OT - New Creature??



 Religions > Atheism > OT - New Creature??

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "*nemo*"
Date: 10 Jun 2004 08:04:30 PM
Object: OT - New Creature??
Check this out:
http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm
It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.

User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 01:14:10 AM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:04:30 GMT in alt.atheism, *nemo* (*nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

Nah. Use your eyes man, it's obviously a thingamabob.
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.

User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 06:48:09 AM
"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

"Sorry, the page you requested was not found on
News-Record.com"
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 06:46:47 PM
In article <9YqdnQXpSfdRB1Td4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm


"Sorry, the page you requested was not found on
News-Record.com"



Boy, they sure took that one down fast. Sorry...
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 12 Jun 2004 07:11:00 PM
"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote

"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm


"Sorry, the page you requested was not found on
News-Record.com"

Boy, they sure took that one down fast. Sorry...

I just tried a second time, and got it. They even had a link to an earlier
story!
.

User: "W. Syme"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 06:53:41 PM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:46:47 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <9YqdnQXpSfdRB1Td4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm


"Sorry, the page you requested was not found on
News-Record.com"




Boy, they sure took that one down fast. Sorry...

It's up, the vast government conspiracy hasn't covered this one up.
Yet.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.


User: "Rune Børsjø"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? - creature060304.jpg (1/1) 11 Jun 2004 06:57:31 PM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:49:27 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

I have the image here... I'm going to try and attach it

*Hands Nemo an asbestos suit*
Prepare to be flamed (by people using inferior browsers, who have
themselves to blame)
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? - creature060304.jpg (1/1) 12 Jun 2004 04:37:19 AM
In article <0mhkc096b7srao7aob0tk1fsgdlfv44fl2@4ax.com>,
Rune B?rsj? <stupid@spammers.com> wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:49:27 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

I have the image here... I'm going to try and attach it


*Hands Nemo an asbestos suit*

Prepare to be flamed (by people using inferior browsers, who have
themselves to blame)

Eh. It's all good, as they say on my favorite islands...
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.



User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 10 Jun 2004 11:29:50 PM
"*nemo*" <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net...

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

It is Bigfoot's dog.
--
RB
.

User: "Olrik"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 10 Jun 2004 10:20:37 PM
*nemo* wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

"Lorraine Smith, a mammals curator at the N.C. Zoo in Asheboro, said she
believes Kurdian's creature is a common grey fox that has lost much of
its fur, possibly due to a heavy parasite infestation."
I'd go with her. Occam's razor and all that. But I could be wrong. We'll
see.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 12:48:06 AM
In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

It's not a jackalope.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 04:33:47 AM
In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.

Oh yeah. We know jackalopes down here. No antlers. We spotted that right
away.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 12 Jun 2004 01:39:16 AM
In article <nemo0037-939F7F.05334711062004@news01.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.


Oh yeah. We know jackalopes down here. No antlers. We spotted that right
away.

Oh. I thought only the males did.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 12 Jun 2004 04:38:55 AM
In article <jhachm-938CBE.23391611062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-939F7F.05334711062004@news01.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.


Oh yeah. We know jackalopes down here. No antlers. We spotted that right
away.


Oh. I thought only the males did.

I thought that jackalopes were exclusively males. Aren't the females of
the species called janealopes...? {;-)
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 13 Jun 2004 11:52:21 PM
In article <nemo0037-EB3625.05385512062004@news03.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <jhachm-938CBE.23391611062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-939F7F.05334711062004@news01.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.


Oh yeah. We know jackalopes down here. No antlers. We spotted that right
away.


Oh. I thought only the males did.


I thought that jackalopes were exclusively males. Aren't the females of
the species called janealopes...? {;-)

Hm. I would have thought to be consistent with the nomeclature used for
donkeys, the female would be a jennylope or perhaps jennalope. :-)
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.


User: "Puck Greenman"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 12 Jun 2004 07:31:43 AM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:39:16 -0700, johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com>
wrote:

In article <nemo0037-939F7F.05334711062004@news01.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote:

In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.


Oh yeah. We know jackalopes down here. No antlers. We spotted that right
away.


Oh. I thought only the males did.

And sea gulls. (:-(
Puck Greenman

#162

BAAWA Knight.

Blesed is the self righteous xtian,
for his is the sure and certain knowledge
that no matter what load of tripe he
comes out with:
God told him to say it.
.



User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 08:58:18 AM
In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>, johac says...


In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.

Maybe it's a woolybooger? I can't say for sure as I can't see the picture ;)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 12 Jun 2004 01:38:36 AM
In article <_Tiyc.5634$H4.288@www.newsranger.com>,
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <jhachm-4A7181.22480610062004@news-60.giganews.com>, johac says...


In article <nemo0037-716B45.21042910062004@news04.east.earthlink.net>,
*nemo* <nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


It's not a jackalope.


Maybe it's a woolybooger? I can't say for sure as I can't see the picture ;)

With those long legs, it might be one of Robbie Burn's "long legged
beasties", but I don't know if it goes bump in the night.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.



User: "Rune Børsjø"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 10 Jun 2004 08:15:05 PM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:04:30 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

South american Maned Wolf, chrysocyon brachyurus. Most likely
someone's released them into the wild.
.
User: "towelie"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 10 Jun 2004 11:36:25 PM
TV's Rune Børsjø wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:04:30 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??


South american Maned Wolf, chrysocyon brachyurus. Most likely
someone's released them into the wild.

I dunno....
http://www.cites.org/gallery/species/mammal/maned_wolf.html
Doesn't look the same to me.
--
.
User: "Rune Børsjø"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 09:40:56 AM
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:36:25 -0500, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:

I dunno....
http://www.cites.org/gallery/species/mammal/maned_wolf.html

Doesn't look the same to me.

That one's a bit hairy. But look at the reddish color, ears, snout,
eyes, stilt legs... sure looks like one to me.
.



User: "Mike Ruskai"

Title: Re: OT - New Creature?? 11 Jun 2004 10:24:33 PM
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:04:30 GMT, *nemo* wrote:

Check this out:

http://www.news-record.com/news/local/rand/creature_061004_hp.htm

It's a ... um .... whatchmacallit.......??

I think the one person mentioned in the article has it spot on - a normal
fox which has lost most of its hair, for one reason or another. Compare
the head to pictures of foxes (easy to find in a search).
--
- Mike
Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Are we the most intelligent creature possible?
Are we the most intelligent creature possible?
God exists but god isn't a living creature
Proof That 'God' Cares More About Window Washers Than Trapped Coal Miners . . . and Just About Any Other Creature On Planet Earth.
‘Living fossil’ found in Coral Sea Shrimplike creature was thought to have gone extinct 60 million years ago
Re: Hairs From Mystery Chile Creature Recovered
Re: Did "Jesus" teach that the Creator became a human creature?
Furry lobster like creature bewilders Darwinian scientists
Porn industry creature of U.S. morality
Re: New World Ancestors Lose 12,000 Years
Re: !Mel Gibson's New Film
Re: [Internet Safety] New E-Mail Worm Targets Hole in Internet Explorer
OT: Maybe It's Time for Another New Deal
New questions?
The new pleasure seekers
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER