OT: Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, too



 Religions > Atheism > OT: Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, too

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "maff"
Date: 12 Jul 2007 06:29:51 PM
Object: OT: Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, too
Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, too
http://scatablog.blogspot.com/2007/07/obama-et-al-serve-up-raw-meat-while.h=
tml
Obama is somewhat stuck between the need of Democrats for raw meat and
his long-term strategy of attacking excessive partisanship. Anyone who
does not think most ordinary Democrats want to see today's Republicans
thoroughly discredited and destroyed is na=EFve. It is not just a few on
the "left" who believe Bush and Cheney and their followers have been a
true scourge that for the good of country and the world, not political
partisanship as such, must be pulled out from the roots.
Democrats in the primary will be voting mainly on who will be the most
effective at taking the Republicans down. Namby-pambyisms and lukewarm
split-the-difference approaches are not what they want to see.
Nevertheless, the "above-the-fray" strategy is a good one for the long
haul because it appeals to a broad swath of the public, including even
many of those aforesaid liberal Democrats who want to see today's
Republicans discredited and destroyed. Obama is an idealist in this
sense, and a brilliant wordsmith. I think he truly believes that he
can find the words and the right tone that will unite all but the most
recalcitrant Republicans around concepts that are essentially liberal
ones. I am enough of an idealist to think he's right, even if it won't
be easy.
.

User: "HayekFan"

Title: Re: OT: Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, too 12 Jul 2007 10:32:02 PM
On Jul 12, 6:29 pm, maff <maf...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road, toohttp://=

scatablog.blogspot.com/2007/07/obama-et-al-serve-up-raw-meat-w...


Obama is somewhat stuck between the need of Democrats for raw meat and
his long-term strategy of attacking excessive partisanship. Anyone who
does not think most ordinary Democrats want to see today's Republicans
thoroughly discredited and destroyed is na=EFve. It is not just a few on
the "left" who believe Bush and Cheney and their followers have been a
true scourge that for the good of country and the world, not political
partisanship as such, must be pulled out from the roots.

Democrats in the primary will be voting mainly on who will be the most
effective at taking the Republicans down. Namby-pambyisms and lukewarm
split-the-difference approaches are not what they want to see.
Nevertheless, the "above-the-fray" strategy is a good one for the long
haul because it appeals to a broad swath of the public, including even
many of those aforesaid liberal Democrats who want to see today's
Republicans discredited and destroyed. Obama is an idealist in this
sense, and a brilliant wordsmith. I think he truly believes that he
can find the words and the right tone that will unite all but the most
recalcitrant Republicans around concepts that are essentially liberal
ones. I am enough of an idealist to think he's right, even if it won't
be easy.

Obama is just another foolish statist Democrat who happens to be of
mixed race. I will not be voting for him.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: OT: Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the highroad, too 13 Jul 2007 03:54:05 PM
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:32:02 -0700, HayekFan wrote:

On Jul 12, 6:29 pm, maff <maf...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Obama et al: serve up the raw meat while taking the high road,
toohttp://scatablog.blogspot.com/2007/07/obama-et-al-serve-up-raw-meat-

w...


Obama is somewhat stuck between the need of Democrats for raw meat and
his long-term strategy of attacking excessive partisanship. Anyone who
does not think most ordinary Democrats want to see today's Republicans
thoroughly discredited and destroyed is naïve. It is not just a few on
the "left" who believe Bush and Cheney and their followers have been a
true scourge that for the good of country and the world, not political
partisanship as such, must be pulled out from the roots.

Democrats in the primary will be voting mainly on who will be the most
effective at taking the Republicans down. Namby-pambyisms and lukewarm
split-the-difference approaches are not what they want to see.
Nevertheless, the "above-the-fray" strategy is a good one for the long
haul because it appeals to a broad swath of the public, including even
many of those aforesaid liberal Democrats who want to see today's
Republicans discredited and destroyed. Obama is an idealist in this
sense, and a brilliant wordsmith. I think he truly believes that he can
find the words and the right tone that will unite all but the most
recalcitrant Republicans around concepts that are essentially liberal
ones. I am enough of an idealist to think he's right, even if it won't
be easy.


Obama is just another foolish statist Democrat

<snork>
Oh yeah, that government sure shrunk in power and scope under the GOP...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You know, I'd get it if people were just looking for a
way to fill the holes. But they want the holes. They wanna
live in the holes. And they go nuts when someone else
pours dirt in their holes.
"Climb out of your holes people!"
- Dr. House, on faith
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER