| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andres64" |
| Date: |
07 Sep 2006 05:03:35 PM |
| Object: |
OT: Ohh Fred |
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to several
terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up the
sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the president's
warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary Committee
chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper and
necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize national
security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
.
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 05:13:38 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to several
terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up the
sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the president's
warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary Committee
chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper and
necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize national
security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7 President Bush has called
on Congress to approve the warrant-less EAVESDROPPING PROGRAM THE
NATIONAL SECURITY AEGNCY HAS BEEN PURSUING FOR MOST OF THE LAST FIVE
YEARS. The New York Times revealed the program last year, and a federal
court in Michigan has ruled it unconstitutional.
Since shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, THE NSA HAS BEEN
EAVESDROPPING ON PHONE CALLS into the United States from suspected
terrorists overseas -- without getting a warrant from the special court
set up to do so.
Critics say it amounts to illegal spying on Americans, But the White
House says the program is essential to thwarting terrorist plots.
Bills pending in Congress would try to bring the monitoring program
into line with the Constitution. But getting a bill to the floor for a
vote is proving to be a challenge.
Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Arlen Specter, took
up the Pennsylvania Republican's bill on the matter.
"The legislation which I have proposed," Specter said, "as you all
know, has the agreement of the President to pursue it." He then
reiterated that President Bush has pledged to bring the program under
judicial review.
Specter's plan would loosen some of the rules requiring the government
to get a warrant from the FISA, or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court, before conducting a wiretap.
The plan has the White House's stamp of approval, which makes some
Democrats inherently suspicious. Many, like Vermont's Patrick Leahy,
say THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE FISA SYSTEN -- IT'S THE FACT THAT THE WHITE
HOUSE AND THE NSA HAVE IGNORED IT.
"The monitoring of communications with suspected terrorists is vitally
important," Leahy said.
"But when you're MONITORING AMERICANS, it has to be done lawfully with
checks and balances, and respect Americans' privacy."
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3D5783529
BTW: Where are those WMDs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 05:50:59 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157667218.543806.133460
@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to several
terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up the
sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the president's
warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary Committee
chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper and
necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize national
security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh Andres?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Still got nothing to show that it's wrong, eh Fred?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 06:27:29 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157669459.329422.159410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate
Judiciary Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
Still got nothing to show that it's wrong, eh Fred?
Still got nothing to show that the MSM aren't lying, eh Andres?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:23:41 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157669459.329422.159410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate
Judiciary Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
Still got nothing to show that it's wrong, eh Fred?
Still got nothing to show that the MSM aren't lying, eh Andres?
Fred, it is *undisputed*. Shrub's own people have been quote above,
and yet you still refuse to admit your mistake. You do realize that
it's this type of stupidity/lying that makes you such a joke, don't
you? You do realize that it's this type of stubbornness that makes no
one take you seriously, don't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:29:07 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157678621.462324.189160@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157669459.329422.159410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed support for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
Still got nothing to show that it's wrong, eh Fred?
Still got nothing to show that the MSM aren't lying, eh Andres?
Fred, it is *undisputed*. Shrub's own people have been quote above,
and yet you still refuse to admit your mistake.
How many times do I have to demonstrate the dishonesty of MSM quotes,
Andres? And yet you still believe them every time they pretend somebody
said something.
They've been calling it "wiretapping" when it has absolutely nothing to
do with wiretapping. They call it "domestic spying" when it involves
*FOREIGN* intelligence. So why in hell do you believe them when they
reword what some "administration official" said?
You do realize that
it's this type of stupidity/lying that makes you such a joke, don't
you? You do realize that it's this type of stubbornness that makes no
one take you seriously, don't you?
You believe everything you read in the newspapers, Andres?
Talk about stubbornness, I've been resisting your kind of stubbornness
for six years now.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 07:06:48 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157678621.462324.189160@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157669459.329422.159410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed support for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
Still got nothing to show that it's wrong, eh Fred?
Still got nothing to show that the MSM aren't lying, eh Andres?
Fred, it is *undisputed*. Shrub's own people have been quote above,
and yet you still refuse to admit your mistake.
How many times do I have to demonstrate the dishonesty of MSM quotes,
Andres? And yet you still believe them every time they pretend somebody
said something.
