OT: Not totalitarian - but guilty of creeping authoritarianism



 Religions > Atheism > OT: Not totalitarian - but guilty of creeping authoritarianism

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "maff"
Date: 26 Apr 2006 03:52:15 AM
Object: OT: Not totalitarian - but guilty of creeping authoritarianism
Not totalitarian - but guilty of creeping authoritarianism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1761318,00.html
Blair has built an entire foreign policy around the kind of glib
historical parallel to which Clarke now takes exception
Simon Jenkins
Wednesday April 26, 2006
The Guardian
Whatever horrors now loom over the home secretary's career, in one
respect he is right. On this page yesterday, Charles Clarke complained
that political language was being debased. He and Tony Blair object to
critics bandying about "lazy and deceitful" words and glib ideological
parallels. They particularly object to being called fascist,
totalitarian, hijackers of democracy and destroyers of the rule of law,
not to mention wanting a police state, a holocaust, a gulag and
apartheid. Clearly, as was said of the antipope John, the more serious
charges have been suppressed.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
OT: Sharon's target is not Arafat, but Palestinian solidarity
god loves YOU but not them!
Re: No ! Pond Scum to Humans is though. But not Jesus. ATTN DIRK
AWOL: Not Just a *****, But a Flip-Flopping *****
OT: Party Centrists Find Places on Stage but Not on Agenda
OT: The Next Shock: Not Oil, but Debt
***** Cheney: It's Okay For Me to Work For Terrorists, But Not You
Insane Christanic kook spam: Santa but not Jesus
Re: I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good you are, nor if you are a church member, but are you saved? Are you sure you will go to Heaven when you die? The reason s
think we all know who was responsible for that, the Godless liberals who cannot stand having their immorality shoved back in their ugly face!! The defenders of free thought, the Big Bang theory and evolution, are not only striking out at me, but at a
Not to bring peace, but with a sword?
The redskinned Indians are naturally lazy and vicious, melancholic, cowardly, and in general a lying, shiftless, people. Their marriages are not a sacrament but a sacrilege. They are idolatrous, libidinous, and commit sodomy. Their chief desire is to
Re: Why do we shoot escaping prisoners but not invading illegals?
OT: Not only stranger than we imagine, but stranger than we can..
OT: Despair turns to fury, but it's not too late to end France's war with itself
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER