| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fester" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2004 05:55:22 PM |
| Object: |
OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us up
to the question, which Dem done it? Which donkey do we get to pin the tail
on for this bungled election fraud? I say that if Blather won't come clean
and fess up to who it was that pulled the dirty deed, then it's up to
Congress to begin an investigation and subpoena him.
In other news, those desperados of donkeydom tried out another lie. This
one, claiming that Bush lied about being active duty USAF (he was for about
120 days) was shot down like a cessna dogfighting a F-102.
Finally, lest we have *any* remaining doubts (snicker) about the fairness of
the MSM, I heard that NBC has begun their Kitty litter mini-series in the
morning. LOL, how low can the donkeys limbo?
--
"Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and
he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion"
Edmund Burke
.
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 06:46:21 PM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us up
to the question, which Dem done it?
It's impossible for Rove to have done this as a deliberate distraction?
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 08:07:46 PM |
|
|
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:4146314d$0$65563$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us
up
to the question, which Dem done it?
It's impossible for Rove to have done this as a deliberate distraction?
LOL! Firstly, Bush doesn't need any distraction, he's winning! And
secondly, do you honestly think that if Blather's source were a Rep, that he
would have hestitated for 1 nonosecond to give him up?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 08:30:14 PM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:4146314d$0$65563$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us
up
to the question, which Dem done it?
It's impossible for Rove to have done this as a deliberate distraction?
LOL! Firstly, Bush doesn't need any distraction, he's winning!
Not lately; and why would that rule out dirty tricks by Rove?
And
secondly, do you honestly think that if Blather's source were a Rep, that he
would have hestitated for 1 nonosecond to give him up?
Do you think Rove himself would give it to Rather? Don't you
remember how Rove pulled the dirty trick over the debate
tapes in 2000?
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 08:52:56 PM |
|
|
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:414649a6$0$48312$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:4146314d$0$65563$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists
among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads
us
up
to the question, which Dem done it?
It's impossible for Rove to have done this as a deliberate distraction?
LOL! Firstly, Bush doesn't need any distraction, he's winning!
Not lately; and why would that rule out dirty tricks by Rove?
And
secondly, do you honestly think that if Blather's source were a Rep, that
he
would have hestitated for 1 nonosecond to give him up?
Do you think Rove himself would give it to Rather? Don't you
remember how Rove pulled the dirty trick over the debate
tapes in 2000?
You're in *serious* desperation mode to be listening to McAwful's lame
excuses. Personally, he' my guess to be the bungler. We're talking about
the guy who cheated Mobile Crossing shareholders (many of whom were
employees counting on the stock for their retirements) out of $18 million in
a scam as bad as Enron. To think that Rove would jeopardize Bush's victory
(and if you still doubt Bush is winning, pick up any newspaper, even a
librall rag) by spreading forgeries that *implicate his own* candidate in
questionable behavior is bizaro. Face it, there is *no* logic to his
speculation and you're just making youself look silly by going along with
this lame attempt at deflection.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 11:00:39 PM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:414649a6$0$48312$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
"Brian Westley" <westley@visi.com> wrote in message
news:4146314d$0$65563$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
"Fester" <not@home.com> writes:
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us up
to the question, which Dem done it?
It's impossible for Rove to have done this as a deliberate distraction?
LOL! Firstly, Bush doesn't need any distraction, he's winning!
Not lately; and why would that rule out dirty tricks by Rove?
And
secondly, do you honestly think that if Blather's source were a Rep, that he
would have hestitated for 1 nonosecond to give him up?
Do you think Rove himself would give it to Rather? Don't you
remember how Rove pulled the dirty trick over the debate
tapes in 2000?
You're in *serious* desperation mode to be listening to McAwful's lame
excuses. Personally, he' my guess to be the bungler. We're talking about
the guy who cheated Mobile Crossing shareholders (many of whom were
employees counting on the stock for their retirements) out of $18 million in
a scam as bad as Enron. To think that Rove would jeopardize Bush's victory
(and if you still doubt Bush is winning, pick up any newspaper, even a
librall rag) by spreading forgeries that *implicate his own* candidate in
questionable behavior is bizaro. Face it, there is *no* logic to his
speculation and you're just making youself look silly by going along with
this lame attempt at deflection.
Uh, no. You're the one trying to state (on zero evidence)
that this is a fraud committed by a Democrat. Which one,
and what's your evidence?
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: So which Dem is the forger? |
13 Sep 2004 08:24:31 PM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote
LOL! Firstly, Bush doesn't need any distraction, he's winning!
So first you claim he doesn't need a distraction, then you give a
very good reason why he needs a distracton... ignoring, for the
moment, that the race is a statistical tie in popular votes, but
Kerry has an edge in Electoral Votes...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: So which Dem is the forger? |
16 Sep 2004 01:00:57 PM |
|
|
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:uzp1d.5119$n%3.294044@twister.southeast.rr.com...
Despite Dan Blather's impersonation of Baghdad Bob, no doubt exists among
any sane observer that his Bush-bash docs are forgeries. That leads us up
to the question, which Dem done it? Which donkey do we get to pin the
tail
on for this bungled election fraud? I say that if Blather won't come
clean
and fess up to who it was that pulled the dirty deed, then it's up to
Congress to begin an i nvestigationandsubpoenahim.
In other news, those desperados of donkeydom tried out another lie. This
one, claiming that Bush lied about being active duty USAF (he was for
about
120 days) was shot down like a cessna dogfighting a F-102.
Finally, lest we have *any* remaining doubts (snicker) about the fairness
of
the MSM, I heard that NBC has begun their Kitty litter mini-series in the
morning. LOL, how low can the donkeys limbo?
Only a Republican would resort to dishonesty like forgery. It is not in the
nature of liberals or Democrats to do such a thing.
--
Peacenik
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Popelish" |
|
| Title: Re: So which Dem is the forger? |
17 Sep 2004 12:14:29 AM |
|
|
Peacenik wrote:
Only a Republican would resort to dishonesty like forgery. It is not in the
nature of liberals or Democrats to do such a thing.
I can't agree with this. No party is immune to the baser instincts.
But getting a forgery into the hands of the news media and then
screaming about it would be in character for Karl Rove. This guy is
really into mind games, and politics is just a competitive game to
him. It reminds me of the time he invited the FBI into his office in
Texas to search for a suspected bug and, of course they found one. He
screamed that the Democrats were doing to him what Nixon did at the
Watergate hotel (without actually referring to Nixon). The FBI
concluded that he had probably planted the bug, himself. I really
look forward to a tell all book from Rove. The stories he could
tell...
If the forger actually wanted to get away with this forgery, don't you
think he might have used a typewriter to make them?
It will be fascinating to eventually find out the story on these
documents, regardless of their source.
--
John Popelish
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
