"Dave Fritzinger" <dfritzin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158797006.161160.227350@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Fester wrote:

"Dave Fritzinger" <dfritzin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158790054.727535.72530@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Fester wrote:

"Dave Fritzinger" <dfritzin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158769084.653992.175840@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Fester wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@nospamtome.hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:dfritzin-850D5B.19062119092006@news-server.hawaii.rr.com...

In article <ET3Qg.31568$Md4.15447@tornado.southeast.rr.com>,
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzin@nospamtome.hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:dfritzin-71A67F.18400319092006@news-server.hawaii.rr.com...

In article <Mf2Qg.13271$Qg.2929@southeast.rr.com>,
"Fester" <not@home.com> wrote:

"Dave Fritzinger" <dfritzin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158716103.238164.232100@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Fester wrote:

"Dave Fritzinger" <dfritzin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158706907.723671.91170@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Fester wrote:

"GoDrex" <godrex35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3sicnX1VX_U9k43YUSdV9g@ptd.net...

<snip>

I'll bet more people now know about Olbermann's
pathetic
little
rant
thanks
to this posting than would ever have watched his
third-rate
program
for
themselves. Does Keith send each of his viewers a
personalized
thank
you
note? He should, it would only take a couple of
minutes
to
address
and
sign
them.

Interesting that you made no comments about the content
of
the
post.
I
wonder why...

Because it's unworthy of comment, of course.

Except, of course, that it isn't. Can you defend Bush?

I didn't think so.

He does a decent job of defending himself. He doesn't need
my
help.

He needs all the help he can get. I would suggest that he
start
surrounding himself with competent advisors for a start, not
those
who
just tell him what he wants to hear.

It's a darn good thing that he cares not a whit for your advice.
Generally
speaking, I think that opinion pools are meaningless. But, that
is
the
criteria by which I have heard a steady drumbeat of hope from
his
naysayer's
to justify their hopes. Well, his numbers are rising, and his
coat
tails
have brought the Republican generic candidate numbers to even
with
the
election coming up. All this lip-smacking about speaker Pelosi
(shudder)
and majority leader Reid is heading for the same, predictable
crop
of
gloom
for the donkeys yet again. Yes, it's a good thing that Bush is
too
smart
to
have you for an advisor!

Yeah, fear is still a powerful emotion, isn't it? It appears that
you
are quite happy having a bunch of incompetents run the US (Lies
about
the causes of the war in Iraq, totally screwing up the occupation
of
Iraq, totally screwing up FEMA, etc). The question is why do you
hate
the US and the American people so much?

Ah yes, the old liberal passive-aggressive trick. Sorry, but you
won't
find
any takers for your silly trolling games here.

IOW, you are unable to refute the fact that the Bush administration
is
a bunch of incompetents. Yet you still support them. One has to
wonder
why.

There are no facts in evidence to refute.

So, despite all the evidence to the contrary, you think there were WMD
in Iraq prior to our invasion?

I am certain that Saddam retained the capability to produce WMDs. I am
also
certain that the intel said that there were stocks and tha administration
did not lie about it.

Don't get out much, do you. I suggest you do some more reading...

You think that the post-invasion
occupation of Iraq was handled competently?

Plenty of mistakes were made, but it wasn't worse than the performance of
most other conflicts we've engaged in.

Yeah, Iraq is really looking good now, isn't it?

Katrina was handled
competently?

Of course not! Nagin and Blanco need to be keel-hauled (sorry, I guess
pirate day is past now) for their unconscionable mismanagement.

Of course, you'll let Bush and crew off for their unconscionable
mismanagement.

We have done, and are doing a good job in Afghanistan?

A superb job!

If you like a resurgent Taliban and poppy seed production, you might be
right...

It's OK for the president to lie to the American people wrt wiretapping
and illegal detentions?

It;';s OK if the lie was necessitated by legtimate national security
interests, which are indeed the case.

Umm, no. He broke the law, and lied to the American people about it.

And, the list goes on and on...

Yep, read my thread on "Bush's Crimes," I'm sure can help me add to the
list.

Since most of your list was BS...

After all of this, you actually believe the current administration has
handled the affairs of the country in a competent manner? If so, I
would have to say that you really are quite delusional.

So far you've only addressed the GWOT. As for his economic policies,
he's
done a great job. He did a lousy job in promoting SS reform and in
expanding welfare for the old, but over all, he's been pretty good.

The GWOT is supposed to be his strong point, and he sure screwed that
up. Let's talk about misnamed attempts to destroy the environment, like
the "Clear Skies" initiative. Let's talk about the economy. Average
wages are down, 5 years in a row (Well, you could say they were up last
year, but only if you count households with a retired person in it. For
working families, wages are down, 5 years in a row). More people in
poverty. More people without healthcare. Minimum wage at its lowest
point in many years, while huge tax cuts are being given to the rich.
Bush came into office with a surplus, which he managed to turn into a
huge deficit.

Do you need anymore information about the administration incompetence.

Oh, I almost forgot (and this is my favorite), the politicization of
science, pushing the teaching of Intelligent Design, and having
falshoods published on the web as truth to satisfy his right-wing
religous constituency.

Oh, then there is Terri Schiavo...

You just repeat the same old factually wrong BS that we've been hearing the
leftists whine for years. Life's too short to waste on fools like you.

<arrgh, walk the plonk>