| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2006 11:32:19 PM |
| Object: |
Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The abortion provider is in a "never-ending quest to sexualize everything in
our culture," said Jim Sedlak, executive director of American Life League's
STOPP International.
Some of the 28 versions of the key chain, sold by Planned Parenthood of
Connecticut, are "blasphemous," asserted Sedlak, who urges Americans to
contact local schools and churches and insist "that the promiscuity
promoters at Planned Parenthood not be allowed anywhere near our children."
Access to the page offering the items has been blocked since STOPP
International publicized it.
Sedlak also wants "all government officials to stop taxpayer money from
going to this organization that makes a habit of blaspheming God."
Another key chain, he points out, has a caricature of a baby crying loudly,
accompanied by the Planned Parenthood slogan, "Condoms are cheaper than
diapers."
Also, series of three key chains "offends all patriotic Americans," he said.
One is a takeoff on the "Uncle Sam Wants You" poster from World War II,
replacing Uncle Sam with a condom. The second has an American flag with the
stars in the field of blue replaced with the words, "Wear with Pride." The
third is a picture of the Statue of Liberty holding a condom instead of a
torch.
Another key chain says, "Earth and condoms, we can't live without them."
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 01:19:49 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
Doesn't it just suck that your alleged church doesn't make the law? (That
First Amendment is the bomb.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Iowa 1 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 13 vs. Iowa, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 01:26:11 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 08:54:04 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
Only a queer could drream that one up.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 07:45:08 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
Only a queer could drream that one up.
I guess it hit too close to home (or showed more imagination than BAM
is capable of). Is he embarassed that J. Young was exaggerating? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 08:17:50 PM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m37j9360uy.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder
the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood
intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
Only a queer could drream that one up.
I guess it hit too close to home (or showed more imagination than BAM
is capable of). Is he embarassed that J. Young was exaggerating? :-)
Typical queer response. If someone doesn't like queers he must secretly want
to be one. Where that came from only a queer could explain. (queerly)
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 01:42:18 AM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m37j9360uy.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned
Parenthood intended to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would
have put the image on the condom itself so the recipient could
"worship" what is inside. :-)
Only a queer could drream that one up.
I guess it hit too close to home (or showed more imagination than BAM
is capable of). Is he embarassed that J. Young was exaggerating? :-)
Typical queer response. If someone doesn't like queers he must secretly want
to be one. Where that came from only a queer could explain. (queerly)
BAM
Wow. You dig yourself deeper into a hole with each post. Now think.
The organization is named "Planned Parenthood". They provide advise
to help people avoid unwanted pregnancies, among other things. Given
the organization's charter, its customers/patients are going to be
into heterosexual sex.
So, from a _Planned Parenthood_ perspective, the only people who use
their services who might be into "penis worship" are straight or
bisexual women with male partners. Yet *you* think it is "queer"???
Now, why is that? Are you inadequate in a certain department to
the extent women think ill of your member virilis? Or is it that
you are really interested in guys - you do seem to bring up the
word "queer" a lot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 09:03:33 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote
Wow. You dig yourself deeper into a hole with each post. Now think.
The organization is named "Planned Parenthood". They provide advise
to help people avoid unwanted pregnancies, among other things. Given
the organization's charter, its customers/patients are going to be
into heterosexual sex.
Can't argue that one. In fact very few pregnancies arise from buggery.
So, from a _Planned Parenthood_ perspective, the only people who use
their services who might be into "penis worship" are straight or
bisexual women with male partners. Yet *you* think it is "queer"???
You might try to rephrase this - it's incoherent.
Now, why is that? Are you inadequate in a certain department to
the extent women think ill of your member virilis? Or is it that
you are really interested in guys - you do seem to bring up the
word "queer" a lot.
Typical queer. Draws a queer conclusion, asks me why I concluded what he
concluded (which I didn't), and then provides his own answers to his false
accusations.
BAM
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 10:57:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:17:50 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>
queer
queers
queer
(queerly)
Your obsession with homosexuality duly noted, Bryan.
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual
tendencies is not negligible....They must be accepted with respect,
compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in
their regard should be avoided.
Enjoy Hell, unrepentant sinner! LOL
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "erikc" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 02:14:09 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:54:04 -0500, "bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>
wrote:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
Only a queer could drream that one up.
Like yourself, perhaps?
Erikc (alt.atheist #002) | "An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil."