They've been calling it "wiretapping" when it has absolutely nothing to
do with wiretapping. They call it "domestic spying" when it involves
*FOREIGN* intelligence. So why in hell do you believe them when they
reword what some "administration official" said?
You do realize that
it's this type of stupidity/lying that makes you such a joke, don't
you? You do realize that it's this type of stubbornness that makes no
one take you seriously, don't you?
You believe everything you read in the newspapers, Andres?
Talk about stubbornness, I've been resisting your kind of stubbornness
for six years now.
You know, either you are completely retarded, a distinct possibility,
or you're a liar. Personally, I don't think that you're retarded, just
a liar. In either case, everyone here sees it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Andres |
08 Sep 2006 06:55:51 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157717208.055758.189480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
<...>
You believe everything you read in the newspapers, Andres?
Talk about stubbornness, I've been resisting your kind of
stubbornness for six years now.
You know, either you are completely retarded, a distinct possibility,
or you're a liar. Personally, I don't think that you're retarded,
just a liar. In either case, everyone here sees it.
Hey, you're a guy who judges the truth of claims by how many headlines they
get in the MSM. So I'm not exactly worried about your opinion.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Andres |
08 Sep 2006 09:45:11 AM |
|
|
On 08 Sep 2006 11:55:51 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157717208.055758.189480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
<...>
You believe everything you read in the newspapers, Andres?
Talk about stubbornness, I've been resisting your kind of
stubbornness for six years now.
You know, either you are completely retarded, a distinct possibility,
or you're a liar. Personally, I don't think that you're retarded,
just a liar. In either case, everyone here sees it.
Hey, you're a guy who judges the truth of claims by how many headlines they
get in the MSM. So I'm not exactly worried about your opinion.
Ah Fred Stone and his "credibility"
========================
"What fictitious connections? The only ones drawing fictitious
connections between Iraq and 9/11 are DEMOCRATS. And *YOU* keep
falling for it. "
-Fred Stone 3/30/2006, arguing that Buch and the NeoCon never
tried to link 911 with Iraq
========================
========================
"It's evidence all right. Not perfect evidence, but it's not to be so
easily dismissed as that. "
-Fred Stone, in response to Fester's
"Yet *more* evidence of Saddm's 9/11 involvement" Title
5/29/2004
========================-
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2663 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 06:02:56 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157667218.543806.133460
@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to several
terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up the
sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the president's
warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary Committee
chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper and
necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize national
security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to comprehend;
let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own people: the acting
assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and the NSA's general
counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're biased?
BTW: Where are those WMDs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 06:30:28 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to comprehend;
let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own people: the acting
assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and the NSA's general
counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration official
on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:40:55 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to comprehend;
let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own people: the acting
assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and the NSA's general
counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration official
on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:35:13 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we found
isn't good enough. I know the warehouses full of precursor chemicals
weren't good enough for you either. Nothing would ever be good enough
for you.
If they *had* found stockpiles of the finished stuff ready to fire,
you'd be claiming that it was planted.
You're as transparent as glass, Andres. All of you leftwingers are.
And you have the unmitigated gall to call *me* dishonest.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 10:07:14 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we found
isn't good enough.
Because you have nothing Fred. Cite even one Administration source.
Hint: the American Forces Press Service is *NOT* an Administration
source.
..=2E.snip...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 10:07:06 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we found
isn't good enough.
Because you have nothing Fred. Cite even one Administration source.
Hint: the American Forces Press Service is *NOT* an Administration
source?
..=2E.snip...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 06:10:31 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157684826.076321.103200@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress
took up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to
the president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president
had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it
could jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information,
eh Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury,
and the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that
they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we
found isn't good enough.
Because you have nothing Fred. Cite even one Administration source.
Hint: the American Forces Press Service is *NOT* an Administration
source?
Like hell.
...snip...
....unsnip...
I know the warehouses full of precursor chemicals
weren't good enough for you either. Nothing would ever be good enough
for you.
If they *had* found stockpiles of the finished stuff ready to fire,
you'd be claiming that it was planted.
You're as transparent as glass, Andres. All of you leftwingers are.
