| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"desertphile@hot mail. com Desertphile, American Patriot" |
| Date: |
26 Mar 2005 12:40:37 PM |
| Object: |
[OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails,
both angry and complimentary _ as well as a few death threats.
"Apparently the making of terroristic threats against those who
don't share your views is a high art form among a certain core
audience," said Kimery, 45.
Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain, Kimery
became an independent in the 1990s when he said the state party
stopped taking input from its everyday members.
Kimery now contends Fox News' top-level management dictates a
conservative journalistic bias, that inaccuracies are never
retracted, and what winds up on the air is more opinion than news.
"I might as well be reading tabloids out of the grocery store," he
says.
"Anything to get a rise out of the viewer and to reinforce certain
retrograde notions."
A Fox spokeswoman at the station's New York headquarters said the
channel's ratings speak for themselves.
For the first three months of this year, Fox has been averaging
1.62 million viewers in prime-time, compared with CNN's 805,000,
according to Nielsen Media Research.
Kimery's motives go deeper than preventing people from watching
the channel, which he acknowledges can be done without the
Blocker.
But he likens his device to burning a draft card, a tangible
example of disagreement.
And he's taking this message to the network's advertisers.
After buying the $8.95 device online, would-be blockers are shown
a letter that they can send to advertisers via the Fox Blocker
site.
"The point is not to block the channel or block free speech but to
raise awareness," said Kimery, who works in the tech industry.
Kimery doesn't use the device himself; his remote is programmed to
only a half-dozen channels.
Plus he occasionally feels the need to tune into Fox News for
something "especially heinous."
Business could pick up since the blocker was alluded to in a
recent episode of the ABC drama "Boston Legal."
The show's original script mentioned Fox News, but ABC had the
references removed.
Fox Blocker: http://www.foxblocker.com
---
http://lastliberal.org
Free random & sequential signature changer http://holysmoke.org/sig
"It's a fool's life, a rogue's life, and a good life if you keep laughing
all the way to the grave." -- Edward Abbey
.
|
|
| User: "John Hearsey" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 01:13:38 PM |
|
|
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo
80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels (though
with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would want to) are the
same people who vote for your Democratic party or our Lib Dems. God help us
all if they reproduce at a greater than the rest of us.
--
John Hearsey
aa1886
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 02:10:54 PM |
|
|
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in
message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or our
Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than the
rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news that
hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might explode from
cognitive dissonance.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 02:53:58 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in
message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or our
Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than the
rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news that
hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might explode from
cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television. If there were a liberal
media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's heads explode
from cognitive dissonance.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south to
you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to you.)
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the free
market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 03:58:17 PM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in
message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or
our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than
the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news that
hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might explode
from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major network
news, and even they get mighty selective about saying anything good
about Republican issues.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's heads
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south to
you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their brains
running out their ears.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 04:04:41 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in
message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or
our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than
the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news that
hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might explode
from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
If you think CBS is "partisan Democratic propaganda", then you obviously
do not know what "partisan Democratic propaganda" is.
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major network
news, and even they get mighty selective about saying anything good
about Republican issues.
I don't watch PBS's news hour so I can't comment.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's heads
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. You don't.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
Because it's incorrect. If I said "Funny how conservatives hate to be
identified as money-grubbing, big-corporation, Christofascists hate to
be identified as such", you'd say that that'd be incorrect. This is
what you're doing to us. You are building a strawman and then attacking
that strawman. Liberals are NOT what you think they are.
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south to
you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their brains
running out their ears.
I watch Fox News all the time. My brains are not running out of my
ears. I do get to yell at the TV, though, which is fun. :-) If you
want to hear _REAL_ liberal media, turn on Air America. Go on, I dare
you. ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 05:36:20 PM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:-JKdnYE1-bPsQdjfRVn-hA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote
in message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or
our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than
the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news
that hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
If you think CBS is "partisan Democratic propaganda", then you
obviously do not know what "partisan Democratic propaganda" is.
I know what got Dan Rather to resign in disgrace, and it wasn't being
"fair and balanced".
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major
network news, and even they get mighty selective about saying
anything good about Republican issues.
I don't watch PBS's news hour so I can't comment.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's
heads explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. You don't.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
Because it's incorrect. If I said "Funny how conservatives hate to be
identified as money-grubbing, big-corporation, Christofascists hate to
be identified as such", you'd say that that'd be incorrect. This is
what you're doing to us. You are building a strawman and then
attacking that strawman. Liberals are NOT what you think they are.
Talk about strawmen, what do you think I think you are?
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south
to you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to
you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their
brains running out their ears.
I watch Fox News all the time. My brains are not running out of my
ears.
You sure about that?
I do get to yell at the TV, though, which is fun. :-) If you
want to hear _REAL_ liberal media, turn on Air America. Go on, I dare
you. ;-)
I can get all I can stand of that right here on alt.atheism.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 05:50:18 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:-JKdnYE1-bPsQdjfRVn-hA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote
in message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or
our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than
the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news
that hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
If you think CBS is "partisan Democratic propaganda", then you
obviously do not know what "partisan Democratic propaganda" is.
I know what got Dan Rather to resign in disgrace, and it wasn't being
"fair and balanced".
Sorry, but Dan Rather was disgraced not because of the story he did, but
because he became the scapegoat of years of perceived "liberal media
bias". It culminated in a story that is still true but disgraced the
long career of a seasoned reporter. I do hope you guys are satisifed
for destroying this man because he was doing his JOB.
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major
network news, and even they get mighty selective about saying
anything good about Republican issues.
I don't watch PBS's news hour so I can't comment.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's
heads explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. You don't.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
Because it's incorrect. If I said "Funny how conservatives hate to be
identified as money-grubbing, big-corporation, Christofascists hate to
be identified as such", you'd say that that'd be incorrect. This is
what you're doing to us. You are building a strawman and then
attacking that strawman. Liberals are NOT what you think they are.
Talk about strawmen, what do you think I think you are?
Then, what are you saying by "Funny how libruls hate so much to be
identified as such"? Please let me know is clear, concise terms so that
I can apologize if you think differently than I think you do.
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south
to you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to
you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their
brains running out their ears.
I watch Fox News all the time. My brains are not running out of my
ears.
You sure about that?
Yes.
I do get to yell at the TV, though, which is fun. :-) If you
want to hear _REAL_ liberal media, turn on Air America. Go on, I dare
you. ;-)
I can get all I can stand of that right here on alt.atheism.
What? You don't want more? Afraid YOUR brains are going to run out
your ears?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 06:03:36 PM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:7KqdnbmkzfKuaNjfRVn-sA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:-JKdnYE1-bPsQdjfRVn-hA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote
in message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not
news at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August
debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone
would want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic
party or our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a
greater than the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news
that hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
If you think CBS is "partisan Democratic propaganda", then you
obviously do not know what "partisan Democratic propaganda" is.
I know what got Dan Rather to resign in disgrace, and it wasn't being
"fair and balanced".
Sorry, but Dan Rather was disgraced not because of the story he did,
but because he became the scapegoat of years of perceived "liberal
media bias". It culminated in a story that is still true but
disgraced the long career of a seasoned reporter. I do hope you guys
are satisifed for destroying this man because he was doing his JOB.
He destroyed himself. Knowingly or not, he ran with a story based on
pure disinformation from *obviously* forged documents.
Thanks for admitting that his JOB was to disseminate Democratic
disinformation and propaganda.
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major
network news, and even they get mighty selective about saying
anything good about Republican issues.
I don't watch PBS's news hour so I can't comment.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's
heads explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. You don't.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what
"left wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
Because it's incorrect. If I said "Funny how conservatives hate to
be identified as money-grubbing, big-corporation, Christofascists
hate to be identified as such", you'd say that that'd be incorrect.
This is what you're doing to us. You are building a strawman and
then attacking that strawman. Liberals are NOT what you think they
are.
Talk about strawmen, what do you think I think you are?
Then, what are you saying by "Funny how libruls hate so much to be
identified as such"? Please let me know is clear, concise terms so
that I can apologize if you think differently than I think you do.
You first.
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south
to you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to
you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their
brains running out their ears.
I watch Fox News all the time. My brains are not running out of my
ears.
You sure about that?
Yes.
I do get to yell at the TV, though, which is fun. :-) If you
want to hear _REAL_ liberal media, turn on Air America. Go on, I
dare you. ;-)
I can get all I can stand of that right here on alt.atheism.
What? You don't want more? Afraid YOUR brains are going to run out
your ears?
No, it gets old after a while. Same reason I don't hang out at my
mother's church.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 06:37:43 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:7KqdnbmkzfKuaNjfRVn-sA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:-JKdnYE1-bPsQdjfRVn-hA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:iJqdnYM7CZxCVtjfRVn-ug@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote
in message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not
news at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August
debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone
would want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic
party or our Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a
greater than the rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news
that hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might
explode from cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television.
CBS is nothing but partisan Democratic propaganda.
If you think CBS is "partisan Democratic propaganda", then you
obviously do not know what "partisan Democratic propaganda" is.
I know what got Dan Rather to resign in disgrace, and it wasn't being
"fair and balanced".
Sorry, but Dan Rather was disgraced not because of the story he did,
but because he became the scapegoat of years of perceived "liberal
media bias". It culminated in a story that is still true but
disgraced the long career of a seasoned reporter. I do hope you guys
are satisifed for destroying this man because he was doing his JOB.
He destroyed himself. Knowingly or not, he ran with a story based on
pure disinformation from *obviously* forged documents.
So, he was destroyed by doing what Bush has done for the past 4 years:
Operated on "bad information".
Thanks for admitting that his JOB was to disseminate Democratic
disinformation and propaganda.
Sorry, but the story was not disinformation. Even if the memos
themselves were forgeries, the _information_ they contained was
accurate. Has there been ANYONE to stand up and admit they were with
Bush throughout his ANG tour?
Gosh, even the SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH admitted they were with
John Kerry in Vietname. Where are the "Air National Guardsmen for Truth"?
PBS "News Hour" is probably the best balanced of all the major
network news, and even they get mighty selective about saying
anything good about Republican issues.
I don't watch PBS's news hour so I can't comment.
If there were a
liberal media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's
heads explode from cognitive dissonance.
Naw, we've got natural resistance from all the years of ABCNBCCBS.
Trust me. You don't.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what
"left wing" actually is!
Funny how libruls hate so much to be identified as such.
Because it's incorrect. If I said "Funny how conservatives hate to
be identified as money-grubbing, big-corporation, Christofascists
hate to be identified as such", you'd say that that'd be incorrect.
This is what you're doing to us. You are building a strawman and
then attacking that strawman. Liberals are NOT what you think they
are.
Talk about strawmen, what do you think I think you are?
Then, what are you saying by "Funny how libruls hate so much to be
identified as such"? Please let me know is clear, concise terms so
that I can apologize if you think differently than I think you do.
You first.
No. You made the claim "Funny how libruls..." Please explain yourself.
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south
to you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to
you.)
Frankly, FOX News mostly bores me to tears.
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the
free market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Hey, I'm all for it. I'd hate to see all those libruls with their
brains running out their ears.
I watch Fox News all the time. My brains are not running out of my
ears.
You sure about that?
Yes.
I do get to yell at the TV, though, which is fun. :-) If you
want to hear _REAL_ liberal media, turn on Air America. Go on, I
dare you. ;-)
I can get all I can stand of that right here on alt.atheism.
What? You don't want more? Afraid YOUR brains are going to run out
your ears?
No, it gets old after a while. Same reason I don't hang out at my
mother's church.
The old "CBSNBCABCCNN Liberal Media Bias" claim gets old after a while, too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 07:33:25 PM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:A8ednQtE3tzSndvfRVn-jw@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:7KqdnbmkzfKuaNjfRVn-sA@comcast.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
<snip-a-dee-doo-dah>
He destroyed himself. Knowingly or not, he ran with a story based on
pure disinformation from *obviously* forged documents.
So, he was destroyed by doing what Bush has done for the past 4 years:
Operated on "bad information".
Bush at least has corrected his course when it became obvious that he
had been misled. Not that we could pull out of Iraq once we proved that
they didn't have the stockpiles of WMD that we expected to find.
Thanks for admitting that his JOB was to disseminate Democratic
disinformation and propaganda.
Sorry, but the story was not disinformation. Even if the memos
themselves were forgeries, the _information_ they contained was
accurate.
Not a bit of it. The content was just as bogus as the type font.
Has there been ANYONE to stand up and admit they were with
Bush throughout his ANG tour?
Yes, as a matter of fact, they have. In considerable detail, in the
"right-wing" press where you lefties just handwave it away.
Gosh, even the SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH admitted they were with
John Kerry in Vietname. Where are the "Air National Guardsmen for
Truth"?
Buried by the same media that attacked the Swifties with such fury when
they exposed Kerry's ***** claims about Vietnam and his subsequent
actions in the anti-war movement.
<el snippo>
Then, what are you saying by "Funny how libruls hate so much to be
identified as such"? Please let me know is clear, concise terms so
that I can apologize if you think differently than I think you do.
You first.
No. You made the claim "Funny how libruls..." Please explain
yourself.
You reflexively oppose anything Republican, whether it makes sense or
not. You spout Democratic talking points, even when a basic fact-check
in published reports shows that it's disinformation. It's like you can't
think for yourself or remember anything from six months ago, much less
all the way back to the public debate before the Iraq invasion.
And spare me the reflexive "your mama too".
Even when the Dems have held substantially similar positions in the
past, anything that Reps propose is automatically evil.
Does "Anybody But Bush" sound familiar to you, maybe?
<snippy snippy snip>
No, it gets old after a while. Same reason I don't hang out at my
mother's church.
The old "CBSNBCABCCNN Liberal Media Bias" claim gets old after a
while, too.
So does the "you live with Fox News" claim.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
29 Mar 2005 12:35:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:53:58 -0800, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
"John Hearsey" <JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
news:d24c85$ee$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in
message news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d
8
92auo 80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels
(though with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would
want to) are the same people who vote for your Democratic party or our
Lib Dems. God help us all if they reproduce at a greater than the
rest of us.
Goodness knows, if, just by chance, they happen to hear any news that
hasn't been filtered by the liberal media their heads might explode from
cognitive dissonance.
Which of course, does not exist on television. If there were a liberal
media outlet on television, it'd make the conservative's heads explode
from cognitive dissonance.
Trust me. If you think CNN is "left wing", you don't know what "left
wing" actually is!
(Of course, when you live on the north pole, everything looks south to
you, and when you live with Fox News, everything looks left to you.)
Personally, I find the Fox Blocker hilarious. This guy's using the free
market to make a buck! You righties should be proud!
Phelching Phred's a brainless and dickless fool. I was LMAO at the
blocker myself. Three cheers for the gent! As he indicates, the unit
isn't necessary other than to make a point.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 04:34:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:13:38 -0000, "John Hearsey"
<JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo
80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels (though
with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would want to) are the
same people who vote for your Democratic party or our Lib Dems. God help us
all if they reproduce at a greater than the rest of us.
Obviously the whole point (and the article actually outright stated it
for the dummies) all went over your head.
No surprise there.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
29 Mar 2005 12:43:30 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:13:38 -0000, "John Hearsey"
<JHtest@testzolien.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo
80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
Bet these people who are too stupid to select other news channels (though
with Fox News being the best I don't know why anyone would want to) are the
same people who vote for your Democratic party or our Lib Dems. God help us
all if they reproduce at a greater than the rest of us.
Stupid people like you do reproduce at a greater rate.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 12:19:51 AM |
|
|
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
When I had cable, I used my TV's built-in featers to eliminate Fox, QVC,
Home Shopping Network and other worthless channels from my channel list.
.
|
|
|
| User: "desertphile@hot mail. com Desertphile, American Patriot" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 08:43:45 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:19:51 -0800, "Peacenik"
<criskity999@com999cast.removeallnines.net> wrote:
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
When I had cable, I used my TV's built-in featers to
eliminate Fox, QVC, Home Shopping Network and other
worthless channels from my channel list.
Indeed: most intelligent people do. Apparently point of the "FOX
Buster" is to buy one and then tell KFOX one has done so, and also
write to the top ten KFOX advertisers telling them one has done
so.
The problem with blocking out worthless channels is, one ends up
with no channels to watch. (I put a .45 bullet through my TV six
or seven years ago, and would do it again at the least or no
provocation). Even the allegedly "science" channels have gone to
crap--- pandering and catering to "NewAge" (rhymes with "Sewage")
*****.
People who watch FOX "news" are dangerous in a democracy such as
the USA is supposed to be. A democracy cannot survive the
disinformation campaign FOX "news" exists to inflict upon the
country.
---
http://lastliberal.org
Free random & sequential signature changer http://holysmoke.org/sig
"Zen: the sound of the ax chopping. Chopping logic." -- Edward Abbey
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 11:27:34 AM |
|
|
People who watch FOX "news" are dangerous in a democracy such as
the USA is supposed to be. A democracy cannot survive the
disinformation campaign FOX "news" exists to inflict upon the
country.
Should the government ban it? Perhaps as part of the "anti-terrorism"
effort?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 07:34:21 PM |
|
|
On 28 Mar 2005 09:27:34 -0800, wrote:
People who watch FOX "news" are dangerous in a democracy such as
the USA is supposed to be. A democracy cannot survive the
disinformation campaign FOX "news" exists to inflict upon the
country.
Should the government ban it? Perhaps as part of the "anti-terrorism"
effort?
It would be a lot more effective than any move they've made so far.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 10:56:22 PM |
|
|
People who watch FOX "news" are dangerous in a democracy such as
the USA is supposed to be. A democracy cannot survive the
disinformation campaign FOX "news" exists to inflict upon the
country.
Should the government ban it? Perhaps as part of the
"anti-terrorism"
effort?
It would be a lot more effective than any move they've made so far.
It might keep people from panicing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 04:30:31 PM |
|
|
<desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot)> wrote in message
news:3alolgF6aun6pU3@individual.net...
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2005/03/26/ap/entertainment/d892auo80.txt
Man Sells Device That Blocks Fox News
By EMILY FREDRIX
It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox
News.
The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends the channel is not news
at all.
Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of
metal that screw into the back of most televisions, allowing
people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.
The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails,
both angry and complimentary _ as well as a few death threats.
"Apparently the making of terroristic threats against those who
don't share your views is a high art form among a certain core
audience," said Kimery, 45.
Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain, Kimery
became an independent in the 1990s when he said the state party
stopped taking input from its everyday members.
Kimery now contends Fox News' top-level management dictates a
conservative journalistic bias, that inaccuracies are never
retracted, and what winds up on the air is more opinion than news.
"I might as well be reading tabloids out of the grocery store," he
says.
"Anything to get a rise out of the viewer and to reinforce certain
retrograde notions."
A Fox spokeswoman at the station's New York headquarters said the
channel's ratings speak for themselves.
For the first three months of this year, Fox has been averaging
1.62 million viewers in prime-time, compared with CNN's 805,000,
according to Nielsen Media Research.
Kimery's motives go deeper than preventing people from watching
the channel, which he acknowledges can be done without the
Blocker.
But he likens his device to burning a draft card, a tangible
example of disagreement.
And he's taking this message to the network's advertisers.
After buying the $8.95 device online, would-be blockers are shown
a letter that they can send to advertisers via the Fox Blocker
site.
"The point is not to block the channel or block free speech but to
raise awareness," said Kimery, who works in the tech industry.
Kimery doesn't use the device himself; his remote is programmed to
only a half-dozen channels.
Plus he occasionally feels the need to tune into Fox News for
something "especially heinous."
Business could pick up since the blocker was alluded to in a
recent episode of the ABC drama "Boston Legal."
The show's original script mentioned Fox News, but ABC had the
references removed.
Fox Blocker: http://www.foxblocker.com
The reason most people watch Fox news has nothing to do with politics. It's
becuase the other news channels show more useless crap like celebrity junk
to try to get people to buy more corporate owned entertainment. Also the
other channels have no agenda and hence no motivation to show a lot of news.
because Fox has an agenda they show more news instead of feel-good
entertainment just geared to sell products and get your money. The product
Fox sells is conservatism to get money for the fascists, but at least that
makes for more coverage of actual news.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 01:14:54 AM |
|
|
The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails,
both angry and complimentary _ as well as a few death threats.
This might be true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
29 Mar 2005 01:11:23 PM |
|
|
On 27 Mar 2005 23:14:54 -0800, wrote:
The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails,
both angry and complimentary _ as well as a few death threats.
This might be true.
90+% probability.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
29 Mar 2005 05:03:49 PM |
|
|
The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails,
both angry and complimentary _ as well as a few death threats.
This might be true.
90+% probability.
I just don't see very many people getting too worked up over the issue
of someone not watching Fox News. But it takes all types I guess.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 01:08:00 AM |
|
|
I'm 100% in favor of people's right not to watch Fox or any other news
outlet. I'm also in favor of their having the right to watch them if
they want to. I'm also in favor of TV networks, radio networks,
newspapers, etc. to be as biased or unbiased as they want to be without
the government telling them what to say or threatening to take away
their right to broadcast or publish.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quaoar" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 08:36:01 AM |
|
|
wrote:
I'm 100% in favor of people's right not to watch Fox or any other news
outlet. I'm also in favor of their having the right to watch them if
they want to. I'm also in favor of TV networks, radio networks,
newspapers, etc. to be as biased or unbiased as they want to be
without the government telling them what to say or threatening to
take away their right to broadcast or publish.
Apparently, the Rice brothers have a television with only one channel or
the tuner knob has fallen off or perhaps they channel Fox News. With
their foil hats one would think that FNC would be blocked, but we know
that the Enemies of the State have very mysterious and powerful beam
antennas that can penetrate their electro-magnetic protection because
Barbara says so.
Q
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 08:35:43 PM |
|
|
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote:
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm 100% in favor of people's right not to watch Fox or any other news
outlet. I'm also in favor of their having the right to watch them if
they want to. I'm also in favor of TV networks, radio networks,
newspapers, etc. to be as biased or unbiased as they want to be
without the government telling them what to say or threatening to
take away their right to broadcast or publish.
Apparently, the Rice brothers have a television with only one channel or
the tuner knob has fallen off or perhaps they channel Fox News.
<rofl!> Apparently Shydavid was mistaken when he suggested that you're
not an *****. <smile>
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
Scientology murder: http://PerkinsTragedy.org
Improving the herd: http://www.rightard.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: KFOX "News" Blocker |
29 Mar 2005 01:10:30 PM |
|
|
On 27 Mar 2005 23:08:00 -0800, wrote:
I'm 100% in favor of people's right not to watch Fox or any other news
outlet. I'm also in favor of their having the right to watch them if
they want to. I'm also in favor of TV networks, radio networks,
newspapers, etc. to be as biased or unbiased as they want to be without
the government telling them what to say or threatening to take away
their right to broadcast or publish.
As is the developer of the blocker.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Quaoar" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
26 Mar 2005 02:01:16 PM |
|
|
desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot) wrote:
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
Explain to me and other readers how these completely off-topic posting
of yours differ in any meaningful way from the typical blatherings of
babz swartz, truthseeker, or even the sporge of a few years ago.
Use as much space as you deem necessary for your explanation.
Q
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
27 Mar 2005 05:23:09 PM |
|
|
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote:
desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot) wrote:
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
Explain to me and other readers how these completely off-topic posting
of yours differ in any meaningful way from the typical blatherings of
babz swartz, truthseeker, or even the sporge of a few years ago.
Well for one thing, you're an *****.
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
Scientology murder: http://PerkinsTragedy.org
Improving the herd: http://www.rightard.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Quaoar" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
27 Mar 2005 09:02:18 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote:
desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot) wrote:
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
Explain to me and other readers how these completely off-topic
posting of yours differ in any meaningful way from the typical
blatherings of babz swartz, truthseeker, or even the sporge of a few
years ago.
Well for one thing, you're an *****.
Nicely intellectualized.
Q
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: [OT] KFOX "News" Blocker |
28 Mar 2005 08:06:29 AM |
|
|
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.net> wrote:
desertphile@hot mail. com (Desertphile, American Patriot) wrote:
From The Rapid City Journal, 3/26/05:
Explain to me and other readers how these completely off-topic
posting of yours differ in any meaningful way from the typical
blatherings of babz swartz, truthseeker, or even the sporge of a few
years ago.
Well for one thing, you're an *****.
Nicely intellectualized.
You're welcome. If there's any other assistance I may provide, please
do let me know, won't you? Thanks.
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
Scientology murder: http://PerkinsTragedy.org
Improving the herd: http://www.rightard.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