BAAWA Knight (retired) | "The Truth against the World."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
17 Jan 2006 12:25:53 PM |
|
|
In article <m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
But many in the pro-life movement do worship what's inside
the condom. After it's used.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
17 Jan 2006 12:52:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:25:53 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> writes:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
But many in the pro-life movement do worship what's inside
the condom. After it's used.
Every sperm is sacred...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Polish Prince \Szynka" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 06:31:58 AM |
|
|
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine
Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 08:55:06 AM |
|
|
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
If pre-marital sex is OK, is post-marital sex OK?
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 04:20:41 AM |
|
|
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 08:59:38 AM |
|
|
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 04:58:20 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:59:38 -0500, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> in alt.abortion with message-id
<ch8yf.34526$__4.6543@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
Reproduction machines only.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 12:13:20 PM |
|
|
bam <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
You want women to be slaves.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Altarriba" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 12:26:52 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
Every so often, I encounter someone on the net, and find myself
wondering... "Do they *really* believe this, or are they just trolling
for effect?" I mean, could any human being truly believe, in this day
and age, that "women should just give birth and be under control"?
And yet, the sad truth is that there *are* humans out there who believe
this, and for every troll there's someone who sincerely believes the
exact same thing.
Humans can be very disappointing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
15 Jan 2006 07:43:50 AM |
|
|
in article 1137263212.355148.307370@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, Michael
Altarriba at wrote on 1/14/06 1:26 PM:
bam wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
Every so often, I encounter someone on the net, and find myself
wondering... "Do they *really* believe this, or are they just trolling
for effect?" I mean, could any human being truly believe, in this day
and age, that "women should just give birth and be under control"?
And yet, the sad truth is that there *are* humans out there who believe
this, and for every troll there's someone who sincerely believes the
exact same thing.
Bam is both...
Paul
Humans can be very disappointing.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
15 Jan 2006 07:28:07 AM |
|
|
in article ch8yf.34526$__4.6543@bignews1.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/14/06 9:59 AM:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFEE3AA9.2DC12%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article %6Pxf.63079$Lb1.21251@bignews3.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 1/13/06 9:55 AM:
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Like birth control - no birth and no control.
Bam thinks women should just give birth and be under control.
That's the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
Let us know if you ever find a bottom feeder willing to agree to
those terms...
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 10:09:29 AM |
|
|
"Polish Prince (Szynka)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:25Nxf.253038$qk4.183284@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
No.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 09:36:35 AM |
|
|
"Polish Prince \(Szynka\)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> writes:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m3k6d43813.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Have these heathens any shame? Any sense of decency at all? No wonder the
average American looks upon PPA with contempt.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48315
God, Adam on 'condom key chain'
Planned Parenthood accused of blaspheming Almighty
A pro-life group is protesting Planned Parenthood's sale of a line of
"condom key chains' that include a takeoff on Michelangelo's famous
Sistine Chapel image in which the hand of God gives a condom to Adam.
The "pro-life group" needs to get a life. If Planned Parenthood intended
to "blaspheme" the "Almighty", they would have put the image on the
condom itself so the recipient could "worship" what is inside. :-)
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
A lot less ridiculous than an anonymous cowardly wingnut calling itself
Polish, considering 90% or so of Planned Parenthood's services are concerned
with prenatal care and education...have you ever been within ten miles of one
of them?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Iowa 1 (January 12)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 13 vs. Iowa, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 11:08:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:31:58 +0000, Polish Prince (Szynka) wrote:
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
As opposed to, say, "Pretend that we have no fucking clue how pregnancy
occurs, insist that people behave in a way that is contrary to one of our
most basic biologic drives, then blame the woman if she winds up with an
*unplanned* pregnancy"? I don't know about you, but I, for one, would
like to take advantage of the fact that we can PLAN something as important
as pregnancy.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 07:37:48 AM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "Polish Prince \(Szynka\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> posting the following on Fri, 13 Jan
2006 12:31:58 GMT iin alt.atheism?
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Not if you understand that PP also provides low-cost neonatal
services, runs free clinics to teach mothers-to-be how to care for
their infants, and does some fertility testing.
The name says it all: *Planned* Parenthood. They are fully behind the
concept of every child being a wanted child.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 09:01:46 AM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:u4bfs1dj14h8astdkb6louqoo21mkc36d4@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "Polish Prince \(Szynka\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> posting the following on Fri, 13 Jan
2006 12:31:58 GMT iin alt.atheism?
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Not if you understand that PP also provides low-cost neonatal
services, runs free clinics to teach mothers-to-be how to care for
their infants, and does some fertility testing.
The name says it all: *Planned* Parenthood. They are fully behind the
concept of every child being a wanted child.
Originally called the American Birth Control League, it was founded by
Margaret Sanger, a eugenecist, right along the lines of the Nazi party. She
first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we can guess what
race she was trying to cut back on.
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
BAM
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 03:58:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:46 -0500, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> in alt.abortion with message-id
<fdPxf.63081$Lb1.10252@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:u4bfs1dj14h8astdkb6louqoo21mkc36d4@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "Polish Prince \(Szynka\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> posting the following on Fri, 13 Jan
2006 12:31:58 GMT iin alt.atheism?
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Not if you understand that PP also provides low-cost neonatal
services, runs free clinics to teach mothers-to-be how to care for
their infants, and does some fertility testing.
The name says it all: *Planned* Parenthood. They are fully behind the
concept of every child being a wanted child.
Originally called the American Birth Control League, it was founded by
Margaret Sanger, a eugenecist, right along the lines of the Nazi party.
Hitler was elected in a public vote. FDR was elected in a public
vote. Churchill was elected in a public vote. It is obvious Hitler,
FDR, and Churchill were political cronies who shared the same ideals
and goals.
She
first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we can guess what
race she was trying to cut back on.
Was birth control information only given to one race? Isn't it
necessary for every enterprise to have a beginning?
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic
So what? So were Martin Luther's parents and look what he did.
and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
Do you have a reason for thinking that?
Can you say or do anything that is does not have a propaganda spin on
it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 04:46:47 PM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:4a8gs1p9iccff2e4472ono0kullf4l83sg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:46 -0500, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> in alt.abortion with message-id
<fdPxf.63081$Lb1.10252@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:u4bfs1dj14h8astdkb6louqoo21mkc36d4@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "Polish Prince \(Szynka\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> posting the following on Fri, 13 Jan
2006 12:31:58 GMT iin alt.atheism?
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Not if you understand that PP also provides low-cost neonatal
services, runs free clinics to teach mothers-to-be how to care for
their infants, and does some fertility testing.
The name says it all: *Planned* Parenthood. They are fully behind the
concept of every child being a wanted child.
Originally called the American Birth Control League, it was founded by
Margaret Sanger, a eugenecist, right along the lines of the Nazi party.
Hitler was elected in a public vote. FDR was elected in a public
vote. Churchill was elected in a public vote. It is obvious Hitler,
FDR, and Churchill were political cronies who shared the same ideals
and goals.
And this bears *what* relevance to birth control?
She
first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we can guess
what
race she was trying to cut back on.
Was birth control information only given to one race?
No, The rich WASPS liked it as well, but they didn't want to be the only
ones using it.
Isn't it
necessary for every enterprise to have a beginning?
I would think so. Relevance?
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic
So what? So were Martin Luther's parents and look what he did.
Agreed wholeheartedly. Corrupto optima pessima est.
and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
Do you have a reason for thinking that?
Well..........yEAH. She was trying to reduce the population.
Can you say or do anything that is does not have a propaganda spin on
it?
Yes.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "655321" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 08:40:58 PM |
|
|
In article <c1Wxf.128783$k76.48616@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:4a8gs1p9iccff2e4472ono0kullf4l83sg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:46 -0500, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> in alt.abortion with message-id
<fdPxf.63081$Lb1.10252@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:u4bfs1dj14h8astdkb6louqoo21mkc36d4@4ax.com...
What's so funny about peace, love and "Polish Prince \(Szynka\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> posting the following on Fri, 13 Jan
2006 12:31:58 GMT iin alt.atheism?
Planned Parenthood(sic) is who they are.
Why do they use the name "Parenthood" ?
Is that not ridiculous ?
Not if you understand that PP also provides low-cost neonatal
services, runs free clinics to teach mothers-to-be how to care for
their infants, and does some fertility testing.
The name says it all: *Planned* Parenthood. They are fully behind the
concept of every child being a wanted child.
Originally called the American Birth Control League, it was founded by
Margaret Sanger, a eugenecist, right along the lines of the Nazi party.
Hitler was elected in a public vote. FDR was elected in a public
vote. Churchill was elected in a public vote. It is obvious Hitler,
FDR, and Churchill were political cronies who shared the same ideals
and goals.
And this bears *what* relevance to birth control?
Exactly. Sanger's politics bear exactly *what* to Planned Parenthood's
policies and practices today?
She first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we
can guess what race she was trying to cut back on.
Was birth control information only given to one race?
No, The rich WASPS liked it as well, but they didn't want to be the only
ones using it.
If you say so. Sounds like you're just makin' ***** up now.
Isn't it
necessary for every enterprise to have a beginning?
I would think so. Relevance?
That the beginning of something is not necessarily an accurate
definition of a thing at any given point in time.
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic
So what? So were Martin Luther's parents and look what he did.
Agreed wholeheartedly. Corrupto optima pessima est.
Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinis alacribus et
fructuosis potiri potes!
and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
Do you have a reason for thinking that?
Well..........yEAH. She was trying to reduce the population.
Okay, so you really have nothing to contribute other than insinuation
and guilt by association-type silliness.
Fine.
Can you say or do anything that is does not have a propaganda spin on
it?
Yes.
But why bother, right?
655321
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
13 Jan 2006 09:10:28 PM |
|
|
"655321" <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote
And this bears *what* relevance to birth control?
Exactly. Sanger's politics bear exactly *what* to Planned Parenthood's
policies and practices today?
Everything.
She first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we
can guess what race she was trying to cut back on.
Was birth control information only given to one race?
No, The rich WASPS liked it as well, but they didn't want to be the only
ones using it.
If you say so. Sounds like you're just makin' ***** up now.
Nope. Her supporters and financiers were worried about losing political
clout by the decrease in WASP voters and the flood of large family
immigrants. But the large family immigrants (read Catholic) would have
nothing to do with her, so the next best thing was to get rid of the
Negroes.
Isn't it
necessary for every enterprise to have a beginning?
I would think so. Relevance?
That the beginning of something is not necessarily an accurate
definition of a thing at any given point in time.
In theory, I suppose. But a very weak retort.
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic
So what? So were Martin Luther's parents and look what he did.
Agreed wholeheartedly. Corrupto optima pessima est.
Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinis alacribus et
fructuosis potiri potes!
I can read it fine - but I'm not looking for employment.
and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
Do you have a reason for thinking that?
Well..........yEAH. She was trying to reduce the population.
Okay, so you really have nothing to contribute other than insinuation
and guilt by association-type silliness.
I said "perhaps". It is ironic that one coming from a huge family would
devote her life to reducing the population. It could very well have much to
do with her feeling toward her own family. That's simply a hunch, and not
illogical.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "655321" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood accused of blasphemy |
14 Jan 2006 12:18:11 PM |
|
|
In article <nUZxf.38318$qw4.19413@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"655321" <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote
And this bears *what* relevance to birth control?
Exactly. Sanger's politics bear exactly *what* to Planned Parenthood's
policies and practices today?
Everything.
And by "everything" you mean "nothing." Got it.
She first opened up in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, so we
can guess what race she was trying to cut back on.
Was birth control information only given to one race?
No, The rich WASPS liked it as well, but they didn't want to be the only
ones using it.
If you say so. Sounds like you're just makin' ***** up now.
Nope. Her supporters and financiers were worried about losing political
clout by the decrease in WASP voters and the flood of large family
immigrants. But the large family immigrants (read Catholic) would have
nothing to do with her, so the next best thing was to get rid of the
Negroes.
If you say so. Sounds like you're just makin' ***** up now.
Isn't it
necessary for every enterprise to have a beginning?
I would think so. Relevance?
That the beginning of something is not necessarily an accurate
definition of a thing at any given point in time.
In theory, I suppose.
In fact.
But a very weak retort.
It was not meant as a retort. It was meant as a counter-argument to the
***** you're trying to pile on a worthy organization.
Her mother was a devout Roman Catholic
So what? So were Martin Luther's parents and look what he did.
Agreed wholeheartedly. Corrupto optima pessima est.
Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinis alacribus et
fructuosis potiri potes!
I can read it fine - but I'm not looking for employment.
Good for you.
and perhaps Margaret hated her ten
brothers and sisters.
Do you have a reason for thinking that?
Well..........yEAH. She was trying to reduce the population.
Okay, so you really have nothing to contribute other than insinuation
and guilt by association-type silliness.
I said "perhaps".
Exactly: Insinuation and guilt by association silliness.
It is ironic that one coming from a huge family would
devote her life to reducing the population. It could very well have much to
do with her feeling toward her own family. That's simply a hunch, and not
illogical.
Insinuation, selective characterization, makin' ***** up, and all in
service of the fallacy of guilt by association.
I smell desparation.
655321
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
