________________
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 10:19:00 PM
quibbler wrote:

In article <103vp4v5js2vdf4@news.supernews.com>,


says...

quibbler wrote:


I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside
from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin
Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who are
responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but I
guess that's old news at this point.


So do John Kerry and John Edwards.



But Kerry supports a civil union that "allows same-sex couples all of the
rights of marriage" you dishonest, Bush worshipping *****.

Gee, I thought that "separate but equal" was a no-no.
I guess it's OK since it's anybody but Bush.
<snip the ridiculous diatribe>
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "Edw"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 27 Feb 2004 11:41:31 PM
"Fred Stone" <
> wrote in message
news:10405ldfetnejc7@news.supernews.com...

quibbler wrote:

In article <103vp4v5js2vdf4@news.supernews.com>,


says...

quibbler wrote:


I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside
from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin
Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who

are

responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but

I

guess that's old news at this point.


So do John Kerry and John Edwards.



But Kerry supports a civil union that "allows same-sex couples all of

the

rights of marriage" you dishonest, Bush worshipping *****.


Gee, I thought that "separate but equal" was a no-no.

I guess it's OK since it's anybody but Bush.

It's more ok because it pisses you off so much.


<snip the ridiculous diatribe>

--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369

.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 08:23:01 AM
Edw wrote:

"Fred Stone" <

> wrote in message
news:10405ldfetnejc7@news.supernews.com...

quibbler wrote:


In article <103vp4v5js2vdf4@news.supernews.com>,


says...


quibbler wrote:



I guess Bush has something else in common with Osama bin Laden, aside


from elaborate family business transactions. Of course, both Osama Bin


Laden and George W. Bush are also fundamentalist religious bigots who


are

responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent civilians too, but


I

guess that's old news at this point.


So do John Kerry and John Edwards.



But Kerry supports a civil union that "allows same-sex couples all of


the

rights of marriage" you dishonest, Bush worshipping *****.


Gee, I thought that "separate but equal" was a no-no.

I guess it's OK since it's anybody but Bush.



It's more ok because it pisses you off so much.

Doesn't bother me a bit. I'm just pointing out some obvious omissions by
the OP.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 09:16:06 AM
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote

Doesn't bother me a bit. I'm just pointing out some
obvious omissions by the OP.

Speaking of which...
As Kerry's position almost exactly mirrors Bush's position
on the *Exact* *Same* issue back in 2000 -- and you are
pretending that there's a double standard here -- could you
do us all a favor and quote us all attacking Bush in 2000 for
his position?
You can't?
You're making this ***** up as you go along, just as you do
everything else?
I thought so.
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Osama Bin Laden Opposes Gay Marriages 28 Feb 2004 09:56:51 AM
JTEM wrote:

"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote


Doesn't bother me a bit. I'm just pointing out some
obvious omissions by the OP.



Speaking of which...

As Kerry's position almost exactly mirrors Bush's position
on the *Exact* *Same* issue back in 2000 -- and you are
pretending that there's a double standard here -- could you
do us all a favor and quote us all attacking Bush in 2000 for
his position?

You can't?

I don't have to. You've all been attacking him *now*, and he's *still*
supporting almost exactly the same position as Kerry.

You're making this ***** up as you go along, just as you do
everything else?

I thought so.

Now now, JTEM, don't lie. You didn't think.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.








  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
Bush Secretly Gave Bin Laden Relatives Plane Flights Out of US on 911
OT: Bin Laden memo puts Bush on back foot
OT: Europe unites against Bin Laden after tape offers truce to 'our neighbours in the north'
Re: The link between Saddam and Osama bin Laden discovered
President Says Bin Laden's Soul Is 'corroded' and Can't Be Saved
NBC says Clinton Ordered Bin Laden Spared
NBC says Clinton Ordered Bin Laden Spared! Liberals Are Such Morons!
The shocking links between Michael Moore and Osama bin Laden!!!
Liberals tell Osama bin Laden he is welcome on their airplane flights.
Impeached Liberal Rapist Saved Bin Laden's life in order to let him kill thousands of Americans!
AWOL Losing Track of Bin Laden
OT: Bin Laden
Bin Laden lauds costs of war to U.S.
Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder. ==> OSAMA BIN LADEN and Saddam Hussein had an operational relationship!
OT: Blair and Bin Laden are in same tradition, says pundit
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER