| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
11 Feb 2005 06:33:19 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?pagewanted=all&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was convicted on
all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
Lynne Stewart
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/cfa40615263810c5
Terror
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/ebbc7048bb8eb79c
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
12 Feb 2005 12:54:10 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?pagewanted=all&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was convicted on
all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
This is very reminiscent of the Salem witch hunts: Anyone who
defends someone accused of being a witch must be a witch.
Then again, Shrub is the Texas governor who halved the money
allotted to defence lawyers in capital murder cases on the
argument that the state shouldn't waste money protecting
murderers.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
12 Feb 2005 10:54:17 AM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1108191250.718301.155510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?
pagewanted=al
l&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was convicted on
all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
This is very reminiscent of the Salem witch hunts: Anyone who
defends someone accused of being a witch must be a witch.
You should pay more attention to thed details of the case. She wasn't
charged with defending terrorists, she was caught red-handed discussing
how to pass information about terrorist attacks.
Then again, Shrub is the Texas governor who halved the money
allotted to defence lawyers in capital murder cases on the
argument that the state shouldn't waste money protecting
murderers.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Seems like the administration made their case on this one.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
14 Feb 2005 08:55:00 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
bg12345@apexmail.com wrote in
news:1108191250.718301.155510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?
pagewanted=al
l&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was convicted
on
all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
This is very reminiscent of the Salem witch hunts: Anyone who
defends someone accused of being a witch must be a witch.
You should pay more attention to thed details of the case. She wasn't
charged with defending terrorists, she was caught red-handed
discussing
how to pass information about terrorist attacks.
The Rovestag said the same things about James Yee.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Seems like the administration made their case on this one.
Just like those WMDs, n'estce pas?
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
14 Feb 2005 09:11:09 AM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1108392900.896022.76410@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote in
news:1108191250.718301.155510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?
pagewanted=al
l&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was convicted
on all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
This is very reminiscent of the Salem witch hunts: Anyone who
defends someone accused of being a witch must be a witch.
You should pay more attention to thed details of the case. She wasn't
charged with defending terrorists, she was caught red-handed
discussing how to pass information about terrorist attacks.
The Rovestag said the same things about James Yee.
Non Sequitur.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Seems like the administration made their case on this one.
Just like those WMDs, n'estce pas?
Non Sequitur.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
15 Feb 2005 08:44:03 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
bg12345@apexmail.com wrote in
news:1108392900.896022.76410@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
bg12345@apexmail.com wrote in
news:1108191250.718301.155510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?
pagewanted=al
l&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was
convicted
on all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
You should pay more attention to thed details of the case. She
wasn't
charged with defending terrorists, she was caught red-handed
discussing how to pass information about terrorist attacks.
The Rovestag said the same things about James Yee.
Non Sequitur.
My pointing out that two lawyers were falsely accused of the
same crime is a "non sequitur". Riiiight.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Seems like the administration made their case on this one.
Just like those WMDs, n'estce pas?
Non Sequitur.
Pointing out the pattern of lying by the Shrub regime is a
"non sequitur". Riiiight.
Fraud, you haven't the stones to stand up and admit the facts.
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
15 Feb 2005 09:02:59 AM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1108478643.678700.292880@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote in
news:1108392900.896022.76410@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote in
news:1108191250.718301.155510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
maff wrote:
Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/nyregion/11stewart.html?
pagewanted=al
l&position=
By JULIA PRESTON
In a startlingly sweeping verdict, Lynne F. Stewart was
convicted
on all five counts of providing material aid to terrorism.
You should pay more attention to thed details of the case. She
wasn't charged with defending terrorists, she was caught
red-handed discussing how to pass information about terrorist
attacks.
The Rovestag said the same things about James Yee.
Non Sequitur.
My pointing out that two lawyers were falsely accused of the
same crime is a "non sequitur". Riiiight.
Yes, that's a non sequitur.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
Seems like the administration made their case on this one.
Just like those WMDs, n'estce pas?
Non Sequitur.
Pointing out the pattern of lying by the Shrub regime is a
"non sequitur". Riiiight.
Yes, that's a non sequitur.
Fraud, you haven't the stones to stand up and admit the facts.
Doggie, you ain't got no facts.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Lawyer Is Guilty of Aiding Terror |
14 Feb 2005 12:19:22 AM |
|
|
On 11 Feb 2005 22:54:10 -0800, said in
alt.atheism:
"Innocent until proven guilty" is such a quaint notion.
In Texas it was guilty even if proven innocent in at least one case.
--
rukbat at verizon dot net
If you are open to the point of gullibility and have not an
ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish
the useful ideas from the worthless ones
- Carl Sagan, 1987.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
