| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
20 Aug 2006 05:00:43 PM |
| Object: |
OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
20 Aug 2006 04:47:42 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@
4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places to
guard and not enough troops to guard them. Plus we'd be turning our whole
country into an armed camp, giving all you pantywaist liberals even more
stuff to whine about.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 03:41:58 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@
4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places to
guard and not enough troops to guard them. Plus we'd be turning our whole
country into an armed camp, giving all you pantywaist liberals even more
stuff to whine about.
snort - there wasn't enough troops to put in all the places they needed
to guard in Iraq too, but that didn't stop you idiots from sending them
in to die needlessly.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 05:48:48 PM |
|
|
On 20 Aug 2006 21:47:42 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@
4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places to
guard and not enough troops to guard them. Plus we'd be turning our whole
country into an armed camp, giving all you pantywaist liberals even more
stuff to whine about.
I don't worry about a good defense. We're talking about bridges,
subways, tunnels, water supplies and other things vital to our life.
We are not talking about my bedroom (ugggh) or your's, "thank your
god".
Even some of us Dems are smart enough to have an alarm system to
protect against people who got surplussed and became destitute because
you and your type shipped and are continuing to ship their jobs out of
America.
God dammit or "alleged God" dammit, I just realized I'm talking to
Fred Stone!!! ARRRRGHHHh Newsgroups first, beer+ later. *****.
Never mind.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
20 Aug 2006 06:53:34 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people object
to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a same-sex
strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Member: Intensional misspellingg club.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
25 Aug 2006 06:11:47 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
[snicker]
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle.
San surprise. Velcome to ze police state.
Some people object
to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a same-sex
strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 05:57:10 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people object
to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a same-sex
strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
Fred never noticed all the war did was make the haters of the USA even
madder at us, causing them to build up their strength and numbers.
Like Israel/hezbola - again and again more each time.
What was that definition of insanity? Something like repeating the
same failing action without wondering why and doing something to
change it?
Fred, why can't you learn by all the rebuttals you get here, just like
I learned I'm wrong about the WTC collapse? I dare you.
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 05:21:13 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:g3eke2lhfhmg7mhjvpq1v3ifu13ed9lu1c@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people
object to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a
same-sex strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
Fred never noticed all the war did was make the haters of the USA even
madder at us, causing them to build up their strength and numbers.
Like Israel/hezbola - again and again more each time.
As if anything we could do would make them like us.
What was that definition of insanity? Something like repeating the
same failing action without wondering why and doing something to
change it?
Sounds like the definition of a liberal.
Fred, why can't you learn by all the rebuttals you get here, just like
I learned I'm wrong about the WTC collapse? I dare you.
Why don't you learn from my postings? I've given you plenty of well
documented material. It's not like this is a great mystery.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
22 Aug 2006 04:13:05 PM |
|
|
On 21 Aug 2006 22:21:13 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:g3eke2lhfhmg7mhjvpq1v3ifu13ed9lu1c@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people
object to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a
same-sex strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
Fred never noticed all the war did was make the haters of the USA even
madder at us, causing them to build up their strength and numbers.
Like Israel/hezbola - again and again more each time.
As if anything we could do would make them like us.
What was that definition of insanity? Something like repeating the
same failing action without wondering why and doing something to
change it?
Sounds like the definition of a liberal.
Fred, why can't you learn by all the rebuttals you get here, just like
I learned I'm wrong about the WTC collapse? I dare you.
Why don't you learn from my postings? I've given you plenty of well
documented material. It's not like this is a great mystery.
Well documented, maybe, but not pertinent to the debate and not
proving anything but a diversion to waste my time.
You post ***** and lies, Fred, and the only thing to learn from
that is that you are even unsuccessful at lying and that none of your
codswallop is anything but something to ridicule for amusement.
Let me guess: You are one of Bushes "advisers" making a deluded man
even more fucked up in the head, Fred. How much do they pay you? I
might be interested in bullshitting the nation, too, Fred. Money
walks, y'know. Nah, I could not commit treason. Go tell your friends
to ***** for me, while you *****. BTW, when do you graduate from
Elementary School? 4 years? 5?
spread the love. villains usually take __________ and run.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 07:05:06 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:g3eke2lhfhmg7mhjvpq1v3ifu13ed9lu1c@
4ax.com:
Fred never noticed all the war did was make the haters of the USA even
madder at us, causing them to build up their strength and numbers.
Like Israel/hezbola - again and again more each time.
A friend's son was in Paris recently. He says they are normally assholes,
but they really pile on the ***** when they have to deal with Americans
these days.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Member: Intensional misspellingg club
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
22 Aug 2006 04:14:47 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:05:06 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in news:g3eke2lhfhmg7mhjvpq1v3ifu13ed9lu1c@
4ax.com:
Fred never noticed all the war did was make the haters of the USA even
madder at us, causing them to build up their strength and numbers.
Like Israel/hezbola - again and again more each time.
A friend's son was in Paris recently. He says they are normally assholes,
but they really pile on the ***** when they have to deal with Americans
these days.
This G.W Bush has to go. Far and fast.
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 06:55:35 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Absolutely!
My favorite part is still that after they take away your tweezers and your
Gatorade, nobody's bothered to check the cargo that was loaded into your
plane.
You know how we'll know that terrorists snuck bombs into air cargo?
When the planes explode...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scott Richter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 09:47:43 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
My favorite part is still that after they take away your tweezers and your
Gatorade, nobody's bothered to check the cargo that was loaded into your
plane.
You know how we'll know that terrorists snuck bombs into air cargo?
When the planes explode...
And then Condi can go before Congress and claim, "No one could have
imagined the terrorists would put bombs in the cargo..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 10:46:54 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:47:43 -0700, Scott Richter wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
My favorite part is still that after they take away your tweezers and your
Gatorade, nobody's bothered to check the cargo that was loaded into your
plane.
You know how we'll know that terrorists snuck bombs into air cargo?
When the planes explode...
And then Condi can go before Congress and claim, "No one could have
imagined the terrorists would put bombs in the cargo..."
And Bush will insist that not giving him unlimited power was the reason it
happened...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 06:05:23 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:46:54 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:47:43 -0700, Scott Richter wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
My favorite part is still that after they take away your tweezers and your
Gatorade, nobody's bothered to check the cargo that was loaded into your
plane.
You know how we'll know that terrorists snuck bombs into air cargo?
When the planes explode...
And then Condi can go before Congress and claim, "No one could have
imagined the terrorists would put bombs in the cargo..."
And Bush will insist that not giving him unlimited power was the reason it
happened...
Damn. I wish I could declare myself the winner in every abuse. Nope,
already taken. Feces.
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
25 Aug 2006 06:25:01 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:55:35 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, Uncle Vic wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Absolutely!
My favorite part is still that after they take away your tweezers and your
Gatorade, nobody's bothered to check the cargo that was loaded into your
plane.
You know how we'll know that terrorists snuck bombs into air cargo?
When the planes explode...
/BushCo
There was no plane.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
20 Aug 2006 07:00:16 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:53:34 -0500, in alt.atheism
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
<Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136>:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people object
to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a same-sex
strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
If someone agrees with Fred, Fred starts to think he himself has become
too much of a pantywaist liberal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scott Richter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 12:27:00 AM |
|
|
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
If someone agrees with Fred,
You are speaking hypothetically, of course.
Fred starts to think he himself has become
too much of a pantywaist liberal.
Never realizing how gay his neofascist jackboots make him look...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 07:04:03 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:27:00 -0700, in alt.atheism
scottrichter422@yahoo.com (Scott Richter) wrote in
<1hke396.jwsd9e1mti4bkN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com>:
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
If someone agrees with Fred,
You are speaking hypothetically, of course.
Fred starts to think he himself has become
too much of a pantywaist liberal.
Never realizing how gay his neofascist jackboots make him look...
Well, fascism is just stalinism with a different vocabulary.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
20 Aug 2006 09:13:20 PM |
|
|
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people
object to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a
same-sex strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
Well, you all objected to "profiling" so they can't be unpolitically
correct about who they search.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
You might remember that the next time you see Sunyutz join the "insult
Fred" party.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 05:58:52 PM |
|
|
On 21 Aug 2006 02:13:20 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Plus we'd be turning our
whole country into an armed camp,
Yeah, it already is. I had to go through airport security a few weeks
ago, nearly got arrested for wearing a belt buckle. Some people
object to others feeling them up, so they put up a sign offering a
same-sex strip search. Yeah, that's much better.
Well, you all objected to "profiling" so they can't be unpolitically
correct about who they search.
giving all you pantywaist liberals
even more stuff to whine about.
You don't gain allies by insulting them, Fred.
You might remember that the next time you see Sunyutz join the "insult
Fred" party.
I learned it from you, sweetie! :) <smak>
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
20 Aug 2006 10:14:43 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone (fstone69
@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Yeah, lucky for us England was on the ball. That would be the same ball
Bush and his morons would have dropped had they not been so astute.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Member: Intensional misspellingg club.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 06:00:21 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:14:43 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone (fstone69
@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It would
expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many places
to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Yeah, lucky for us England was on the ball. That would be the same ball
Bush and his morons would have dropped had they not been so astute.
Seems those Brits are busy running their country while the USA runs
the oil biz.
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 05:23:38 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:uleke2htsadcj99rtdckc9e6fhmr5bir1d@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:14:43 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone (fstone69
@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It
would expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many
places to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Yeah, lucky for us England was on the ball. That would be the same
ball Bush and his morons would have dropped had they not been so
astute.
Seems those Brits are busy running their country while the USA runs
the oil biz.
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are maturing.
Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 07:03:29 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns9826C4C76C340fstone69@66.150.105.47:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:uleke2htsadcj99rtdckc9e6fhmr5bir1d@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:14:43 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone (fstone69
@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports,
subways, water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure
England can suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It
would expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many
places to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and
undertrained security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of
a problem.
Yeah, lucky for us England was on the ball. That would be the same
ball Bush and his morons would have dropped had they not been so
astute.
Seems those Brits are busy running their country while the USA runs
the oil biz.
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are
maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Conspiracy theory duly noted.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Member: Intensional misspellingg club
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
21 Aug 2006 09:48:01 PM |
|
|
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:Xns9826AD85EE930vicman@
216.196.97.142:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns9826C4C76C340fstone69@66.150.105.47:
<...>
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are
maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Conspiracy theory duly noted.
Try historical fact.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
22 Aug 2006 04:19:33 PM |
|
|
On 21 Aug 2006 22:23:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:uleke2htsadcj99rtdckc9e6fhmr5bir1d@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:14:43 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone (fstone69
@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns9825ABD575091vicman@216.196.97.136:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Fred Stone
(fstone69@earthling.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:ogmhe2t3qsupk31qcii8medngo54df96ef@ 4ax.com:
Yep, that's right. Let's put our troops in our airports, subways,
water supplies, ports, the pentagon wtc etc. I'm sure England can
suggest who many to put where.
Let's wait for them to try, then we can kill them, on our soil,
without trial, in justifiable self defense.
I know why not: It would work and kill too many cash cows. It
would expose the sham.
Sunyata
No, and I know why not. It would not work. There are too many
places to guard and not enough troops to guard them.
So I guess we'll just leave it to the understaffed and undertrained
security force already there, eh?
If we keep the terrorists from coming here, it won't be as much of a
problem.
Yeah, lucky for us England was on the ball. That would be the same
ball Bush and his morons would have dropped had they not been so
astute.
Seems those Brits are busy running their country while the USA runs
the oil biz.
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are maturing.
Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Now that Bush &Co, abetted by clods like you, has poked the beehives
and steeled their resolve, you are, albeit by accident, correct about
not seeing the last of them. Don't bask too much in your accidental
glory. It won't last.
Catch a falling star, put it in your pocket, save it for a rainy day
or whatever, just stop talking.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
22 Aug 2006 04:43:15 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:susme2t9s6r56j6u9jm3fq34cpoc18j7ff@4ax.com:
On 21 Aug 2006 22:23:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
<...>
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are
maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Now that Bush &Co, abetted by clods like you, has poked the beehives
and steeled their resolve, you are, albeit by accident, correct about
not seeing the last of them. Don't bask too much in your accidental
glory. It won't last.
Sorry Subnutz, but it wasn't Bush who stirred up the hornet's nest. They
were stirred long before Bush took office. Or maybe you've simply erased
everything before 9/11/2001 from your memory.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
23 Aug 2006 08:43:50 PM |
|
|
On 22 Aug 2006 21:43:15 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Sunyata@wastherain.net wrote in
news:susme2t9s6r56j6u9jm3fq34cpoc18j7ff@4ax.com:
On 21 Aug 2006 22:23:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
<...>
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are
maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Now that Bush &Co, abetted by clods like you, has poked the beehives
and steeled their resolve, you are, albeit by accident, correct about
not seeing the last of them. Don't bask too much in your accidental
glory. It won't last.
Sorry Subnutz, but it wasn't Bush who stirred up the hornet's nest. They
were stirred long before Bush took office. Or maybe you've simply erased
everything before 9/11/2001 from your memory.
Ovaltine has vitamins that Nestles does not. Epoxy can be cured.
Celibacy is not hereditary. Gunmen shot up the morgue, all residents
remained dead. What do Christians tell God when he sneezes? C'mon,
wander and wonder with me, I can teach you a lot, Fred. Y'ain't seen
nothing yet. You can even learn to spell peoples names correctly,
changing bad, hateful energy to good constructive energy, like
exploring facts and dismissing the fantasies you currently live on.
I'm waiting, with love,
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
Sunyata
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
23 Aug 2006 08:21:59 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:3e0qe2tnr45fqj4sfhevab5lu8e9hrdi9j@4ax.com:
On 22 Aug 2006 21:43:15 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
wrote in
news:susme2t9s6r56j6u9jm3fq34cpoc18j7ff@4ax.com:
On 21 Aug 2006 22:23:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
<...>
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last
fifty years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the
mideast and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots
are maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of
them.
Now that Bush &Co, abetted by clods like you, has poked the beehives
and steeled their resolve, you are, albeit by accident, correct
about not seeing the last of them. Don't bask too much in your
accidental glory. It won't last.
Sorry Subnutz, but it wasn't Bush who stirred up the hornet's nest.
They were stirred long before Bush took office. Or maybe you've simply
erased everything before 9/11/2001 from your memory.
<snip Subnutz's goofball ramblings>
Whoops, nothing's left.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Truth is the first casualty in war - but it shouldn't be the news media
who kill it."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bring troops home, put them in airports. |
25 Aug 2006 06:23:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:43:50 -0400, wrote in
alt.atheism
On 22 Aug 2006 21:43:15 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
wrote in
news:susme2t9s6r56j6u9jm3fq34cpoc18j7ff@4ax.com:
On 21 Aug 2006 22:23:38 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
<...>
The Brits have been setting themselves up for this for the last fifty
years, importing Muslim extremists from every hellhole in the mideast
and letting them propagate their hate. And now their plots are
maturing. Don't think for a minute that you've seen the last of them.
Now that Bush &Co, abetted by clods like you, has poked the beehives
and steeled their resolve, you are, albeit by accident, correct about
not seeing the last of them. Don't bask too much in your accidental
glory. It won't last.
Sorry Subnutz, but it wasn't Bush who stirred up the hornet's nest. They
were stirred long before Bush took office. Or maybe you've simply erased
everything before 9/11/2001 from your memory.
Ovaltine has vitamins that Nestles does not. Epoxy can be cured.
Celibacy is not hereditary. Gunmen shot up the morgue, all residents
remained dead. What do Christians tell God when he sneezes? C'mon,
wander and wonder with me, I can teach you a lot, Fred. Y'ain't seen
nothing yet. You can even learn to spell peoples names correctly,
changing bad, hateful energy to good constructive energy, like
exploring facts and dismissing the fantasies you currently live on.
I'm waiting, with love,
Make sure you're up on all your shots.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
