| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
| Date: |
23 Sep 2003 02:18:56 PM |
| Object: |
Poll: Bush is very weak |
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll of registered voters
http://tinyurl.com/oec6
6. If retired General Wesley Clark were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Wesley Clark, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Clark 49 Bush 46
7. If former Vermont Governor Howard Dean were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Howard Dean, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Dean 46 Bush 49
8. If Missouri Congressman ***** Gephardt were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- ***** Gephardt, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Gephardt 46 Bush 48
9. If Massachusetts Senator John Kerry were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- John Kerry, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Kerry 48 Bush 47
10. If Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Joe Lieberman, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Lieberman 47 Bush 48
--
"Beware of the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double
edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the
mind."
--Attribured to Julius Caesar
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 04:49:00 PM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers
should be challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an
election before a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are
doing it.
Did you forget about Iran? Syria? What about the Anthrax attacks
here at home? Supposedly terrorists have been running around the
U.S. for two years now, with a complete & operational biological
weapons laboratory at their disposal.
Nobody was ever caught. The terrorist, right here at home, are
safe & free and have deadly biological agents and are looking to
use them.
It's a done deal. They'll be a body count soon, and amongst the
casualties will be the Democratic poll numbers.
9/11 saved this administration once, and a convenient "terrorist"
attack will save it again.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "M is for Malapert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 04:01:31 PM |
|
|
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
Expect another "terrorist attack" at just the right time. I don't think
Bush and his handlers plan to leave.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 04:28:06 PM |
|
|
"M is for Malapert" <minxs@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:Kw2cb.418845$cF.129057@rwcrnsc53...
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44...
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
Expect another "terrorist attack" at just the right time. I don't think
Bush and his handlers plan to leave.
That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another terrorist attack
just before the election wouldn't pass the sniff test to even the most devout
moron-American.
And I don't think the Dems would be out of line for politicizing it, either.
Point out just how effective Bush's policies have been on terror...
Then again:
http://tinyurl.com/oewa (QuickTime)
http://tinyurl.com/oewh (Windows Media)
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 05:40:06 PM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
Remember those Anthrax attacks?
According to this administration, terrorist are running around
America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
and have been running around for at least two years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 06:25:59 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in news:jpScndv8a5e2Vu2iU-KYuQ@comcast.com:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
Remember those Anthrax attacks?
According to this administration, terrorist are running around
America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
and have been running around for at least two years.
Ashcroft may not be able to stop anthrax attacks,
but there is at least one topless statue in Washington
he has protected us from.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 07:14:01 PM |
|
|
Ashcroft may not be able to stop anthrax attacks,
but there is at least one topless statue in Washington
he has protected us from.
Methinks that the offensive boob might be the one in front of the camera, not
the one that was covered up.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Ill-Legal Dept. "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here"
"My country, right or wrong; to be defended when right and righted when wrong."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fear gan dia" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 07:02:12 PM |
|
|
Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com>
in <Xns93FFBC2D9A05Dta2eenew@216.148.227.77>:
# "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in news:jpScndv8a5e2Vu2iU-KYuQ@comcast.com:
#
# >
# > "Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
# >
# >> That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
# >> terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
# >> sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
# >
# > Remember those Anthrax attacks?
# >
# > According to this administration, terrorist are running around
# > America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
# > and have been running around for at least two years.
#
#
# Ashcroft may not be able to stop anthrax attacks,
# but there is at least one topless statue in Washington
# he has protected us from.
But there's still a giant boob in every photo of Ash-hole.
--
Fear gan dia ### http://goddamliberal.blogspot.com
Director, EAC Division for Leaving the Toilet Seat up.
-No God for Ireland! he cried. We have had too much
God in Ireland. Away with God!
-James Joyce, _A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man_
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 05:46:01 PM |
|
|
On 23 Sep 2003, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> posted this:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
Remember those Anthrax attacks?
According to this administration, terrorist are running around
America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
and have been running around for at least two years.
We're safe from the anthrax terrorists for now. They only attack
Democratic senators, and then only when Democrats have a one person
majority in the Senate.
--
"Although it is true that only about 20 percent of American workers
are in unions, that 20 percent sets the standards across the board
in salaries, benefits and working conditions. If you are making a
decent salary in a non-union company, you owe that to the unions.
One thing that corporations do not do is give out money out of the
goodness of their hearts."
--Molly Ivins
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
24 Sep 2003 09:21:27 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:40:06 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> posted
in alt.atheism:
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
Remember those Anthrax attacks?
According to this administration, terrorist are running around
America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
and have been running around for at least two years.
That would mean ... ummm ...
that the administration is powerless to stop them?
--
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fear gan dia" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 06:57:34 PM |
|
|
Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by "JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com>
in <jpScndv8a5e2Vu2iU-KYuQ@comcast.com>:
#
# "Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
#
# > That'd be a real roll of the dice, don't you think? Another
# > terrorist attack just before the election wouldn't pass the
# > sniff test to even the most devout moron-American.
#
# Remember those Anthrax attacks?
#
# According to this administration, terrorist are running around
# America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
# and have been running around for at least two years.
And they're targeting Democratic senators and the
so-called liberal media. Yet no-one seems willing
to speculate that conservatives are behind the...
[carnivore:initiate_emergency_shutdown]
[connection closed by remote host]
--
Fear gan dia ### http://goddamliberal.blogspot.com
Director, EAC Division for Leaving the Toilet Seat up.
-No God for Ireland! he cried. We have had too much
God in Ireland. Away with God!
-James Joyce, _A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man_
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
24 Sep 2003 03:14:09 AM |
|
|
"Fear gan dia" <btbrrtdshbnx@rhhsdxqndqnq.com> wrote
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com>
# Remember those Anthrax attacks?
#
# According to this administration, terrorist are running around
# America, right now, with a fully functioning bio-weapons lab,
# and have been running around for at least two years.
And they're targeting Democratic senators and the
so-called liberal media. Yet no-one seems willing
to speculate that conservatives are behind the...
No one amongst the Democrats or the "Liberal Media" you mean.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
24 Sep 2003 10:57:54 AM |
|
|
"M is for Malapert" <minxs@sonic.net> wrote...
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote...
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
Expect another "terrorist attack" at just the right time. I don't think
Bush and his handlers plan to leave.
According to the American Research Group, Bush's numbers are now 47%
approve, 49% disapprove. That's a 9 point drop in the last 3 weeks.
Bush is in free fall.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is very weak |
24 Sep 2003 11:00:14 AM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0309240757.298ddd23@posting.google.com...
"M is for Malapert" <minxs@sonic.net> wrote...
"Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" <tim@somecallme.net> wrote...
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
Expect another "terrorist attack" at just the right time. I don't think
Bush and his handlers plan to leave.
According to the American Research Group, Bush's numbers are now 47%
approve, 49% disapprove. That's a 9 point drop in the last 3 weeks.
Bush is in free fall.
Until the mysteriously missing Osama or Saddam put in their
appearances...right before the primaries or so...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 07:52:48 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:18:56 +0000, Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced wrote:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
Gets even more fun in some of the other recent polls:
Zogby America Poll. Sept. 3-5, 2003. N=1,013 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.2.
"Do you think President Bush deserves to be reelected or do you think it is time for someone new?"
Deserves Reelection - 40%
Someone New --------- 52%
Not Sure ------------ 8%
Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates. Sept. 18-19, 2003.
N=855 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 4 (total sample).
"In general, would you like to see George W. Bush reelected to another term as president, or not?"
Yes No Don't Know
% % %
44 50 6
And his numbers keep dropping...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 02:28:14 PM |
|
|
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll of registered voters
http://tinyurl.com/oec6
6. If retired General Wesley Clark were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Wesley Clark, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Clark 49 Bush 46
7. If former Vermont Governor Howard Dean were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Howard Dean, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Dean 46 Bush 49
8. If Missouri Congressman ***** Gephardt were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- ***** Gephardt, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Gephardt 46 Bush 48
9. If Massachusetts Senator John Kerry were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- John Kerry, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Kerry 48 Bush 47
10. If Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Joe Lieberman, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Lieberman 47 Bush 48
--
"Beware of the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double
edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the
mind."
--Attribured to Julius Caesar
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
Sounds like Whistle ***** is going to need another terrorist attack before
the election to help bump up his popularity again.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 05:14:43 PM |
|
|
"A MODEST REQUEST....According to Newsweek, a few months ago Wesley
Clark told two Colorado Republicans that, following 9/11, 'I would
have been a Republican if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls.'
Clark says he was just kidding, but Newsweek reported it seriously.
However, even if Clark was serious, he was obviously speaking
metaphorically here, since the very first paragraph of Newsweek's
story had already told us that 'when GOP friends inquired [about
Clark joining the Bush team], they were told: forget it.' So Clark
himself didn't call Karl Rove, his friends did.
Matthew Continetti, writing in the Weekly Standard, doesn't much care
about this. He just wants to prove that Clark is a lying, lying,
liar:
'Unfortunately for Clark, the White House has logged every incoming
phone call since the beginning of the Bush administration in January
2001. At the request of THE DAILY STANDARD, White House staffers went
through the logs to check whether Clark had ever called White House
political adviser Karl Rove. The general hadn't. What's more, Rove
says he doesn't remember ever talking to Clark, either.'
Obviously this doesn't prove anything one way or the other, but what
caught my eye is that the White House is apparently willing to search
Karl Rove's phone logs upon request by reporters. So I've got a
request of my own: will you please search Rove's phone logs to find
out if Robert Novak called him on or about July 14? Thanks!"
http://www.calpundit.com/archives/002221.html
Yes, the Bush Administration should put at least as much effort into
checking into the Plame affair--which involved a crime--as they did
helping THE DAILY STANDARD make Clark look like a liar.
--
'The concept of military necessity is seductively broad, and
has a dangerous plasticity. Because they invariably have the
visage of overriding importance, there is always a temptation
to invoke security 'necessities' to justify an encroachment
upon civil liberties. For that reason, the military-security
argument must be approached with a healthy skepticism.'
--Justice William Brennan
Tim
'Fair and Balanced'
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 02:41:28 PM |
|
|
"Woden" <woden@charter.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93FF9D2201643wodencharternet@216.168.3.44...
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
<...>
Sounds like Whistle ***** is going to need another terrorist attack before
the election to help bump up his popularity again.
I think another terrorist attack would do just the opposite.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Popelish" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 03:26:53 PM |
|
|
Clave wrote:
"Woden" <woden@charter.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93FF9D2201643wodencharternet@216.168.3.44...
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
<...>
Sounds like Whistle ***** is going to need another terrorist attack before
the election to help bump up his popularity again.
I think another terrorist attack would do just the opposite.
But does Bush know that?
--
John Popelish
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 10:59:06 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:26:53 GMT, John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>
wrote:
Clave wrote:
"Woden" <woden@charter.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93FF9D2201643wodencharternet@216.168.3.44...
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
<...>
Sounds like Whistle ***** is going to need another terrorist attack before
the election to help bump up his popularity again.
I think another terrorist attack would do just the opposite.
But does Bush know that?
he may not know that, but he's a puppet and not running the show
"Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man." -- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al_Lien proud_liberal2003ATyahoo.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Poll: Bush is very weak |
23 Sep 2003 03:44:32 PM |
|
|
Woden <woden@charter.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF9D2201643wodencharternet@216.168.3.44:
Patriotboy is Fair and Balanced <tim@somecallme.net> wrote in
news:Xns93FF7DAA5CF6Ftimsomecallme@216.168.3.44:
Wow, these numbers are incredible. Nobody's poll numbers should be
challenging a sitting president this far ahead of an election before
a nominee is selected, but 5 Demorcats are doing it.
USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll of registered voters
http://tinyurl.com/oec6
6. If retired General Wesley Clark were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Wesley Clark, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Clark 49 Bush 46
7. If former Vermont Governor Howard Dean were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Howard Dean, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Dean 46 Bush 49
8. If Missouri Congressman ***** Gephardt were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- ***** Gephardt, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Gephardt 46 Bush 48
9. If Massachusetts Senator John Kerry were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- John Kerry, the Democrat
or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Kerry 48 Bush 47
10. If Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman were the Democratic Party's
candidate and George W. Bush were the Republican Party's candidate,
who would you be more likely to vote for -- Joe Lieberman, the
Democrat or George W. Bush, the Republican?
Lieberman 47 Bush 48
--
"Beware of the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double
edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the
mind."
--Attribured to Julius Caesar
Tim
"Fair and Balanced"
Sounds like Whistle ***** is going to need another terrorist attack before
the election to help bump up his popularity again.
Will we be shocked if he gets it?
--
http://www.conservativesagainstbush.com/
Taking Back Our Country: www.deanforamerica.com/
Care Packages for Our Troops in Iraq: www.goodygiftbox.com/military.html
Bush Scorecard: http://www.wage-slave.org/scorecard.html
http://www.geocities.com/proud_liberal2003/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