And you have the unmitigated gall to call *me* dishonest.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 07:13:25 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157684826.076321.103200@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress
took up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to
the president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president
had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it
could jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information,
eh Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury,
and the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that
they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly useless
munitions, that took three and a half years to find dispite Shrub's
claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we
found isn't good enough.
Because you have nothing Fred. Cite even one Administration source.
Hint: the American Forces Press Service is *NOT* an Administration
source?
Like hell.
...snip...
...unsnip...
I know the warehouses full of precursor chemicals
weren't good enough for you either. Nothing would ever be good enough
for you.
Right Fred. That's what we went to war for; 26 year old, practically
useless chemicals that had been mis-placed/over-looked.
If they *had* found stockpiles of the finished stuff ready to fire,
you'd be claiming that it was planted.
Psychic are you Fred? Guess what I'm thinking now.
You're as transparent as glass, Andres. All of you leftwingers are.
Define 'leftwingers'.
And you have the unmitigated gall to call *me* dishonest.
If the show fits...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 07:01:16 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157717605.440780.90390@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157684826.076321.103200@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679655.331905.243820@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting
program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support
to several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as
Congress took up the sensitive issue of how to give legal
backing to the president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told
a House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by
the House GOP leadership showed promise and that the
president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate
Judiciary Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM was proper and necessary, and that tampering with
it could jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30
p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate
information, eh Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's
own people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven
Bradbury, and the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I
suppose that they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying
that this is what they were looking for (26 year old, nearly
useless munitions, that took three and a half years to find
dispite Shrub's claims that they knew where they were)
And so the predictable the excuses come out for why the stuff we
found isn't good enough.
Because you have nothing Fred. Cite even one Administration
source. Hint: the American Forces Press Service is *NOT* an
Administration source?
Like hell.
...snip...
...unsnip...
I know the warehouses full of precursor chemicals
weren't good enough for you either. Nothing would ever be good enough
for you.
Right Fred. That's what we went to war for; 26 year old, practically
useless chemicals that had been mis-placed/over-looked.
We went to war for a long list of reasons, all of which were voted for
by your gods in the Democratic party.
If they *had* found stockpiles of the finished stuff ready to fire,
you'd be claiming that it was planted.
Psychic are you Fred? Guess what I'm thinking now.
I don't have to be able to read minds to know your motives, Andres. Like
I said, you're as transparent as glass.
You're as transparent as glass, Andres. All of you leftwingers are.
Define 'leftwingers'.
Anti-war anti-American unpatriotic know-nothing dumbasses.
And you have the unmitigated gall to call *me* dishonest.
If the show fits...
You mean that shoe, on your left foot?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:38:08 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to comprehend;
let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own people: the acting
assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and the NSA's general
counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration official
on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 08:30:11 PM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 10:04:51 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
Now there's an unbiased source, the American Forces Press Service.
So that's all you have? 26 year old, practically useless chemicals
that even they admit were likely simply over-looked? Sure is worth
thousands of Americans lives, tens of thousands of American injuries,
tens of thousands of civilian deaths and hundreds of billions of
dollars.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 06:09:11 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157684690.928734.37380
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress
took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president
had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information,
eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury,
and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
Now there's an unbiased source, the American Forces Press Service.
So that's all you have? 26 year old, practically useless chemicals
that even they admit were likely simply over-looked? Sure is worth
thousands of Americans lives, tens of thousands of American injuries,
tens of thousands of civilian deaths and hundreds of billions of
dollars.
Oh, no, that's not all I have. But it's enough to draw out your lame
excuses and whiny complaints.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 07:08:32 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157684690.928734.37380
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress
took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president
had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information,
eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury,
and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
Now there's an unbiased source, the American Forces Press Service.
So that's all you have? 26 year old, practically useless chemicals
that even they admit were likely simply over-looked? Sure is worth
thousands of Americans lives, tens of thousands of American injuries,
tens of thousands of civilian deaths and hundreds of billions of
dollars.
=20
=20
Oh, no, that's not all I have.=20
..=2E.snip...
Prove it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 06:56:39 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157717312.281415.158540
@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157684690.928734.37380
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting
program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support
to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as
Congress
took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to
the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told
a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by
the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the
president
had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate
Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it
could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30
p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate
information,
eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's
own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven
Bradbury,
and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that
they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying
that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
Now there's an unbiased source, the American Forces Press Service.
So that's all you have? 26 year old, practically useless chemicals
that even they admit were likely simply over-looked? Sure is worth
thousands of Americans lives, tens of thousands of American
injuries,
tens of thousands of civilian deaths and hundreds of billions of
dollars.
Oh, no, that's not all I have.
...snip...
Prove it.
But it's enough to draw out your lame
excuses and whiny complaints, so why bother with more?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It is staggering that anyone could be so self-infatuated as to single
out their own particular policy preferences as "anti-war." Anyone who is
not a sadist or an idiot is anti-war. The only serious issue is how best
to limit, deter or conclude war. But responsibility for confronting this
issue is evaded by those preoccupied with the moral preening of being
"anti-war.""
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 10:02:39 AM |
|
|
On 8 Sep 2006 05:08:32 -0700, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote
in message <1157717312.281415.158540@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in news:1157684690.928734.37380
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157679488.817411.274900@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program
was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress
took
up the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a
House Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the
House GOP leadership showed promise and that the president
had
expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general
counsel, Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING
PROGRAM
was proper and necessary, and that tampering with it could
jeopardize national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m.
ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 ·
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information,
eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to
comprehend; let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own
people: the acting assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury,
and
the NSA's general counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're
biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration
official on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Oh please. Show me one cite of anyone in Shrub's admin saying that
this is what they were looking for.
That *is* the administration.
Now there's an unbiased source, the American Forces Press Service.
So that's all you have? 26 year old, practically useless chemicals
that even they admit were likely simply over-looked? Sure is worth
thousands of Americans lives, tens of thousands of American injuries,
tens of thousands of civilian deaths and hundreds of billions of
dollars.
Oh, no, that's not all I have.
...snip...
Prove it.
This is where he staggeringly fails to do so...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
07 Sep 2006 10:44:54 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
Administration backs surveillance legislation
Offers cautious support to several anti-terrorism bills
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave guarded support to
several terrorist surveillance bills Wednesday as Congress took up
the sensitive issue of how to give legal backing to the
president's warrantless wiretapping.
Steven Bradbury, acting assistant attorney general, told a House
Judiciary subcommittee that legislation backed by the House GOP
leadership showed promise and that the president had expressed
support
for a measure from Sen. Arlen Specter, the Senate Judiciary
Committee chairman.
But Bradbury and the National Security Agency's general counsel,
Robert Deitz, also said the NSA's WIRETAPPING PROGRAM was proper
and necessary, and that tampering with it could jeopardize
national security.
(EMPHASIS MINE)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14705348/
Senate Panel Weighs U.S. Wiretapping Program
by Luke Burbank
Audio for this story will be available at approx. 7:30 p.m. ET
All Things Considered, September 7, 2006 =B7
Nothing like an unbiased source to give accurate information, eh
Andres?
BTW, since you obviously didn't read or are too stopid to comprehend;
let me help. Two the sources were the Shrub's own people: the acting
assistant attorney general, Steven Bradbury, and the NSA's general
counsel, Robert Deitz. I suppose that they're biased?
I wouldn't trust the MSM to accurately quote an administration official
on the color of the sky.
And the WMD are right here:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun2006/20060629_5547.html
Wow! That's great news for your buddy, Shrub. It vindicates his war.
It must have made the front page of every newspaper in the world, or at
least the country. Can you show me even one? No? Well, certainly it
was picked-up by the major news outlets: AP, UPI, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox,
Time, Newsweek, NPR, BBC, NY Times, Washington Post, etc, right? No?
Huh. Funny. It must be that the administration wanted to make the
announcement themselves. Can you provide a cite from Condi? No? How
about Rumsfeld? No? How about Cheney? No? Snow? No? Well, I'm
sure Shrub wanted to make the announcement himself. Can you provide a
cite? No? Wow. That's strange.
Moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Ohh Fred |
08 Sep 2006 06:15:10 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157687094.352385.299460@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157670176.287167.87430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in
news:1157667218.543806.133460 @e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Andres64 wrote:
remember when you said that Shrub's Domestic Spting program was
nothing
more than queering a database?
| | | | | |
