| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mark K. Bilbo" |
| Date: |
09 Sep 2005 01:55:26 AM |
| Object: |
OT: Snork |
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 03:05:10 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’
- Howard Dean
.
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 05:01:29 PM |
|
|
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
-chib
--
Member of SMASH
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
(email: change out to in)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 05:34:22 PM |
|
|
In <090920051001298210%chib@outreach.com>, chibiabos <chib@outreach.com>
wrote:
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
Would not surprise me at all...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
|
| User: "WCB" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
10 Sep 2005 08:32:58 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In <090920051001298210%chib@outreach.com>, chibiabos <chib@outreach.com>
wrote:
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
Would not surprise me at all...
Shameless opportunism = GOP
--
"Today the official spokesman for the Foxes
agreed an investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed."
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
15 Sep 2005 11:29:00 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:32:58 -0500, WCB
<wbarwell@Mungggedd.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In <090920051001298210%chib@outreach.com>, chibiabos <chib@outreach.com>
wrote:
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
Would not surprise me at all...
Shameless opportunism = GOP
Then the world is plastered with the persons 'head cheerleader
support' for Shrubbian.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
15 Sep 2005 11:28:17 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:01:29 -0700, chibiabos <chib@outreach.com>
wrote:
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
[laughter]
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 06:06:27 PM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@outreach.com> wrote in
news:090920051001298210%chib@outreach.com:
In article <1126235111.9f32b2c401e77fc73a5dc323b2b5746b@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
So we can expect the 2008 Republican nominee to repudiate the previous
eight years and run against the Bush record?
They'd have to be crazy to do that. Gore tried that in 2000 and
alienated the Clinton supporters badly.
Bush is still a *huge* fundraising draw for the Reps, and plays well
with the base (except the farthest right fringe). The Rep candidate can
run on the positive Rep agenda and accentuate the positives in the
record.
The Dems still have to formulate a positive agenda of their own, and the
split between the Kos Kidz and the DLC will sink them.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’ - Howard Dean
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 06:37:46 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
The Dems still have to formulate a positive agenda of their own, and the
split between the Kos Kidz and the DLC will sink them.
That's the crux of the matter, of course - the majority of
the voting public don't identify themselves as what they're
not, and won't vote for a candidate that tries to classify
him or herself mainly on what they are not.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 03:51:51 AM |
|
|
TV's Fred Stone wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
You neo-cons need to worry about 2006 before you even think about 08.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 01:07:31 PM |
|
|
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:8ZednU8_S8NVm7zeRVn-tg@centurytel.net:
TV's Fred Stone wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
You neo-cons need to worry about 2006 before you even think about 08.
"Us neo-cons" aren't terribly worried about that either. The Democrats
are even less popular than the President, and all their shrieking and
fingerpointing isn't going to help them.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’
- Howard Dean
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 01:33:28 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:8ZednU8_S8NVm7zeRVn-tg@centurytel.net:
TV's Fred Stone wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
You neo-cons need to worry about 2006 before you even think about 08.
"Us neo-cons" aren't terribly worried about that either. The Democrats
are even less popular than the President, and all their shrieking and
fingerpointing isn't going to help them.
I am reasonably well convinced that the Democrats could have
selected presidential candidates in both 2000 and 2004 that
would have won at a walk. I'm also convinced that 80% of
the Democratic party national leadership would have had to
step in front of a speeding train before the party would have
had any chance of selecting such candidates.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 02:09:47 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1126272808.164104.225560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:8ZednU8_S8NVm7zeRVn-tg@centurytel.net:
TV's Fred Stone wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2K6dndb8xLsbdr3eRVn-uA@megapath.net:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since
Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
Aww, darn, I guess his chances aren't very good for 2008, huh?
You neo-cons need to worry about 2006 before you even think about
08.
"Us neo-cons" aren't terribly worried about that either. The
Democrats are even less popular than the President, and all their
shrieking and fingerpointing isn't going to help them.
I am reasonably well convinced that the Democrats could have
selected presidential candidates in both 2000 and 2004 that
would have won at a walk. I'm also convinced that 80% of
the Democratic party national leadership would have had to
step in front of a speeding train before the party would have
had any chance of selecting such candidates.
That's about my opinion too. The Kossacks would rather split the party
than have it move toward the center where they could easily retake the
White House.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’ - Howard Dean
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 03:55:35 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1126272808.164104.225560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
I am reasonably well convinced that the Democrats could have
selected presidential candidates in both 2000 and 2004 that
would have won at a walk. I'm also convinced that 80% of
the Democratic party national leadership would have had to
step in front of a speeding train before the party would have
had any chance of selecting such candidates.
That's about my opinion too. The Kossacks would rather split the party
than have it move toward the center where they could easily retake the
White House.
While that's a reasonable conjecture, I'm not convinced that
the party itself needed to make a serious move towards the
center - it would have just required a change in the strategies
of their kingmakers. I'm quite sure that there were viable
Democratic candidates that could have beat Bush without trying
to out-Bush Bush.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 04:57:30 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:1126281335.835503.226100@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote in
news:1126272808.164104.225560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
I am reasonably well convinced that the Democrats could have
selected presidential candidates in both 2000 and 2004 that
would have won at a walk. I'm also convinced that 80% of
the Democratic party national leadership would have had to
step in front of a speeding train before the party would have
had any chance of selecting such candidates.
That's about my opinion too. The Kossacks would rather split the
party than have it move toward the center where they could easily
retake the White House.
While that's a reasonable conjecture, I'm not convinced that
the party itself needed to make a serious move towards the
center - it would have just required a change in the strategies
of their kingmakers. I'm quite sure that there were viable
Democratic candidates that could have beat Bush without trying
to out-Bush Bush.
The "Anybody But Bush" strategy played well to the BDS sufferers but
didn't give them anything to stand for when it came to people who wanted
to hear specifics about a positive agenda. So they were basically stuck
with trying to outdo the Republicans on the Reps' own platform.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’ - Howard Dean
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 02:11:28 AM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Mark K. Bilbo (alt-
atheism@org.webmaster) made the light shine upon us with this:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
He's apparently lost a portion of the Bible Belt. Wonder which one.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
Plonked by Raytard
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
15 Sep 2005 11:27:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:11:28 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Mark K. Bilbo (alt-
atheism@org.webmaster) made the light shine upon us with this:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
He's apparently lost a portion of the Bible Belt. Wonder which one.
Certainly not the sphincter. It's constipated and filling up more.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WCB" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Snork |
09 Sep 2005 03:42:45 AM |
|
|
Uncle Vic wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Mark K. Bilbo (alt-
atheism@org.webmaster) made the light shine upon us with this:
Zogby poll. Scroll down to "Would Lose to Every President Since Carter."
Apparently he'd lose even to his own daddy...
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1020
He's apparently lost a portion of the Bible Belt. Wonder which one.
The part that drowned....
--
"Today the official spokesman for the Foxes
agreed an investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed."
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
