| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Daniel Kolle" |
| Date: |
31 Dec 2004 07:41:16 PM |
| Object: |
OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 10:10:06 AM |
|
|
On 5 Jan 2005 19:14:07 -0600, (Kate ) said in
alt.atheism:
Well, IMO the brain is the sexiest part of a man.
Well, that part of me still works ... sort of.
Shoulders are fun
to look at, but a man with superior intellegence and true
laciviousness makes me really... er, never mind.
LOL.
--
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him, the
spinal cord would fully suffice."
- Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 10:55:32 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:10:06 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On 5 Jan 2005 19:14:07 -0600, (Kate ) said in
alt.atheism:
Well, IMO the brain is the sexiest part of a man.
Well, that part of me still works ... sort of.
"Doctor, doctor, can you give me something to lower my sex drive?"
"But Mr. Klein, at your age it should all be in the mind anyway."
"That's what I mean, can you lower it about 30 inches?"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
05 Jan 2005 10:30:45 PM |
|
|
On 4 Jan 2005 14:15:06 -0600, (Kate ) wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:47:15 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) said in
alt.atheism:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
So what do we not-quite-so-buff guys do?
Go with a t-shirt too.
:)
LOL!
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
05 Jan 2005 06:48:18 PM |
|
|
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:07:56 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
I must add: is it a crime to look good, Peter? I never follow any
fashion fads. Hell, I have not worn a pair of actual blue jeans in
almost a year. Khakis and oxfords, thank you!
Blue jeans - fad?
LOL, how long has it been now? 60 70 years now?
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 02:25:04 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:07:56 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
I must add: is it a crime to look good, Peter? I never follow any
fashion fads. Hell, I have not worn a pair of actual blue jeans in
almost a year. Khakis and oxfords, thank you!
Blue jeans - fad?
LOL, how long has it been now? 60 70 years now?
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter T. Daniels" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 04:00:21 PM |
|
|
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
--
Peter T. Daniels
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 06:54:08 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Thank you, Peter, for saying it for me. I mean it.
Although there *are* some cute guys out there. Hee hee!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter T. Daniels" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 08:02:49 AM |
|
|
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Thank you, Peter, for saying it for me. I mean it.
Although there *are* some cute guys out there. Hee hee!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
There may be hope for you yet, but whether that hope may be acted on
depends on the state in which you reside.
--
Peter T. Daniels
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nightingale" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 06:58:54 PM |
|
|
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Thank you, Peter, for saying it for me. I mean it.
Although there *are* some cute guys out there. Hee hee!
I would agree with that, although who knows if we have the same ones in
mind when we think of cute guys. We all seem to have different ideas of
what is good looking. FWIW, I also think Kate is wrong.
--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matthew Fields" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 07:33:00 PM |
|
|
In article <34656fF48542oU1@individual.net>,
Nightingale <sing@music.ca> wrote:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Thank you, Peter, for saying it for me. I mean it.
Although there *are* some cute guys out there. Hee hee!
I would agree with that, although who knows if we have the same ones in
mind when we think of cute guys. We all seem to have different ideas of
what is good looking. FWIW, I also think Kate is wrong.
Maybe Kate is a cannibal and looks for more meat on the bones.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 07:01:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:54:08 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Thank you, Peter, for saying it for me. I mean it.
Although there *are* some cute guys out there. Hee hee!
ROFL!!!!
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 07:00:19 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Ah, I suspected that was the 'avenue' he was on, but Kate was
indicating things from her point of view, so I figured I'd inquire.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
06 Jan 2005 11:37:04 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Not to a het female. And one would think a het male would want to
know what the het female thinks is good looking.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jwk" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 09:47:32 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
Not to a het female. And one would think a het male would want to
know what the het female thinks is good looking.
Not if he can't manage to look like what they think is good looking.
Then he would prefer to delude himself. I speak with some insight
here. :)
jwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 07:31:04 PM |
|
|
On 7 Jan 2005 07:47:32 -0800, "jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
Not to a het female. And one would think a het male would want to
know what the het female thinks is good looking.
Not if he can't manage to look like what they think is good looking.
Then he would prefer to delude himself. I speak with some insight
here. :)
Explains a lot. Especially those total idiots that tell a woman 'I
know you want me'.
LOL
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter T. Daniels" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 08:04:03 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Not to a het female. And one would think a het male would want to
know what the het female thinks is good looking.
One searches in vain for evidence of that in places where males
searching for females congregate.
--
Peter T. Daniels
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
07 Jan 2005 05:46:58 PM |
|
|
On 6 Jan 2005 23:37:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:00:21 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2005 07:58:04 -0600, (Kate ) thought hard
and said:
Nothing is as good looking as a buff guy in a pair of well worn, well
fitting jeans and nothing else.
Wrong!
(chuckling)
Why is Kate wrong?
Daniel, though young, is already an avowed heterosexual, and he believes
that just about any female is better looking than just about any male.
Not to a het female. And one would think a het male would want to
know what the het female thinks is good looking.
What one finds attractive another finds comical.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 11:34:39 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter T. Daniels" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 12:30:48 PM |
|
|
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
If you haven't saved up the money, don't complain!
Have you tried thrift shops (¢¢) or vintage clothing stores ($$)?
