| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Don Martin" |
| Date: |
22 Mar 2007 11:56:39 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Bush bumperstickers |
BEST BUSH BUMPER STICKERS
Bush: End of an Error
That's OK, I Wasn't Using My Civil Liberties Anyway
Let's Fix Democracy in This Country First
If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran
If You Can Read This, You're Not Our President
Of Course It Hurts: You're Getting Screwed by an Elephant
Hey, Bush Supporters: Embarrassed Yet?
George Bush: Creating Terrorists for Our Grandkids to Fight
Impeachment: It's Not Just for Blowjobs Anymore
America: One Nation, Under Surveillance
They Call Him "W" So He Can Spell It
Whose God Do You Kill For?
Jail to the Chief
No, Seriously, Why Did We Invade Iraq ?
Bush: God's Way of Proving Intelligent Design is *****
We Need a President Who is Fluent in at Least One Language
Bush Doesn't Care About White People, Either
Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Handbasket?
You Elected Him. You Deserve Him.
Impeach Cheney First
Dubya, Your Dad Shoulda Pulled Out, Too
When Bush Took Office, Gas Was $1.46
Pray For Impeachment
The Republican Party: Our Bridge to the 11th Century
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
One Nation Under Clod
2004: Embarrassed 2005: Horrified 2006: Terrified
Bush Never Exhaled
At Least Nixon Resigned
Congratulations Osama: Mission Accomplished!
Voted for Bush? Why Do You Hate the U.S.?
Il Buce: He Didn't Make the Trains Run On Time Either
Support Our Troops: Impeach Bush
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 12:53:56 PM |
|
|
"Don Martin" <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 02:31:31 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
I always wonder what was bleeped by the "...". Perhaps the word "not"?
--
Uncle Vic aa Atheist #2011
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 03:42:45 PM |
|
|
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
7C979E.12313122032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
I always wonder what was bleeped by the "...". Perhaps the word "not"?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
"There has never been an embargo against food and medicine. It's just that
Hussein has just not chosen to spend his money on that. Instead, he has
chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction, and
palaces for his cronies."
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist extremism." -
J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 12:00:36 AM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
bloodied us up with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
7C979E.12313122032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
I always wonder what was bleeped by the "...". Perhaps the word
"not"?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
"There has never been an embargo against food and medicine. It's just
that Hussein has just not chosen to spend his money on that. Instead,
he has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction, and palaces for his cronies."
Now that your friends have killed him, it should be easy for them to find
the WMDs he spent all that money on. Where are they?
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack. Plonked by Fester.
Member Duke Spanking Club.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 10:05:57 AM |
|
|
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns98FBDFF485F7Avicman@66.250.146.128:
One fine day in alt.atheism, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
bloodied us up with this:
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
7C979E.12313122032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
I always wonder what was bleeped by the "...". Perhaps the word
"not"?
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
"There has never been an embargo against food and medicine. It's just
that Hussein has just not chosen to spend his money on that. Instead,
he has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction, and palaces for his cronies."
Now that your friends have killed him, it should be easy for them to
find the WMDs he spent all that money on. Where are they?
Beats me.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 02:30:04 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
--
Uncle Vic aa Atheist #2011
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 03:43:34 PM |
|
|
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
4ABC2C.12300422032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
And he could never be trusted.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist extremism." -
J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 09:12:17 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAA40F2ECBfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
4ABC2C.12300422032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
And he could never be trusted.
That's what UN inspectors were for.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 10:01:34 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:yJydnSY-Qrkfqp7bnZ2dnUVZ_ternZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAA40F2ECBfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
4ABC2C.12300422032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection
process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
And he could never be trusted.
That's what UN inspectors were for.
And they couldn't be trusted either, as it turns out. Saddam was bribing
the UN through his Oil for Food program.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist extremism."
- J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 01:10:23 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FC7047A8D8Efreddybear@194.177.96.26...
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:yJydnSY-Qrkfqp7bnZ2dnUVZ_ternZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAA40F2ECBfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
4ABC2C.12300422032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection
process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
And he could never be trusted.
That's what UN inspectors were for.
And they couldn't be trusted either, as it turns out. Saddam was bribing
the UN through his Oil for Food program.
Hahaha...right. In your little fantasy world. Nearly all accusations of
corruption were Bush Administration fabrications, used to discredit the UN.
