| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
17 Nov 2007 03:12:54 PM |
| Object: |
OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination! Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainynight inGeorgia? |
18 Nov 2007 09:40:47 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:14:29 -0800, panamfloyd wrote:
On Nov 17, 5:53 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken
among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God and
his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in that
gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish mistake
again.
Snip
nominated portion begins:
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
nominated portion ends.
IMHO, flawless. As good as I've ever seen here. Respectfully nominated
for AQOTM, Nov `07.
Seconds, anyone?
Yep. Also, nabbed as a sig...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Warned you we tried! Listen you did not! Now screwed
we will all be!"
http://www.sequentialpictures.com/moviestarwarsepisode3.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
17 Nov 2007 11:46:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 02:53:12 PM |
|
|
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide qu=
oted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 07:43:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would have to spend thousands of dollars on acting lessons to even
pretend that I give a damn what you think, boy.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
20 Nov 2007 09:23:41 AM |
|
|
On Nov 19, 8:43 pm, Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you wi=
ll
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among=
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to=
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide=
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=
!-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would have to spend thousands of dollars on acting lessons to even
pretend that I give a damn what you think, boy.
Ah yes, sidestep the opening question. Well, of course you would, it
show you to be a liar.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
20 Nov 2007 11:22:42 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:23:41 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 19, 8:43 pm, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would have to spend thousands of dollars on acting lessons to even
pretend that I give a damn what you think, boy.
Ah yes, sidestep the opening question. Well, of course you would, it
show you to be a liar.
What a queer response. Are you not able to see the responses from
atheists that the topic has generated? They're on it like fleas on a
dog.
Hatter
Beer, bait and ammo...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Panama Floyd" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 07:58:32 PM |
|
|
On Nov 19, 8:43 pm, Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@r=E2lant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you wi=
ll
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among=
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to=
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide=
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=
!-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would have to spend thousands of dollars on acting lessons to even
pretend that I give a damn what you think, boy.
Who you callin' "boy", *****? Now get your ***** down to the docks. The
fleet's in, and they just got paid.
-PF, Atl.
2015/KoB!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
20 Nov 2007 12:49:16 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:58:32 -0800 (PST), Panama Floyd
<panamaflyd@aol.com> wrote:
On Nov 19, 8:43 pm, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Nov 18, 12:46 am, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6neju...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Please show us ONE real person that is "quite taken back by the news"
much less "many." We may be annoyed that people keep claiming that a
less than statistically average success rate equals vindication. We
may be tired of having to say this sort of thing again and again, but
you want me taken aback? If so, show prayer statistically well above
average sucess rate. You want me to actually be a theist, show me
something beyond what is known to be possible. Until then,
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would have to spend thousands of dollars on acting lessons to even
pretend that I give a damn what you think, boy.
Who you callin' "boy",
You, BOY.
-PF, Atl.
2015/KoB!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses equals
total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God and
his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in that gap
in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain that
won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious being
who likes teasing desperate people.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“Honor is simply the morality of superior men.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 10:55:47 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses equals
total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God and
his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in that gap
in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain that
won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious being
who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 01:35:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken
among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain that
won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious being
who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Morality is doing what is right, no matter what you're
told. Religion is doing what you're told, not matter what
is right."
- Jerry Sturdivant
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 11:41:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken
among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain that
won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious being
who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
I might say the same to you except it's part of a man and you just
don't measure up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 07:34:29 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:41:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch
<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions
taken among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left
to defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that
it rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you
in this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain
that won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious
being who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
I might say the same to you except it's part of a man and you just don't
measure up.
yawn
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“There's really no point to voting. If it made any
difference, it would probably be illegal”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 08:06:39 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:34:29 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:41:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch
<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions
taken among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left
to defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that
it rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you
in this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain
that won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious
being who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
I might say the same to you except it's part of a man and you just don't
measure up.
yawn
Translation: "I dropped my ***** in the dirt and someone stepped on it
again."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
20 Nov 2007 11:50:23 AM |
|
|
Bibon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:34:29 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:41:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>=
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch
<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@r=EF=BF=BDlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said..=
..
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you=
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions
taken among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God=
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in=
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left=
to defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that=
it rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of yo=
u
in this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why..=
..
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain
that won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a viciou=
s
being who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works=
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
I might say the same to you except it's part of a man and you just don'=
t
measure up.
yawn
Translation: "I dropped my ***** in the dirt and someone stepped on it
again."
