| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
16 Jan 2005 09:59:34 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
Expect a new, cannier Bush
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1391517,00.html
But don't be fooled by the softer, more accommodating second-term
President. There's still steel in the soul
Will Hutton
Sunday January 16, 2005
The Observer
George Bush's extravagant inauguration this week - in his own mind
nearer to an annunciation - is not what most British and Europeans
wanted. This is a second-term President with the lowest approval
ratings ever at home; they are even lower abroad.
Yet despite everything, from the debacle in Iraq to the tax cuts
directed at the rich, it is Bush, not Kerry, presiding over no less
than 10 inauguration balls and talking reverentially of his mandate,
unsurprisingly, having increased his share of the vote compared to 2000
among almost every category of voter. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Will Hutton
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/a7a67fb555352610
.
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
16 Jan 2005 09:40:09 PM |
|
|
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Tak
a#344
-------------------------------------------------------
Never have I seen such corrupt and foul
minded perversity! Have you ever considered
a career in the church?
"The Bishop of Bath and Wells"
Blackadder,season II
-------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
16 Jan 2005 09:53:09 PM |
|
|
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
17 Jan 2005 04:09:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
19 Jan 2005 03:55:55 PM |
|
|
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
If I was a kneejerk Liberal I might be seen as spouting rhetoric, but
I am not. I was a Republican most of my adult life "I am STILL not
a Democrat" till the Republican party was completely hijacked by the
Christian Right.
I voted every Repub ticket exept Bush 1 and 2 , "I voted Libertarian
and Democrat during those two" , since I first voted for Regan.
Once I was PROUD to be a Republican, Bush and company made it a shame
and an embarassment.
Tak
a#344
-------------------------------------------------------
Never have I seen such corrupt and foul
minded perversity! Have you ever considered
a career in the church?
"The Bishop of Bath and Wells"
Blackadder,season II
-------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
19 Jan 2005 09:33:47 PM |
|
|
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
21 Jan 2005 02:04:48 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
21 Jan 2005 02:46:12 PM |
|
|
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 03:54:59 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 06:50:06 PM |
|
|
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:ZNOdnXg4mPbQ6m_cRVnytg@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
Now you sound like Pastor Dave.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 08:28:41 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:ZNOdnXg4mPbQ6m_cRVnytg@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing to
them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
Now you sound like Pastor Dave.
So what ? It's true enough....you ignored all the 'evidence' about lack
of WMD's in Iraq, and articles about Iraq that I posted. Why play the
same game again with Iran.
You believe whatever ***** that Bush spews forth.....which is your right,
but why should I waste my time arguing with you about the lies being
formed in regard to Iran.
You believe Bush lies over facts...so it's pointless .
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
23 Jan 2005 12:20:09 AM |
|
|
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:auqdnfamvfzuKm_cRVnyhQ@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:ZNOdnXg4mPbQ6m_cRVnytg@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com>
wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing
to them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
Now you sound like Pastor Dave.
So what ? It's true enough....you ignored all the 'evidence' about
lack of WMD's in Iraq, and articles about Iraq that I posted. Why play
the same game again with Iran.
I didn't ignore them, I gave evidence that they're wrong or biased
articles.
You believe whatever ***** that Bush spews forth.....which is your
right, but why should I waste my time arguing with you about the lies
being formed in regard to Iran.
Suit yourself.
You believe Bush lies over facts...so it's pointless .
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as you
can get.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
23 Jan 2005 01:42:32 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:auqdnfamvfzuKm_cRVnyhQ@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:ZNOdnXg4mPbQ6m_cRVnytg@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com>
wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means nothing
to them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you justify
them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
Now you sound like Pastor Dave.
So what ? It's true enough....you ignored all the 'evidence' about
lack of WMD's in Iraq, and articles about Iraq that I posted. Why play
the same game again with Iran.
I didn't ignore them, I gave evidence that they're wrong or biased
articles.
No you just posted right-wing propaganda.
You believe whatever ***** that Bush spews forth.....which is your
right, but why should I waste my time arguing with you about the lies
being formed in regard to Iran.
Suit yourself.
You believe Bush lies over facts...so it's pointless .
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as you
can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
23 Jan 2005 03:58:50 PM |
|
|
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:Zaydnf45VMpcNG7cRVnyuw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:auqdnfamvfzuKm_cRVnyhQ@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:ZNOdnXg4mPbQ6m_cRVnytg@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:-6OdnUjmiZlhlmzcRVnyvw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:t40tu09ln5na1dna013segdtifdk3pqf39@4ax.com:
On 17 Jan 2005 10:09:05 -0600, (Kate )
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com>
wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
LOL, obviously you've never met the slimeballs.
The fact that the areas with Diebold machines are the only ones
where
the exit polls skew wildy from the voting outcomes means
nothing to them......
Mainly because that isn't true.
Show us your *proof*.
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
So you admit that you have no basis for your claims, but you
justify them on the basis that you think *I* made similarly
baseless claims?
No proof is something you ignore. So it's pointless supplying any.
Now you sound like Pastor Dave.
So what ? It's true enough....you ignored all the 'evidence' about
lack of WMD's in Iraq, and articles about Iraq that I posted. Why
play the same game again with Iran.
I didn't ignore them, I gave evidence that they're wrong or biased
articles.
No you just posted right-wing propaganda.
You believe whatever ***** that Bush spews forth.....which is your
right, but why should I waste my time arguing with you about the lies
being formed in regard to Iran.
Suit yourself.
You believe Bush lies over facts...so it's pointless .
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as
you can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
Up your *****, next to your head.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
24 Jan 2005 04:50:14 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:Zaydnf45VMpcNG7cRVnyuw@pipex.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Huge snippage......
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as
you can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
Up your *****, next to your head.
Ahh, not found them then eh ?
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
24 Jan 2005 12:17:39 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:42:32 +0000, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> said in alt.atheism:
Fred Stone wrote:
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as you
can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
Wrong question. Fred is one of those loonies who actually believes
that the WMD are there, and that we have proof.
--
"Christianity has already had the chance to govern
the world according to its own ethical standards.
It was called the "Dark Ages".
- Bill, The Avender
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
24 Jan 2005 04:51:51 AM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:42:32 +0000, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> said in alt.atheism:
Fred Stone wrote:
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as you
can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
Wrong question. Fred is one of those loonies who actually believes
that the WMD are there, and that we have proof.
We do ! We have proof
.............urm.............
................... that they're not there....
Gosh......does that mean Bush lied..........
OK sry trick question...
Hehe.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
24 Jan 2005 02:24:49 PM |
|
|
Jez <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in
news:9e2dnZqusLRC42ncRVnysg@pipex.net:
Al Klein wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:42:32 +0000, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> said in alt.atheism:
Fred Stone wrote:
You believe leftist lies over facts, which is about as pointless as
you can get.
Dear dear, wrong again. Hey...where's those WMD's dude ?
Wrong question. Fred is one of those loonies who actually believes
that the WMD are there, and that we have proof.
We do ! We have proof
............urm.............
.................. that they're not there....
Gosh......does that mean Bush lied..........
OK sry trick question...
Hehe.
Keep it up. The sillier you get the more sure I am that you realize just
how feeble your alleged arguments are.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 05:40:12 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:48 +0000, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> said in alt.atheism:
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
Even when presented with evidence that there were none, Fred still
insisted that they exist.
--
"A truly unselfish act would be a Christian volunteering to have his soul take your
soul's place in hell, so yours could go to Heaven. Don't hold your breath."
- John Popelish
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 06:51:06 PM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:1op3v05g3mt6tvi35mgke86fq16mj5iphi@4ax.com:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:48 +0000, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> said in alt.atheism:
Why ? You never needed proof of WMD's.
Even when presented with evidence that there were none, Fred still
insisted that they exist.
I have presented specific evidence that there were some. Therefore they
*do* exist.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Support bacteria! That's all the culture many people will ever have.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
16 Jan 2005 11:09:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Tak <notanemail@youspambastards.com> wrote in
news:9pnlu0dspihl6ols01luliklqjbdomvs6q@4ax.com:
On 16 Jan 2005 01:59:34 -0800, "maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
. This is one election he didn't
steal.
Diebold.
Hogwash.
WMD insectides
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1362 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
18 Jan 2005 01:35:55 PM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Expect a new, cannier Bush
Whoo ho..does that mean we can now get Bush in a tin ?
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1391517,00.html
But don't be fooled by the softer, more accommodating second-term
President. There's still steel in the soul
What soul ?
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Buck" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Expect a new, cannier Bush |
22 Jan 2005 04:52:41 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:35:55 +0000 in alt.atheism, Jez
<iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> defied the status quo and scrawled
upon the toilet stall:
maff wrote:
Expect a new, cannier Bush
Whoo ho..does that mean we can now get Bush in a tin ?
I think it means it will be more obvious that his speeches are read to
him and 100% written by Karl Rove. You know, "canned speech" like
"canned laughter" - pre-fab.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1391517,00.html
But don't be fooled by the softer, more accommodating second-term
President. There's still steel in the soul
What soul ?
What softer, more accommodating 2nd-term President?
--
L8r,
Uncle Buck
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
