| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2005 09:56:03 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Normans / Saxons |
Divided after Harold
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1394189,00.html
David McKie
Thursday January 20, 2005
The Guardian
"This time, New Labour has to win not by defining ourselves by what
we're against, but by what we're for, so that New Labour is finally
liberated to govern on our own terms" - Alan Milburn, the Guardian,
January 15
There's long been a fashion for assigning oneself and one's friends to
one or other of two polarised groups. Roundhead or Cavalier? Extrovert
or introvert? Lover or hater of Marmite? In Victorian times there was
another distinction on which people divided with passion. Saxon or
Norman? Was the nation better or worse for Harold's defeat at Hastings?
David McKie
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/ce32113a02c0b25a
Normans Saxons
http://news.google.com/news?tab=gn&q=(Normans%20OR%20Saxons)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&
http://www.google.com/search?tab=nw&q=(Normans+OR+Saxons)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?q=(Normans+OR+Saxons)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&output=search&cat=gwd/Top
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=(Normans%20OR%20Saxons)&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wg
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=(Normans+OR+Saxons)&start=0&scoring=d&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&
.
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|