Passion of Christ



 Religions > Atheism > Passion of Christ

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 3 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Bill"
Date: 28 Jan 2005 11:56:29 AM
Object: Passion of Christ
I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.
I cannot understand how any sane person could believe that any real God
would put himself through such humiliation and torture? Why live for 33
years as a poor carpenter to bring his word to only a miniscule portion of
the human race and then die a humiliating and painful death by being
tortured and nailed on a cross with two criminals?
After all, God created man and mans sins. If he was a real God why didn't he
just forgive them without all the cruelty, torture and gore? And why didn't
he appear to the whole world and inform people directly that he was God and
what he expected of them? Why did he wait 100,000 years after man was on the
earth to so indirectly and ineffectively deliver his message. Why did he
create man with such nasty habits in the first place?
Many fairy tales are more believable than this gruesome story.
--
Bill
.

User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 10:34:45 PM
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:04:00 -0600, "valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

You claimed that Jesus was loved by his followers as a God. I point
out that the Bible itself has Judas betraying Jesus for 30 pieces of
silver. Hardly the act of someone who worshipped Jesus. Then Peter,
after the arrest, denies even knowing Jesus three times! Hardly the
act of a loyal friend and follower!

Another Christer who doesn't even know what the bloody book says. Why
am I not surprised?


You sure are an angry person.

How do you arrive at that conclusion?

Anyway, they weren't positive at the time that he was God.
And remember, what those 2 did after Jesus' death?
One ran off to be alone and the other killed himself.

Which contradicts what you just said.
Oh, and the Gospels give Judas two different death scenes, and two
different stories for what he did with the money.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 05:18:24 PM
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:04:00 -0600, "valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com> said
in alt.atheism:

Anyway, they weren't positive at the time that he was God.
And remember, what those 2 did after Jesus' death?
One ran off to be alone and the other killed himself.

First by hanging himself then, after he was dead, by dashing himself
to the ground. Or was it the other way around? It's so hard to keep
these multiple suicides on a single body straight.
--
"religion did for *****, what Stonehenge did for rocks"
- The World Famous Tink
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 02:21:48 AM
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:53:09 -0600, "valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com> said
in alt.atheism:

"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:rujlv0h5famhhmm8n7bjd7kacpfkbdgio0@4ax.com...

On 28 Jan 2005 14:31:35 -0800,

drained his
beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed
the following

But that's not the point, God is LOVE incarnate, jesus was deeply
loved by his followers and they loved him as a God,

Yup, they loved him so much that one of them sold him out first chance
he got, and his right-hand man denied knowing him not once, not twice,
but three times in the space of a few hours!
With friends like that!

That proves nothing.

Merely your assertion.
--
"Creationists are the best evidence we have that there is no intelligent design."
-Josef Balluch
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.

User: "Sam"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 05:57:29 PM
Douglas Berry wrote:

On 28 Jan 2005 14:31:35 -0800,

drained his
beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed
the following

But that's not the point, God is LOVE incarnate, jesus was deeply
loved by his followers and they loved him as a God,



Yup, they loved him so much that one of them sold him out first chance
he got, and his right-hand man denied knowing him not once, not twice,
but three times in the space of a few hours!

With friends like that!

well he was sold out because he cared nothing for the plight of his
people in their political climate, all he had were pie in the sky
platitudes about loving enemies. which worked out real well for the enemy
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 06:58:21 PM
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:57:29 GMT, Sam <srcarruth@yahoo.NO.SPAM.com>
wrote:



Douglas Berry wrote:

On 28 Jan 2005 14:31:35 -0800,

drained his
beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed
the following

But that's not the point, God is LOVE incarnate, jesus was deeply
loved by his followers and they loved him as a God,



Yup, they loved him so much that one of them sold him out first chance
he got, and his right-hand man denied knowing him not once, not twice,
but three times in the space of a few hours!

With friends like that!


well he was sold out because he cared nothing for the plight of his
people in their political climate, all he had were pie in the sky
platitudes about loving enemies. which worked out real well for the enemy

But -in the end- Lord Voldemort will get defeated, doesn't he?
.


User: "Gregory Gadow"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 02:12:33 PM
Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.

For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the same thing.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 12:45:49 AM
"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message
news:41FA9CB1.11A55C1F@serv.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the same

thing.


--

Too easy.

Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear

"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005


.

User: "Clayton Based Life Form"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 05:25:52 PM
"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message
news:41FA9CB1.11A55C1F@serv.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the same

thing.
At least movies like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" have a relevant and
useful message...that inbred hicks from Texas are dangerous!!! Couldn't get
a message more relevant to today than that!
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 12:51:29 AM
"Clayton Based Life Form" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymail.com> wrote in message
news:41fac958$0$1022$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...


"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message
news:41FA9CB1.11A55C1F@serv.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night.

It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the

same

thing.

At least movies like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" have a relevant and
useful message...that inbred hicks from Texas are dangerous!!! Couldn't

get

a message more relevant to today than that!

Dude (hehe) I am from Texas. What a stupid stereotype. Houston is the
business capital
of the U.S. And it is the most ethnically varied of the U.S. Talk about how
we are fat.....c'mon!



.
User: "Clayton Based Life Form"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 02:30:53 AM
"valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com> wrote in message
news:10vmckhr4crf60e@corp.supernews.com...


"Clayton Based Life Form" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymail.com> wrote in message
news:41fac958$0$1022$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...


"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message
news:41FA9CB1.11A55C1F@serv.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night.

It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the

same

thing.

At least movies like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" have a relevant and
useful message...that inbred hicks from Texas are dangerous!!! Couldn't

get

a message more relevant to today than that!


Dude (hehe) I am from Texas. What a stupid stereotype. Houston is the
business capital
of the U.S. And it is the most ethnically varied of the U.S. Talk about

how

we are fat.....c'mon!

I was talking about ONE particular dangerous, inbred Texan who makes
Leatherface look like the Easter Bunny!
.

User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 12:00:31 PM
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:51:29 -0600, "valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

Dude (hehe) I am from Texas. What a stupid stereotype. Houston is the
business capital of the U.S. And it is the most ethnically varied of the U.S. Talk about how
we are fat.....c'mon!

Houston. You are claiming than Houston is the business capital of the
US? Ever hear of New York City? Chicago?
As for ethnic variation, come to San Francisco sometime. Within
walking distance of my old place there, we had a Russian Orthodox
church, Vietnamese restaurants, an oil-change place owned by
Cambodians, an actual Chinese laundry, and a great tacqueria.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 01:02:11 PM
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8jjnv0tl807fkjtdssehd4l43e51r77aak@4ax.com...

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:51:29 -0600, "valhalla" <valhalla@ev1.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

Dude (hehe) I am from Texas. What a stupid stereotype. Houston is the
business capital of the U.S. And it is the most ethnically varied of the

U.S. Talk about how

we are fat.....c'mon!


Houston. You are claiming than Houston is the business capital of the
US? Ever hear of New York City? Chicago?

As for ethnic variation, come to San Francisco sometime. Within
walking distance of my old place there, we had a Russian Orthodox
church, Vietnamese restaurants, an oil-change place owned by
Cambodians, an actual Chinese laundry, and a great tacqueria.
--

Same here.


Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.

.


User: "Gary DeWaay"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 10:40:29 PM
valhalla's at
wisdom:


Dude (hehe) I am from Texas. What a stupid stereotype. Houston is the
business capital
of the U.S. And it is the most ethnically varied of the U.S

Because some people like country, and others like western?
--
Gary
"Intolerance, according to the right, is a liberal condition. If a liberal
points out the intolerance of a conservative position, the liberal is
intolerant because they don't accept others' beliefs. If a conservative
points out the "intolerance" of a liberal position, the liberal is
intolerant because they don't accept others' beliefs. Can a conservative
be intolerant? Only if they take a liberal position." Jesse Taylor
.


User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 07:07:58 PM
"Clayton Based Life Form" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymail.com> wrote in message
news:41fac958$0$1022$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...


"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message
news:41FA9CB1.11A55C1F@serv.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the same

thing.

At least movies like "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" have a relevant and
useful message...that inbred hicks from Texas are dangerous!!! Couldn't
get
a message more relevant to today than that!

SNORK!
Ooops, pardon me <cleans keyboard>
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.


User: "dgillesp"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 04:40:37 PM
Gregory Gadow wrote:

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


For a lot of people, "blood and gore" and "religion" are one and the same thing.

Most of them are atheists, I gather from lots of posts on this NG.
Denny



--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear

"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005

.

User: "stbenn"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 03:51:14 PM
Read this story for a good laugh.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/26/oscar.passion/index.html
It seems there's a christian group thats furious with the
Oscars for not nominating PotC for best picture, claiming
they're biased against religious movies. Oh, it couldn't
possibly be because the movie wasn't good enough, no! its
because Hollywood doesn't like religious movies. Never mind
that religious movies have been honored in the past,
the article mentions several including Ben Hur.
These freaks are so upset they want to boycott Hollywood
and any sponsers of the Oscars! Think about it.
On one hand they're criticizing the Oscars for discriminating
against the movie because its religious in nature, claiming
religion should not be a part of the decision process,
and on the other hand they're championing the movie because
its religious in nature.
christians sure are messed up
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 12:49:01 AM
"stbenn" <sbennetch@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1106949074.280972.94340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


Read this story for a good laugh.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/26/oscar.passion/index.html

It seems there's a christian group thats furious with the
Oscars for not nominating PotC for best picture, claiming
they're biased against religious movies. Oh, it couldn't
possibly be because the movie wasn't good enough, no!

What? Geez. Get a life.
its

because Hollywood doesn't like religious movies. Never mind
that religious movies have been honored in the past,
the article mentions several including Ben Hur.
These freaks are so upset they want to boycott Hollywood
and any sponsers of the Oscars! Think about it.
On one hand they're criticizing the Oscars for discriminating
against the movie because its religious in nature, claiming
religion should not be a part of the decision process,
and on the other hand they're championing the movie because
its religious in nature.

christians sure are messed up

And niggars are stinky. Thanks for the bigotted stereotype.


.
User: "stbenn"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 07:40:45 AM
valhalla wrote:

"stbenn" <sbennetch@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1106949074.280972.94340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


Read this story for a good laugh.


http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/26/oscar.passion/index.html


It seems there's a christian group thats furious with the
Oscars for not nominating PotC for best picture, claiming
they're biased against religious movies. Oh, it couldn't
possibly be because the movie wasn't good enough, no!


What? Geez. Get a life.

Its this group of christians that need to get a life.
Threatening to boycott because their movie wasn't
nominated for an Oscar! There's nothing more pathetic than
someone needing their religion validated by Hollywood.


its

because Hollywood doesn't like religious movies. Never mind
that religious movies have been honored in the past,
the article mentions several including Ben Hur.
These freaks are so upset they want to boycott Hollywood
and any sponsers of the Oscars! Think about it.
On one hand they're criticizing the Oscars for discriminating
against the movie because its religious in nature, claiming
religion should not be a part of the decision process,
and on the other hand they're championing the movie because
its religious in nature.

christians sure are messed up


And niggars are stinky. Thanks for the bigotted stereotype.

Well, you showed your true colors now didn't you.
Is this the kind of mindset you get from christianity?
Or is your hatred of black people a personal view that
christianity did not improve?
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 01:01:12 PM
"stbenn" <sbennetch@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1107006045.851784.81320@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


valhalla wrote:

"stbenn" <sbennetch@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1106949074.280972.94340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


Read this story for a good laugh.


http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/26/oscar.passion/index.html


It seems there's a christian group thats furious with the
Oscars for not nominating PotC for best picture, claiming
they're biased against religious movies. Oh, it couldn't
possibly be because the movie wasn't good enough, no!


What? Geez. Get a life.


Its this group of christians that need to get a life.
Threatening to boycott because their movie wasn't
nominated for an Oscar! There's nothing more pathetic than
someone needing their religion validated by Hollywood.


I don't feel that way

its

because Hollywood doesn't like religious movies. Never mind
that religious movies have been honored in the past,
the article mentions several including Ben Hur.
These freaks are so upset they want to boycott Hollywood
and any sponsers of the Oscars! Think about it.
On one hand they're criticizing the Oscars for discriminating
against the movie because its religious in nature, claiming
religion should not be a part of the decision process,
and on the other hand they're championing the movie because
its religious in nature.

christians sure are messed up


And niggars are stinky. Thanks for the bigotted stereotype.


Well, you showed your true colors now didn't you.
Is this the kind of mindset you get from christianity?
Or is your hatred of black people a personal view that
christianity did not improve?

.

User: "Prism"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 06:14:55 PM
"stbenn" <sbennetch@nyc.rr.com> wrote in news:1107006045.851784.81320
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:


Its this group of christians that need to get a life.
Threatening to boycott because their movie wasn't
nominated for an Oscar! There's nothing more pathetic than
someone needing their religion validated by Hollywood.

I'd say there is nothing more pathetic than anyone needing anything
validated by Hollywood. Thing is this kind of political crap happens every
year because someone, somewhere thinks there favorite movie, documentary,
cartoon or whatever isn't getting a fair shake. Where oh where would we all
be without the rich and glamorous telling us who going to be patting
themselves on the back this year...
Did that sound a tad bit jealous?
.





