| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
17 May 2006 01:04:42 PM |
| Object: |
Osprey's Google Groups profile |
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
.
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 01:22:41 PM |
|
|
wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 02:02:26 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
He didn't have to spend four years posting almost 20,000 articles to do it,
though.
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
It'd be even nicer if you were honest, and about 40 IQ points smarter - which
would get you up to the middle of the bell curve.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: October 2006, opponent/venue/time TBA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ghod" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 01:45:50 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1147890161.640951.190940@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
:
: wrote:
: > I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with
his
: > kindred spirit.
: >
: > Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
: > shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
: >
: >
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
: >
: > Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on
his
: > hand to attack other people has any credibility?
:
: Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
: me..:o)
:
: Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although
Mark,
: it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong and show the
: capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples
opinions.
You're an amusing little crackpot, you are. Why don't you stop and
look at those reactions again, eh? That isn't being "driven crazy" by
you, that's merely amusment, for the most part. No one really takes
you seriously, you know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 01:45:11 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 01:53:16 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
No, that's your problem. Take for example the gay marriage issue.
No, I do NOT support gay marriage, but I "embrace" the ideas by some
legislators to allow civil unions.
YOU are having a hissy fit because I don't want to support gay marrige.
YOU can't tollerate my opinion, therefore you don't show "liberalism"
attitudes towards other peoples ideas and opinions.
I don't march against homosexuals, I don't discriminate against
homosexuals, I don't hate homosexuals. I don't care for the act, but
that's an entirely different issue.
Fact: YOU are not even close to showing true liberalism. You are
selfish, childish, a liar, untollerant, hateful, and bitter.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 02:05:12 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 11:53:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
In YOUR opinion - which is the opinion of someone who doesn't know
what the term means.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
No, that's your problem. Take for example the gay marriage issue.
No, I do NOT support gay marriage, but I "embrace" the ideas by some
legislators to allow civil unions.
IOW, you "embrace" discrimination against homosexuals.
YOU are having a hissy fit because I don't want to support gay marrige.
YOU can't tollerate my opinion, therefore you don't show "liberalism"
attitudes towards other peoples ideas and opinions.
You have a right to your opinion. I don't have to agree with it, you
idiot.
I don't march against homosexuals, I don't discriminate against
homosexuals,
If that wasn't a blatant lie, you would support gay marriage.
I don't hate homosexuals. I don't care for the act, but
that's an entirely different issue.
Fact: YOU are not even close to showing true liberalism. You are
selfish, childish, a liar, untollerant, hateful, and bitter.
Wrong.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 02:45:49 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:53:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
In YOUR opinion
That's RIGHT and if you live by the true definition of liberalism then
you should be able to accept it and have no problem with it.
- which is the opinion of someone who doesn't know
what the term means.
I know that it doesn't apply to you.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
No, that's your problem. Take for example the gay marriage issue.
No, I do NOT support gay marriage, but I "embrace" the ideas by some
legislators to allow civil unions.
IOW, you "embrace" discrimination against homosexuals.
This is what I mean, you are not liberal at all. You can not tollerate
someone else's opinion unless they agree with you.
It's either your way or no way.
YOU are having a hissy fit because I don't want to support gay marrige.
YOU can't tollerate my opinion, therefore you don't show "liberalism"
attitudes towards other peoples ideas and opinions.
You have a right to your opinion. I don't have to agree with it, you
idiot.
I didn't ask you to agree with it, you loser.
I don't march against homosexuals, I don't discriminate against
homosexuals,
If that wasn't a blatant lie, you would support gay marriage.
No, I do not support gay marriage, but that also doesn't mean I am
going to stop it either.
Just like with abortion, I do NOT support the choice of abortion, but I
am not going to stop a woman from having one.
Do you understand the difference at all, loser???
I don't hate homosexuals. I don't care for the act, but
that's an entirely different issue.
Fact: YOU are not even close to showing true liberalism. You are
selfish, childish, a liar, untollerant, hateful, and bitter.
Wrong.
No, I am dead on and this post supports my statement all the way,
loser!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 04:03:12 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 12:45:49 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:53:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
In YOUR opinion
That's RIGHT and if you live by the true definition of liberalism then
you should be able to accept it and have no problem with it.
Liberalism does not extend to accepting bigotry and hatred.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 04:12:57 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:03:12 -0400, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On 17 May 2006 12:45:49 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:53:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
In YOUR opinion
That's RIGHT and if you live by the true definition of liberalism then
you should be able to accept it and have no problem with it.
Liberalism does not extend to accepting bigotry and hatred.
But osprey wants to re-define liberalism as accepting *everything*, so
then he can deny that anyone who disagrees with him is a liberal.
He's dumb that way.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
17 May 2006 03:43:51 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 12:45:49 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:53:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
giving the definition of liberalism and showing that YOU don't even fit
that definition.
In YOUR opinion
That's RIGHT and if you live by the true definition of liberalism then
you should be able to accept it and have no problem with it.
WRONG. Liberalism isn't about blindly accepting every opinion that
comes along.
- which is the opinion of someone who doesn't know
what the term means.
I know that it doesn't apply to you.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
No, that's your problem. Take for example the gay marriage issue.
No, I do NOT support gay marriage, but I "embrace" the ideas by some
legislators to allow civil unions.
IOW, you "embrace" discrimination against homosexuals.
This is what I mean, you are not liberal at all. You can not tollerate
someone else's opinion unless they agree with you.
It's either your way or no way.
Ah, so suddenly I'm not allowed to disagree with an opinion and remain
a liberal?
No, that's not part of liberalism. Damn, you are stupid.
YOU are having a hissy fit because I don't want to support gay marrige.
YOU can't tollerate my opinion, therefore you don't show "liberalism"
attitudes towards other peoples ideas and opinions.
You have a right to your opinion. I don't have to agree with it, you
idiot.
I didn't ask you to agree with it, you loser.
Yes, you claimed I had to 'embrace' your opinions.
I don't march against homosexuals, I don't discriminate against
homosexuals,
If that wasn't a blatant lie, you would support gay marriage.
No, I do not support gay marriage, but that also doesn't mean I am
going to stop it either.
Just like with abortion, I do NOT support the choice of abortion, but I
am not going to stop a woman from having one.
Do you understand the difference at all, loser???
You've already said you support the anti-gay marriage amendment. 'nuff
said.
I don't hate homosexuals. I don't care for the act, but
that's an entirely different issue.
Fact: YOU are not even close to showing true liberalism. You are
selfish, childish, a liar, untollerant, hateful, and bitter.
Wrong.
No, I am dead on and this post supports my statement all the way,
loser!!!
Nope, it doesn't. All it does is show that you just can't seem to
figure what being a liberal is all about.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile |
18 May 2006 01:25:00 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:22:41 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
I promised to do this with Fred Stone so I thought I do it with his
kindred spirit.
Sorry I can't make this a shorter link, without using the link
shortening sites which would probably be overkill:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FvzFtBUAAADKqkZJrEK1yIxgQsscCc5h9h3i3SmjGmAJbX05nZ-8fQ&hl=en
Does anybody think anybody this obsessed with this much time on his
hand to attack other people has any credibility?
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Nope, you lied again. In fact, you even contradicted yourself by
*****, almost everybody has proven you wrong at least once,
yourself included.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Wasting our time with osprey (Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile) |
17 May 2006 01:59:11 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Not that he would ever admit that even if he recognized it. The
silliest thing is that he thinks I spent any time look up his profile,
not understanding a thing about how Google Groups works. All I had to
do was click on link attached to one of his posts and BING up came his
Google Groups profile page.
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
I did make one mistake in my post. I didn't emphasize that I think we
lend osprey too much credibility by simply replying to him. The thing
he would hate most in the world is if people stopped responding to him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Wasting our time with osprey (Re: Osprey's Google Groups profile) |
17 May 2006 02:12:52 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 11:59:11 -0700, wrote:
Adam H wrote:
Obviously you have a lot of time to waste it on looking things up on
me..:o)
Keep up the obsession, I am driving you liberals crazy. Although Mark,
it would be nice if a liberal can prove me wrong
Already done.
Not that he would ever admit that even if he recognized it. The
silliest thing is that he thinks I spent any time look up his profile,
not understanding a thing about how Google Groups works. All I had to
do was click on link attached to one of his posts and BING up came his
Google Groups profile page.
He's not actually very good at teh internets.
(And he'll miss that leet reference, too).
and show the
capability on discussing an issue while respect other peoples opinions.
Which doesn't mean agreeing with them like you want, moron.
I did make one mistake in my post. I didn't emphasize that I think we
lend osprey too much credibility by simply replying to him. The thing
he would hate most in the world is if people stopped responding to him.
You might be right, but it's the old "give 'em enough rope" game.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
