As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for several
years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the condition quite well.
Thinking on that, I got to thinking about spinning things in general.
Everything in the observable universe appears to spin, from the largest
structures down to the smallest. Aside from that, things also decay - this is a
universal phenomenon and appears to be operable - to the best of my knowledge -
on all levels (from the cosmic on down to the subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the fact that
the particle is decaying?

The reason I wonder this may sound simplistic, but yet I know that sometimes
very simple notions can also be true. Singularities in the center of galaxies
are the particular phenomenon which made me think of this - the spin of a galaxy
around the singularity strikes me every bit like the spin of water as it's
funnelling out down the drain. It occurred to me that while there are often
dramatic differences in particulate behavior at divergent levels of observation,
there are also sometimes surprising similarities. So my suspicion is that a
particle may in some way "decay" due to the "funelling" of energy through some
kind of interatomic "whirlpool" of sorts (perhaps a whirlpool operating in the
10 or 11 dimensions string theory talks about).

I know that the established rule is that matter and energy are neither created
nor destroyed, but this would be a relative thing. If energy is funelling out
of the observable universe at a uniform rate throughout, none of the measuring
devices within the universe - composed of matter -from- that universe - would be
able to detect it. From the relative perspective of our existence here within
this cosmos, the amount of energy and matter would appear to be constant, either
scenario (either the "constant preserved mass/energy" or else the "draino"
effect). This would be for the same reason that a ruler wouldn't be able to
measure the stretching of mass when approaching light speeds - everything
changes uniformly.

Make sense to anyone? :-?

As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for several
years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the condition quite
well. Thinking on that, I got to thinking about spinning things in
general. Everything in the observable universe appears to spin, from the
largest structures down to the smallest. Aside from that, things also
decay - this is a universal phenomenon and appears to be operable - to the
best of my knowledge - on all levels (from the cosmic on down to the
subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the fact
that the particle is decaying?

As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for several
years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the condition quite well.
Thinking on that, I got to thinking about spinning things in general.
Everything in the observable universe appears to spin, from the largest
structures down to the smallest. Aside from that, things also decay - this is a
universal phenomenon and appears to be operable - to the best of my knowledge -
on all levels (from the cosmic on down to the subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the fact that
the particle is decaying?

The reason I wonder this may sound simplistic, but yet I know that sometimes
very simple notions can also be true.

Singularities in the center of galaxies
are the particular phenomenon which made me think of this - the spin of a galaxy
around the singularity strikes me every bit like the spin of water as it's
funnelling out down the drain.

It occurred to me that while there are often
dramatic differences in particulate behavior at divergent levels of observation,
there are also sometimes surprising similarities. So my suspicion is that a
particle may in some way "decay" due to the "funelling" of energy through some
kind of interatomic "whirlpool" of sorts (perhaps a whirlpool operating in the
10 or 11 dimensions string theory talks about).

I know that the established rule is that matter and energy are neither created
nor destroyed, but this would be a relative thing. If energy is funelling out
of the observable universe at a uniform rate throughout, none of the measuring
devices within the universe - composed of matter -from- that universe - would be
able to detect it.

From the relative perspective of our existence here within
this cosmos, the amount of energy and matter would appear to be constant, either
scenario (either the "constant preserved mass/energy" or else the "draino"
effect).

This would be for the same reason that a ruler wouldn't be able to
measure the stretching of mass when approaching light speeds - everything
changes uniformly.

Make sense to anyone? :-?

As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for
several years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the
condition quite well. Thinking on that, I got to thinking about
spinning things in general. Everything in the observable universe
appears to spin, from the largest structures down to the smallest.
Aside from that, things also decay - this is a universal phenomenon
and appears to be operable - to the best of my knowledge - on all
levels (from the cosmic on down to the subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the
fact that the particle is decaying?

The reason I wonder this may sound simplistic, but yet I know that
sometimes very simple notions can also be true. Singularities in the
center of galaxies are the particular phenomenon which made me think
of this - the spin of a galaxy around the singularity strikes me every
bit like the spin of water as it's funnelling out down the drain.

It
occurred to me that while there are often dramatic differences in
particulate behavior at divergent levels of observation, there are
also sometimes surprising similarities. So my suspicion is that a
particle may in some way "decay" due to the "funelling" of energy
through some kind of interatomic "whirlpool" of sorts (perhaps a
whirlpool operating in the 10 or 11 dimensions string theory talks
about).

I know that the established rule is that matter and energy are neither
created nor destroyed, but this would be a relative thing. If energy
is funelling out of the observable universe at a uniform rate
throughout, none of the measuring devices within the universe -
composed of matter -from- that universe - would be able to detect it.

As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for
several years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the
condition quite well. Thinking on that, I got to thinking about spinning
things in general. Everything in the observable universe appears to
spin, from the largest structures down to the smallest. Aside from
that, things also decay - this is a universal phenomenon and appears to
be operable - to the best of my knowledge - on all levels (from the
cosmic on down to the subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the
fact that the particle is decaying?

The reason I wonder this may sound simplistic, but yet I know that
sometimes very simple notions can also be true. Singularities in the
center of galaxies are the particular phenomenon which made me think of
this - the spin of a galaxy around the singularity strikes me every bit
like the spin of water as it's funnelling out down the drain. It
occurred to me that while there are often dramatic differences in
particulate behavior at divergent levels of observation, there are also
sometimes surprising similarities. So my suspicion is that a particle
may in some way "decay" due to the "funelling" of energy through some
kind of interatomic "whirlpool" of sorts (perhaps a whirlpool operating
in the 10 or 11 dimensions string theory talks about).

I know that the established rule is that matter and energy are neither
created nor destroyed, but this would be a relative thing. If energy is
funelling out of the observable universe at a uniform rate throughout,
none of the measuring devices within the universe - composed of matter
-from- that universe - would be able to detect it. From the relative
perspective of our existence here within this cosmos, the amount of
energy and matter would appear to be constant, either scenario (either
the "constant preserved mass/energy" or else the "draino" effect). This
would be for the same reason that a ruler wouldn't be able to measure
the stretching of mass when approaching light speeds - everything
changes uniformly.

Make sense to anyone? :-?
--

L8r,
Uncle Clover the AntiTwink

************************************************

The true mark of a civilized society is that its
citizens know how to hate each other peacefully.

************************************************

Make sense to anyone? :-?

As someone who seems to be in remission from Meniere's Disease for several
years, now, I remember the vertigo which accompanied the condition quite well.
Thinking on that, I got to thinking about spinning things in general.
Everything in the observable universe appears to spin, from the largest
structures down to the smallest. Aside from that, things also decay - this is a
universal phenomenon and appears to be operable - to the best of my knowledge -
on all levels (from the cosmic on down to the subatomic).

My question is this: Is a particle's spin related in some way to the fact that
the particle is decaying?

The reason I wonder this may sound simplistic, but yet I know that sometimes
very simple notions can also be true. Singularities in the center of galaxies
are the particular phenomenon which made me think of this - the spin of a galaxy
around the singularity strikes me every bit like the spin of water as it's
funnelling out down the drain. It occurred to me that while there are often
dramatic differences in particulate behavior at divergent levels of observation,
there are also sometimes surprising similarities. So my suspicion is that a
particle may in some way "decay" due to the "funelling" of energy through some
kind of interatomic "whirlpool" of sorts (perhaps a whirlpool operating in the
10 or 11 dimensions string theory talks about).

I know that the established rule is that matter and energy are neither created
nor destroyed, but this would be a relative thing. If energy is funelling out
of the observable universe at a uniform rate throughout, none of the measuring
devices within the universe - composed of matter -from- that universe - would be
able to detect it. From the relative perspective of our existence here within
this cosmos, the amount of energy and matter would appear to be constant, either
scenario (either the "constant preserved mass/energy" or else the "draino"
effect). This would be for the same reason that a ruler wouldn't be able to
measure the stretching of mass when approaching light speeds - everything
changes uniformly.

Make sense to anyone?