OT: Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)



 Religions > Atheism > OT: Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "maff"
Date: 31 Oct 2004 03:25:05 AM
Object: OT: Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)
Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,1340237,00.html
Christopher Hitchens
Sunday October 31, 2004
The Observer
The election season is always hellish for people who fancy that they
live by political principles, because 'politics' becomes, even more
than usually, a matter of showbusiness and superficial calculation.
Ever since 1980, when I bet the liberals of New York that Ronald
Reagan would win easily (and didn't have to buy my own lunch for
months afterward), I have sympathised with the prisoners' dilemma
facing liberals and leftists every four years. The shady term 'lesser
evil' was evolved to deal with this very trap.
Christopher Hitchens
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=18510aff.0409221303.273a74cc%40posting.google.com
.

User: "DJ Nozem"

Title: Re: OT: Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just) 31 Oct 2004 10:56:58 AM
(maff) wrote in message news:<18510aff.0410310125.7fb31ff7@posting.google.com>...

Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,1340237,00.html
Christopher Hitchens
Sunday October 31, 2004
The Observer
The election season is always hellish for people who fancy that they
live by political principles, because 'politics' becomes, even more
than usually, a matter of showbusiness and superficial calculation.
Ever since 1980, when I bet the liberals of New York that Ronald
Reagan would win easily (and didn't have to buy my own lunch for
months afterward), I have sympathised with the prisoners' dilemma
facing liberals and leftists every four years. The shady term 'lesser
evil' was evolved to deal with this very trap.

Chris is a flip-flopper!
http://slate.msn.com/id/2108714/
<quote>
Christopher Hitchens, Contributor: Kerry
I am assuming for now that this is a single-issue election. There is
one's subjective vote, one's objective vote, and one's ironic vote.
Subjectively, Bush (and Blair) deserve to be re-elected because they
called the enemy by its right name and were determined to confront it.
Objectively, Bush deserves to be sacked for his flabbergasting failure
to prepare for such an essential confrontation. Subjectively, Kerry
should be put in the pillory for his inability to hold up on principle
under any kind of pressure. Objectively, his election would compel
mainstream and liberal Democrats to get real about Iraq.
The ironic votes are the endorsements for Kerry that appear in
Buchanan's anti-war sheet The American Conservative, and the support
for Kerry's pro-war candidacy manifested by those simple folks at
MoveOn.org. I can't compete with this sort of thing, but I do think
that Bush deserves praise for his implacability, and that Kerry should
get his worst private nightmare and have to report for duty.
</quote>
This after he wrote a story in The Nation where he supported Bush! (
see http://slate.msn.com/id/2108682/&#sybil ) That story is identical
to the one in the Guardian, by the way. Did Chris sell it before he
changed his mind, or did he re-change it just now? The mystery
continues! (Incidentally, the above analysis by Chris is sharp, to the
point and funny, the long article is drawn-out half-hearted babbling,
IMNSHO)
--
We give meaning to each other
.

User: "Jez"

Title: Re: OT: Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just) 31 Oct 2004 01:32:41 PM
maff wrote:

Why I'm voting for Bush (but only just)
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,1340237,00.html

Christopher Hitchens

Hitchens has lost all credibility.
Best we can do is buy the poor old bugger a drink.......
http://www.command-post.org/oped/2_archives/013547.html
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
Skype callto://hellward
NFS Porsche Unleashed, Hot Pursuit 2, Underground.
Yeowww
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
OT: Chads are gone, but Florida faces new voting foul-up fears
The End of Pensions -- But Keep Voting for Republicans as You Spend Your Golden Years in a Cardboard Box on the Street
Re: Not Sure if ALL of this is true - but it is interesting
An oldie-but-goodie from the Onion
It's small but noticeable, unlike pyramids
Re: OT: Ustinov dies, but leaves some resonable quotes
Their Beliefs are Bonkers, but they are at the Heart of Power
Op-Ed: Teach science, but keep the faith
OT: Things You'd Love to Say at Work, but Can't
OT: Iraq is not Bush's Vietnam. But it is becoming Blair's
Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You
OT: Lab fireball 'may be black hole' (but did they drop it?)
Manufacturing trade winds are blowing Asia's way, but what's wrong with that?
OT: But did he get the job?
OT: Vatican says-No Gay Priests but Paedophiles are OK!
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER