| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"A former Atheist" |
| Date: |
09 Sep 2005 09:02:50 AM |
| Object: |
OT: One of my screenplays |
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell. Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly Wrestling
Federation!
Raymond Farrell: What a great night this is going to be.
Chris Assaf: I agree with you, Ray. We have an interesting list of
matches lined up here today.
(Music from Dr. Jonathan Parker, PH.D's subliminal tape is played and
the bell rings.)
MV: Okay! Let's go to our first match.
Ring Announcer: This match is scheduled for one fall with a 10-minute
time limit. Introducing first from Auckland, New Zealand, weighing at
112 Pounds, and accompanied to the ring by Kenny, MARY GLONKA!!
CA: What a cute pooch Kenny is!
RF: ((Laughing) You want to pet him?
MV: Yeah, Right! That dog has to work.
CA: I know that. Guide dog for Mary, you know.
(Music from Bret "The Hitman" Hart plays in the background.)
RA: And her opponent, from Calgary, Alberta, Canada, he weighs in at
about 115 pounds, Dallas Hart!!!!!!
CA: Dallas Hart is a very talented kid! Emerged victorious over kids
his own age!
MV: And adults too, man!
RF: Can you imagine him being the champion?
MV: A thirteen-year-old kid as the champion?
(The bell rings)
CA: Okay, guys! The match has begun. As we all know, Mary is blind! But
she once told, she can do all things through Christ who strengthens
her.
MV: Yeah? Well......
RF: Okay, Mary and Dallas lock-up. Holding on! Mary being backed into a
corner....almost!
MV: But, she is showing some resistance. Finally, she is able to push
Dallas back, but she falls on her face in the process.
CA: Which could be dangerous for Mary. And I am about right as Dallas
returns with a stomp to the back of Mary's head.
MV: (Shaking his head) She is going to need her God for this one!
RF: Ouch! Chops to her back. That is something you don't see
everyday!
MV: Yeah! They are usually at the front.
CA: I don't think it would be a good idea to set her up for an Irish
whip.
RF: No. Dallas is pulling her to the middle of the ring. And NAILS HER
WITH A HARD RIGHT HAND!!!
CA: Mary is dazed right now.
MV: What? Don't use words I can't understand, guy!
CA: (A bit annoyed) It means, she is dizzy!
RF: It could be time for the sharpshooter.
CA: You said it. Dallas is going for it right now. Mary at this point
is trying to resist using her hands!
MV: Dallas is going to win! I am telling you right now!
RF: You could be right, Mohamed. Because he has got her turned over and
is now sitting on her lower back and tugging at her legs.
CA: It's over!
MV: I know! She taps out and IT IS OVER!!!!
(The bell rings and Bret "The Hitman" Hart's music plays)
RA: Ladies and Gentlemen, here is your winner, DALLAS HART!
CA: That sharpshooter can get you everytime.
RF: I would like to see a kid break the sharpshooter.
MV: That was one of our very interesting matches that we have lined up.
Stay tuned! We will be right back!
(The screen fades to black)
.
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 08:48:03 AM |
|
|
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us with:
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Why would you not care? Aren't you interested in having the existence
of God proved to you?
Phylter grabs a brew, a joint, drags over a chair and says "this should
be interesting...."
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
Define "Humanism". Atheism is merely the lack of theism...
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 08:59:48 AM |
|
|
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 09:10:26 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
I really hate non-conformists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 09:18:03 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us
with: news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
***** the dictionary!! Atheists define atheism!
I really hate non-conformists.
Oh dear, that ugly word "hate" coming from the mouth of an "ex-atheist"....
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 09:22:22 AM |
|
|
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us
with: news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happene=
d=2E
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
***** the dictionary!! Atheists define atheism!
Well, those atheists say that you should define it the way the
dictionary does. What should I tell them?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 11:45:35 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534942.165039.220330@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Phÿltêr wrote:
snip
***** the dictionary!! Atheists define atheism!
Well, those atheists say that you should define it the way the
dictionary does. What should I tell them?
Tell them to get stuffed.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 11:44:44 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
I really hate non-conformists.
Sorry, but I don't care about your mental problems.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 05:22:58 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 06:06:54 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us
with: news:1126563778.045637.50380@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories
happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism
behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the
way they think you should. They say you should care about what the
herd cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same
way as the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
***** you're a fucking knobhead!
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 07:06:07 PM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126563778.045637.50380@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, I don't give a flying ***** what your "atheist friends" think.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was |
12 Sep 2005 08:22:14 PM |
|
|
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends" come onto this newsgroup, tell them
that I told them to *****. :-)
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "If God had intended us to walk, he wouldn't *
* have invented roller skates." --Willy Wonka *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 08:29:06 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 09:40:48 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126574946.847526.68130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
snip
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
No dear, we don't give a ***** if they are.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was |
12 Sep 2005 08:50:39 PM |
|
|
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup, then I don't really care what they have to say.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "If God had intended us to walk, he wouldn't *
* have invented roller skates." --Willy Wonka *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 08:56:37 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup....
They can speak for themselves.
But, the reason why they don't is because they don't like the way
people in alt.atheism behave.
They are conformists, you see and they don't feel comfortable with
non-conformists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 06:10:21 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us
with: news:1126576597.662303.159820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote
in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories
happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism
behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk
the way they think you should. They say you should care about what
the herd cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that
are speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same
way as the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according
to the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the
dictionary is the final authority on matters such as the definition
of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup....
They can speak for themselves.
But, the reason why they don't is because they don't like the way
people in alt.atheism behave.
They are conformists, you see and they don't feel comfortable with
non-conformists.
Well if they're conformists, they can't be atheists then...that would mean
questioning everything. Conformists don't question, they just go "baaaaaaa"
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 06:14:37 AM |
|
|
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> astounded us
with: news:1126576597.662303.159820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote
in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories
happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism
behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk
the way they think you should. They say you should care about what
the herd cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that
are speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same
way as the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according
to the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the
dictionary is the final authority on matters such as the definition
of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup....
They can speak for themselves.
But, the reason why they don't is because they don't like the way
people in alt.atheism behave.
They are conformists, you see and they don't feel comfortable with
non-conformists.
Well if they're conformists, they can't be atheists then...that would mean
questioning everything. Conformists don't question, they just go "baaaaaa=
a"
Conformists are not necessarily theists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 09:44:25 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126610077.249756.256270@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
snip
Conformists are not necessarily theists.
Well, they can't be atheists.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 09:43:41 AM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126576597.662303.159820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
DanielSan wrote:
snip
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup....
They can speak for themselves.
So, why don't they?
But, the reason why they don't is because they don't like the way
people in alt.atheism behave.
Their mental problems are not my concern.
They are conformists, you see and they don't feel comfortable with
non-conformists.
See what I wrote above about your "friends" mental problems.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was |
12 Sep 2005 09:08:11 PM |
|
|
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
DanielSan wrote:
Chris Assaf's commanding officer wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
Well, until your "atheist friends".....
You don't believe that my friends are atheists?
I don't really care. If they can't speak for themselves on this
newsgroup....
They can speak for themselves.
Great. Bring them here, then.
But, the reason why they don't is because they don't like the way
people in alt.atheism behave.
They are conformists, you see and they don't feel comfortable with
non-conformists.
Then, if they're too pussywimped to speak their position on matters,
then why should I care about their position? I'm sorry, but I refuse to
speak with an intermediary. Either bring your atheist friends onto this
newsgroup, or stop speaking for them.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "If God had intended us to walk, he wouldn't *
* have invented roller skates." --Willy Wonka *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 10:22:44 AM |
|
|
In article <1126563778.045637.50380@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> writes:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
You need to start hanging out with brighter atheists -- the dictionary
is not some kind of supreme court of the English language, enforcing
a sort of underlying and eternal definitions of words. What
a dictionary DOES do is to try to summarize the currently
widely accepted meanings of a word ... which means that
lexicographers are forever playing catchup as their lexical
ground constantly shifts under them. To take the first
example that comes to my mind, words like "silly" and
"fond" and "gentle" often mislead us when we read
Shakespeare, because these words have seriously different
primary meanings to Shakespeare than they do to us today.
The dictionary is not the law. The common usage
of the people is the law, and the law changes
over time. Witness that silly French committee
for the preservation of the purity of the French
language. A complete fool's errand.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hannele Huigens" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
13 Sep 2005 04:48:52 PM |
|
|
Op Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:22:44 +0200 schreef Cary Kittrell
<cary@afone.as.arizona.edu>:
In article <1126563778.045637.50380@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "Chris
Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> writes:
x-no-archive: yes
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:1126534226.919807.281660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126532626.541559.137110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
snip
Look, a few atheists I know care whether or not these stories
happened.
Yeah, right. Name them.
These atheists don't like the way the people on alt.atheism
behave.
So fucking what?
These atheists believe that you should respond, think, and talk the
way
they think you should. They say you should care about what the herd
cares about.
Then they're just as moronic as you are.
It is not me speaking. It is those atheist friends of mine that are
speaking.
Yeah, right. Go pull the other one.
They say that you don't speak for them as atheists.
That's right we don't. We only speak for ourselves.
Oh, and as for how they define atheism, they define it the same
way as
the dictionary does.
And I should give a ***** because............?
Because I have seen that the way the people on alt.atheism define
atheism is different than the way the dictionary defines it.
So what? Why do you even care?
Well, my atheist friends think that you should define it according to
the way the dictionary defines it. They believe that the dictionary is
the final authority on matters such as the definition of atheism.
You need to start hanging out with brighter atheists -- the dictionary
is not some kind of supreme court of the English language, enforcing
a sort of underlying and eternal definitions of words. What
a dictionary DOES do is to try to summarize the currently
widely accepted meanings of a word ... which means that
lexicographers are forever playing catchup as their lexical
ground constantly shifts under them. To take the first
example that comes to my mind, words like "silly" and
"fond" and "gentle" often mislead us when we read
Shakespeare, because these words have seriously different
primary meanings to Shakespeare than they do to us today.
The dictionary is not the law. The common usage
of the people is the law, and the law changes
over time. Witness that silly French committee
for the preservation of the purity of the French
language. A complete fool's errand.
Well, my dictionary defines an atheist as someone without a godbelief. :-D
--
Hannele Huigens
aa #2221
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
11 Sep 2005 09:18:41 PM |
|
|
On 11 Sep 2005 07:51:44 -0700, "Chris Assaf's commanding officer"
<chrisa1981@hotmail.com> got double secret probation because:
x-no-archive: yes
Archie Leach wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell. Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly Wrestling
Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
For the endless refrains of....
All of which are the truth.
Oh yes, and Karin does exist outside of my head. I just spoke with her
on MSN messenger.
Oh, and I am not a fake doctor. If you want proof that I am a doctor,
you just have to have faith.
I had Faith, she was hell on head, but sloppy in the sack
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ærchie" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
12 Sep 2005 05:41:01 AM |
|
|
The curfew had been lifted and the gamblin' wheel shut down, Anyone with
any sense had already left town. Yet Aratzio was standin' in the doorway
saying:
On 11 Sep 2005 07:51:44 -0700, "Chris Assaf's commanding officer"
<chrisa1981@hotmail.com> got double secret probation because:
x-no-archive: yes
Archie Leach wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell. Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly Wrestling
Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
For the endless refrains of....
All of which are the truth.
Oh yes, and Karin does exist outside of my head. I just spoke with her
on MSN messenger.
Oh, and I am not a fake doctor. If you want proof that I am a doctor,
you just have to have faith.
I had Faith, she was hell on head, but sloppy in the sack
Of course she was sloppy - I had her first!
Pope Ærchie 1st, The Poon Pope, Preacher of the Perpetual Wet
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PJR" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: Fake "Dr." Chris Assaf for Busted Urinal Award (was Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
11 Sep 2005 10:03:52 AM |
|
|
On 11 Sep 2005 07:51:44 -0700, Chris Assaf's commanding officer
<chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
If you want proof that I am a doctor, you just have to have faith.
<snort />
I think Mr Leach has found us a good one here.
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vivapadrepios personal Cthulhu" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
09 Sep 2005 08:59:28 PM |
|
|
Cometh the hour, cometh "A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave us this:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell. Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly Wrestling
Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
You aren't the one with the key to your ward, and neither are you the
one who is in charge of the meds round. I think that that
comprehensively makes you patient Assaf.
----------------------------------------
Cthulhu.
Cthulhu says "tortured souls are tough and taste rather sour. Be happy, die happy, make me a happy eater. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Assafs commanding officer" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
09 Sep 2005 09:00:37 PM |
|
|
Vivapadrepio's personal Cthulhu wrote:
Cometh the hour, cometh "A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave us this:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell. Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly Wrestling
Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
You aren't the one with the key to your ward, and neither are you the
one who is in charge of the meds round. I think that that
comprehensively makes you patient Assaf.
I have a doctorate, to tell you the truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu the Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
09 Sep 2005 09:26:29 PM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126317637.333554.290910@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Vivapadrepio's personal Cthulhu wrote:
Cometh the hour, cometh "A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave us
this:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On
my right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond
Farrell. Oh, and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the
Otherworldly Wrestling Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
You aren't the one with the key to your ward, and neither are you the
one who is in charge of the meds round. I think that that
comprehensively makes you patient Assaf.
I have a doctorate, to tell you the truth.
Yet you never say what it's in, what the topic of your disertation was,
or what school awarded your PhD. That tells me you are lying.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
As a set of cognitive beliefs, religion is a speculative hypothesis of an
extremely low order of probability.
-- Sidney Hook, The Partisan Review, March 1950
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
09 Sep 2005 09:52:44 PM |
|
|
"Chris Assaf's commanding officer" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126317637.333554.290910@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Vivapadrepio's personal Cthulhu wrote:
Cometh the hour, cometh "A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave us this:
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
"A former Atheist" <chrisa1981@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126274570.536950.18380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Mohamed Vadia: Welcome, wrestling fans! Welcome to our show. On my
right side is Chris Assaf and on my left side is Raymond Farrell.
Oh,
and I am Mohamed Vadia. Welcome everyone to the Otherworldly
Wrestling
Federation!
Assaf....
It is Dr. Assaf.
You aren't the one with the key to your ward, and neither are you the
one who is in charge of the meds round. I think that that
comprehensively makes you patient Assaf.
I have a doctorate, to tell you the truth.
Prove it.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "A former Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: One of my screenplays |
09 Sep 2005 09:12:47 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Enkidu the Atheist wrote:
If you want to save your child from polio, you can pray.....
about your sig;
"Soon after I graduated from High school with honors in 1999, I was
having some chest pains. (The chest pains occured in July of 1999) My
heart felt like a stone, almost. The first time, I collapsed, but I did
not pass out. I thought that maybe I would crawl home on the sidewalk.
I got up again and this time I collapsed AND passed out. A retired
couple and a daycare supervisor (I collapsed in front of a daycare
centre) saw me and called the paramedics. The pain went away and I went
to the hospital. The next few days, I went to a cardiologist and she
said that it was just a muscle spasm. I thanked God that it was not a
heart attack and I thanked him that I was alright."
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
