| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jez" |
| Date: |
27 Aug 2004 09:05:24 AM |
| Object: |
OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
27 Aug 2004 01:37:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez <iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior candidate and best
choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
27 Aug 2004 04:39:23 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:lqvui0h36r2e4s4q5l0cs9q57ii16gaejr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez <iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best
choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is true.
Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count to ONE?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
27 Aug 2004 06:17:01 PM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:QeadnY6_nIEPNLLcRVn-pA@io.com:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:lqvui0h36r2e4s4q5l0cs9q57ii16gaejr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior
candidate and best
choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is
true. Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count
to ONE?
His laser-eyes are interfering with that microwave brain of his.
--
Dr. Smartass -- BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
The Fundamentalist
== Knows no greater joy than the sound of his own voice.
== Knows no greater terror than the god he creates in his own image.
== Knows no greater evil than an unfettered mind.
== Knows no greater blasphemy than being told "NO."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
27 Aug 2004 06:51:44 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:17:01 GMT, Doc Smartass <gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com>
wrote:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:QeadnY6_nIEPNLLcRVn-pA@io.com:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:lqvui0h36r2e4s4q5l0cs9q57ii16gaejr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior
candidate and best
choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is
true. Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count
to ONE?
His laser-eyes are interfering with that microwave brain of his.
You omitted the 'd'.
Here, I'll fix it for you: "microwaved".
--
/Apostate
atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer
EAC Supernumerary Deputy Director, Department of Redundancy Department
plonked by Lani_girl, first post; Billions Served!
I doubt, therefore I might be.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 10:51:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:39:23 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is true.
Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count to ONE?
It's such a powerful statement I had to break it up into 2 parts.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 11:49:36 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:39:23 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is
true. Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count to
ONE?
It's such a powerful statement I had to break it up into 2 parts.
Such a lie, even you couldn't stomach that much lie in one place.
1.1 million lost jobs, down to 2.8% growth rate, a war we are not winning,
America now despised world wide, poverty rate rising to new records,
Our rights being eroded and destroyed by right winger morons.
GOP pork spending doubled in two years. Government size grew 26% in three
years, the worst record since WWII.
The poverty rate is rising by leaps and bounds.
Bush in three years added $2 trillion in debt to the national deby, $3333
for each American.
$13,332 for a family of four. SS trusts funds for the three budget years
have been stolen.
Only a moron would vote for a failure like this.
You are such a moron.
Bush gave massive tax cuts to his rich pig buddies and his big business
buddies. He told us that this would make the American economy grow, and
supply jobs and wealth,
Instead, we have high unemployment at 5.5%. Only 32,000 jobs added
last month. We need 150,000 a month just to keep up with population growth.
Those greatful big business ***** are sending the jobs overseas.
Their big tax cut rewards were supposedly to grow jobs here not in China.
What does Stupid Bush want to do? Make these tax cuts permanent.
Bush now has the third worst average growth rate of all post war
ahead of only Nixon and his worthless daddy.
Why do you deeply stupid right winger ***** monkies vote for a moron that is
this unsuccessful?
Because you are stupid to the bone and worthless.
Oxygen thieves and black mold on the body politic.
You worship failure and hate and incompetence.
Why would anybody want to vote for more failure after three and a half
years of failure? Just. Plain. Stupid.
You hate America.
That is why you tout a loser who is destroying this nation.
You are stupid.
Totally stupid
--
Senator Waxman's searchable database of iraq war lies.
www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/
A good portal to more lies and Bush stupidity is to be found at
www.failureisimpossible.com - Go to the index and go to
"L" for lies. All you need to know about Bush when you
step into the voting booth. Bush is a liar and surrounds
himself with fellow liars.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 04:05:51 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:49:36 -0400, wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is
true. Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count to
ONE?
It's such a powerful statement I had to break it up into 2 parts.
Such a lie, even you couldn't stomach that much lie in one place.
Haahaahaahaahaa.
1.1 million lost jobs, down to 2.8% growth rate, a war we are not winning,
The lost jobs are all about 911.
America now despised world wide
For getting mad at the terrorists???????????
poverty rate rising to new records,
What record?
Our rights being eroded and destroyed by right winger morons.
I haven't lost a thing. What's your problem?
GOP pork spending doubled in two years. Government size grew 26% in three
years, the worst record since WWII.
50% of the Congressional politicians are 'rats.
The poverty rate is rising by leaps and bounds.
You already said that, and I asked you to quality it.
Bush in three years added $2 trillion in debt to the national deby, $3333
for each American.
War is expensive.
$13,332 for a family of four. SS trusts funds for the three budget years
have been stolen.
Numbers stupidly quoted can make you look real bad.
Only a moron would vote for a failure like this.
You are such a moron.
When will kerry announce what he will do to "improve" things, or does he just hope to
sucker people like you by saying anything and people like you believe it.
Bush gave massive tax cuts to his rich pig buddies and his big business
buddies. He told us that this would make the American economy grow, and
supply jobs and wealth,
Tax cuts went to the people that paid the taxes.
Instead, we have high unemployment at 5.5%.
That's considered more or less normal rates. 'rat willie did better, but he did it with
Mcdonald's cashiers.
Only 32,000 jobs added
last month. We need 150,000 a month just to keep up with population growth.
This IS a free country. Besides the abortion queens need to use the aspirin method - put
an aspirin behind one knee and hold it there with the other knee.
Those greatful big business ***** are sending the jobs overseas.
To hold down prices. American labor is extremely expensive and high cost oriented.
Their big tax cut rewards were supposedly to grow jobs here not in China.
What does Stupid Bush want to do? Make these tax cuts permanent.
Absolutely.
Bush now has the third worst average growth rate of all post war
ahead of only Nixon and his worthless daddy.
All three had to deal with a war.
Why do you deeply stupid right winger ***** monkies vote for a moron that is
this unsuccessful?
He's much better than 'rat willie, and will be so in the case of 'rat kerry..
Because you are stupid to the bone and worthless.
Making you feel bad, aren't I.
Oxygen thieves and black mold on the body politic.
You worship failure and hate and incompetence.
Actually I worship God. What rock do you worship?
Why would anybody want to vote for more failure after three and a half
years of failure? Just. Plain. Stupid.
It is so much better than botox would bring us.
You hate America.
That is why you tout a loser who is destroying this nation.
You are stupid.
Totally stupid
I'm doing it for you.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 02:44:08 PM |
|
|
wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in
news:41321614$0$170$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com:
duke wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:39:23 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior
candidate and best choice.
Duke, that would amount to TWO reasons even though neither of them is
true. Are you really so keen to demonstrate that you can't even count
to ONE?
It's such a powerful statement I had to break it up into 2 parts.
Such a lie, even you couldn't stomach that much lie in one place.
1.1 million lost jobs, down to 2.8% growth rate, a war we are not
winning,
A war we already won.
Jobs being created.
America now despised world wide
By the French.
, poverty rate rising to new
records,
Mostly due to *immigration* rising to new records.
Our rights being eroded and destroyed by right winger morons.
GOP pork spending doubled in two years. Government size grew 26% in
three years, the worst record since WWII.
The poverty rate is rising by leaps and bounds.
Bush in three years added $2 trillion in debt to the national deby,
$3333 for each American.
Still not as bad as in the past, relative to GDP.
$13,332 for a family of four. SS trusts funds for the three budget
years have been stolen.
There *ARE NO TRUST FUNDS* for Social Security. NEVER WERE.
Only a moron would vote for a failure like this.
You are such a moron.
Bush gave massive tax cuts to his rich pig buddies and his big
business buddies. He told us that this would make the American
economy grow, and supply jobs and wealth,
Instead, we have high unemployment at 5.5%.
5.5% is LOW, historically.
Only 32,000 jobs added
last month. We need 150,000 a month just to keep up with population
growth.
If you don't count the 250,000 new jobs added last month that aren't
counted by the "payroll" figures.
Those greatful big business ***** are sending the jobs overseas.
Their big tax cut rewards were supposedly to grow jobs here not in
China. What does Stupid Bush want to do? Make these tax cuts
permanent.
Bush now has the third worst average growth rate of all post war
ahead of only Nixon and his worthless daddy.
Only if you count "growth" from the *HIGH* of the Clinton era.
Why do you deeply stupid right winger ***** monkies vote for a moron
that is this unsuccessful?
Because they can see right through your lies.
Because you are stupid to the bone and worthless.
Oxygen thieves and black mold on the body politic.
You worship failure and hate and incompetence.
Why would anybody want to vote for more failure after three and a half
years of failure? Just. Plain. Stupid.
You hate America.
That is why you tout a loser who is destroying this nation.
You are stupid.
Totally stupid
Look who's talking. Moore-ons. Complete sheep.
Baa. Baa. Liberal sheep, ready to flock up for another shearing by the
Democrats.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
28 Aug 2004 11:43:16 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez <iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior candidate and best
choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said "one
thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans to
process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple
the TV cameras, etc?
Apparently, if more than a few people go to Central Park, there's
going to be a problem. How will they distinguish a bunch of people
enjoying the outdoors from a radical protest group?.
drift
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
28 Aug 2004 12:21:10 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said "one
thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans to
process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple
the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
Apparently, if more than a few people go to Central Park, there's
going to be a problem. How will they distinguish a bunch of people
enjoying the outdoors from a radical protest group?.
drift
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
28 Aug 2004 03:17:24 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said "one
thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans to
process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple
the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my blood
right now.
Apparently, if more than a few people go to Central Park, there's
going to be a problem. How will they distinguish a bunch of people
enjoying the outdoors from a radical protest group?.
drift
drift
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
28 Aug 2004 04:04:13 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said
"one thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes
lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans
to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than
triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my blood
right now.
They were in Boston.
Apparently, if more than a few people go to Central Park, there's
going to be a problem. How will they distinguish a bunch of people
enjoying the outdoors from a radical protest group?.
drift
drift
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
28 Aug 2004 09:14:25 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said
"one thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes
lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans
to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than
triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my blood
right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party, or is it a
policy imposed by Homeland Security.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 07:39:05 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was
talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry
either - he said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand
reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for him is that he's
not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is
swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of
cops, plans to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal
detectors, more than triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my blood
right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party, or is
it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 11:07:03 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was
talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry
either - he said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand
reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for him is that he's
not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is
swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of
cops, plans to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal
detectors, more than triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my blood
right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party, or is
it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 11:14:50 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was
talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry
either - he said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand
reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for him is that
he's not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is
swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of
cops, plans to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal
detectors, more than triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my
blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party, or
is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 01:37:20 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the
superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was
talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry
either - he said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand
reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for him is that
he's not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is
swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of
cops, plans to process so many arrests etc? Extra metal
detectors, more than triple the TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my
blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party, or
is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you mentioned the
security at the Democratic convention as if it were demanded by the
democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you don't, in fact, KNOW that
the Democrats had anything to do with it?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 02:37:21 PM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:jMKdnc3P2ed4vK_cRVn-tA@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away
the superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner
was talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't
like Kerry either - he said he may not vote. I used one of
the thousand reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for
him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a
nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention
is swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive
presence of cops, plans to process so many arrests etc?
Extra metal detectors, more than triple the TV cameras,
etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my
blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party,
or is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you mentioned
the security at the Democratic convention as if it were demanded by
the democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you don't, in fact,
KNOW that the Democrats had anything to do with it?
drift tried to imply that the Republicans had called for the level of
security at *their* convention, and I mentioned that it wasn't much
different for the Democrats. Funny how you read such a slant into that.
I don't *KNOW* that either party organization specifically had anything
to do with making sure that the protestors can't run riot like Seattle,
WTO, 1999.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "gammajoe8" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
31 Aug 2004 09:02:40 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95549EEE5F187fstone69@207.69.154.203...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:jMKdnc3P2ed4vK_cRVn-tA@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away
the superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner
was talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't
like Kerry either - he said he may not vote. I used one of
the thousand reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for
him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a
nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention
is swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive
presence of cops, plans to process so many arrests etc?
Extra metal detectors, more than triple the TV cameras,
etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my
blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party,
or is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you mentioned
the security at the Democratic convention as if it were demanded by
the democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you don't, in fact,
KNOW that the Democrats had anything to do with it?
drift tried to imply that the Republicans had called for the level of
security at *their* convention, and I mentioned that it wasn't much
different for the Democrats. Funny how you read such a slant into that.
Actually, it was significantly different. At the DNC no three year old
information had emerged citing the DNC as a terrorist target. However, if
you recall, that is exactly what happened just prior to the RNC in New York.
So, not only New York but a significant radius around New York, including
all of Northern New Jersey was put on terror alert DURING the RNC. My
daughter how is a public health nurse in a town in New Jersey was ordered by
the federal government to prepare for a biological attack from August 29
through September 3rd. She coordinated with the fire department and the
police department and worked out a plan to innoculate all the citizens of
her town within 24 hours - that is if injection was the antidote, less time
if oral medication could be administered.
Well, it gave my daughter a chance to shine. Otherwise it is just Bush
using Homeland Security to rattle his sabers for his war dance - obviously
the only dance he knows.
Gammajoe
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 07:12:39 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95549EEE5F187fstone69@207.69.154.203...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:jMKdnc3P2ed4vK_cRVn-tA@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away
the superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner
was talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't
like Kerry either - he said he may not vote. I used one of
the thousand reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has going for
him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up and he gave a
nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention
is swamped with paranoiac levels of security, massive
presence of cops, plans to process so many arrests etc?
Extra metal detectors, more than triple the TV cameras,
etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the Democratic
Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in my
blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic party,
or is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you mentioned
the security at the Democratic convention as if it were demanded by
the democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you don't, in fact,
KNOW that the Democrats had anything to do with it?
drift tried to imply that the Republicans had called for the level of
security at *their* convention, and I mentioned that it wasn't much
different for the Democrats. Funny how you read such a slant into that.
Funny, I knew you'd say that. Unfortunately for you, the situation is not
symmetrical.
Either the security at the Republican convention is demanded by the
Republican Party, or it's a policy of Homeland Security created by the
Republican party. Either way, the Republican party is responsible for it.
I don't *KNOW* that either party organization specifically had anything
to do with making sure that the protestors can't run riot like Seattle,
WTO, 1999.
Note that they didn't.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 07:35:12 PM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:Xtmdnbdgpcvh7a_cRVn-rw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95549EEE5F187fstone69@207.69.154.203...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:jMKdnc3P2ed4vK_cRVn-tA@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and
away the superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner
was talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't
like Kerry either - he said he may not vote. I used one
of the thousand reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has
going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican
Convention is swamped with paranoiac levels of security,
massive presence of cops, plans to process so many
arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple the
TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the
Democratic Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in
my blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic
party, or is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you
mentioned the security at the Democratic convention as if it were
demanded by the democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you
don't, in fact, KNOW that the Democrats had anything to do with it?
drift tried to imply that the Republicans had called for the level of
security at *their* convention, and I mentioned that it wasn't much
different for the Democrats. Funny how you read such a slant into
that.
Funny, I knew you'd say that. Unfortunately for you, the situation is
not symmetrical.
Either the security at the Republican convention is demanded by the
Republican Party, or it's a policy of Homeland Security created by the
Republican party. Either way, the Republican party is responsible for
it.
