Religions > Atheism > Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Roy Jose Lorr" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2006 04:38:07 AM |
| Object: |
Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications
Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)
By: Staff
Discovery Institute
August 1, 2006
Editors's Note:: Critics of intelligent design often claim
that design advocates don’t publish their work in
appropriate scientific literature. For example, Barbara
Forrest, a philosophy professor at Southeastern Louisiana
University, was quoted in USA Today (March 25, 2005) that
design theorists “aren’t published because they don’t have
scientific data.”
Other critics have made the more specific claim that design
advocates do not publish their works in peer-reviewed
scientific journals-as if such journals represented the only
avenue of legitimate scientific publication. In fact,
scientists routinely publish their work in peer-reviewed
scientific journals, in peer-reviewed scientific books, in
scientific anthologies and conference proceedings (edited by
their scientific peers), and in trade presses. Some of the
most important and groundbreaking work in the history of
science was first published not in scientific journal
articles but in scientific books-including Copernicus’ De
Revolutionibus, Newton’s Principia, and Darwin’s Origin of
Species (the latter of which was published in a prominent
British trade press and was not peer-reviewed in the modern
sense of the term). In any case, the scientists who advocate
the theory of intelligent design have published their work
in a variety of appropriate technical venues, including
peer-reviewed scientific journals, peer-reviewed scientific
books (some in mainstream university presses), trade
presses, peer-edited scientific anthologies, peer-edited
scientific conference proceedings and peer-reviewed
philosophy of science journals and books. We provide below
an annotated bibliography of technical publications of
various kinds that support, develop or apply the theory of
intelligent design.
Featured Articles
Meyer, S. C. DNA and the origin of life: Information,
specification and explanation, in Darwinism, Design, &
Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003),
Pp. 223-285. (PDF, 1.13MB)
Behe, M. J., Design in the details: The origin of
biomolecular machines, in Darwinism, Design, & Public
Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003), Pp. 287-302
Dembski, W.A., Reinstating design within science, in
Darwinism, Design, & Public Education (Michigan State
University Press, 2003), Pp. 403-418.
Stephen Meyer, “The Origin of Biological Information and the
Higher Taxonomic Categories” Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington 117(2004):213-239.
Lönnig, W.-E. Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the
origin of irreducible complexity, Dynamical Genetics, Pp.
101-119. (PDF, 2.95MB; HTML)
Jonathan Wells, “Do Centrioles Generate a Polar Ejection
Force?," Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 37-62.
Scott Minnich and Stephen C. Meyer, “Genetic Analysis of
Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits,”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design
& Nature, Rhodes Greece, edited by M.W. Collins and C.A.
Brebbia (WIT Press, 2004). (PDF, 620KB)
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Books Supportive of Intelligent
Design Published by Trade Presses or University Presses
W.A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance
through Small Probabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1998).
Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge
to Evolution (The Free Press, 1996).
Charles B. Thaxton, Walter L. Bradley, Roger L. Olsen, The
Mystery of Life’s Origin: Reassessing Current Theories
(Philosophical Library, 1984, Lewis & Stanley, 4th ed., 1992).
John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer, Darwinism, Design,
& Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003)
Scientific Books Supportive of Intelligent Design Published
by Prominent Trade Presses
Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay W. Richards, The Privileged
Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for
Discovery (Regnery Publishing, 2004).
William Dembski, No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity
Cannot be Purchased without Intelligence (Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers, 2002).
Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Adler &
Adler, 1985).
Peer-Reviewed Philosophical Books Books Supportive of
Intelligent Design Published by Academic University Presses
Del Ratzsch, Nature, Design, and Science: The Status of
Design in Natural Science (State University of New York
Press, 2001).
Michael C. Rea, World without Design : The Ontological
Consequences of Naturalism (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Articles Supportive of Intelligent Design Published in
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals
Ø. A. Voie, "Biological function and the genetic code are
interdependent," Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2006, Vol
28(4), 1000-1004.
John A. Davison, “A Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis,”
Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 155-166.
S.C. Meyer, “The Origin of Biological Information and the
Higher Taxonomic Categories,” Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington, 117(2) (2004): 213-239.
M.J. Behe and D.W. Snoke, “Simulating Evolution by Gene
Duplication of Protein Features That Require Multiple Amino
Acid Residues,” Protein Science, 13 (2004): 2651-2664.
W.-E. Lönnig & H. Saedler, “Chromosome Rearrangements and
Transposable Elements,” Annual Review of Genetics, 36
(2002): 389-410.
D.K.Y. Chiu & T.H. Lui, “Integrated Use of Multiple
Interdependent Patterns for Biomolecular Sequence Analysis,”
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 4(3) (September
2002): 766-775.
M.J. Denton, J.C. Marshall & M. Legge, (2002) “The Protein
Folds as Platonic Forms: New Support for the pre-Darwinian
Conception of Evolution by Natural Law,” Journal of
Theoretical Biology 219 (2002): 325-342.
Articles Supportive of Intelligent Design Published in
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Anthologies
Lönnig, W.-E. Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the
origin of irreducible complexity, Dynamical Genetics, Pp.
101-119. In Dynamical Genetics by V. Parisi, V. de Fonzo &
F. Aluffi-Pentini, eds.,(Research Signpost, 2004)
Granville Sewell, Postscript, in Analysis of a Finite
Element Method: PDE/PROTRAN (Springer Verlag, 1985). (HTML)
Five science articles from Darwinism, Design, & Public
Education, edited by John Angus Campbell and Stephen C.
Meyer (Michigan State University Press, 2003) (hereinafter
DDPE):
Meyer, S. C. DNA and the origin of life: Information,
specification and explanation, DDPE Pp. 223-285. (PDF, 1.13MB)
Behe, M. J., Design in the details: The origin of
biomolecular machines. DDPE Pp. 287-302
Nelson, P. & J. Wells, Homology in biology: Problem for
naturalistic science and prospect for intelligent design,
DDPE, Pp. 303-322.
Meyer, S. C., Ross, M., Nelson, P. & P. Chien, The Cambrian
explosion: biology’s big bang, DDPE, Pp. 323-402. (PDF, 2.33MB)
Dembski, W.A., Reinstating design within science, DDPE, Pp.
403-418.
Peer-Edited or Editor-Reviewed Articles Supportive of
Intelligent Design Published in Scientific Journals,
Scientific Anthologies and Conference Proceedings
Jonathan Wells, “Do Centrioles Generate a Polar Ejection
Force?," Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 37-62.
Granville Sewell, "A Mathematician’s View of Evolution," The
Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol 22 (4) (2000). (HTML)
Four science articles from W. A. Dembski & M. Ruse, eds.,
DEBATING DESIGN: FROM DARWIN TO DNA (Cambridge, United
Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2004) (hereinafter
DEBATING DESIGN)
Dembksi, W.A., The logical underpinnings of intelligent
design, DEBATING DESIGN, Pp.
311-330.
Bradley, W. L., Information, Entropy, and the Origin of
Life, DEBATING DESIGN, Pp. 331-
351.
Behe, M., Irreducible complexity: obstacle to Darwinian
evolution, DEBATING DESIGN, Pp. 352-370.
Meyer, S. C., The Cambrian information explosion: evidence
for intelligent design, DEBATING DESIGN, Pp. 371-391.
Scott Minnich and Stephen C. Meyer, “Genetic Analysis of
Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits,”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design
& Nature, Rhodes Greece, edited by M.W. Collins and C.A.
Brebbia (WIT Press, 2004).
MERE CREATION: SCIENCE, FAITH & INTELLIGENT DESIGN (William
A. Dembski ed., 1998).
Articles Supportive of Intelligent Design Published in
Peer-Reviewed Philosophy Journals
Behe, M.J., Self-Organization and Irreducibly Complex
Systems: A Reply to Shanks and Joplin, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
67:155-162 (March 2000)
Craig, W.L., “God, Creation, and Mr. Davies.” British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1986): 168-175
Craig, W.L., “Barrow and Tipler on the Anthropic Principle
vs. Divine Design.” British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science 38 (1988): 389-395.
Craig, W.L., “The Anthropic Principle.” In The History of
Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: an
Encyclopedia, pp. 366-368. Ed. G. B. Ferngren.
Craig, W.L., “Design and the Anthropic Fine-Tuning of the
Universe.” In GOD AND DESIGN: THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND
MODERN SCIENCE, pp. 155-177. (ed. Neil Manson. London:
Routledge, 2003).
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640&program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science
Discovery Institute - Center for Science and Culture
1511 Third Ave., Suite 808 - Seattle, WA 98101
206-292-0401 phone - 206-682-5320 fax
email:
.
|
|
| User: "Richard Forrest" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 06:16:06 AM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications
Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)
By: Staff
Discovery Institute
August 1, 2006
<snipped>
But Roy, the Discovery Institute accepts the evidence that evolution
has happened.
This is the evidence you said was a lie.
Does this make the DI a bunch of liars?
By the way, Answers in Genesis (remember the link I gave you? You know,
the one you said didn't work for you) also accepts the evidence that
evolution has occured.
Does that make them a bunch of liars too?
RF
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 05:09:05 PM |
|
|
On 17 Oct 2006 04:16:06 -0700, "Richard Forrest"
<richard@plesiosaur.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1161083766.085258.100210@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications
Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)
By: Staff
Discovery Institute
August 1, 2006
<snipped>
But Roy, the Discovery Institute accepts the evidence that evolution
has happened.
This is the evidence you said was a lie.
Does this make the DI a bunch of liars?
Amongst other things, YES!
By the way, Answers in Genesis (remember the link I gave you? You know,
the one you said didn't work for you) also accepts the evidence that
evolution has occured.
Does that make them a bunch of liars too?
Amongst other things, YES!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 09:30:47 AM |
|
|
Richard Forrest wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience school.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 10:47:26 AM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Richard Forrest wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience school.
Petty insults are not answering the question.
The Discovery Institute accepts the evidence that evolution has
happened.
This is the evidence you said was a lie.
Does this make the DI a bunch of liars?
By the way, Answers in Genesis (remember the link I gave you? You know,
the one you said didn't work for you) also accepts the evidence that
evolution has occured.
Does that make them a bunch of liars too?
RF
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 11:19:01 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Richard Forrest wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience school.
Petty insults are not answering the question.
The Discovery Institute accepts the evidence that evolution has
happened.
This is the evidence you said was a lie.
Does this make the DI a bunch of liars?
I've found nothing on their site that agrees with the notion
that one species can change into another.
By the way, Answers in Genesis (remember the link I gave you? You know,
the one you said didn't work for you) also accepts the evidence that
evolution has occured.
Does that make them a bunch of liars too?
Since the link didn't work I couldn't visit the site so I
wouldn't know now would I?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 02:34:25 PM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
richard@plesiosaur.com wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Richard Forrest wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience school.
Petty insults are not answering the question.
The Discovery Institute accepts the evidence that evolution has
happened.
This is the evidence you said was a lie.
Does this make the DI a bunch of liars?
I've found nothing on their site that agrees with the notion
that one species can change into another.
By the way, Answers in Genesis (remember the link I gave you? You know,
the one you said didn't work for you) also accepts the evidence that
evolution has occured.
Does that make them a bunch of liars too?
Since the link didn't work I couldn't visit the site so I
wouldn't know now would I?
So why not visit Answers in Genesis (http://www.answersingenesis.org/)
If that link does not works, do a web search for "Answers in Genesis"
It will take you to the site.
Click on the link at the top of the page marked "Get Answers" - it's
the second from the left, next to the one marked "Home"
On the articles topic index there is a link marked "Arguments
creationists should NOT use".
Click on that. It will take you to a page in which you can find the
following text:
""No new species have been produced."
This is not true-new species have been observed to form. In fact,
rapid speciation is an important part of the creation model. But this
speciation is within the "kind," and involves no new genetic
information. See Q&A: Speciation."
If you have trouble in following all those links, try simpy following
this link:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp
You will also find several articles on the site, such as this one:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i2/biters.asp
and this one:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i3/finches.asp
and this one:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i4/species.asp
and several more
You are on record as stating that all the evidence which shows that
speciation is taking place is a lie.
Fine.
SO tell me:
Is "Answers in Genesis" a web site containing many lies?
It seems a simple conclusion from your statements that it is, and I
happen to agree with you that it is full of lies.
Can we agree on this?
OR is the evidence that speciation events have occured a lie?
Or will you simply run away from this question using some facile excuse
or resort to insult, silliness and unfounded assertion as you always do
when faced with anything you don't like?
I don't mind if you do - after all, one of the reasons I post here is
to reveal the moral and intellectual cowardice of creationists, and you
have been more helpful in this respect than any other.
RF
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 07:04:24 PM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications
Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)
By: Staff
Discovery Institute
August 1, 2006
I found this interesting. These were on the list, but in two different
spots. One would think that, with so few papers to list, they would
figure that folks would not miss such double-listing. (NB: The authors
used the acronym for _Darwinism, Design & Public Education_: DDPE.
Don't know about you, but I wacky-read that as DOPE.):
Meyer, S. C. DNA and the origin of life: Information,
specification and explanation, in Darwinism, Design, &
Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003),
Pp. 223-285. (PDF, 1.13MB)
Behe, M. J., Design in the details: The origin of
biomolecular machines, in Darwinism, Design, & Public
Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003), Pp. 287-302
Dembski, W.A., Reinstating design within science, in
Darwinism, Design, & Public Education (Michigan State
University Press, 2003), Pp. 403-418.
John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer, Darwinism, Design,
& Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003)
Five science articles from Darwinism, Design, & Public
Education, edited by John Angus Campbell and Stephen C.
Meyer (Michigan State University Press, 2003) (hereinafter
DDPE):
Meyer, S. C. DNA and the origin of life: Information,
specification and explanation, DDPE Pp. 223-285. (PDF, 1.13MB)
Behe, M. J., Design in the details: The origin of
biomolecular machines. DDPE Pp. 287-302
Nelson, P. & J. Wells, Homology in biology: Problem for
naturalistic science and prospect for intelligent design,
DDPE, Pp. 303-322.
Meyer, S. C., Ross, M., Nelson, P. & P. Chien, The Cambrian
explosion: biology's big bang, DDPE, Pp. 323-402. (PDF, 2.33MB)
Dembski, W.A., Reinstating design within science, DDPE, Pp.
403-418.
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supportingthe |
17 Oct 2006 09:30:49 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supportingthe |
17 Oct 2006 09:36:27 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Memphis" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 09:43:33 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Memphis" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supportingthe |
17 Oct 2006 09:44:24 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Memphis" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 09:46:57 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paris" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 10:13:14 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
Why is talk.origins blocking Roy Jose Lorr's posts?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Townsend" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
18 Oct 2006 12:18:23 AM |
|
|
Paris wrote:
Tom McDonald wrote:
Why is talk.origins blocking Roy Jose Lorr's posts?
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience training school.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 10:56:13 PM |
|
|
Paris wrote:
Tom McDonald wrote:
Why is talk.origins blocking Roy Jose Lorr's posts?
Blocking Roy's posts is good.
---DPM
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paris" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 10:15:07 PM |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
Why is talk.origins blocking Roy Jose Lorr's posts?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
18 Oct 2006 08:52:41 PM |
|
|
Paris wrote:
Tom McDonald wrote:
Why is talk.origins blocking Roy Jose Lorr's posts?
Because he is a well known lunatic.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man, Sep 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 08:35:35 AM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Some of the
most important and groundbreaking work in the history of
science was first published not in scientific journal
articles but in scientific books-including Copernicus' De
Revolutionibus, Newton's Principia, and Darwin's Origin of
Species (the latter of which was published in a prominent
British trade press and was not peer-reviewed in the modern
sense of the term).
So you are saying anything published as a book has scientific
importance?
I guess that means the DaVinci Codes has scientific merit!
HB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 05:09:35 PM |
|
|
On 17 Oct 2006 06:35:35 -0700, wrote:
- Refer: <1161092135.657272.251770@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Some of the
most important and groundbreaking work in the history of
science was first published not in scientific journal
articles but in scientific books-including Copernicus' De
Revolutionibus, Newton's Principia, and Darwin's Origin of
Species (the latter of which was published in a prominent
British trade press and was not peer-reviewed in the modern
sense of the term).
So you are saying anything published as a book has scientific
importance?
I guess that means the DaVinci Codes has scientific merit!
And Harry Potter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron O" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
17 Oct 2006 06:45:46 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On 17 Oct 2006 06:35:35 -0700, wrote:
- Refer: <1161092135.657272.251770@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
Some of the
most important and groundbreaking work in the history of
science was first published not in scientific journal
articles but in scientific books-including Copernicus' De
Revolutionibus, Newton's Principia, and Darwin's Origin of
Species (the latter of which was published in a prominent
British trade press and was not peer-reviewed in the modern
sense of the term).
So you are saying anything published as a book has scientific
importance?
I guess that means the DaVinci Codes has scientific merit!
And Harry Potter.
No, not fantasy. Behe claimed claimed in court that ID could be tested
in Science fiction.
Ron Okimoto
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paris" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
17 Oct 2006 09:58:46 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience training
school.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kermit" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting |
18 Oct 2006 12:43:24 PM |
|
|
Paris wrote:
Michael Gray wrote:
Congratulations on your graduation from obedience training
school.
Not that anyone doubted "Paris" was also Roy...
Y'know, Roy, when all your insults are the same, and not tailored to
the person in any discernable way, they are as content free as a
chihuahua's bark.
Kermit
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the |
18 Oct 2006 02:28:20 AM |
|
|
Stripping out the books and nonscientific papers, we get this:
....
Stephen Meyer, "The Origin of Biological Information and the
Higher Taxonomic Categories" Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington 117(2004):213-239.
Lönnig, W.-E. Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the
origin of irreducible complexity, Dynamical Genetics, Pp.
101-119. (PDF, 2.95MB; HTML)
Jonathan Wells, "Do Centrioles Generate a Polar Ejection
Force?," Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 37-62.
....
Articles Supportive of Intelligent Design Published in
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals
....
John A. Davison, "A Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis,"
Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 155-166.
S.C. Meyer, "The Origin of Biological Information and the
Higher Taxonomic Categories," Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington, 117(2) (2004): 213-239.
Already listed.
M.J. Behe and D.W. Snoke, "Simulating Evolution by Gene
Duplication of Protein Features That Require Multiple Amino
Acid Residues," Protein Science, 13 (2004): 2651-2664.
W.-E. Lönnig & H. Saedler, "Chromosome Rearrangements and
Transposable Elements," Annual Review of Genetics, 36
(2002): 389-410.
....
M.J. Denton, J.C. Marshall & M. Legge, (2002) "The Protein
Folds as Platonic Forms: New Support for the pre-Darwinian
Conception of Evolution by Natural Law," Journal of
Theoretical Biology 219 (2002): 325-342.
....
Jonathan Wells, "Do Centrioles Generate a Polar Ejection
Force?," Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98 (2005): 37-62.
Already listed
....
So, seven science papers. Let's now look at the journals:
The Washington one is well known - it was passed through without peer
review by a sympathetic editor. Down to six.
Wells' hypothesis has been shown to be wrong. Down to five.
Behe and Snoke doesn't actually say much about ID. Down to four.
Rivista di Biologia is a very well known forum for fringe science. It
doesn't have a rigid peer review, and it is known that the editor is
anti-evolutionist, although occasionally you get some good articles that
really are too radical. But let's leave Davison in for the moment.
Now we have two papers by Lönnig. What do they actually say about ID? Do
they *use* it? Assume not. Down to *two*.
That leaves Denton et al. I read this, and they don't use ID in it, just
a wellworn Platonism of form, as old as the hills.
So, Davison. What does he say? I don't have access to that journal, but
here's the abstract:
"I propose that phylogeny took place in a manner similar to that of
ontogeny by the derepression of preformed genomic information which was
expressed through release from latency (derepression) by the
restructuring of existing chromosomal information (position effects).
Both indirect and direct evidence is presented in support of the
Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis."
That's not ID. That's warmed over Buffon. Lamarck, maybe.
So, no *actual* scientific papers on ID...
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