User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 01:21:25 PM
Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.

Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.
Does this make me shallow?
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
User: "valhalla"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 29 Jan 2005 12:42:47 AM
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1106940013.30718.0@spandrell.news.uk.clara.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.

Does this make me shallow?

Yes. hehe

--

Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org

.

User: "Clayton Based Life Form"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 05:23:33 PM
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1106940013.30718.0@spandrell.news.uk.clara.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It

was

almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.

Does this make me shallow?

Not sure about shallow....illiterate maybe! :)
No true movie buff should go without seeing "Cinema
Paridiso"...careful...you may need tissues at the end...I've seen it 5 times
and I still get weepy!!
.

User: "Marvin"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 01:28:48 PM
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1106940013.30718.0@spandrell.news.uk.clara.net...

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It
was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.

Does this make me shallow?

Makes you honest.


--

Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org

Marvin
###########################################
You wake up in the morning, get something for the pot
Wonder why the sun makes the rocks feel hot
Draw on the walls, eat, get laid
Back in the good old days
- Roger Waters
.
User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 03:43:08 PM
Marvin wrote:

"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1106940013.30718.0@spandrell.news.uk.clara.net...

Bill wrote:


I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It
was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.

Does this make me shallow?



Makes you honest.

That too. Honest and shallow. I can live with that.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.


User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 28 Jan 2005 07:27:23 PM
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:21:25 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:

Bill wrote:

I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.

Any reason for that? You can't read? Or you are fluent in _all_
languages?

Does this make me shallow?

.
User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 30 Jan 2005 08:11:07 AM
Jos Flachs wrote:

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:21:25 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:


Bill wrote:


I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.


Any reason for that? You can't read? Or you are fluent in _all_
languages?

I can read, I just don't like to do so whilst
in the cinema. If I'm going to read a story,
I'll read the book.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 30 Jan 2005 11:56:51 PM
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:11:07 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:

Jos Flachs wrote:

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:21:25 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:


Bill wrote:


I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.


Any reason for that? You can't read? Or you are fluent in _all_
languages?


I can read, I just don't like to do so whilst
in the cinema. If I'm going to read a story,
I'll read the book.

Well, don't take it as offensive. It's less common in the USA. In
Europe dubbing is more or less on the way out. All foreign movies in
Holland are subtitled (Hollandwood doesn't make too many movies).
It's just a matter of getting used to it.
I rather dislike dubbed movies. Nothing more silly than John Wayne
stepping out of a saloon shouting: "Verdammt nog mal, pakke die
Kanone!"
.
User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 31 Jan 2005 02:02:50 PM
Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:11:07 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:


Jos Flachs wrote:


On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:21:25 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:



Bill wrote:



I watched the Passion of Christ movie for the first time last night. It was
almost pure blood and gore. It certainly was not uplifting religion.


Never seen it, never will. Nothing to do with the
content - I just refuse to watch any film which
has subtitles.


Any reason for that? You can't read? Or you are fluent in _all_
languages?


I can read, I just don't like to do so whilst
in the cinema. If I'm going to read a story,
I'll read the book.


Well, don't take it as offensive. It's less common in the USA. In
Europe dubbing is more or less on the way out. All foreign movies in
Holland are subtitled (Hollandwood doesn't make too many movies).
It's just a matter of getting used to it.

I rather dislike dubbed movies. Nothing more silly than John Wayne
stepping out of a saloon shouting: "Verdammt nog mal, pakke die
Kanone!"

I just thought of an exception - I bought Das Boot in
the subtitled version. Couldn't say why really, I've
seen both and just prefered the German one.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Passion of Christ 01 Feb 2005 03:18:02 AM
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:02:50 +0000, Graham Kennedy <graham@ditl.org>
wrote:

I rather dislike dubbed movies. Nothing more silly than John Wayne
stepping out of a saloon shouting: "Verdammt nog mal, pakke die
Kanone!"


I just thought of an exception - I bought Das Boot in
the subtitled version. Couldn't say why really, I've
seen both and just prefered the German one.

That's a nice example. Most movies are simply better in their original
language, even if you can' t understand it.
Subtitles may seem irritating, but you get used to it very quickly.
.







  Page 3 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3802     pg.2110     pg.1170     pg.648     pg.358     pg.197     pg.108     pg.59     pg.32     pg.17     pg.9     pg.5     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER