| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Gregory Gadow" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2005 11:09:27 AM |
| Object: |
OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
White House Says Iraq Weapons Search Over
WASHINGTON - The search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (news -
web sites) has quietly concluded without any evidence of the banned
weapons that President Bush (news - web sites) cited as justification
for going to war, the White House said Wednesday.
The Iraq Survey Group, made up of some 1,200 military and intelligence
specialists and support staff, spent nearly two years searching military
installations, factories and laboratories whose equipment and products
might be converted quickly to making weapons.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said there no longer is an
active search for weapons. "There may be a couple, a few people, that
are focused on that" but that it has largely concluded, he said.
"If they have any reports of (weapons of mass destruction) obviously
they'll continue to follow up on those reports," McClellan said. "A lot
of their mission is focused elsewhere now."
Chief U.S. weapons hunter Charles Duelfer is to deliver his final report
on the search next month. "It's not going to fundamentally alter the
findings of his earlier report," McClellan said, referring to
preliminary findings from last September. Duelfer reported then that
Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) not only had no weapons of mass
destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no
capability of making any either. Bush unapologetically defended his
decision to invade Iraq.
Bush has appointed a panel to investigate why the intelligence about
Iraq's weapons was wrong.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"The President is merely the most important among a large number
of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to
the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct,
his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and
disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is
absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell
the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly
necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when
he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both
base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of
the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or
wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about
him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth,
pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
President Theodore Roosevelt, editorial to the Kansas City Star
May 7, 1918
.
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
12 Jan 2005 11:29:38 AM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
12 Jan 2005 04:07:46 PM |
|
|
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
15 Jan 2005 06:20:47 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns95DC8FED53F68vicman@127.0.0.1>, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
As soon as Bush gets caught getting a *****?
Sean C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
15 Jan 2005 09:02:31 AM |
|
|
In our last episode
<150120050720470486%redhawk@/burnspammersalive/hvc.rr.com>, Sean C lept
out of the bushes shouting:
In article <Xns95DC8FED53F68vicman@127.0.0.1>, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof." Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
As soon as Bush gets caught getting a *****?
Nah, that's okay for a Republican. Only *Democrats are impeached for blow
jobs. Anyway, it'll still be Clinton's fault...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
16 Jan 2005 09:23:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:07:46 -0600, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
Just like the treason trials-never.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
16 Jan 2005 11:47:08 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:23:28 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:07:46 -0600, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
Just like the treason trials-never.
The Republican witch hunt over Clinton showed that impeachment is now
part of the political process, and no longer a trail for "high crimes
and misdemeanours". Anything now goes to try and oust a popular
President that the Republicans don't like.
So Republican-controlled House and Senate won't do it to a Republican
President, no matter how egregious his crimes are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
18 Jan 2005 03:46:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:47:08 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:23:28 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:07:46 -0600, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
Just like the treason trials-never.
The Republican witch hunt over Clinton showed that impeachment is now
part of the political process, and no longer a trail for "high crimes
and misdemeanours". Anything now goes to try and oust a popular
President that the Republicans don't like.
So Republican-controlled House and Senate won't do it to a Republican
President, no matter how egregious his crimes are.
Exactly.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
12 Jan 2005 04:24:07 PM |
|
|
Vic Sagerquist wrote:
on 12 Jan 2005 in alt.atheism, Tukla Ratte dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_r
e_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
Yeah, he had satellite photos of trucks. Everything after that was
speculation, at best.
< snip >
So when do we begin the impeachment procedures?
When there's a Democratic majority in Congress, I guess. If they can be
bothered.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
12 Jan 2005 05:03:09 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:09:27 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net>
said in alt.atheism:
Duelfer reported then that
Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) not only had no weapons of mass
destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no
capability of making any either.
Making the entire invasion a lie.
Bush has appointed a panel to investigate why the intelligence about
Iraq's weapons was wrong.
It wasn't. There was no actual intel that there were WMD.
Shades of _1984_.
--
"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education and social
ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he
had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
-Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
16 Jan 2005 09:24:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:03:09 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:09:27 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net>
said in alt.atheism:
Duelfer reported then that
Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) not only had no weapons of mass
destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no
capability of making any either.
Making the entire invasion a lie.
Bush has appointed a panel to investigate why the intelligence about
Iraq's weapons was wrong.
It wasn't. There was no actual intel that there were WMD.
Shades of _1984_.
Bush; (on Saddam's disarming) "It doesn't matter what he does we're
going to invade anyway." Azores meeting radio comment.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: But... but... he had sattelite photos and everything! |
13 Jan 2005 09:27:56 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:09:27 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote:
So much for his loudly proclaimed "proof."
Given in full from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons
White House Says Iraq Weapons Search Over
WASHINGTON - The search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (news -
web sites) has quietly concluded without any evidence of the banned
weapons that President Bush (news - web sites) cited as justification
for going to war, the White House said Wednesday.
I said, when it all started, that Saddam Hussein , was acting the pratt, that he
had no weapons, but was making it difficult for the inspectors, to provoke a
reaction from America.
They had ***** on him once, under Bush Sn, and he was trying to get even in the
only way left to him, on the world political stage.
I think he was hoping to win a political victory, big powerful America, bullying
honest, defenseless, little Iraq.
He reckoned without the power of stupidity, dishonesty, and fanaticism.
The thing is, even if they hang him, and I am sure the shrub, will push for it,
he has still won.
America, and the UK, are in a state of war, that has all the earmarks of
becoming another Korea, or Nam.
It is costing billions, and not a drop, so far as I can ascertain, of Iraqi oil
is flowing toward America, of the UK, or anywhere else, for that matter, to
help with the cost.
A billion tax payers, are paying for the arrogance and stupidity of two men.
If it was me in Saddam's shoes, I'd be laughing all the way to the gallows.
Personally, I don't think he will ever come to trial. In twenty years or so,
some human rights group will manage to get him released, should he survive so
long, he will disappear into obscurity, and be forgotten.
But he will have cost the west, dearly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
OT: We hate our politicians, but we've never had it so good
Happy Easter - Why Jesus had to die - But why his Resurrection?
If you could make 7 billion dollars, but first you had to kill 3000 people ...
Papa Bush had his own Swift Boat Liars, but Dukakis ignored them....
If you could make 7 billion dollars, but first you had to kill 3000 people ...
Jesus, your services are no longer required. Due to your long period away and your continual promises (to return) that you fail to honour, we have had no choice but to replace you.
If you could make 7 billion dollars, but first you had to kill 3000 people ...
If you could make 7 billion dollars, but first you had to kill 3000 people ...
| Re: [ Slightly off stopic ] But interesting
At sea-level NOBODY has gone faster than 600KPH, but you believe that they reach 1200KPH, don't you?
Re: OT: Ustinov dies, but leaves some resonable quotes
Economists Contradict Kerry's Badmouthing Of America- Economists Optimistic, but Kerry Keeps Attacking Bush's Policies
OT: "But it's just not natural...."
OT: One Nation Indivisible, but Some of It Invisible
Paradise in biblical times, but now more like a hell on Earth
|
|
|