And none involved UNMOVIC. Try again sporto.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 12:01:29 AM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> bloodied us
up with this:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAA40F2ECBfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote in news:address-
4ABC2C.12300422032007@news.isp.giganews.com:
In article <Xns98FB8D7DA1B0Bfreddybear@194.177.96.26>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
And they were never found...
And he could never be trusted.
That's what UN inspectors were for.
I think they should send Frank. I'll bet he knows where they are.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack. Plonked by Fester.
Member Duke Spanking Club.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 03:19:00 PM |
|
|
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Don Martin" <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote innews:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
So stop being a photo negative of the hippie peacenicks who think the
US wh never should do anything military.
Stop being a dogmatic fool. We have enough of them with theists and
hippie peacenicks.
Hatter
IRIATTAW
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 03:54:34 PM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1174594740.460512.24480@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Don Martin" <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote
innews:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
So stop being a photo negative of the hippie peacenicks who think the
US wh never should do anything military.
Stop being a dogmatic fool. We have enough of them with theists and
hippie peacenicks.
All that you have said is an admission that "Bush lied" is itself a lie.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ghod" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 04:00:08 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
[snip]
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
True, but if you were to limit yourself, we'd sure as ***** appreciate
it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 09:14:12 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 10:02:09 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:l4udnQ3h0vVoqp7bnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not verifiably.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not verifiably.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 01:14:23 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FC70609BD3Efreddybear@194.177.96.26...
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:l4udnQ3h0vVoqp7bnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not verifiably.
Yes. But then, nothing would have satisfied those who needed a motivation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 09:28:51 AM |
|
|
On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fston...@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Furthermore it didn't cost the US its security, world position, and a
TRILLION FUCKING BUCKS!!!!!!
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 10:02:55 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1174660130.988112.197430@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fston...@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq
with suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country
with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Furthermore it didn't cost the US its security, world position, and a
TRILLION FUCKING BUCKS!!!!!!
Neither has the invasion and subsequent creation of the Democratic
government of Iraq.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist extremism."
- J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 01:12:55 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FC7082155DDfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1174660130.988112.197430@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fston...@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBAC1E79736freddybear@194.177.96.26...
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq
with suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country
with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
It ended Iraq's WMDs.
Furthermore it didn't cost the US its security, world position, and a
TRILLION FUCKING BUCKS!!!!!!
Neither has the invasion and subsequent creation of the Democratic
government of Iraq.
LOL...you're dreaming if you think that's ever going to happen. The chances
of that went out the fucking door long ago. The Kurds are for all intents
and purposes autonomous.
The Shiites control the balance of the oil, have closer allies and are a
majority. Do you think they are ever going to want to share power after Bush
declares victory (again) and we waddle home?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 09:27:10 AM |
|
|
On Mar 22, 4:54 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote innews:1174594740.460512.24480@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Don Martin" <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote
innews:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
All those quotes are true. They all use forebarance, wisdom, and
scrutiny. Most are postulates about treating the motive of Iraq with
suspicion and the possibility of limited military responses.
Limited responses never put an end to anything.
Not one of them said "Invade Iraq, they have weapons" THEY did not
lead to the overpriced quagmire Bush has disgraced the country with.
Nor did they put an end to the situation.
So stop being a photo negative of the hippie peacenicks who think the
US wh never should do anything military.
Stop being a dogmatic fool. We have enough of them with theists and
hippie peacenicks.
All that you have said is an admission that "Bush lied" is itself a lie.
--
Your reading comprehension is crippled by your reality filters. You
are stuck in your delusion of Conservative equals Good. It is your
religion. I will write you off to the same category as the hippie
peacenicks and Christians.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "magilla" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 01:24:17 PM |
|
|
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 01:51:09 PM |
|
|
On Mar 22, 2:24 pm, "magilla" <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah . . .
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Give Fred Stone a
presidential orgasm, and he is busy for years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 03:45:24 PM |
|
|
"Don Martin" <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1174589469.073503.85480@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 22, 2:24 pm, "magilla" <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 22, 1:53 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
blahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblah
blahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblahblah
blahblahblahblahblahblahCLINTONblahblah
blahblahblahCLINTONblahblahblahblahblah . . .
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Give Fred Stone a
presidential orgasm, and he is busy for years.
Ah, the denialists, busy rewriting history in their own minds.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist extremism." -
J. L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 04:28:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:53:56 +0100, Fred Stone wrote:
"Don Martin" <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle,
John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
We didn't start the war until March, 2003. He may very well have had WMDs
in 1998. When, in 2002, Hussain provided evidence to the UN that the WMDs
had been dismantled, Bush didn't believe him. Apparently, he didn't
believe the intelligence reports saying that Iraq did not have any WMDs,
or any viable program to develop new ones, either. He DID make
predictions about 'mushroom clouds' over American cities if we didn't go
to war. So now, we are all stuck with the war he so desperately wanted.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 04:52:22 PM |
|
|
MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote in
news:pan.2007.03.22.21.28.37.907079@stopspam.net:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:53:56 +0100, Fred Stone wrote:
"Don Martin" <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
The part about how he used the Time Machine to convince all these
Democrats:
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State. Feb 18, 1998.
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.
We didn't start the war until March, 2003. He may very well have had
WMDs in 1998. When, in 2002, Hussain provided evidence to the UN that
the WMDs had been dismantled, Bush didn't believe him.
There were significant flaws in that evidence, not least of which was
the fact that inspectors were not present when the material was
destroyed. That in itself was a violation of the UN resolution.
Apparently, he
didn't believe the intelligence reports saying that Iraq did not have
any WMDs, or any viable program to develop new ones, either.
The *consensus* of the Intelligence Community was that Iraq *did* have
WMD and viable programs to manufacture WMD. Indeed, there were
dissenting opinions, but those were *not* the majority opinion before
the war.
And of course we *did* find warehouses full of precursor chemicals, and
usable CBW artillery shells, and even some leftovers from the stuff that
he supposedly destroyed.
He DID
make predictions about 'mushroom clouds' over American cities if we
didn't go to war.
That was a hypothetical case, if I recall correctly.
So now, we are all stuck with the war he so
desperately wanted.
So now you're trying desperately to pretend that you can just walk away
from it and the consequences of that act won't be on your hands.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 09:18:33 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBB5EB61B03freddybear@194.177.96.26...
The *consensus* of the Intelligence Community
To bad they didn't listen to the UN inspectors instead of George Tenet. Even
I knew that Iraq didn't have WMDs. The problem with the "Intelligence
Community" (whatever you mean by that) is that they only looked at
supporting data (regardless whether or not it was reliable or not) and
discounted anything that ran counter to their mindset.
The books were cooked in order to garner support for the war. If you can't
see that then you're an idiot.
was that Iraq *did* have
WMD and viable programs to manufacture WMD. Indeed, there were
dissenting opinions, but those were *not* the majority opinion before
the war.
Not in the Bush Administration. No. What do you expect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
23 Mar 2007 10:05:11 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:8KOdnXiLAchnpZ7bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBB5EB61B03freddybear@194.177.96.26...
The *consensus* of the Intelligence Community
To bad they didn't listen to the UN inspectors instead of George
Tenet. Even I knew that Iraq didn't have WMDs. The problem with the
"Intelligence Community" (whatever you mean by that) is that they only
looked at supporting data (regardless whether or not it was reliable
or not) and discounted anything that ran counter to their mindset.
The books were cooked in order to garner support for the war. If you
can't see that then you're an idiot.
The Senate Intelligence Committee decided otherwise. If you think you
can rewrite history to suit your need to be "right" about being against
the war, you're delusional.
was that Iraq *did* have
WMD and viable programs to manufacture WMD. Indeed, there were
dissenting opinions, but those were *not* the majority opinion before
the war.
Not in the Bush Administration. No. What do you expect.
Not in any administration. Not in the entire world, prior to the war.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"There is something profoundly wrong when opposition to the war in Iraq
seems to inspire greater passion than opposition to Islamist
extremism." - J. L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
24 Mar 2007 10:15:29 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:05:11 +0100, Fred Stone wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:8KOdnXiLAchnpZ7bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBB5EB61B03freddybear@194.177.96.26...
The *consensus* of the Intelligence Community
To bad they didn't listen to the UN inspectors instead of George Tenet.
Even I knew that Iraq didn't have WMDs. The problem with the
"Intelligence Community" (whatever you mean by that) is that they only
looked at supporting data (regardless whether or not it was reliable or
not) and discounted anything that ran counter to their mindset.
The books were cooked in order to garner support for the war. If you
can't see that then you're an idiot.
The Senate Intelligence Committee decided otherwise. If you think you
can rewrite history to suit your need to be "right" about being against
the war, you're delusional.
You mean this Committee? This report?:
(from Wikipedia)
"The Senate Report on Iraqi WMD Intelligence (formally, the "Report of the
Select Committee on Intelligence on the U.S. Intelligence Community's
Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq") was the report by the United
States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence concerning the U.S.
intelligence community's assessments of Iraq during the time leading up to
the 2003 U.S. invasion. The report, which was released on July 9, 2004,
identified numerous failures in the intelligence-gathering and -analysis
process. The report found that these failures led to the creation of
inaccurate materials that misled both government policy makers and the
American public.
"The Committee's Republican majority and Democratic minority agreed on the
report's major conclusions and unanimously endorsed its findings. They
disagreed, though, on the impact that statements on Iraq by senior members
of the Bush administration had on the intelligence process. A second phase
of the investigation, which was to have addressed the way senior
policymakers used the intelligence, has not yet been completed.
In summary, the Committee found that pre-war intelligence was grossly
inaccurate. The second phase of the investigation, looking at how the
Administration used the faulty intel to sell the war to Congress and the
populace, was stone-walled by the Republicans who controlled the
committee. Now that the Democrats are in power, we may see some actual
investigation being done.
was that Iraq *did* have
WMD and viable programs to manufacture WMD. Indeed, there were
dissenting opinions, but those were *not* the majority opinion before
the war.
Not in the Bush Administration. No. What do you expect.
Not in any administration. Not in the entire world, prior to the war.
It is painfully obvious that Bush decided to go to war first, then went
fishing for the 'evidence' he needed to make it look like an imperative.
Now that his house of cards is collapsing, he can look forward to being
remembered in the history books as the most disasterous President in
history. In fact, I have heard one political commentator observe that GW
Bush seems bent on making Warren G. Harding's Administration look good by
comparison.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
25 Mar 2007 08:40:03 AM |
|
|
MarkA <toor@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:pan.2007.03.25.03.15.28.971258@nowhere.com:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:05:11 +0100, Fred Stone wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:8KOdnXiLAchnpZ7bnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBB5EB61B03freddybear@194.177.96.26...
The *consensus* of the Intelligence Community
To bad they didn't listen to the UN inspectors instead of George
Tenet. Even I knew that Iraq didn't have WMDs. The problem with the
"Intelligence Community" (whatever you mean by that) is that they
only looked at supporting data (regardless whether or not it was
reliable or not) and discounted anything that ran counter to their
mindset.
The books were cooked in order to garner support for the war. If you
can't see that then you're an idiot.
The Senate Intelligence Committee decided otherwise. If you think you
can rewrite history to suit your need to be "right" about being
against the war, you're delusional.
You mean this Committee? This report?:
(from Wikipedia)
"The Senate Report on Iraqi WMD Intelligence (formally, the "Report of
the Select Committee on Intelligence on the U.S. Intelligence
Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq") was the report
by the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
concerning the U.S. intelligence community's assessments of Iraq
during the time leading up to the 2003 U.S. invasion. The report,
which was released on July 9, 2004, identified numerous failures in
the intelligence-gathering and -analysis process. The report found
that these failures led to the creation of inaccurate materials that
misled both government policy makers and the American public.
"The Committee's Republican majority and Democratic minority agreed on
the report's major conclusions and unanimously endorsed its findings.
They disagreed, though, on the impact that statements on Iraq by
senior members of the Bush administration had on the intelligence
process. A second phase of the investigation, which was to have
addressed the way senior policymakers used the intelligence, has not
yet been completed.
Yes, that committee. You'll notice that they don't say that "BUSH LIED".
Oh, and that Wiki entry is old. The second phase was completed, and
laughed out of town for a total partisan whitewash.
In summary, the Committee found that pre-war intelligence was grossly
inaccurate. The second phase of the investigation, looking at how the
Administration used the faulty intel to sell the war to Congress and
the populace, was stone-walled by the Republicans who controlled the
committee. Now that the Democrats are in power, we may see some
actual investigation being done.
The Democrats will be covering up for their intellectual brethren in the
CIA, who ignored all the evidence in favor of their ideological theories
about Iraq. True liberals all.
was that Iraq *did* have
WMD and viable programs to manufacture WMD. Indeed, there were
dissenting opinions, but those were *not* the majority opinion
before the war.
Not in the Bush Administration. No. What do you expect.
Not in any administration. Not in the entire world, prior to the war.
It is painfully obvious that Bush decided to go to war first, then
went fishing for the 'evidence' he needed to make it look like an
imperative. Now that his house of cards is collapsing, he can look
forward to being remembered in the history books as the most
disasterous President in history.
Jimmy Carter will always have that record.
In fact, I have heard one political
commentator observe that GW Bush seems bent on making Warren G.
Harding's Administration look good by comparison.
You mean he didn't compare him to Hitler? How tame!
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: more Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 09:59:46 PM |
|
|
In article <1174582599.138547.212120@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
drdonmartin@comcast.net says...
BEST BUSH BUMPER STICKERS
Also:
Bush bin Lyin
Bush bin Spyin
I didn't vote for the Son of a Bush
Deport Dubai Dubya
Yeehaw is not a foreign policy
Rapture is not an exit strategy
My Cat Is Smarter Than Your President
Bush's Approval Rating Is Getting As Low As His IQ
I'm George W. Bush And I Approved This Mess
The Only Thing Bush Fixes Are Elections
Osama Attack America and All He Got Was Away With It
2 Billion a Week To Kill People. What A Bargain!
Make Levees, Not War
Stand With Democrats or Lie With Bush
G.O.P. (Greedy One Percent)
Draft Republicans
If Liberals Hated America They'd Vote Republican
Bush Is Listening. Use Big Words.
....and for the ladies, some variant of
My Bush Would Make a Better President
At Least My Bush Sheds It's Own Blood
....and the male version
My ***** Would Make a Better Vice President Than Cheney
Plus a blast from the past:
I Don't Care If Nixon's Dead. I Still Want Him Impeached. (W Too).
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Bush bumperstickers |
22 Mar 2007 12:34:12 PM |
|
|
On 22 mrt, 17:56, "Don Martin" <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:
BEST BUSH BUMPER STICKERS
Bush: End of an Error
That's OK, I Wasn't Using My Civil Liberties Anyway
But you are now!
Let's Fix Democracy in This Country First
Good Idea
Get proportional!
If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran
That's what he is planning!
If You Can Read This, You're Not Our President
I'm not
Of Course It Hurts: You're Getting Screwed by an Elephant
Don't blame the elephants, they only invaded soem West-african
villages.
Hey, Bush Supporters: Embarrassed Yet?
I will keep supporting Kate Bush
George Bush: Creating Terrorists for Our Grandkids to Fight
No creation involved
they are evolving into terrorists,
Bush is what we Dutch would call "een terroristenfokker"
Impeachment: It's Not Just for Blowjobs Anymore
For blow up jobs?
America: One Nation, Under Surveillance
But who is surveiling the man with the WMD's
They Call Him "W" So He Can Spell It
He can spell U?
Whose God Do You Kill For?
Somebody owns God?
Jail to the Chief
Like he was a red Indian?
No, Seriously, Why Did We Invade Iraq ?
Because of the oil!
Bush: God's Way of Proving Intelligent Design is *****
I thought that was Microsoft!
We Need a President Who is Fluent in at Least One Language
You don't need one that can talk,
you need one that can listen!
Bush Doesn't Care About White People, Either
Only reds sure!
Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Handbasket?
?!?
You Elected Him. You Deserve Him.
I didn't:)
Impeach Cheney First
Clever thinking!
Stop here, diner is ready
and dinner by a cook as good as my wife
shouldn't be left waiting
Peter van Velzen Daengprasert
March 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Dubya, Your Dad Shoulda Pulled Out, Too
When Bush Took Office, Gas Was $1.46
Pray For Impeachment
The Republican Party: Our Bridge to the 11th Century
What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?
One Nation Under Clod
2004: Embarrassed 2005: Horrified 2006: Terrified
Bush Never Exhaled
At Least Nixon Resigned
Congratulations Osama: Mission Accomplished!
Voted for Bush? Why Do You Hate the U.S.?
Il Buce: He Didn't Make the Trains Run On Time Either
Support Our Troops: Impeach Bush
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