--
Peter T. Daniels
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 04:08:51 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:30:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
If you haven't saved up the money, don't complain!
Have you tried thrift shops (¢¢) or vintage clothing stores ($$)?
I will now. Thanks, Pete!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 04:27:35 PM |
|
|
Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:5r7et05vk27okfmd1vkeovnfvj7e3rlt2c@4ax.com:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:30:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want
one. Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number
one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure
that since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes
that either do not fit or are too old and you want to give them
away. Why not makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to
me? I take either a 44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be
hurt if I get no offers, though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't
impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And...
***** it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they
are $150!
If you haven't saved up the money, don't complain!
Have you tried thrift shops (¢¢) or vintage clothing stores ($$)?
I will now. Thanks, Pete!
You'll find some very cool stuff there!
--
Enkidu AA# 2165
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then where does evil come from?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Epicurus 341-270 B.C.E.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "T.J. Higgins" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 04:56:39 PM |
|
|
In article <5r7et05vk27okfmd1vkeovnfvj7e3rlt2c@4ax.com>, Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:30:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
If you haven't saved up the money, don't complain!
Have you tried thrift shops (¢¢) or vintage clothing stores ($$)?
I will now. Thanks, Pete!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr
Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
I quoted your complete post above. How do you have the nerve to
call yourself "Mr. Brevity?"
--
TJH
tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 06:30:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:56:39 -0000,
ernest.p.worrell@vernal.equinox.edu (T.J. Higgins) thought hard and
said:
In article <5r7et05vk27okfmd1vkeovnfvj7e3rlt2c@4ax.com>, Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:30:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
If you haven't saved up the money, don't complain!
Have you tried thrift shops (¢¢) or vintage clothing stores ($$)?
I will now. Thanks, Pete!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr
Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
I quoted your complete post above. How do you have the nerve to
call yourself "Mr. Brevity?"
But all I wrote was:
I will now. Thanks, Pete!
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
02 Jan 2005 10:58:58 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:34:39 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:11:48 GMT, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@worldnet.att.net> thought hard and said:
Daniel Kolle wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Now, let's see. You have a computer, so your family isn't impoverished.
Is it more a case of you wanting something faddish that your folks
aren't willing to waste money on?
No. Peacoats are faddish now, Peter. Topcoats are not. And... *****
it, Peter, they ain't exactly cheap! Even at Burlington they are $150!
www.overstock.com
http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2.cgi?PAGE=CATLIST&PRO_SUB_CAT=652&PRO_SSUB_CAT=999
http://www.smartbargains.com/search.aspx?deptId=0&ev=0&CatId=0&fd=True&k=Jackets&an=Department&av=Men's+Apparel&sp=All+Products%2f%2f%2f%2fUserSearch%3dJackets%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C5DC2242A
http://www.shopzilla.com/7Y_-_cat_id--1__keyword--top%20coat__lp--10__mkt_id--20016972__rf--gsz
http://makeashorterlink.com/?B5EC4242A
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
02 Jan 2005 06:14:34 AM |
|
|
In article <mevbt05nevddkbklvkv22uor2qt9gso4a5@4ax.com>, Daniel Kolle
<DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote:
I prefer lacquer for a top coat, or on very fine woods a French rub of
3-lb shellac and tung oil.
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
02 Jan 2005 06:20:42 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:14:34 -0800 in alt.atheism, chibiabos
(chibiabos <chib@nospam.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
In article <mevbt05nevddkbklvkv22uor2qt9gso4a5@4ax.com>, Daniel Kolle
<DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote:
I prefer lacquer for a top coat, or on very fine woods a French rub of
3-lb shellac and tung oil.
I bet you say that to all the girls.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
02 Jan 2005 06:21:36 AM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote:
I prefer lacquer for a top coat, or on very fine woods a French rub of
3-lb shellac and tung oil.
What's your opinion on Bee's Wax?
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
03 Jan 2005 03:34:24 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:21:36 GMT, Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net>
wrote:
chibiabos <chib@nospam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote:
I prefer lacquer for a top coat, or on very fine woods a French rub of
3-lb shellac and tung oil.
What's your opinion on Bee's Wax?
It's for the birds.....
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
01 Jan 2005 10:31:23 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:41:16 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
I'm sooooo jealous of the fur coats each of my cat's have. And they
tale them for granted!!
:)
drift
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT (very OT): I need a topcoat! |
02 Jan 2005 12:25:40 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:41:16 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I need a topcoat. Actually, I want one.
Still, it is about the same, no?
I do have this:
http://www.menswearhouse.com/home_page/shop_online/product_categories/so412_single_item_template.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=1408474395558070&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=1408474395558061&bmUID=1104646378860
I've worn it twice I think.
I don't know anything about sizes.
You say you wear a 44 or 46 reg.
Is that close to a medium?
I'm 5'8 and it comes to about mid calf on me.
Will it fit you?
atheist@home#1554
I am asking you people because of a few reasons. Number one,
eBay ain't workin' out too well for me. And, number two, I figure that
since the holidays are over many of you have some clothes that either
do not fit or are too old and you want to give them away. Why not
makes yourselves a small profit by selling one to me? I take either a
44 or 46 reg. My feelings are not going to be hurt if I get no offers,
though.
P.S. I am fully aware of the crosspost. Play nice, children.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
