Ironically, as the implementation of Singer's philosophical imperatives
of drastic population reduction, mass euthanasia programmes, abortion
and infanticide advance, the logical outcome will be that only those
'know-nothing religious fundamentalists' he excoriates will survive the
anti-human pogroms.

PRINCETON, December 2, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Infamous advocate of
infanticide and the man often credited as the founder of the modern
radical animal rights movement, Dr. Peter Singer, was featured in the
National Post this week predicting that the traditional ethics of
western civilization would shortly be abolished. Singer's comments
appeared first in the September/October edition of the journal Foreign
Policy as a speculation on what cherished social institutions would
still exist in 35 years.

Singer, a strict utilitarian and the man the New York Times called the
'greatest living philosopher,' says, 'By 2040, it may be that only a
rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists will defend
the view that every human life, from conception to death, is
sacrosanct.'

The title, 'The Sanctity of Life,' can only be meant as ironic coming
from a man who has made his fame advocating abortion through all nine
months of pregnancy, infanticide up to thirty days after birth and
euthanasia for the elderly and infirm.

Singer's predictions, shocking as they may appear, are well on the way
to fruition, however. With the advance of utilitarian philosophy at
both ends of human life, first with abortion, then with cloning, IVF,
and growing rates of infanticide, and then with the acceptance of
euthanasia, Singer has merely given an approving nod to what is
verifiably happening all over the world.

He predicts bluntly, 'During the next 35 years, the traditional view of
the sanctity of human life will collapse under pressure from
scientific, technological, and demographic developments.'

What Singer refuses to acknowledge is that there is no unavoidable
necessity for this collapse. In fact most of it is being forced on
nations by activist judges, undemocratic government and other
organization actions and ruthless elites, who have constantly distorted
facts to suit their agendas.

Technology has been developing since the emergence of organized human
culture. In all that time, however, it is not until our own epoch that
the suicidal anti-human philosophy has been so broadly accepted. In no
other time before the modern age, has it been seriously proposed that
the development of technology must necessarily supercede the inherent
value of human life.


Ironically, as the implementation of Singer's philosophical imperatives
of drastic population reduction, mass euthanasia programmes, abortion
and infanticide advance, the logical outcome will be that only those
'know-nothing religious fundamentalists' he excoriates will survive the
anti-human pogroms.

Princeton Bioethicist says only Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists
will Value Human Life by 2040