| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mark K. Bilbo" |
| Date: |
18 Feb 2005 11:30:44 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Look out Gannon! |
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=14843
"The Bush administration said yesterday it would seek to reinstate an
indictment against a California pornography business that was charged with
violating federal obscenity laws."
(Huh? Whaddya mean they won't prosecute Gannon for obscenity??? You don't
mean the White House is *hypocritical do you???)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
18 Feb 2005 11:50:08 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what? It seems like the last three have tried to outdo one
another in how they can dismantle the Constitution.
Hopefully, with the imperial overreach of BushCo, the US Government
finally implodes like with Rome and the Soviets. It's probably our
only hope.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=14843
"The Bush administration said yesterday it would seek to reinstate an
indictment against a California pornography business that was charged
with
violating federal obscenity laws."
(Huh? Whaddya mean they won't prosecute Gannon for obscenity??? You
don't
mean the White House is *hypocritical do you???)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 01:20:26 PM |
|
|
On 18 Feb 2005 09:50:08 -0800, "Rump Ranger" <buttpirate@fadmail.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
You must be too young to remember Ed Meese.
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what?
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 02:57:00 PM |
|
|
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:824f11tufpupbbtbk5bn0pii4929kmv2vl@4ax.com:
On 18 Feb 2005 09:50:08 -0800, "Rump Ranger" <buttpirate@fadmail.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I
thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
You must be too young to remember Ed Meese.
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what?
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 05:10:33 PM |
|
|
Le Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Re. Elian: why do you hate family values so much? Why do you want to
deprive a child from his only living parent?
Re. Waco: why do you give a ***** about a bunch of fucknuts? Should'nt we
all be happy that they all went straight to that wonderful afterlife place
they kept dreaming about when they were alive?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 05:44:09 PM |
|
|
Divin Marquis <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:pan.2005.02.19.23.10.33.213370@127.0.0.1:
Le Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Re. Elian: why do you hate family values so much? Why do you want to
deprive a child from his only living parent?
If you believe that he is in his father's custody, you obviously haven't
watched any of the followup programs about him.
Re. Waco: why do you give a ***** about a bunch of fucknuts? Should'nt
we all be happy that they all went straight to that wonderful
afterlife place they kept dreaming about when they were alive?
Why *don't* you give a ***** about a bunch of fucknuts? Don't they have
the same civil rights that you cry about?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
21 Feb 2005 09:04:06 AM |
|
|
Le Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:44:09 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
Why *don't* you give a ***** about a bunch of fucknuts? Don't they have the
same civil rights that you cry about?
I'm just being facetious, if that wasn't obvious to you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 08:17:02 PM |
|
|
Divin Marquis wrote:
Le Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000, Fred Stone a =E9crit :
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Re. Elian: why do you hate family values so much? Why do you want to
deprive a child from his only living parent?
That isn't the point. What she ordered was a bunch of armed thugs in
military suits to come and point their weapons at a 6 year old kid's
*face.* It could have been handled better.
Re. Waco: why do you give a ***** about a bunch of fucknuts? Should'nt
we
all be happy that they all went straight to that wonderful afterlife
place
they kept dreaming about when they were alive?
So you don't mind the US burning it's own citizens (including children)
alive because they have eccentric beliefs? Atheist or not, you're just
as bad as any religious fundamentalist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 05:13:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:824f11tufpupbbtbk5bn0pii4929kmv2vl@4ax.com:
On 18 Feb 2005 09:50:08 -0800, "Rump Ranger" <buttpirate@fadmail.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I
thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
You must be too young to remember Ed Meese.
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what?
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who was
closest living relative. When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but peaceably
removed him. If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign governments
would do exactly the same?
The execution of the search warrant in Waco was obviously planned long
before Reno came into office. If the whakos of Wako were peaceful
civilians instead of heavily armed militant religious fanatics, the
incident would have been uneventful. I am not saying that the
government forces handled the situation well - clearly it was botched.
I am only saying that the Davidians must bear the primary
responsibility for the violence and, in any event, it wasn't Janet
Reno's fault.
During the siege itself, the Davidians could have surrendered
peacefully at any time and submitted themselves to civil authority.
They certainly could have released the children but that is not what
they were about. These were irrational religious fanatics devoted to
the apocalyptic visions of a charismatic leader with a messiah
complex. They believed that everything that was happening was
preordained by God and that the final outcome involved their
martyrdom. This was not a recipe for a happy outcome. The government
chose to invade rather than wait them out. It is far from certain
that waiting would have produced a better result. At worst the ATF
was guilty of bad judgement and/or negligence.
from: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20000718_wisenberg.html
(a legal analysis website) here are some comments on the civil case
against the feds. The jury completely exonerated the government.
-- quote --
Indeed, the testimony established that the ATF agents, rather than
Koresh and his followers, were taken by surprise and pinned down under
heavy fire with limited ammunition. Under these circumstances, it
seems fair to assume that the jury was not all that bothered by the
possibility that some ATF gunfire indiscriminately raked the second
story windows of the compound. Most Americans, no matter how skeptical
they may be of the law enforcement community, are not willing to let
their fellow citizens choose which warrants to accept or reject --
especially when that rejection is accompanied by machine gun fire.
The government's evidence as to who started the fires on April 19 was
similarly devastating. In addition to expert testimony that the
Davidians were responsible for setting the fires, FBI-installed
listening devices recorded sect members joking about becoming
"charcoal briquettes" and contemplating "catching fire" a day before
the compound was destroyed. And on the day of the fire, the listening
devices recorded the chilling commands to "spread the fuel" and "light
the torch." Given the Davidian involvement in starting and spreading
the fire, it is not surprising that the advisory jury absolved the
government on this question.
- unquote -
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 05:49:15 PM |
|
|
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:824f11tufpupbbtbk5bn0pii4929kmv2vl@4ax.com:
On 18 Feb 2005 09:50:08 -0800, "Rump Ranger"
<buttpirate@fadmail.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I
thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
You must be too young to remember Ed Meese.
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what?
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who was
closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but peaceably
removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign governments
would do exactly the same?
If he was brought "back" to America, he'd be coming to a free country.
You can't say that about Cuba.
The execution of the search warrant in Waco was obviously planned long
before Reno came into office. If the whakos of Wako were peaceful
civilians instead of heavily armed militant religious fanatics, the
incident would have been uneventful. I am not saying that the
government forces handled the situation well - clearly it was botched.
I am only saying that the Davidians must bear the primary
responsibility for the violence and, in any event, it wasn't Janet
Reno's fault.
I guess it's OK for the Feds to use all the force at their disposal as
long as the victims are whackos? That sounds like something you'd
attribute to a "neocon".
During the siege itself, the Davidians could have surrendered
peacefully at any time and submitted themselves to civil authority.
They certainly could have released the children but that is not what
they were about. These were irrational religious fanatics devoted to
the apocalyptic visions of a charismatic leader with a messiah
complex. They believed that everything that was happening was
preordained by God and that the final outcome involved their
martyrdom. This was not a recipe for a happy outcome. The government
chose to invade rather than wait them out. It is far from certain
that waiting would have produced a better result. At worst the ATF
was guilty of bad judgement and/or negligence.
from: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20000718_wisenberg.html
(a legal analysis website) here are some comments on the civil case
against the feds. The jury completely exonerated the government.
-- quote --
Indeed, the testimony established that the ATF agents, rather than
Koresh and his followers, were taken by surprise and pinned down under
heavy fire with limited ammunition. Under these circumstances, it
seems fair to assume that the jury was not all that bothered by the
possibility that some ATF gunfire indiscriminately raked the second
story windows of the compound. Most Americans, no matter how skeptical
they may be of the law enforcement community, are not willing to let
their fellow citizens choose which warrants to accept or reject --
especially when that rejection is accompanied by machine gun fire.
The government's evidence as to who started the fires on April 19 was
similarly devastating. In addition to expert testimony that the
Davidians were responsible for setting the fires, FBI-installed
listening devices recorded sect members joking about becoming
"charcoal briquettes" and contemplating "catching fire" a day before
the compound was destroyed. And on the day of the fire, the listening
devices recorded the chilling commands to "spread the fuel" and "light
the torch." Given the Davidian involvement in starting and spreading
the fire, it is not surprising that the advisory jury absolved the
government on this question.
- unquote -
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 11:01:02 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:49:15 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who was
closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
Maybe so, but then she can't really take custody of him, can she. The
father is entitled to have custody of his child. That was what our
court (remember democracy and that whole rule of law thing?) decided.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but peaceably
removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
I don't recall that anyone was bleeding when it ended.
If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign governments
would do exactly the same?
If he was brought "back" to America, he'd be coming to a free country.
You can't say that about Cuba.
Freedom is a matter of degree. What if his mother had taken him from
America to the Netherlands? Besides, I don't think Cuba is that bad.
The execution of the search warrant in Waco was obviously planned long
before Reno came into office. If the whakos of Wako were peaceful
civilians instead of heavily armed militant religious fanatics, the
incident would have been uneventful.
I guess it's OK for the Feds to use all the force at their disposal as
long as the victims are whackos?
If the victims were just whackos, there wouldn't have been a search
warrant in the first place. It was the whacko/machine gum combination
which was disconcerting to the ATF. Let me ask you this. If the year
was 2005 instead of 1995 and the whackos with machine guns were
spin-offs of the Shiites instead of the Seventh Day Adventists, how
would you want Gonzales to handle it?
That sounds like something you'd attribute to a "neocon".
If a Neocon had been involved, they would have bombed the ***** out of
the compound and then they would have found not so much as a slingshot
inside.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
20 Feb 2005 09:49:43 AM |
|
|
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:935g11t34mpphekbhnljihhr0t4omhnkan@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:49:15 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia
and the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in
the same sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who was
closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
Maybe so, but then she can't really take custody of him, can she. The
father is entitled to have custody of his child. That was what our
court (remember democracy and that whole rule of law thing?) decided.
Our "rule of law" was unduly influenced by a propaganda campaign in our
liberal media engineered by Fidel Castro.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but
peaceably removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
I don't recall that anyone was bleeding when it ended.
Of course you didn't hear about it in the liberal media.
If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign governments
would do exactly the same?
If he was brought "back" to America, he'd be coming to a free country.
You can't say that about Cuba.
Freedom is a matter of degree. What if his mother had taken him from
America to the Netherlands? Besides, I don't think Cuba is that bad.
Compared to what? How about if we deport *you* there?
The execution of the search warrant in Waco was obviously planned
long before Reno came into office. If the whakos of Wako were
peaceful civilians instead of heavily armed militant religious
fanatics, the incident would have been uneventful.
I guess it's OK for the Feds to use all the force at their disposal as
long as the victims are whackos?
If the victims were just whackos, there wouldn't have been a search
warrant in the first place. It was the whacko/machine gum combination
which was disconcerting to the ATF. Let me ask you this. If the year
was 2005 instead of 1995 and the whackos with machine guns were
spin-offs of the Shiites instead of the Seventh Day Adventists, how
would you want Gonzales to handle it?
Oh, spare me. You'd be moaning and groaning about their civil rights.
That sounds like something you'd attribute to a "neocon".
If a Neocon had been involved, they would have bombed the ***** out of
the compound and then they would have found not so much as a slingshot
inside.
So, how many suvivalist compounds have the neocons bombed the ***** out
of in America under Ashcroft?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
21 Feb 2005 10:47:51 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:935g11t34mpphekbhnljihhr0t4omhnkan@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:49:15 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like
pedophilia
and the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in
the same sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who
was
closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
Maybe so, but then she can't really take custody of him, can she.
The
father is entitled to have custody of his child. That was what our
court (remember democracy and that whole rule of law thing?)
decided.
Our "rule of law" was unduly influenced by a propaganda campaign in
our
liberal media engineered by Fidel Castro.
What "liberal media"? If it was truly liberal, chances are it wouldn't
be as anti-Castro as it is.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but
peaceably removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
I don't recall that anyone was bleeding when it ended.
Of course you didn't hear about it in the liberal media.
What "liberal media"?
That sounds like something you'd attribute to a "neocon".
If a Neocon had been involved, they would have bombed the ***** out
of
the compound and then they would have found not so much as a
slingshot
inside.
So, how many suvivalist compounds have the neocons bombed the *****
out
of in America under Ashcroft?
They did, however, round up thousands of Arabs and Muslims post 9/11
*without* charging them and then released them a couple years later
saying they had no evidence they were a security risk. Not to mention
the UnConstitutional PATRIOT Act, the war crimes at Gitmo, etc....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
20 Feb 2005 02:58:55 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:49:43 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:935g11t34mpphekbhnljihhr0t4omhnkan@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:49:15 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia
and the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in
the same sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who was
closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
Maybe so, but then she can't really take custody of him, can she. The
father is entitled to have custody of his child. That was what our
court (remember democracy and that whole rule of law thing?) decided.
