Technically there is a miss: You are missing doctype declarations on
your pages which means that web browsers would not know, but have to
guess, which markup language you are actually using.

This could lead to unexpected behaviour in many of them.

Apart from that I don't really have much to comment on, the page works
well even in screen readers and non-graphical readers that I tested -
so I think it is great. Just give it a doctype and run it through
validator.w3.org.

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:46:22 GMT, "Raptor514"
<Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> said in alt.atheism:

Here's the url: http://www.dallastherapeutics.com and I really appreciate
any critiques or suggestions.

Just a few grammatical suggestions. The page looks fine on MSIE.

"continues to improve we continuously adapt" -> "continues to improve,
we continue to adapt"

"for accident, illness, and injury rehabilitation. " -> "for accident,
illness and injury rehabilitation. "

"prescription and diagnosis, and verify your insurance coverage." ->
"prescription and diagnosis and we must verify your insurance
coverage."

"injuries, from CTS, to Fibromyalgia, to lower back pain, to migraine
headaches, and countless other conditions" -> "injuries from CTS to
Fibromyalgia to lower back pain to migraine headaches, and many other
conditions"

"We have each worked in multiple doctors' " -> "We have worked in many
doctors' "

"In November, Kathy Bills" -> "In November Kathy Bills"

"what we offer just click " -> "what we offer, just click "

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:46:22 GMT, "Raptor514"
<Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> wrote:

As some of you know I am a medical massage therapist in Dallas, Texas. I
have recently rebuilt and rewritten the website for Dallas Therapeutics and
would love feedback from anyone who cares to offer. I know we have some
webmaster types out there as well. . .

Didn't you used to be an airforce airplane mechanic? Pretty big jump,
isn't it? hehe

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:46:22 GMT, "Raptor514"
<Raptor514@SPAMSUCKS.com> wrote:

As some of you know I am a medical massage therapist in Dallas, Texas. I
have recently rebuilt and rewritten the website for Dallas Therapeutics

would love feedback from anyone who cares to offer. I know we have some
webmaster types out there as well. . .

Didn't you used to be an airforce airplane mechanic? Pretty big jump,
isn't it? hehe

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:46:22 GMT, Raptor514 wrote:

Greetings all,

As some of you know I am a medical massage therapist in Dallas, Texas.

have recently rebuilt and rewritten the website for Dallas Therapeutics

would love feedback from anyone who cares to offer. I know we have some
webmaster types out there as well. . .

Here's the url: http://www.dallastherapeutics.com and I really

any critiques or suggestions. I would also like to know if it doesn't
display right on your machine.

Since Mr. Klein did the text, I'll just make a few comments on the
layout. These will probably seem unbearably nit-picky, but they're
important for image.

Title: Rather than "Home", it would be more professional to title the
page "Dallas Massage Therapeutics", and maybe a short, as in three to
four words, slogan. Remember, the page's title is what displays in the
Windows taskbar so people with multiple programs running know what's
what. They should see "Home" and wonder what they were looking at.

"Hello and welcome to Dallas Massage Therapeutics!" It may have been
intentional for the "HE" to be smaller than the rest of the sentance,
but it suggests an error.

The pages for Techniques and Doctors are named toppage1 and toppage3,
which is not very professional, and the For Doctors page should not be
titled "Contact".

This is a purely personal observation, but did you consider dropping the

style for the lists in for_doctors.htm and just going with the

default bulleted list layout? It seems a little pressed for space the
way it is.

The For Patients page shouldn't be titled "Home". Also, you used a size
2 font rather than 3, like the rest of the pages. The title and font
comments also apply to for_mts.htm and research.htm

Rather than defining the Grip Strength image on research.htm to be a
smaller size, it were better to use a graphics program to shrink it. As
it is, it's both harder to read and it doesn't look quite so good.

Also on research.htm, the lower info box on the right really shouldn't
be justified as it's leaving huge spaces between words. Plus you forgot
a subject for the first sentance in that box (what can move between?).

Last of all, my browser (Mozilla 1.3.1 on Win98) was wildly unhappy with
something on each page. I assume the applet at top, but I didn't check
to see. Not one page ever loaded entirely. That is, all the text and
each image displayed, but it never changed from Loading to Finished.
That really slowed down the speed with which I could view each page.

--
L. Raymond