Grow up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
21 Nov 2007 02:38:31 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:50:23 -0800 (PST), JessHC
<jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote:
Bibon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:34:29 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:41:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:47 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:43:51 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 +0000, Bibon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch
<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism Bibon
<bibob@r?lant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@ 4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you
will agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions
taken among some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and six misses
equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left
to defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that
it rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you
in this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
You presume much. Nobody's "taken back" by it at all.
The drought persists.
If you want to believe that your "god" would answer the prayers of
drought stricken people by sending an insignificant amount of rain
that won't help them, you merely tell us that you believe in a vicious
being who likes teasing desperate people.
I have never professed a adherence to any religion. You use of the
phrase, "your god", is ignorant.
Let's get this outta the way:
I don't give flying ***** of a fart what "adherence" you "profess". You
may profess your adherences up your ***** okay?
Now.
Take "your" in the sense of "one's" if you wish. I don't care. It works
either way.
(One thing certainly adhere to is being a *****)
I might say the same to you except it's part of a man and you just don't
measure up.
yawn
Translation: "I dropped my ***** in the dirt and someone stepped on it
again."
Grow up.
I have. I don't drop my ***** in the dirt and let someone step on it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
21 Nov 2007 07:42:16 AM |
|
|
Bibon wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:50:23 -0800 (PST), JessHC
<jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote:
Bibon wrote:
Translation: "I dropped my ***** in the dirt and someone stepped on it again."
Grow up.
I have. I don't drop my ***** in the dirt and let someone step on it.
You must keep it in your purse, then.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AZ Nomad" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
22 Nov 2007 11:29:36 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
big
fucking
deal.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 10:52:30 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 10:57:20 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
What a remarkably stupid question to ask an atheist on an atheist
newsgroup.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 11:37:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:20 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
What a remarkably stupid question to ask an atheist on an atheist
newsgroup.
Only a stupid atheist would think it stupid.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "AZ Nomad" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
22 Nov 2007 11:30:03 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:20 -0500, Christopher A.Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
What a remarkably stupid question to ask an atheist on an atheist
newsgroup.
baboon is remarkably stupid.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 11:00:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<7dr0k3pgi56ptj3t5gdagn8r90cevr989q@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
Only when people try to tell me that I ought to believe in this
non-responsive, probably non-existent, deity and tell me what He wants.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bibon" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
18 Nov 2007 11:39:27 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:00:26 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<7dr0k3pgi56ptj3t5gdagn8r90cevr989q@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
Does that bother you, make you unhappy?
Only when people try to tell me that I ought to believe in this
non-responsive, probably non-existent, deity and tell me what He wants.
You atheists tell people they shouldn't believe. Have you special
rights and exemptions as an atheist to tell others what they should or
shouldn't do?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Any comments on the recent rainy night in Georgia? |
19 Nov 2007 06:29:17 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:39:27 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<6982k3l57lhbk67eh79qtfdoch1f381v60@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:00:26 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:52:30 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<7dr0k3pgi56ptj3t5gdagn8r90cevr989q@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:30:44 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:46:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<18kvj3p85ak660m3bn6pfu4kk429hffrhe@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:53:23 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:29:20 GMT, in alt.atheism
Bibon <bibob@râlant.org> wrote in
<pjquj3l650ecmhq464gk2rcmse6nejui67@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:16 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <ruluj3hc213v9qd5jiduche8cukn8h4t2f@
4ax.com>, said...
To say the very least the rain was refreshing and, I'm sure you will
agree, reasonable cause for rethinking some positions taken among
some minority groups -- don't you agree?
Week 1: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 2: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 3: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 4: Pray for rain
Result: Drought
Week 5: Pray for lots rain
Result: Drought
Week 6: Pray REALLY HARD for lots of rain
Result: Drought
Week 7: Pray for lots of rain
Result: Rain
Conclusion: God answers prayer! Woo hoo! One hit and
six misses equals total vindication of the faith!
You must not be familiar with comments in the scriptures about God
and his view of time. Perhaps some knowing Christian will fill in
that gap in your knowledge bank and you won't make such a foolish
mistake again.
When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions are
identical to those of a universe without God, you have nothing left to
defend.
I wasn't defending anything to begin with. Merely pointing out that it
rained one night recently in Georgia. Now I find that many of you in
this newsgroup seem quite taken back by the news. I wonder why...
Even if you don't personally believe the justification that you brought
up, that is a very common excuse, er, doctrine among Christians for why
prayers are not answered.
| | | | | | |
