Religions > Atheism > Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
06 Jun 2007 06:02:44 PM |
| Object: |
Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
398 U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan
25,830 U.S. Military Maimed in Iraq (source: DoD Update as of June 5, 2007)
71,042 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: Iraq Body Count)
655,000 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: The Lancet)
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
07 Jun 2007 01:50:25 AM |
|
|
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
398 U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan
25,830 U.S. Military Maimed in Iraq (source: DoD Update as of June 5, 2007)
71,042 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: Iraq Body Count)
655,000 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: The Lancet)
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
07 Jun 2007 03:56:59 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
398 U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan
25,830 U.S. Military Maimed in Iraq (source: DoD Update as of June 5,
2007)
71,042 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: Iraq Body Count)
655,000 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: The Lancet)
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
07 Jun 2007 06:49:31 PM |
|
|
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
398 U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan
25,830 U.S. Military Maimed in Iraq (source: DoD Update as of June 5,
2007)
71,042 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: Iraq Body Count)
655,000 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: The Lancet)
--
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
08 Jun 2007 12:25:11 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
398 U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan
25,830 U.S. Military Maimed in Iraq (source: DoD Update as of June 5,
2007)
71,042 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: Iraq Body Count)
655,000 Iraqis Reported Killed (source: The Lancet)
--
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
08 Jun 2007 06:20:13 PM |
|
|
In article <waKdnQidDO62dfXbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
I know. Someone in BushCo with half a brain figured out that they'd
better renounce the World Court treaty in 2002 so they could escape
prosecution. This is even though Clinton had signed on in 2000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1970312.stm
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
08 Jun 2007 08:13:16 PM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-2DED77.16201308062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <waKdnQidDO62dfXbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll
have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
I know. Someone in BushCo with half a brain figured out that they'd
better renounce the World Court treaty in 2002 so they could escape
prosecution. This is even though Clinton had signed on in 2000.
I read the article. That cowardly *****!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1970312.stm
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
09 Jun 2007 12:54:18 AM |
|
|
In article <E7qdnc_kOaoDY_TbnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-2DED77.16201308062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <waKdnQidDO62dfXbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll
have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
I know. Someone in BushCo with half a brain figured out that they'd
better renounce the World Court treaty in 2002 so they could escape
prosecution. This is even though Clinton had signed on in 2000.
I read the article. That cowardly *****!
Isn't he. These guys knew what was going to happen and they are covering
their little fannies. I don't know why other countries even want to deal
with us anymore. Did you see Bush strutting around Europe this week
acting like little Napoleon?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1970312.stm
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
09 Jun 2007 10:49:41 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-F9BF25.22541808062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <E7qdnc_kOaoDY_TbnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-2DED77.16201308062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <waKdnQidDO62dfXbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll
have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
I know. Someone in BushCo with half a brain figured out that they'd
better renounce the World Court treaty in 2002 so they could escape
prosecution. This is even though Clinton had signed on in 2000.
I read the article. That cowardly *****!
Isn't he. These guys knew what was going to happen and they are covering
their little fannies. I don't know why other countries even want to deal
with us anymore. Did you see Bush strutting around Europe this week
acting like little Napoleon?
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1970312.stm
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
09 Jun 2007 06:15:42 PM |
|
|
In article <xL2dnW8-2-uaUffbnZ2dnUVZ_oupnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-F9BF25.22541808062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <E7qdnc_kOaoDY_TbnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-2DED77.16201308062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <waKdnQidDO62dfXbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-1DAF40.16493107062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <1sSdnXe_U4nMVfrbnZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-302CBF.23502506062007@news.giganews.com...
In article <WfydnRwAE6SXoPrbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
I still say that the cowardly deserter from
the National Guard in a time of war should
be placed on the front line (the place in the
most danger).
Bush Lied, Soldiers Keep Dying.
3,503 U.S. Military Fatalities in Iraq
26 so far this month. It's still only the 6th. At this rate we'll
have
130 by the end of the month, More than last month.
It was a phony war from day one. Bush should
be up on both treason and murder charges.
Then sent over to The Hague for prosecution as a war criminal.
Definitely, but I think they figured out some way
around that.
I know. Someone in BushCo with half a brain figured out that they'd
better renounce the World Court treaty in 2002 so they could escape
prosecution. This is even though Clinton had signed on in 2000.
I read the article. That cowardly *****!
Isn't he. These guys knew what was going to happen and they are covering
their little fannies. I don't know why other countries even want to deal
with us anymore. Did you see Bush strutting around Europe this week
acting like little Napoleon?
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to behave
in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush pushing?
Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet, and there are
still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie system works or not.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1970312.stm
--
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
09 Jun 2007 05:34:15 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
The proposed system, designed to guard against a missile attack from
Iran, poses serious diplomatic and technical challenges, experts said.
But the fact that it was suggested by Mr. Putin, and not immediately
rejected by Mr. Bush, indicated a desire on both sides to cool the
hostile exchanges that in recent months had driven relations to a low
point in the post-cold-war era.
The offer came during a much anticipated private meeting between the
presidents at a gathering of leaders of wealthy democracies. Mr. Bush
said that Mr. Putin had put forth “some interesting suggestions,” and
that the two agreed to form a working group of military and diplomatic
experts to examine how they could cooperate on missile defense, an issue
that has long divided Russia and the United States.
As I’ve argued many times, the missile defense argument is a charade.
Russia needs missile protection – from the east and south. It also needs
western allies....
[much more at the site]
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 01:05:53 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical reasons
it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to the launch
site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
The proposed system, designed to guard against a missile attack from
Iran, poses serious diplomatic and technical challenges, experts said.
But the fact that it was suggested by Mr. Putin, and not immediately
rejected by Mr. Bush, indicated a desire on both sides to cool the
hostile exchanges that in recent months had driven relations to a low
point in the post-cold-war era.
The offer came during a much anticipated private meeting between the
presidents at a gathering of leaders of wealthy democracies. Mr. Bush
said that Mr. Putin had put forth “some interesting suggestions,” and
that the two agreed to form a working group of military and diplomatic
experts to examine how they could cooperate on missile defense, an issue
that has long divided Russia and the United States.
As I’ve argued many times, the missile defense argument is a charade.
Russia needs missile protection – from the east and south. It also needs
western allies....
[much more at the site]
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 06:23:05 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical reasons
it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to the launch
site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a diplomatic
maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine about Bush being
such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that seemed
like posturing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 08:00:12 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote in message
news:466bdde2$0$6869$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
We don't get our information from Yang. I get mine
from BuzzFlash and Zepp, the occasional blog and
Keith Olberman. They don't fear to tell the truth and
find articles that the regular papers and newscasts
are afraid to print or show.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical reasons
it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to the launch
site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a
diplomatic
maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine about Bush
being
such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
Actually, I wasn't the one who wrote that. I said
that he was banging his weasly chest like Tarzan
and trying to do as much damage as he could.
But, if the little bitty shoe fits...
Honestly, Fred, what do you see in this guy? He
has the IQ of a grapefruit, no morals, ethics or
scruples, doesn't care how many people have to
die as long as he gets his way, is trying to destroy
the Constitution and Bill of Rights, has ruined
our country's reputation worldwide and is trying
to hide information that he knows will incriminate
him and Cheney and Rove. How can you support
such a creature? Even his own Party has turned
against him.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
When fascism comes to America, it will be
wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross -
Sinclair Lewis
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 10:43:07 AM |
|
|
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Fred Stone" <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote in message
news:466bdde2$0$6869$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
We don't get our information from Yang. I get mine
from BuzzFlash and Zepp, the occasional blog and
Keith Olberman. They don't fear to tell the truth and
find articles that the regular papers and newscasts
are afraid to print or show.
Zepp is even worse than Yang, and Olbermoonbat has been fisked so many times
that he's a running joke
They aren't fearless. They know perfecly well that there will be no
repercussions for their silly lies. If they were really fearless they would
expose some of the lies coming from the Left, but that would get them
ostracized like Joe Lieberman or some of the more honest reporters who have
*dared* to break with the moonbat pack.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical reasons
it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to the launch
site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a
diplomatic maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine
about Bush being such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
Actually, I wasn't the one who wrote that. I said
that he was banging his weasly chest like Tarzan
and trying to do as much damage as he could.
But, if the little bitty shoe fits...
Honestly, Fred, what do you see in this guy?
I see you repeating stupid lies about him.
He
has the IQ of a grapefruit, no morals, ethics or
scruples, doesn't care how many people have to
die as long as he gets his way, is trying to destroy
the Constitution and Bill of Rights, has ruined
our country's reputation worldwide and is trying
to hide information that he knows will incriminate
him and Cheney and Rove. How can you support
such a creature? Even his own Party has turned
against him.
I support the truth, Michelle. It's just too bad that you've given up doing
that.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that seemed
like posturing."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 06:39:51 PM |
|
|
In article <466bdde2$0$6869$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots like
Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them to
behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why is Bush
pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear weapons yet,
and there are still many questions as to whether our anti-misslie
system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system in the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical reasons
it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to the launch
site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a diplomatic
maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine about Bush being
such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
You may have missed it but two days later in Poland Bush said he was
going back to the original plan of putting the missiles back in Poland.
Then yesterday, the little swaggerer goes to Albania and give Putin a
poke in the eye again by demanding independence for Kosovo.
So much for diplomacy.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
10 Jun 2007 06:13:45 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-7917BE.16395110062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <466bdde2$0$6869$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots
like Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them
to behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why
is Bush pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear
weapons yet, and there are still many questions as to whether
our anti-misslie system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for
missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system
in the former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical
reasons it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to
the launch site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a
diplomatic maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine
about Bush being such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
You may have missed it but two days later in Poland Bush said he was
going back to the original plan of putting the missiles back in
Poland. Then yesterday, the little swaggerer goes to Albania and give
Putin a poke in the eye again by demanding independence for Kosovo.
So much for diplomacy.
And where exactly does Putin get off telling Kosovo that they can't have
independence? Or threatening Europe over the missile shield in Poland?
What in the ***** is WRONG with you people?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
11 Jun 2007 12:08:24 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns994BCCC7878E6freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-7917BE.16395110062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <466bdde2$0$6869$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994AC60FA4D90freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-70EB6A.16154209062007@news.giganews.com:
Yes, and it's obvious that no one wants to have
anything to do with him. He did them all a favor
by catching a stomach virus the other day and
missing meetings. And, all this idiocy with Putin...
I wish they'd both grew up.
You both need start observing the world instead of letting idiots
like Yang feed you propaganda all day long.
I was hoping Angela Merkel would scold them both and tell them
to behave in her house. I don't get this thing with Russia. Why
is Bush pushing? Iran doesn't have the missiles or the nuclear
weapons yet, and there are still many questions as to whether
our anti-misslie system works or not.
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1810
The NY Times reported:
After months of angrily rejecting a White House plan for
missile
defense in Europe, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia surprised
President Bush on Thursday with an offer to build a joint system
in the former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan.
I saw that, but some have raised objections that for technical
reasons it is harder for technical to intercept missiles closer to
the launch site when they are in the 'boost stage'.
Minor technical details do not alter the fact that this was all a
diplomatic maneuver that completely blows away Michelle's whole whine
about Bush being such a bullying Napoleon at the G-8 meeting.
You may have missed it but two days later in Poland Bush said he was
going back to the original plan of putting the missiles back in
Poland. Then yesterday, the little swaggerer goes to Albania and give
Putin a poke in the eye again by demanding independence for Kosovo.
So much for diplomacy.
And where exactly does Putin get off telling Kosovo that they can't have
independence? Or threatening Europe over the missile shield in Poland?
What in the ***** is WRONG with you people?
Where does Little Bush get off telling Serbia that they have to let
Kosovo go? That's something between the Serbs and the Kossovars. In case
you forget, Serbia and Russia have been close friends allies going back
to the 19th century.
..As far as the missiles, I remember the US getting just a little bit
peeved in 1962 over a little missile incident in Cuba.
Stop drinking that right wing Kool-Aid. It rots the mind.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
11 Jun 2007 11:40:58 AM |
|
|
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
.As far as the missiles, I remember the US getting just
a little bit peeved in 1962 over a little missile incident in
Cuba.
You're not being fair. The Soviets placed offensive nuclear
weapons in Cuba. Bush wants to place an anti-ballistic
missile (ABM) system in eastern Europe.
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
11 Jun 2007 11:50:00 PM |
|
|
In article <1181580058.937415.247070@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
.As far as the missiles, I remember the US getting just
a little bit peeved in 1962 over a little missile incident in
Cuba.
You're not being fair. The Soviets placed offensive nuclear
weapons in Cuba. Bush wants to place an anti-ballistic
missile (ABM) system in eastern Europe.
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's the
impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the ABMs will
knock down their retaliatory strike.
Actually I think that in reality it's a lot of posturing by both sides.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
12 Jun 2007 01:02:36 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
12 Jun 2007 05:34:10 PM |
|
|
In article <1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics than
security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's superpower status
and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are former Communists
officials, some are right wing nationalists. To placate them Putin,
feels the need to appear tough in international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but Bush is
acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his own way, he
gets stubborn and acts up even more.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
12 Jun 2007 05:37:57 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics than
security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's superpower
status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are former
Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists. To placate
them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but Bush
is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his own way,
he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the President
that way. President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled child than are
any other world leaders. Just because he won't give in at the first sign
of resistance doesn't make him "stubborn". You people seem to want
America to do all the giving so that every other country on Earth can do
all the taking.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
12 Jun 2007 11:26:52 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled
child than are any other world leaders. Just
because he won't give in at the first sign of
resistance doesn't make him "stubborn".
Here in our universe, a missile defense was so
controversial that Clinton had to leave the decision
on whether of not to build one to his successor.
He had no choice. He could've said "Yes" only to
spend $100 billion on the plan and have the next
guy cancel it. Or he could say "no," order the
project to stand down only to have the next guy
spend all the money to bring it back up again.
Anyhow, that was for the United States. We're
talking about Europe here. Where placing such
a defense system in, say, California was truly
controversial, Bush wants one in Europe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
13 Jun 2007 05:37:30 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled
child than are any other world leaders. Just
because he won't give in at the first sign of
resistance doesn't make him "stubborn".
Here in our universe, a missile defense was so
controversial that Clinton had to leave the decision
on whether of not to build one to his successor.
He had no choice. He could've said "Yes" only to
spend $100 billion on the plan and have the next
guy cancel it. Or he could say "no," order the
project to stand down only to have the next guy
spend all the money to bring it back up again.
Anyhow, that was for the United States. We're
talking about Europe here. Where placing such
a defense system in, say, California was truly
controversial, Bush wants one in Europe.
Oooo it was controversial. In JTEM's universe, that makes it wrong.
Presidents should only make *safe* decisions. Popular ones.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that seemed
like posturing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
13 Jun 2007 11:47:23 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <N...@Biznez.net> wrote:
Oooo it was controversial. In JTEM's universe, that
makes it wrong.
It shattered the ABM treaty. Yeah, a lot of people thought
that was wrong.
Nixon got us into the treaty, signed it, and Bush WITHDREW
the United States from the treaty.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Over 3500 Soldiers Dead Due to Shrub Trying to Outdo His Daddy |
12 Jun 2007 11:39:57 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns994DC6BB9FD09freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics than
security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's superpower
status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are former
Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists. To placate
them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but Bush
is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his own way,
he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the President
that way. President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled child than are
any other world leaders. Just because he won't give in at the first sign
of resistance doesn't make him "stubborn". You people seem to want
America to do all the giving so that every other country on Earth can do
all the taking.
Bush and the neocons have a one track mind. they want their American
Imperium and don't understand why some other countries might object.
When they do object he gets angry and resorts to bluster. He blunders
into situations that he really doesn't understand. When things go wrong
he keeps on making the same mistakes over and over. He refuses to take
advice from anyone except his close cronies. Fortunately we have less
than two year of him left. Hopefully, he won't destroy the country or
the planet in the meantime.
I feel sorry for the next president. He or she will have a hell of a
time cleaning up Bush's messes.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Get Rid Of Yang's Stupid Thread Titles |
13 Jun 2007 05:35:26 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994DC6BB9FD09freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics than
security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's superpower
status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are former
Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists. To placate
them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but Bush
is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his own way,
he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the President
that way. President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled child than are
any other world leaders. Just because he won't give in at the first sign
of resistance doesn't make him "stubborn". You people seem to want
America to do all the giving so that every other country on Earth can do
all the taking.
Bush and the neocons have a one track mind. they want their American
Imperium and don't understand why some other countries might object.
That's just silly. He knows perfectly well why some countries might object
to being confronted over their human rights records or their brazen support
of terrorism.
When they do object he gets angry and resorts to bluster.
You've been listening to too much Coal-bear.
He blunders
into situations that he really doesn't understand. When things go wrong
he keeps on making the same mistakes over and over.
Yep, too much Coal-bear and Olbermoonbat. Neither of them see anything but
their own reflections in the mirror and they think they're being so
profound.
He refuses to take
advice from anyone except his close cronies.
He seems to get advice from everybody on the damn planet. He doesn't take
*your* lousy advice, which is what really bugs the ***** out of you.
Fortunately we have less
than two year of him left. Hopefully, he won't destroy the country or
the planet in the meantime.
I don't think you need to worry about that. I'm more worried about what your
heroic leedurrs will do to the planet in the name of saving it. The
Goracle's next ego-trip will cost American trillions of dollars for
absolutely nothing.
I feel sorry for the next president. He or she will have a hell of a
time cleaning up Bush's messes.
Bush had a hell of a time cleaning up Clinton's messes.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that seemed
like posturing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Get Rid Of Yang's Stupid Thread Titles |
13 Jun 2007 05:40:58 PM |
|
|
In article <466fc79b$0$7201$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994DC6BB9FD09freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use against
other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot missiles were
adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least that's
the impression that they give, that if the US attacks first, the
ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't make
much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics than
security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's superpower
status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are former
Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists. To placate
them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but Bush
is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his own way,
he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the President
that way. President Bush is no more acting like a spoiled child than are
any other world leaders. Just because he won't give in at the first sign
of resistance doesn't make him "stubborn". You people seem to want
America to do all the giving so that every other country on Earth can do
all the taking.
Bush and the neocons have a one track mind. they want their American
Imperium and don't understand why some other countries might object.
That's just silly. He knows perfectly well why some countries might object
to being confronted over their human rights records or their brazen support
of terrorism.
Perhaps he should look at his own country's recent record before he
casts the first stone.
When they do object he gets angry and resorts to bluster.
You've been listening to too much Coal-bear.
He blunders
into situations that he really doesn't understand. When things go wrong
he keeps on making the same mistakes over and over.
Yep, too much Coal-bear and Olbermoonbat. Neither of them see anything but
their own reflections in the mirror and they think they're being so
profound.
That's nice now go listen to Rush and turn on Faux Spews.
He refuses to take
advice from anyone except his close cronies.
He seems to get advice from everybody on the damn planet. He doesn't take
*your* lousy advice, which is what really bugs the ***** out of you.
I'm far from the only one.
Fortunately we have less
than two year of him left. Hopefully, he won't destroy the country or
the planet in the meantime.
I don't think you need to worry about that. I'm more worried about what your
heroic leedurrs will do to the planet in the name of saving it. The
Goracle's next ego-trip will cost American trillions of dollars for
absolutely nothing.
Gore really pisses you off, doesn't he? Afraid he might be right?
I feel sorry for the next president. He or she will have a hell of a
time cleaning up Bush's messes.
Bush had a hell of a time cleaning up Clinton's messes.
Not really. It didn't take him long to get ride of that big surplus.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Get Rid Of Yang's Stupid Thread Titles |
13 Jun 2007 08:02:36 PM |
|
|
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-5C0837.15405813062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <466fc79b$0$7201$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994DC6BB9FD09freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article
<1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use
against other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot
missiles were adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least
that's the impression that they give, that if the US attacks
first, the ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't
make much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics
than security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's
superpower status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are
former Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists.
To placate them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in
international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but
Bush is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his
own way, he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the
President that way. President Bush is no more acting like a
spoiled child than are any other world leaders. Just because he
won't give in at the first sign of resistance doesn't make him
"stubborn". You people seem to want America to do all the giving
so that every other country on Earth can do all the taking.
Bush and the neocons have a one track mind. they want their
American Imperium and don't understand why some other countries
might object.
That's just silly. He knows perfectly well why some countries might
object to being confronted over their human rights records or their
brazen support of terrorism.
Perhaps he should look at his own country's recent record before he
casts the first stone.
Show me *one* case of *any* American serviceman who did *anything*
remotely resembling anything in the al Qaeda handbook. Just one, and
then you can pretend that there is some kind of moral equivalence.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0524072torture1.html
And don't give me that ***** about how we have to be better than they
are. We *ARE* better than they are.
When they do object he gets angry and resorts to bluster.
You've been listening to too much Coal-bear.
He blunders
into situations that he really doesn't understand. When things go
wrong he keeps on making the same mistakes over and over.
Yep, too much Coal-bear and Olbermoonbat. Neither of them see
anything but their own reflections in the mirror and they think
they're being so profound.
That's nice now go listen to Rush and turn on Faux Spews.
Sorry, but if I turn on Fox it'll clash with Geddy Lee's vocals.
He refuses to take
advice from anyone except his close cronies.
He seems to get advice from everybody on the damn planet. He doesn't
take *your* lousy advice, which is what really bugs the ***** out of
you.
I'm far from the only one.
And you all whine about how Bush won't totally ***** things up by taking
your stupid advice.
Fortunately we have less
than two year of him left. Hopefully, he won't destroy the country
or the planet in the meantime.
I don't think you need to worry about that. I'm more worried about
what your heroic leedurrs will do to the planet in the name of saving
it. The Goracle's next ego-trip will cost American trillions of
dollars for absolutely nothing.
Gore really pisses you off, doesn't he? Afraid he might be right?
I am absolutely certain that he's dead wrong and equally certain that
people like you are stupid enough to let him ***** things up.
I feel sorry for the next president. He or she will have a hell of
a time cleaning up Bush's messes.
Bush had a hell of a time cleaning up Clinton's messes.
Not really. It didn't take him long to get ride of that big surplus.
9/11, johac. THAT was Clinton's little present for Bush.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Get Rid Of Yang's Stupid Thread Titles |
13 Jun 2007 11:39:40 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns994EDF469DF7Cfreddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-5C0837.15405813062007@news.giganews.com:
In article <466fc79b$0$7201$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
Fred Stone <Nunya@Biznez.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <Xns994DC6BB9FD09freddybear@66.150.105.47>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachmann@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-CCA1A4.15341012062007@news.giganews.com:
In article
<1181671356.849363.102680@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
An ABM is effectively an anti-aircraft missile for use
against other missiles, similar to the way the Patriot
missiles were adapted to shoot down Scuds.
Yes, but the Russians are probably worried, or at least
that's the impression that they give, that if the US attacks
first, the ABMs will knock down their retaliatory strike.
Maybe. But I've got to wonder about Russia's insistance that
the missiles could be adapted for offensive use. It doesn't
make much sense. It comes across more as fear mongering ala
GOP... give the people something to worry about... keep their
attention off the fact that their "Democratic" President is an
unelected dictator.
I agree that Putin's objections have more to do with politics
than security. Many in Russia bemoan the loss of Russia's
superpower status and blame Putin and his predecessors. Some are
former Communists officials, some are right wing nationalists.
To placate them Putin, feels the need to appear tough in
international politics.
I'm sure that the whole question can be solved by diplomacy, but
Bush is acting like a spoiled child. If he can't have things his
own way, he gets stubborn and acts up even more.
I don't understand why you feel the need to characterize the
President that way. President Bush is no more acting like a
spoiled child than are any other world leaders. Just because he
won't give in at the first sign of resistance doesn't make him
"stubborn". You people seem to want America to do all the giving
so that every other country on Earth can do all the taking.
Bush and the neocons have a one track mind. they want their
American Imperium and don't understand why some other countries
might object.
That's just silly. He knows perfectly well why some countries might
object to being confronted over their human rights records or their
brazen support of terrorism.
Perhaps he should look at his own country's recent record before he
casts the first stone.
Show me *one* case of *any* American serviceman who did *anything*
remotely resembling anything in the al Qaeda handbook. Just one, and
then you can pretend that there is some kind of moral equivalence.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0524072torture1.html
And don't give me that ***** about how we have to be better than they
are. We *ARE* better than they are.
When they do object he gets angry and resorts to bluster.
You've been listening to too much Coal-bear.
He blunders
into situations that he really doesn't understand. When things go
wrong he keeps on making the same mistakes over and over.
Yep, too much Coal-bear and Olbermoonbat. Neither of them see
anything but their own reflections in the mirror and they think
they're being so profound.
That's nice now go listen to Rush and turn on Faux Spews.
Sorry, but if I turn on Fox it'll clash with Geddy Lee's vocals.
He refuses to take
advice from anyone except his close cronies.
He seems to get advice from everybody on the damn planet. He doesn't
take *your* lousy advice, which is what really bugs the ***** out of
you.
I'm far from the only one.
And you all whine about how Bush won't totally ***** things up by taking
your stupid advice.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
