Peace Rallies March 17th

Religions > Atheism > Peace Rallies March 17th

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"quibbler"
Date:	11 Mar 2007 03:59:29 AM
Object:	Peace Rallies March 17th

The 4th anniversary of Bush's ***** war and occupation of Iraq will be
on March 17th (St. Patty's Day). I would like to encourage all atheists,
agnostics, humanists, free-thinkers and so-called "secular progressives"
out there to look up a rally in a city near you. See the United for
Peace link below that has listings for over 150 cities so far.
http://www.unitedforpeace.org
Secularists ought to oppose the war and go to the peace rallies for the
following reasons:
1. This conflict in Iraq is fueled by sectarian religious rivalries, not
just between shia, sunni and wahaab, but between fundamental
christianists and fundamental islamists. They shouldn't be using our tax
dollars and military to fight their holy wars.
2. While atheists don't have to agree on politics or ethics or anything
else, the fact is that most atheists, especially in the US, tend to be
progressive and humanistic in their worldviews. Humans can solve
problems like the one in Iraq without resorting to unnecessary, expensive
warfare.
3. Most people, including those who supported it initially, now oppose
the Iraq War by about a 2:1 margin. Therefore, even if you don't
particularly care about the issue, an anti-war/pro-peace rally would be a
good place to talk to other open-minded people about religion. (It also
is a good place to pick up chicks and get 'em drunk on St. Patty's Day.)
4. The enormous amounts of money being spent on this war could be better
used on just about anything and would likely be more effective at keeping
us safer. Imagine if $500 billion had been spent to make our planes and
ports and homeland safer. We could fucking install guided missile
systems in every major skyscraper and likely place that anybody would
want to crash a plane.
5. Far more americans die of cardio-vascular diseases, cancer, diabetes
and even car accidents than have ever been killed by terrorism.
Installing ignition interlocks in cars would probably save more lives in
1 year than all the peoople who died in the World Trade Center. We need
a scientific (and therefore secular) war on disease and death, rather
than a ***** war on terrorism.
6. Staying in Iraq doesn't make us any safer. It gives muslim fanatics
more targets and helps them draw new recruits. I'm all for fighting the
pernicious theocratic stupidity known as Islam, but we need to fight it
as an idea and drain the swamp of hatred. Instead our present crusade in
Iraq is creating enemies far faster than we can kill them.
7. This is a good opportunity, especially if you want to mess with
christer hippie types, that their support of religion actually enables
and emboldens religious terrorists like Bush and Co, who then exploit
religion as a fuel to ignite the fanaticism of other bible beaters. They
see this as a sort of "end of the world, defend the holy land" type of
deal.
8. Repugs, who tend to be theocrats, will continue to lose on this issue
in 2008, just as they lost on it in 2006, because things will only
continue to get more and more fucked up. If you want to lessen the
influence of the religious reich in american politics, then you need to
support grass roots activism, like the kind you are going to find at
these peace rallies.
9. The longer we stay diverted in Iraq, fucking with them over there and
letting bin Laden and his loyalists rebuild, the more likely we are to
continue to see them perform terrorist acts in the United States. We
have had other attacks on US soil, from the DC Sniper to anthrax, plus
plenty of attempts. We will continue to see these, but because of the
resource drain created by the present pork-barrel war, we won't have the
money to adequately defend ourselves at home.
10. Rallies are part of the answer because you can get your ideas out
there for the cost of a $1 sign. If you're lucky, you'll get broadcast
on national TV, at least on the one or two networks that aren't wholly
owned by the corporate-christian hegemony. Plus, it's something to tell
the kids. Heck, bring your kids and show them that peace protests are
patriotic.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 09:51:58 AM

I strongly protest this attempted hijacking of March 17...the holiest day of
the year..by the so-called peace movement (read: Surrender Slugs' Bug Out).
It is reserved to driving out snakes with green beer, step dancing, and Kiss
Me, I'm Irish buttons.
Dennis (a foine, foine, Irish name, b'gorra!)
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.205d2ac66f2c8ddf989e74@news.readfreenews.net...

The 4th anniversary of Bush's ***** war and occupation of Iraq will be
on March 17th (St. Patty's Day). I would like to encourage all atheists,
agnostics, humanists, free-thinkers and so-called "secular progressives"
out there to look up a rally in a city near you. See the United for
Peace link below that has listings for over 150 cities so far.

http://www.unitedforpeace.org

Secularists ought to oppose the war and go to the peace rallies for the
following reasons:
1. This conflict in Iraq is fueled by sectarian religious rivalries, not
just between shia, sunni and wahaab, but between fundamental
christianists and fundamental islamists. They shouldn't be using our tax
dollars and military to fight their holy wars.
2. While atheists don't have to agree on politics or ethics or anything
else, the fact is that most atheists, especially in the US, tend to be
progressive and humanistic in their worldviews. Humans can solve
problems like the one in Iraq without resorting to unnecessary, expensive
warfare.
3. Most people, including those who supported it initially, now oppose
the Iraq War by about a 2:1 margin. Therefore, even if you don't
particularly care about the issue, an anti-war/pro-peace rally would be a
good place to talk to other open-minded people about religion. (It also
is a good place to pick up chicks and get 'em drunk on St. Patty's Day.)
4. The enormous amounts of money being spent on this war could be better
used on just about anything and would likely be more effective at keeping
us safer. Imagine if $500 billion had been spent to make our planes and
ports and homeland safer. We could fucking install guided missile
systems in every major skyscraper and likely place that anybody would
want to crash a plane.
5. Far more americans die of cardio-vascular diseases, cancer, diabetes
and even car accidents than have ever been killed by terrorism.
Installing ignition interlocks in cars would probably save more lives in
1 year than all the peoople who died in the World Trade Center. We need
a scientific (and therefore secular) war on disease and death, rather
than a ***** war on terrorism.
6. Staying in Iraq doesn't make us any safer. It gives muslim fanatics
more targets and helps them draw new recruits. I'm all for fighting the
pernicious theocratic stupidity known as Islam, but we need to fight it
as an idea and drain the swamp of hatred. Instead our present crusade in
Iraq is creating enemies far faster than we can kill them.
7. This is a good opportunity, especially if you want to mess with
christer hippie types, that their support of religion actually enables
and emboldens religious terrorists like Bush and Co, who then exploit
religion as a fuel to ignite the fanaticism of other bible beaters. They
see this as a sort of "end of the world, defend the holy land" type of
deal.
8. Repugs, who tend to be theocrats, will continue to lose on this issue
in 2008, just as they lost on it in 2006, because things will only
continue to get more and more fucked up. If you want to lessen the
influence of the religious reich in american politics, then you need to
support grass roots activism, like the kind you are going to find at
these peace rallies.
9. The longer we stay diverted in Iraq, fucking with them over there and
letting bin Laden and his loyalists rebuild, the more likely we are to
continue to see them perform terrorist acts in the United States. We
have had other attacks on US soil, from the DC Sniper to anthrax, plus
plenty of attempts. We will continue to see these, but because of the
resource drain created by the present pork-barrel war, we won't have the
money to adequately defend ourselves at home.
10. Rallies are part of the answer because you can get your ideas out
there for the cost of a $1 sign. If you're lucky, you'll get broadcast
on national TV, at least on the one or two networks that aren't wholly
owned by the corporate-christian hegemony. Plus, it's something to tell
the kids. Heck, bring your kids and show them that peace protests are
patriotic.

--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 09:37:19 AM

In article <12v82c4aa1ja9c3@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

I strongly protest

You're free to protest. That's why it's called a protest ;)

this attempted hijacking of March 17...the holiest day of

Yeah, well, we didn't start the war on that day. Dry drunk bushie did.
I'm planning on hoisting a few cold ones after the protest in honor of
Dear ol' Eire.

the year..by the so-called peace movement (read: Surrender Slugs' Bug Out).

There's nothing to surrender, laddie. If the Iraqis still want to kill
each other, it shouldn't be our troops and tax dollars in the middle of
it.

It is reserved to driving out snakes with green beer, step dancing, and Kiss
Me, I'm Irish buttons.

You can do that all night. Most of the peace rallies will be getting
over about 3:00-4:00pm which is still plenty o' time. Heck, bring your
bagpipe to the rally and hang a "Brits out of Northern Ireland" sign on
your back. That's what I'd do (if I didn't hate bag pipes and all)
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 12:03:42 PM

"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.205dc20c13bc2ae0989e7a@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v82c4aa1ja9c3@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

I strongly protest

You're free to protest. That's why it's called a protest ;)

this attempted hijacking of March 17...the holiest day of

Yeah, well, we didn't start the war on that day. Dry drunk bushie did.
I'm planning on hoisting a few cold ones after the protest in honor of
Dear ol' Eire.

the year..by the so-called peace movement (read: Surrender Slugs' Bug

Out).

There's nothing to surrender, laddie. If the Iraqis still want to kill
each other, it shouldn't be our troops and tax dollars in the middle of
it.

It is reserved to driving out snakes with green beer, step dancing, and

Kiss

Me, I'm Irish buttons.

Now that's clever rejoinder...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum (let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).
Dennis

--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 03:03:06 PM

In article <12v8a37t61ejk9d@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

As I said, you fucking moron, there is nothing to surrender. We already
kicked fucking ***** and that was over in about one month. We can go back
in whenever the ***** we want. But we don't need to fucking be there now.
Let the stupid muslim bastards slaughter each other until they're tired
of it. It wasn't worth $500 billion and 3000 american lives (plus 30-40
thousand casualties). This isn't a fucking sporting match, mate. There
is nothing to "win" that we haven't already won. We can't stay there
forever. BTW, it's not surrender to leave a place where you've kicked
*****. We have to leave eventually, because the only alternative is to
annex the motherfucking country as the 51st fucking state of the union.
So shut the ***** up about your "surrender" *****. Why the ***** aren't
you over there if you supposedly believe in this moronic war so much?
Surrender is what you do with your little "boy *****" to men in bath
houses who pay you $5. Iraq wasn't a threat to us under Saddam and it
sure as hell isn't now that its military has been annihilated.

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

I've displayed a lot more brain power than you. Your tactics are idiotic
and they are the reason we have wasted so much money and manpower so far.
You don't win by continuing to stay and be attacked. You win by
accomplishing your objectives and getting the ***** out. You lose by
continuing to hemorrhage cash and soldiers in a pointless guerilla war
that is not in your national interest, which is exactly the quagmire that
the US finds itself. Everyone said we needed an exit strategy and 4
years later we still have nothing (other than stay there until we run out
of money).

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

There aren't even any decent targets still left in Iraq and there haven't
been any for years. Now get George Bush's ***** out of your mouth and
grow a brain, you little neocon puke. You greedy corporate whores will
be forced to pay back every penny you tried to steal from public coffers
with this illegal war in Iraq.

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

First off, "love thy neighbor" is secular and humanistic. It doesn't
require any god or religious faith. It's just about one person
responding to another person. Secondly, you religious fuckwads
consistently fail to practice these alleged moral standards. That's why
you're advocating bombing the ***** out of your neighbor in Iraq right
now, whereas, I'm the one asking you to practice what you preach, you
hypocritical *****.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 05:35:59 PM

"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.205e0e6267cd9dd9989e7b@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8a37t61ejk9d@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

My, my, kibbler, you certainly are nasty of tongue. Tell us, you kiss your
mother with that mouth? Which of her smelly body parts first, smooth brain?
I've often wondered, why are atheists always so angry? Must be bravado,
sorta like the small, smooth brained lizards who puff up their neck folds to
appear bigger when confronted with that which is greater than themselves.
Must be!
Dennis

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 08:30:43 PM

In article <12v8ti34innp15b@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

My, my, kibbler, you certainly are nasty of tongue.

It was neither nasty, nor involved my tongue, though perhaps you drool
onto your keyboard. You merited what I said to you.

Tell us, you kiss your
mother with that mouth?

It has nothing to do with my mouth, though apparently you're rather adept
at talking out your ***** instead.

Which of her smelly body parts first, smooth brain?

You appear to be projecting your own demented sexual fantasies about your
mother onto other people.

I've often wondered, why are atheists always so angry?

Hummmm....perhaps it has something to do with theists being so assholic
and stupid.

Must be bravado

So you answered your own question then...no need to actually find out an
answer when you're just going to make ***** up anyway.
,

sorta like the small, smooth brained lizards who puff up their neck folds to
appear bigger when confronted with that which is greater than themselves.

How would that apply to you, you sad little cockroach dropping. The only
thing lizards would do in your case is step around the poo-stain.

Must be!

If you say so, dumbass....or better yet, if you say know then we know it
can't be true.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 11:46:22 AM

"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.205e5b2c56e0f567989e7f@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8ti34innp15b@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

My, my, kibbler, you certainly are nasty of tongue.

It was neither nasty, nor involved my tongue, though perhaps you drool
onto your keyboard. You merited what I said to you.

Tell us, you kiss your
mother with that mouth?

It has nothing to do with my mouth, though apparently you're rather adept
at talking out your ***** instead.

Which of her smelly body parts first, smooth brain?

You appear to be projecting your own demented sexual fantasies about your
mother onto other people.

I've often wondered, why are atheists always so angry?

Hummmm....perhaps it has something to do with theists being so assholic
and stupid.

Must be bravado

So you answered your own question then...no need to actually find out an
answer when you're just going to make ***** up anyway.

,

sorta like the small, smooth brained lizards who puff up their neck

folds to

appear bigger when confronted with that which is greater than

themselves.

How would that apply to you, you sad little cockroach dropping. The only
thing lizards would do in your case is step around the poo-stain.

Must be!

If you say so, dumbass....or better yet, if you say know then we know it
can't be true.

You am easy, ain't cha!!! As for March 17, I'll be celebrating my American
Legion Post's birthday with a fine dinner shared by veterans, patriots, and
other proud Americans. Of course we'll say grace before our meal, thanking
the Lord for his bounty.
We'll also be discussing how the Gathering of Eagles in Washington kicked a
whole lot of long-haired, maggot infested, coke-head asses there on the Mall
that day.
It'll be a great time, heh, heh, heh.
Say, just what the hell were you trying to convey with your completely
nonsensical word grouping: "if you say know then we know it can't be true."
Do you ever get tired of everyone always chuckling at your expense, heh,
heh, heh?
Dennis

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 05:41:21 PM

You am easy, ain't cha!!! As for March 17, I'll be celebrating my American
Legion Post's birthday with a fine dinner shared by veterans, patriots, and
other proud Americans.

Real patriots would be at this rally, defending this country from
traitors like George W. Bush. Cowardly, brown-shirt, pieces-of-*****
like you have always sold out their fellow countrymen and ***** on The
Constitution. We refuse to fight your holy wars. No Jihads 4 Any
Gods.

Of course we'll say grace before our meal, thanking
the Lord for his bounty.

As Bart Simpson said, "'Dear God, we paid for all this food ourselves,
so thanks for nothing". Your god is powerless to do anything which
humans do not already do for themselves without his aid. I'd tell you
to go ***** your "Lord" straight up his *****, but then I remembered that
you're a dickless wonder. Probably got it shot off being an oil-
nazi.

We'll also be discussing how the Gathering of Eagles in Washington kicked a
whole lot of long-haired, maggot infested, coke-head asses there on the Mall
that day.

You're free to try it any time. I need the entertainment of beating
you into the pavement.

It'll be a great time, heh, heh, heh.

Say, just what the hell were you trying to convey with your completely
nonsensical word grouping: "if you say know then we know it can't be true."

It was supposed to read, "if you say *so* then we know it can't be
true", which is apparently quite accurate.

Do you ever get tired of everyone always chuckling at your expense, heh,
heh, heh?

Drooling retards like you chuckle at things which you're too dumb to
understand.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	13 Mar 2007 01:33:23 AM

"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173739280.928100.142350@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

You am easy, ain't cha!!! As for March 17, I'll be celebrating my

American

Legion Post's birthday with a fine dinner shared by veterans, patriots,

and

other proud Americans.

Of course we'll say grace before our meal, thanking
the Lord for his bounty.

We'll also be discussing how the Gathering of Eagles in Washington

kicked a

whole lot of long-haired, maggot infested, coke-head asses there on the

Mall

that day.

You're free to try it any time. I need the entertainment of beating
you into the pavement.

It'll be a great time, heh, heh, heh.

Say, just what the hell were you trying to convey with your completely
nonsensical word grouping: "if you say know then we know it can't be

true."

It was supposed to read, "if you say *so* then we know it can't be
true", which is apparently quite accurate.

Do you ever get tired of everyone always chuckling at your expense, heh,
heh, heh?

Drooling retards like you chuckle at things which you're too dumb to
understand.

A short quote from Stars Wars suits you very well, "You're a funny little
boy" heh, heh, heh.
Dennis

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 04:55:12 PM

On Mar 11, 6:35 pm, <

> wrote:

"quibbler" <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.205e0e6267cd9dd9989e7b@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Because they're surrounded by the stupid, and the petty. Tell ya what,
boy-o..why don't you take your fat assed gas guzzling, McDonalds
eating, bible thumping, homeskooolin', barefoot & pregnant teenager
right-wing freak show and show it up your red *****?
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06
Write your Senators & Representatives. End the Electoral College.
http://www.fakeisthenewreal.org/reform/
http://www.geocities.com/dave_enrich/ctd/ec001108.html
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060601_electoral_college_reform/
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 01:50:40 PM

<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173650112.493385.235570@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 11, 6:35 pm, <no_surren...@never.net> wrote:

"quibbler" <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.205e0e6267cd9dd9989e7b@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,

no_surren...@never.net

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

As I said, you fucking moron, there is nothing to surrender. We

already

kicked fucking ***** and that was over in about one month. We can go

back

in whenever the ***** we want. But we don't need to fucking be there

now.

Let the stupid muslim bastards slaughter each other until they're

tired

of it. It wasn't worth $500 billion and 3000 american lives (plus

30-40

thousand casualties). This isn't a fucking sporting match, mate.

There

is nothing to "win" that we haven't already won. We can't stay there
forever. BTW, it's not surrender to leave a place where you've kicked
*****. We have to leave eventually, because the only alternative is to
annex the motherfucking country as the 51st fucking state of the

union.

So shut the ***** up about your "surrender" *****. Why the *****

aren't

you over there if you supposedly believe in this moronic war so much?
Surrender is what you do with your little "boy *****" to men in bath
houses who pay you $5. Iraq wasn't a threat to us under Saddam and it
sure as hell isn't now that its military has been annihilated.

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

I've displayed a lot more brain power than you. Your tactics are

idiotic

and they are the reason we have wasted so much money and manpower so

far.

You don't win by continuing to stay and be attacked. You win by
accomplishing your objectives and getting the ***** out. You lose by
continuing to hemorrhage cash and soldiers in a pointless guerilla war
that is not in your national interest, which is exactly the quagmire

that

the US finds itself. Everyone said we needed an exit strategy and 4
years later we still have nothing (other than stay there until we run

out

of money).

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

There aren't even any decent targets still left in Iraq and there

haven't

been any for years. Now get George Bush's ***** out of your mouth and
grow a brain, you little neocon puke. You greedy corporate whores

will

be forced to pay back every penny you tried to steal from public

coffers

with this illegal war in Iraq.

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

why

you're advocating bombing the ***** out of your neighbor in Iraq right
now, whereas, I'm the one asking you to practice what you preach, you
hypocritical *****.

My, my, kibbler, you certainly are nasty of tongue. Tell us, you kiss

your

mother with that mouth? Which of her smelly body parts first, smooth

brain?

I've often wondered, why are atheists always so angry?

Because they're surrounded by the stupid, and the petty. Tell ya what,
boy-o..why don't you take your fat assed gas guzzling, McDonalds
eating, bible thumping, homeskooolin', barefoot & pregnant teenager
right-wing freak show and show it up your red *****?

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06

Write your Senators & Representatives. End the Electoral College.
http://www.fakeisthenewreal.org/reform/
http://www.geocities.com/dave_enrich/ctd/ec001108.html

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060601_electoral_college_reform/

User: ""
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 01:53:14 PM

<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173650112.493385.235570@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 11, 6:35 pm, <no_surren...@never.net> wrote:

"quibbler" <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.205e0e6267cd9dd9989e7b@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,

no_surren...@never.net

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

As I said, you fucking moron, there is nothing to surrender. We

already

kicked fucking ***** and that was over in about one month. We can go

back

in whenever the ***** we want. But we don't need to fucking be there

now.

Let the stupid muslim bastards slaughter each other until they're

tired

of it. It wasn't worth $500 billion and 3000 american lives (plus

30-40

thousand casualties). This isn't a fucking sporting match, mate.

There

union.

So shut the ***** up about your "surrender" *****. Why the *****

aren't

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

I've displayed a lot more brain power than you. Your tactics are

idiotic

and they are the reason we have wasted so much money and manpower so

far.

that

the US finds itself. Everyone said we needed an exit strategy and 4
years later we still have nothing (other than stay there until we run

out

of money).

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

There aren't even any decent targets still left in Iraq and there

haven't

been any for years. Now get George Bush's ***** out of your mouth and
grow a brain, you little neocon puke. You greedy corporate whores

will

be forced to pay back every penny you tried to steal from public

coffers

with this illegal war in Iraq.

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

why

you're advocating bombing the ***** out of your neighbor in Iraq right
now, whereas, I'm the one asking you to practice what you preach, you
hypocritical *****.

My, my, kibbler, you certainly are nasty of tongue. Tell us, you kiss

your

mother with that mouth? Which of her smelly body parts first, smooth

brain?

I've often wondered, why are atheists always so angry?

Wow, now that's hate. I'll be sure to use your comments as an illustration
of truly mindless liberal hate? Guess you hate the Constitution,too, eh,
reading about your oppostion to the electoral college.
Dennis

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06

Write your Senators & Representatives. End the Electoral College.
http://www.fakeisthenewreal.org/reform/
http://www.geocities.com/dave_enrich/ctd/ec001108.html

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060601_electoral_college_reform/

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 05:44:55 PM

Wow, now that's hate.

Your stupidity merits hate.

I'll be sure to use your comments as an illustration
of truly mindless liberal hate?

Actually, the hate was very well justified. We're not required to
coddle your stupidity, especially it your stupidity is injurious to us
in the form of idiotic, unsupportable wars.

Guess you hate the Constitution,too, eh,
reading about your oppostion to the electoral college.

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 08:32:53 PM

In article <1173650112.493385.235570@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
panamfloyd@hotmail.com says...

On Mar 11, 6:35 pm, <

> wrote:

"quibbler" <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.205e0e6267cd9dd9989e7b@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

Now that's clever rejoinder

Unfortunately, one can't say the same for your comments.

...too bad you're in favor of the Surrender
Slug's

Bug Out. Must be a smooth spot in your cerebrum

(let your fellow
surrender slugs try figuring that one out, heh, heh, heh).

Dennis

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

I suspect that he already did that, which explains where he gets most of
his material.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: ""
Title: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 03:09:53 PM

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,

says...

snippy
In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

(nom ends)
Although from a thread that was political in nature, IMO this is a
wonderful defense of secular ideas. Respectfully nominated for AQOTM,
Mar `07.
Y'know, quib...you keep throwing `em out like this, and we'll have to
ban you for someone else to have a chance...<g>
Call for seconds/extra groups snecked
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.

User: "Fred Stone"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 05:19:21 PM

wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight it
out". If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"...the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and began
seeking a more "appropriate" television partner.
Comedy Central, perhaps?"
.

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 08:18:52 PM

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight it
out".

If theist lemmings choose to kill themselves then I'm not going to demand
that the US spend $500 billion more to try to stop them. It might be
unfortunate, but it's their problem. We didn't create their ancient
sectarian feuds. I'm glad Saddam is gone, but they've already had
several elections to try to pick leaders to put in his place and keep the
peace. We need to take the Iraqis at their word and leave like they have
asked us to on a number of occasions.

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

We've already loved the Iraqis to the toon of $500 billion and massive
casualties on our part. We need to start loving them a lot less
intensely and from afar before it bankrupts our country. What ever
happened to "tough love", Mr. "Personal Responsibility"?
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: "Kate "
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 09:41:03 AM

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:18:52 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight it
out".

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

Since when does 'letting them fight it out' mean we are massacreing
someone?
Oh my, I think Fred is trying yet again to pull a word from the
neo-con's dictionary of bizzarre
definitions-that-change-on-a-moment's-notice-when-we-think-it-might-help-our-argument
Now if Fred had practiced what he's actually preaching, he'd be
eternally grateful for the Al Queda's intervention into American
politics by bombing us to keep us from fighting it out between
ourselves and get properly chastized and see it their way. Funny how
that didn't work worth a *****.
.

User: "Fred Stone"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 12:09:09 PM

(Kate ) wrote in
news:45f66492.59604437@news-west.newscene.com:

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:18:52 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight
it out".

If theist lemmings choose to kill themselves then I'm not going to
demand that the US spend $500 billion more to try to stop them. It
might be unfortunate, but it's their problem. We didn't create their
ancient sectarian feuds. I'm glad Saddam is gone, but they've already
had several elections to try to pick leaders to put in his place and
keep the peace. We need to take the Iraqis at their word and leave
like they have asked us to on a number of occasions.

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

Since when does 'letting them fight it out' mean we are massacreing
someone?

We have taken on the responsibility for preventing that massacre, to the
extent that we can. If we "let them fight it out" we will be responsible
for the outcome.

Oh my, I think Fred is trying yet again to pull a word from the
neo-con's dictionary of bizzarre
definitions-that-change-on-a-moment's-notice-when-we-think-it-might-

hel

p-our-argument

Oh, I think Kate's having another of those liberal "reality-based"
brainstorms.

Now if Fred had practiced what he's actually preaching, he'd be
eternally grateful for the Al Queda's intervention into American
politics by bombing us to keep us from fighting it out between
ourselves and get properly chastized and see it their way. Funny how
that didn't work worth a *****.

And heeeeere's Kate with another of those fancy-dancy liberal strawmen.
She's sooooooo smart.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"...the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and began
seeking a more "appropriate" television partner.
Comedy Central, perhaps?"
.

User: "Fred Stone"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 07:14:00 AM

quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.205e5866c7bda3eb989e7d@news.readfreenews.net:

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight
it out".

If theist lemmings choose to kill themselves then I'm not going to
demand that the US spend $500 billion more to try to stop them.

Sorry, quibbler, you can't justify allowing mass-murder by pretending
that it's suicide.

It
might be unfortunate, but it's their problem.

You've been Blaming Bush for them for four years now. What's the
difference?

We didn't create their
ancient sectarian feuds. I'm glad Saddam is gone, but they've already
had several elections to try to pick leaders to put in his place and
keep the peace. We need to take the Iraqis at their word and leave
like they have asked us to on a number of occasions.

The leaders whom they picked have not asked us to leave.

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

Whatever happened to "You break it, you own it", Mr "reality-based"?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"...the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and began
seeking a more "appropriate" television partner.
Comedy Central, perhaps?"
.

User: "quibbler"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 10:23:27 AM

In article <Xns98F154587AEE1freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.205e5866c7bda3eb989e7d@news.readfreenews.net:

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post quibbler
called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting them fight
it out".

If theist lemmings choose to kill themselves then I'm not going to
demand that the US spend $500 billion more to try to stop them.

Sorry, quibbler, you can't justify allowing mass-murder by pretending
that it's suicide.

Oh, now you're in denial that these people use suicide tactics. To make
a dent in religious fanaticism we would have to occupy Iraq for the next
50 years. You have absolutely no plan for seriously dealing with
sectarian violence in Iraq. Even if you put together a solid police
force and military, those people still have religious, clan and cultural
loyalties that you can't erase, no matter how much money and blood you
try to waste on it.

It
might be unfortunate, but it's their problem.

You've been Blaming Bush for them for four years now. What's the
difference?

That's because the stupid ***** is too dumb to realize that it's
their problem and therefore has made it our problem also. It's not our
fight, despite his efforts to make it so. Naturally, Bush's motives for
being there have nothing to do with helping sunnis and shias live
together in harmony and brotherhood.

The leaders whom they picked have not asked us to leave.

Even the puppets we permit to rule have encouraged us to set time tables.

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

Whatever happened to "You break it, you own it",

We already fixed it as much as it can be fixed. We could just the "we're
here to fix it" excuse to indefinitely occupy any fucked up country from
Haiti to Kosovo to Somalia. We've poured more into Iraq than just about
any country in modern times and enough is fucking enough.

Mr "reality-based"?

I remain reality-based, while you mouth pathetic excuses about how we
have to stay in Iraq and fix ***** forever. We didn't "break" the sunni-
shia unity/love-fest because there never was any.
All of your lies have fallen to pieces Fred. Just admit that you were
wrong (again) and moveon.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: "Fred Stone"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	12 Mar 2007 12:04:40 PM

quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.205f1e5d997261e1989e8b@news.readfreenews.net:

In article <Xns98F154587AEE1freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.205e5866c7bda3eb989e7d@news.readfreenews.net:

In article <Xns98F0BAFC5FC65freddybear@194.177.96.26>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...

panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

I respectfully object on the grounds that in the same post
quibbler called for the massacre of millions of Iraqis by "letting
them fight it out".

If theist lemmings choose to kill themselves then I'm not going to
demand that the US spend $500 billion more to try to stop them.

Sorry, quibbler, you can't justify allowing mass-murder by pretending
that it's suicide.

Oh, now you're in denial that these people use suicide tactics.

No, quibbler, that's an entirely different issue.

To
make a dent in religious fanaticism we would have to occupy Iraq for
the next 50 years.

We don't need to make a dent in religious fanaticism. We need to make a
dent in terrorism.

You have absolutely no plan for seriously dealing
with sectarian violence in Iraq.

Yes we do, and it's working.

Even if you put together a solid
police force and military, those people still have religious, clan and
cultural loyalties that you can't erase, no matter how much money and
blood you try to waste on it.

We don't want to erase them. We want to quell the artificial violence
that has been imposed on top of them.

It
might be unfortunate, but it's their problem.

You've been Blaming Bush for them for four years now. What's the
difference?

That's because the stupid ***** is too dumb to realize that
it's their problem and therefore has made it our problem also. It's
not our fight, despite his efforts to make it so. Naturally, Bush's
motives for being there have nothing to do with helping sunnis and
shias live together in harmony and brotherhood.

Of course they have nothing to do with helping sunnis and shias live
together in harmony and brotherhood. That's not our job. Our job is to
eliminate al Qaeda's and Iran's outside influence over the violence
there so that the Iraqis can work out their differences without that
*extra* provocation. Sunnis and Shias in Iraq have been living together
there for *CENTURIES*.
And yes, before you go there, our outside influence is OK, Iran's is
not. Because I said so. If you can't figure out why I said so, you're
too fucking stupid to argue with.

We didn't create their
ancient sectarian feuds. I'm glad Saddam is gone, but they've
already had several elections to try to pick leaders to put in his
place and keep the peace. We need to take the Iraqis at their word
and leave like they have asked us to on a number of occasions.

The leaders whom they picked have not asked us to leave.

Even the puppets we permit to rule have encouraged us to set time
tables.

Not the sort of timetables that you cut-and-run Democrats want to set.

If that's practicing what he preaches, I want no part of it.

Whatever happened to "You break it, you own it",

We already fixed it as much as it can be fixed. We could just the
"we're here to fix it" excuse to indefinitely occupy any fucked up
country from Haiti to Kosovo to Somalia. We've poured more into Iraq
than just about any country in modern times and enough is fucking
enough.

That's what you cowards said about Vietnam in 1975 and three million
people died as a direct result.

Mr "reality-based"?

I remain reality-based, while you mouth pathetic excuses about how we
have to stay in Iraq and fix ***** forever. We didn't "break" the
sunni- shia unity/love-fest because there never was any.

This is just your "reality based" display of nothing but your complete
ignorance of Iraq, quibbler.

All of your lies have fallen to pieces Fred. Just admit that you were
wrong (again) and moveon.

--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"...the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and began
seeking a more "appropriate" television partner.
Comedy Central, perhaps?"
.

User: "Lucifer"
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	11 Mar 2007 07:26:11 PM

On Mar 11, 10:19 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:

panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote innews:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):

(nom ends)

Although from a thread that was political in nature, IMO this is a
wonderful defense of secular ideas. Respectfully nominated for AQOTM,
Mar `07.

Y'know, quib...you keep throwing `em out like this, and we'll have to
ban you for someone else to have a chance...<g>

Call for seconds/extra groups snecked

I'm seconding it just to annoy you, so there.
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil
and General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck
of Doom
Convicted by Earthquack
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"

--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"...the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and began
seeking a more "appropriate" television partner.

Comedy Central, perhaps?"

User: *"nemo"*
Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination: was-Re: Peace Rallies March 17th	18 Mar 2007 02:44:01 PM

In article <1173659171.036012.293080@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mar 11, 10:19 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:

panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote
innews:1173643792.998936.311660@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 11, 4:03 pm, quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <12v8a37t61ej...@corp.supernews.com>,
no_surren...@never.net says...

snippy

In response to:

Yep, "love thy neighbor" is real nasty, all right.

Our good buddy Quib said (nom begins):