| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Les Hemmings" |
| Date: |
19 Nov 2005 10:44:57 AM |
| Object: |
OT: 911 - Flight Of The Bumble Planes |
From http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
* A Boeing 767 was secured and painted up to look like a United Airlines
jet. It had remote controls installed in it, courtesy of some NORAD types.
Call that plane "Pseudo Flight 175" and leave it parked at a military
airfield for the moment.
* The number of the passengers on each flight was kept artificially low
that day. Easy to do. Just monkey with the airline computers and show the
fights full so no more tickets are sold. Include some of your own
operatives in each flight, maybe.
* After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut down.
There are a few ways to do this, maybe, but the simplest is this: Have one
of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This is the North American
Aerospace Defense Command. There is a national emergency. We are under
terrorist attack. Turn off your transponders. Maintain radio silence.
Here is your new flight plan. You will land at [name] military air base."
* The pilots turn off the transponders. The FAA weenies lose the
information which identifies the airline, the flight number, and the
altitude of the planes. Of course the planes can still be seen on
conventional radar, but the planes are just nameless blips now.
* What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths? We'll never see the
real records, for sure. But in the spy movies, when the spy wants to lose a
tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while the spy goes the
other. If I were designing Operation 911, I'd do that: As each of the
original jets is flying, another jet is sent to fly just above or below it,
at the same latitude and longitude. The blips of the two planes merge on
the radar scopes. Alternately, a plane is sent to cross the flight path of
the original plane. Again, the blips merge, just like the little bees
you're watching outside the hive. The original planes proceed to the
military airfield and air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching
the wrong blips ...
That's probably close to the way it was managed. Like I say, we'll never
see the radar records so we won't know exactly.
[For the alleged flight paths of the four jets, see
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/4flights.html
For names and locations of military airfields in the US, try
http://www.globemaster.de/bases.html
You can search for a listing of bases in 9-11 related states by using the
search engine.]
* A small remote controlled commuter jet filled with
incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile, if you like -- is flown into
the first WTC tower. That's the plane the first NBC eyewitness saw.
* The remote controlled "Pseudo Flight 175," decked out to look like a
United airlines passenger jet, is sent aloft and flown by remote control --
without passengers -- and crashed into the second tower.
Beautiful! Everyone has pictures of that.
Why did Pseudo Flight 175 almost miss the second tower? Because the remote
operators were used to smaller, more maneuverable craft, not a big stubborn
passenger jet. The operators brought the jet in on a tight circle and
almost blew it because those jets do hairpin turns like the Queen Mary.
They brought it in too fast and too close to do the job right and just hit
the corner of the tower.
* Then another remote controlled commuter jet filled with
incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile if you like -- hits the
Pentagon, in the name of Flight 77.
* Eyewitnesses are a dime a dozen. Trusted media whores "witness" the
Pentagon hit and claim it was an American Airlines Boeing 757, Flight 77.
Reporters lie better than lawyers.
* Meanwhile, the passengers from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at the
military airfield, are loaded onto Flight 93. If you've put some of your
own agents aboard, they stay on the ground, of course.
* Flight is taken aloft.
* Flight 93 is shot down or bombed -- makes no difference which. Main deal
is to destroy that human meat without questions. Easiest way to dispose of
15,000 lbs. of human flesh, and nobody gets a headline if they find a foot
in their front garden. No mass graves will ever be discovered, either.
* The trail is further confused by issuing reports that Flight 77 was
actually headed towards the White House but changed course.
* The trail is further confused by having the Washington Post wax lyrical
about the flying skills of non-existent pilots on a non-existence plane
(Flight 77).
* The trail is further confused with conflicting reports and artificial
catfight issues, such as -- did The Presidential Shrub really see the first
tower hit on TV while he was waiting to read the story about the pet goat
....
So we know the Boeing that used to be Flight 93 was blown up. The other
three original Boeings (Flights 11, 175, 77) still exist somewhere, unless
they were cut up for scrap.
[CV comments, January 1, 2004: The Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration
Center (AMARC) is located outside Tuscon, Arizona; it is an Air Force
aeroplane graveyard and a storehouse for spare parts. The Air Force also
uses AMARC to convert discarded planes into remote-controlled drones. See
http://www.modern-ruins.com/boneyard/boneyardtext.html
or
http://www.public-action.com/911/airforce-graveyard
AMARC is one likely repository for the original 911 passenger jets.]
The passengers and crews of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 died in an airplane
crash, just like the newspapers said. Only for most of them, it was the
wrong crash. But that's as close to the truth as the news media likes to
get anyway, so it works.
--
Remove Frontal Lobes to reply.
http://armsofmorpheus.blogspot.com/
http://www.fordmondeo.org/forum/index.php?referral/22134/
"...The people can always be brought to the bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and
exposing the country to greater danger "
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
.
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: 911 - Flight Of The Bumble Planes |
19 Nov 2005 08:54:14 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:44:57 -0000, "Les Hemmings"
<les.frontalclaire@lobesvirgin.net> wrote:
* After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut down.
There are a few ways to do this, maybe, but the simplest is this: Have one
of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This is the North American
Aerospace Defense Command. There is a national emergency. We are under
terrorist attack. Turn off your transponders. Maintain radio silence.
Here is your new flight plan. You will land at [name] military air base."
I'm sure that the rest of these fantasies are equally wrong, but this
one is just nuts. Airliners are directed by air traffic control.
They are not going to follow directions from someone claiming to be
NORAD. Furthermore, they are using common radio frequencies so there
would be no way to tell a particular airliner to do anything without a
lot of others hearing it.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