Funny, I knew you'd say that. Homeland Security was voted for
*overwhelmingly* by both parties, House and Senate. It's about as
bipartisan as you can get in Washington.
I don't *KNOW* that either party organization specifically had
anything to do with making sure that the protestors can't run riot
like Seattle, WTO, 1999.
Note that they didn't.
They *couldn't*.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
30 Aug 2004 07:21:35 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554D16FD7F79fstone69@207.69.154.206...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:Xtmdnbdgpcvh7a_cRVn-rw@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95549EEE5F187fstone69@207.69.154.203...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:jMKdnc3P2ed4vK_cRVn-tA@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95547C9767Cfstone69@207.69.154.202...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:UPqdnRrFYM8wY6zcRVn-uQ@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9554580264229fstone69@207.69.154.201...
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:SvKdnSOynp4apqzcRVn-vg@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9553ADA8BE7CFfstone69@207.69.154.206...
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:2qp1j052l3mh81g26de1orsekvnp84iahm@4ax.com:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
drift@lost.net wrote in
news:moc1j015f0sujggefv7q34uauviliisaau@4ax.com:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:37:53 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez
<iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and
away the superior candidate and best choice.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner
was talking about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't
like Kerry either - he said he may not vote. I used one
of the thousand reasons: I said "one thing Kerry has
going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican
Convention is swamped with paranoiac levels of security,
massive presence of cops, plans to process so many
arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple the
TV cameras, etc?
Just like the Democratic convention was, eh?
I didn't hear much news regarding that about the
Democratic Convention.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/25/dems.security/
Did the Democrats use NYC? I can't recall. I got beer in
my blood right now.
They were in Boston.
I'm curious, was the security requested by the Democratic
party, or is it a policy imposed by Homeland Security.
Why don't you find out and let us know?
So we can assume you don't know.
Interesting...
Why don't you do your own research?
I could, but I assumed you already did that. After all, you
mentioned the security at the Democratic convention as if it were
demanded by the democratic party. Are you now suggesting that you
don't, in fact, KNOW that the Democrats had anything to do with it?
drift tried to imply that the Republicans had called for the level of
security at *their* convention, and I mentioned that it wasn't much
different for the Democrats. Funny how you read such a slant into
that.
Funny, I knew you'd say that. Unfortunately for you, the situation is
not symmetrical.
Either the security at the Republican convention is demanded by the
Republican Party, or it's a policy of Homeland Security created by the
Republican party. Either way, the Republican party is responsible for
it.
Funny, I knew you'd say that. Homeland Security was voted for
*overwhelmingly* by both parties, House and Senate. It's about as
bipartisan as you can get in Washington.
Hmm. If that's so then the situation is symmetrical and I'm wrong. I must
note that the Democratic party has not spoken out plainly against the
concept of "free speech zones", and that's a shame. The democrats are not
perfect.
That said, a turnip as president would be preferable to Bush for the next
four years.
I don't *KNOW* that either party organization specifically had
anything to do with making sure that the protestors can't run riot
like Seattle, WTO, 1999.
Note that they didn't.
They *couldn't*.
Oh nonsense. They weren't hobbled, for Pete's sake. I saw video of the
march, there were enough people there to do any kind of violence they
wanted.
They didn't.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 10:54:09 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:43:16 -0400, wrote:
FWIW - I was at the package store just now and the owner was talking
about disliking Bush, and saying he doesn't like Kerry either - he
said he may not vote. I used one of the thousand reasons: I said "one
thing Kerry has going for him is that he's not Bush." His eyes lit up
and he gave a nod!!
ONly the fringe element looks at it that way.
Also, isn't it interesting that the Republican Convention is swamped
with paranoiac levels of security, massive presence of cops, plans to
process so many arrests etc? Extra metal detectors, more than triple
the TV cameras, etc?
The weirdos are out enmass.