Our "rule of law" was unduly influenced by a propaganda campaign in our
liberal media engineered by Fidel Castro.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but
peaceably removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
I don't recall that anyone was bleeding when it ended.
Of course you didn't hear about it in the liberal media.
So do you have a link to someone bleeding?
If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign governments
would do exactly the same?
If he was brought "back" to America, he'd be coming to a free country.
You can't say that about Cuba.
Freedom is a matter of degree. What if his mother had taken him from
America to the Netherlands? Besides, I don't think Cuba is that bad.
Compared to what? How about if we deport *you* there?
Compared to Saudi Arabia or El Salvador or Guatemala or Chile under
Pinochet of Indonesia under Suharto or any of a dozen other times and
places where the US government propped up tyranny against popular
sentiment. Remember that Saddam was placed in power in Iraq by us.
Deport me there? Are you thinking Guantanemo?
If the victims were just whackos, there wouldn't have been a search
warrant in the first place. It was the whacko/machine gum combination
which was disconcerting to the ATF. Let me ask you this. If the year
was 2005 instead of 1995 and the whackos with machine guns were
spin-offs of the Shiites instead of the Seventh Day Adventists, how
would you want Gonzales to handle it?
Oh, spare me. You'd be moaning and groaning about their civil rights.
If you have a valid search warrant, it isn't a violation of their
civil rights. And I certainly wouldn't blame the Feds for going in
armed to execute it.
That sounds like something you'd attribute to a "neocon".
If a Neocon had been involved, they would have bombed the ***** out of
the compound and then they would have found not so much as a slingshot
inside.
So, how many suvivalist compounds have the neocons bombed the ***** out
of in America under Ashcroft?
I imagine he didn't do a thing against them if they were Christian.
He likes guns. He made sure that under the Patriot Act the government
can find out what books you buy but not what guns you buy.
On the other hand, his department has encouraged infiltration of
peaceful anti-war groups, some of which did little more than talk over
coffee and donuts.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
20 Feb 2005 03:20:28 PM |
|
|
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:sash115351msua94sqlqscfcd871rhqbo0@4ax.com:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:49:43 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:935g11t34mpphekbhnljihhr0t4omhnkan@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:49:15 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
news:5ref111mhlktictjcvm4mlhtrjbh7leil8@4ax.com:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:57:00 +0000 (UTC), Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia
and the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in
the same sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
Two words: Elian, Waco.
Custody of Elian, a minor, was lawfully given to his father who
was closest living relative.
Elian's *MOTHER* died to get him out of a communist tyranny.
Maybe so, but then she can't really take custody of him, can she.
The father is entitled to have custody of his child. That was what
our court (remember democracy and that whole rule of law thing?)
decided.
Our "rule of law" was unduly influenced by a propaganda campaign in
our liberal media engineered by Fidel Castro.
When those physically holding the boy
refused to surrender him, governmental forces forcibly, but
peaceably removed him.
Peaceably? You haven't heard about the lawsuits?
I don't recall that anyone was bleeding when it ended.
Of course you didn't hear about it in the liberal media.
So do you have a link to someone bleeding?
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=
3074
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J2E24268A
By Sherrie Gossett
Elian Gonzalez's name is back in the news since a new trial related to
the custody drama got underway in Miami the last week of January. He was
the Cuban boy who came to America when his mother died to give him
freedom. Clinton Attorney General Janet Reno ordered him returned to the
communist island prison nation. She had armed federal agents grab him
out of a Miami home from his relatives.
A $4-million lawsuit was brought by 13 people who say they were injured
or traumatized when machine-gun-toting federal agents stormed the house
where Gonzalez was staying in Miami and snatched the boy at gunpoint in
April 2000. Gonzalez, now 11, was one of three survivors of a makeshift
raft carrying Cubans seeking refuge in the U.S. His mother died in the
search for freedom from Castro.
One of the most controversial issues has received almost no follow-up
investigative reporting by the press: namely, that the Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) had a memo written before Elian was seized,
indicating the INS was weighing political asylum for Elian days before
the feds seized him.
Elian was returned to the Castro government and his father in Cuba. The
father was depicted as a faithful communist who wanted Elian back with
him. That line was accepted by the Clinton Administration. But the memo,
authored by INS attorney Rebeca Sanchez-Roig, stated that Elian's father
may have made his "own attempts to depart Cuba," and had made two phone
calls "from a pay phone in Cuba" to let his family in Miami know that
Elian was coming. In addition, the memo says that "the Cuban government
installed what somebody described as a speaker phone" in the father's
home in Cuba so that Cuban government agents could coach him on what to
say.
The memo said if coercion could be shown against the father then the INS
could accept the child for entry into the U.S. Then-INS chief Doris
Meissner ordered Sanchez-Roig to destroy the memo. The raid followed
within days.
This is not the first time that news about the memo has surfaced.
Christopher Caldwell, senior editor for The Weekly Standard, wrote an
article, "The Elian Cover-up" back in 2002, citing evidence that INS
chief Doris Meissner knew that Elian's father was acting under duress
and didn't want his child returned to communism.
Actually, the memo's existence was known at the time that Elian was in
the U.S. If its contents had been exposed then, the reporting would have
had a significant impact. I was told about it by an individual in Ft.
Lauderdale who said he could not "get anyone at the Miami Herald
interested in covering this." Sanchez-Roig didn't speak to the press,
but surely some intrepid reporting could've led to uncovering and
publicizing the truth about the real wishes of Elian's father. Elian
could be living and prospering in freedom today if the press had done
its job.
If the situation were reversed and Elian was the child
of an American parent, wouldn't you hope that a foreign
governments would do exactly the same?
If he was brought "back" to America, he'd be coming to a free
country. You can't say that about Cuba.
Freedom is a matter of degree. What if his mother had taken him
from America to the Netherlands? Besides, I don't think Cuba is
that bad.
Compared to what? How about if we deport *you* there?
Compared to Saudi Arabia or El Salvador or Guatemala or Chile under
Pinochet of Indonesia under Suharto or any of a dozen other times and
places where the US government propped up tyranny against popular
sentiment.
Against communist insurgents, you mean.
Remember that Saddam was placed in power in Iraq by us.
Except that he wasn't. He took power in a coup of his own making.
Deport me there? Are you thinking Guantanemo?
No, and I'm not at all surprised that you'd try to duck the question.
If the victims were just whackos, there wouldn't have been a search
warrant in the first place. It was the whacko/machine gum
combination which was disconcerting to the ATF. Let me ask you
this. If the year was 2005 instead of 1995 and the whackos with
machine guns were spin-offs of the Shiites instead of the Seventh
Day Adventists, how would you want Gonzales to handle it?
Oh, spare me. You'd be moaning and groaning about their civil rights.
If you have a valid search warrant, it isn't a violation of their
civil rights. And I certainly wouldn't blame the Feds for going in
armed to execute it.
But you object to the Patriot Act and the valid warrants issued under
it.
That sounds like something you'd attribute to a "neocon".
If a Neocon had been involved, they would have bombed the ***** out
of the compound and then they would have found not so much as a
slingshot inside.
So, how many suvivalist compounds have the neocons bombed the ***** out
of in America under Ashcroft?
I imagine he didn't do a thing against them if they were Christian.
He likes guns. He made sure that under the Patriot Act the government
can find out what books you buy but not what guns you buy.
In fact the Patriot Act doesn't specify what kind of "business records"
may be subpoenaed.
On the other hand, his department has encouraged infiltration of
peaceful anti-war groups, some of which did little more than talk over
coffee and donuts.
Well if they're so peaceful they don't have anything to worry about.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Look out Gannon! |
19 Feb 2005 08:14:23 PM |
|
|
satyr wrote:
On 18 Feb 2005 09:50:08 -0800, "Rump Ranger" <buttpirate@fadmail.com>
wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
Alberto Gonzales is coming to get you!
You know, Gonzales might actually be worse than Ashcroft (and I
thought
nobody would have been a worse AG than Janet Reno during the 90's).
You must be too young to remember Ed Meese.
No, Meese was bad during the 80's, but he didn't outright murder over
80 Americans like Reno did in Waco or order armed thugs to point
assault weapons at an unarmed 6 year old boy on live TV like with the
Elian Gonzalez affair.
Does America have an obsession for fascist assholes for Attorney
General or what?
Well, the job does lend itself to that - sort of like pedophilia and
the priesthood. Still, I can't see how you can put Reno in the same
sentence as the GOP AG nazis.
I dunno, Reno's just as bad. She ordered children to be burned alive
and when she was in Florida before she became AG, she abused her power
to intimidate people into making false confessions. The GOP overall is
worse, but Reno's pretty damn close.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|