Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
in <vqd79he4mb6sb7@news.supernews.com>:

# Fear gan dia wrote:
#
# > Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
# > in <vqcmhaaq8vpuac@news.supernews.com>:
# >
# > # Fear gan dia wrote:
# > # > Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
# > # > in <vq7dc5pqivon2e@news.supernews.com>:
# > # >
# > # > # Yang, What About Overrated White Athletes Like Jeremy Shockey? wrote:
# >
# > # > # > You're not answering my question. Which treehugger was against
# > # > # > clearing *dead* brushes per se?
# > # > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # The NRDC, the Sierra Club, Earth First!, and the whole damned panoply.
# > # >
# > # > As always, you are lying.
# > #
# > # <weasel alert>
# > #
# > # > The Sierra Club has stated clearly
# > # > that it support clearing dead brush at the interface between
# > # > forests and inhabited areas.
# > # >
# > # > http://www.sierraclub.org/forests/fires/7pt_communityplan.asp
# > # >
# > # > Junior's so called "Healthy Forests Initiative" has NOTHING -
# > # > zero, zip, nada - to do with fire safety. It's all about clear-
# > # > cutting old-growth trees in remote areas like Tongass and Chugach
# > # > National Forests in Alaska. It creates windfall profit for the
# > # > lumber mega-corporations but won't stop a single fire.
# > # >
# > #
# > # > <weasel alert>
# > # > # They didn't *say* that, but that's the result of their "no help for the
# > # > # logging industry" policy.
# > # >
# > # > Care to explain why the mega-corporations are entitled
# > # > to billions of dollars in corporate welfare, paid from
# > # > my hard-earned taxes?
# > # >
# > #
# > #
# > # Care to explain why the government isn't supposed to pay for services?
# >
# > What services? How is clear-cutting old-growth forest in
# > Alaska a "service" that will mitigate fire risk in
# > California?
#
# How does ignoring California make this about Alaska? How did this
# suddenly become a debate about one specific bill?
#
# > And why is billions of tax dollars being spent
# > carving out roads in wilderness areas to let the mega-
# > corporations get in and clear-cut the forest, taking the
# > lumber for pennies on the dollar, polluting streams and
# > groundwater, and eroding soil?
#
# Doesn't that lie from the Sierra Club get old after a while? They've
# been recycling that same "analysis" of Federal forestry policy since the
# seventies, at least.
#
# >
# > You're still trying to weasel out of answering questions,
# > and not doing a very good job.
# >
#
# What kind of ***** questions are those anyway? How is talking about
# Alaska policy anything to do with California timber management, which Oh
# By The Way is partly a state responsibility?

You are such a lying weasel. The Sierra Club and local
forest managers are in agreement on the need to thin
brush near inhabited areas (another lie of yours exposed)

but the fat cats in Washington are starving these thinning
projects of funds and instead diverting the money to places
like Alaska.

The "Healthy Profits Initiative" will pour
billions of dollars in corporate welfare into the coffers
of the lumber mega-corporations but do sweet ***** all to
mitigate fire risk. Get your head out of your ***** for once.