Apparently, if more than a few people go to Central Park, there's
going to be a problem. How will they distinguish a bunch of people
enjoying the outdoors from a radical protest group?.
drift
Sounds pretty simple to me. A bunch of people out enjoying the outdoors doesn't destroy
things.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Holloway" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
27 Aug 2004 02:28:24 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:24 +0100, Jez <iced_spear@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote:
One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush
http://www.thousandreasons.org/listB.html
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior candidate and best
choice.
That's a good reason. No wonder so many Republicans wish it were true.
Dave
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 10:49:50 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:28:24 -0500, Dave Holloway <silentdave47NOSPAM@cableone.net> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior candidate and best
choice.
That's a good reason. No wonder so many Republicans wish it were true.
It is true. John kerry faked his way to 3 purple hearts in Vietnam and got an early out.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "nemo nemo outis" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 11:06:21 AM |
|
|
In article <jnu3j0lh8s9oubbj3nqur03n2979mb0co0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:28:24 -0500, Dave Holloway
<silentdave47NOSPAM@cableone.net> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best
choice.
That's a good reason. No wonder so many Republicans wish it were true.
It is true. John kerry faked his way to 3 purple hearts in Vietnam and got an
early out.
Holy *****! Then you mean when Bush said on NBC that Kerry was
more heroic than he was, he was lying? Again?
And if Kerry is a faker and shirker as you say, then what must
Bush, who admits he is less heroic than Kerry, be?
Say it isn't so. You're destroying my faith in the integrity of
politicians.
Regards,
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 03:48:09 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:06:21 GMT, nemo (nemo outis) wrote:
Holy *****! Then you mean when Bush said on NBC that Kerry was
more heroic than he was, he was lying? Again?
Nope, being polite.
And if Kerry is a faker and shirker as you say, then what must
Bush, who admits he is less heroic than Kerry, be?
Polite.
Say it isn't so. You're destroying my faith in the integrity of
politicians.
So you're been a 'rat all this time.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 11:31:28 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:28:24 -0500, Dave Holloway
<silentdave47NOSPAM@cableone.net> wrote:
One reason to vote for George Bush - he is by far and away the superior
candidate and best choice.
That's a good reason. No wonder so many Republicans wish it were true.
It is true. John kerry faked his way to 3 purple hearts in Vietnam and
got an early out. duke
This is false. Kerry faked nothing.
You are a liar.
Say, doesn't the bible forbid lying?
Yet, you are tthe stuoidest religous fanatic shitting in AA.
Yet lying us into a war in Iraq is OK.
When it comes to lying about militay claims, try www.awolbush.com were Bush
lies about his military record are to be found.
Kerry, a hero, Bush a lying zero.
There is a picture there of Bush in uniform from the 70's
wearing a medal he has no right too.
--
Senator Waxman's searchable database of iraq war lies.
www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/
A good portal to more lies and Bush stupidity is to be found at
www.failureisimpossible.com - Go to the index and go to
"L" for lies. All you need to know about Bush when you
step into the voting booth. Bush is a liar and surrounds
himself with fellow liars.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT:One Thousand Reasons to Vote Against George Bush |
29 Aug 2004 03:52:27 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:31:28 -0400, wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
It is true. John kerry faked his way to 3 purple hearts in Vietnam and
got an early out. duke
This is false. Kerry faked nothing.
You are a liar.
Say, doesn't the bible forbid lying?
Yes, kerry should know better.
Yet, you are tthe stuoidest religous fanatic shitting in AA.
Very pleasurable.
Yet lying us into a war in Iraq is OK.
When it comes to lying about militay claims, try www.awolbush.com were Bush
lies about his military record are to be found.
That's Terry McAuliffe's website. Hes the chairman of the DNC. He needs the job.
Kerry, a hero, Bush a lying zero.
Kerry did not impress his boat captain, now rear admiral.
There is a picture there of Bush in uniform from the 70's
wearing a medal he has no right too.
What's it for?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
