Religions > Atheism > Poll: Half of the Christian Fundamentalists Think Falwell Is a Loonie
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
13 Aug 2004 01:00:42 AM |
| Object: |
Poll: Half of the Christian Fundamentalists Think Falwell Is a Loonie |
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1963&e=9&u=/ap/20040812/ap_on_el_pr/gop_convention_evangelicals
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -934 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Dave Middleton" |
|
| Title: Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry |
13 Aug 2004 02:39:32 AM |
|
|
Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry
President Bush's campaign for re-election has an easy job running
anti-Kerry ads. All it has to do is quote John Kerry.
The most laughed-about quotation in the new TV commercial about the
Massachusetts Democrat's flip-flop on Iraq: "I actually did vote for
his $87 billion, before I voted against it."
Kerry's campaign responded by raging that "America continues to
falter."
By the way, still no comment from Kerry's handlers on his ringing
endorsement from radical anti-Jewish zealot Mahathir "Final Victory"
Mohamad.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, closed-minded,
selfish, intolerant, bigoted and racist.
Liberals HATE America!
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Bush Fights Bush With Kerry |
13 Aug 2004 08:35:04 AM |
|
|
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote
The most laughed-about quotation in the new TV commercial
about the Massachusetts Democrat's flip-flop on Iraq: "I
actually did vote for his $87 billion, before I voted against it."
Bush had three different positions on the exact same bill.
Originally Bush was against it, even as Kerry voted for it. The
bill including roughly $20 billion in totally unaccounted for
spending to rebuild Iraq. Problem is, only about half the necessary
rebuilding was a result of war damage, the other half being the
result of more than 10 years of sanctions. The original version,
the one Kerry voted for, made half of the $10 a loan that Iraq
would have to repay.
Many members of congress -- Kerry included -- didn't think the
American taxpayer, all alone, should pay for the damage caused
by U.N. sanctions. Bush disagreed. Bush thought that even though
money was tight here in the United States -- at least on this kind
of spending -- the American taxpayers should lavish cash on the
Iraqi people.
Bush promised to veto the bill.
Later the Republicans amended the bill, turning all of the $20
billion into a gift to the people of Halliburton....errr... "Iraq."
Kerry switched sides, voting against it. Bush switched sides,
now supporting it and even signing it into law.
Both Bush & Kerry each held two positions on the exact same
bill.
....then Bush took on a third position. Bush decided that anyone
who didn't offer their unconditional support for the bill -- just as
he refused his unconditional support -- was against the troops
and a flip-flopper.
Moral of the story: You can't get "Educated" on the issues if you
only listen to political ads and am radio talk shows.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Marxist Moore" |
|
| Title: The Impeached Rapist, Bill Clinton, has ADD!! |
13 Aug 2004 09:25:21 AM |
|
|
The Impeached Rapist, Bill Clinton, has ADD!!!
By ***** Morris
A cold-blooded creature must bask in others' sunlight to stay warm;
that's what Bill Clinton is doing to John Kerry
--
Bill Clinton has a unique form of ADD - he is disordered when he does
not get enough attention. Like a headlight reflector on the highway,
he cannot shine unless a light illuminates him. Like a solar battery,
he cannot generate energy unless he basks in the outside stimulus of
sunlight. And like a cold-blooded creature, he cannot internally
generate body warmth, but relies upon the sun to provide it.
Just remember how fully he realized himself standing before Congress
and basking in applause, spotlights and public adulation. He chose a
profession in which the band rarely stops playing and the press never
goes home.
But now, in the twilight of his political career, he craves attention.
He needs an audience. He has to have a mirror, to see himself in the
eyes of others in order to understand who he is.
Clinton could no more resist writing his memoirs and releasing them in
the middle of a presidential campaign than he could turn aside from
any spotlight. Clinton has run for office in 1974, 1976, 1978, 1980,
1982, 1984, 1986, 1990, 1992, and 1996. Indeed, the former president
is launching his own campaign beginning with the unveiling of his
portrait at the White House last week, continuing through his massive
book publicity campaign and nationwide book signings, the release of
Harry Thomasson’s sympathetic “The Hunting of the President” movie,
his upcoming speech to the 2004 Democratic convention and, finally,
the opening of his presidential library in Little Rock later this
year.
The real question is why Clinton is campaigning. A large part of the
answer must lie in his neurosis and his inability to function when he
is not on stage. This incessant need for outside stimulus that caused
him to risk his presidency on a series of affairs cannot be
extinguished. It can only be channeled. And he cannot resist mounting
the platform when it is erected every four years.
But one cannot brush aside a pragmatic calculus where the former
president is concerned. The fact remains that a Kerry victory would
retard Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions for at least four
years. The New York Democratic senator could clearly have the 2008
nomination for the asking. But if she had to wait until 2012 and
compete with Kerry’s vice president, who knows what the outcome would
be.
Clinton certainly knows that the side-by-side comparison of his own
charisma, pathos, empathy and charm with the stiff, patrician bearing
of Kerry will redound to the disadvantage of the Democratic nominee.
Even
assuming that Kerry could grow, which man, only beginning to sample
the national stage, is the equal of an experienced performer at the
end of two terms as president?
Clinton owns prime time. Kerry is not even ready for it. The contrast
will be telling. Contrasted with Clinton, Kerry will come across as
aloof, arrogant, conceited and remote. Hardly the stuff of which
presidential candidacies are nurtured.
But is there an even more devious motivation behind Clinton’s tell-all
psychobabble? Does his banter about his affair with Monica Lewinsky
make Bush’s normalcy suddenly more attractive? Remember how Jimmy
Carter’s integrity, which got him elected in 1976, was irrelevant when
he ran against Ronald Reagan? To
make simple, plain ethical behavior relevant, one needs a contrast.
What better comparison could one hope for than Clinton’s pathetic
excuses for his conduct alongside Bush’s decency and dignity?
Clinton’s insistence on revisiting the past and dragging it into the
present is bound to have a negative impact on Kerry’s candidacy. First
Reagan’s death and now Clinton’s memoir blot out Kerry’s message and
usurp his time in the sun. The run-up to the Democratic convention now
must be fraught with the wreckage of Clinton’s personal image.
Is it just a coincidence that the former president has strewn such
dubious roses in the path of his possible successor as Democratic
standard-bearer? One suspects that Clinton, of all people, knows
exactly what he is doing and precisely why he is doing it.
--
"Look at the murdering thugs in US military uniforms storming through
Iraq, murdering as they go."
- Jefferson Brady, Proud America-Hating, left-wing Liberal Democrat
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shannon Jacobs" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
13 Aug 2004 09:58:43 AM |
|
|
Dang, I need a really squeaky voice to do this. Hey, Mr or Ms Bushevik, can
I borrow the mouse in your pocket? Imagine this with a really squeaky voice:
"Run away, run away! The issues are chasing me! Help! Run away!"
Michael Marxist Moore wrote:
The Impeached Rapist, Bill Clinton, has ADD!!!
<tripe snip>
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
Do you agree that democracy is good and depends on serious discussion
of the issues? If so, don't reply to off topic, ad hominem garbage.
Send it to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Fights Bush With Kerry |
13 Aug 2004 10:01:47 AM |
|
|
The perfect time to for Kerry to bring this up is during the debates
where Bush will have to answer attacking Kerry for this when he did the
same.
JTEM wrote:
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote
The most laughed-about quotation in the new TV commercial
about the Massachusetts Democrat's flip-flop on Iraq: "I
actually did vote for his $87 billion, before I voted against it."
Bush had three different positions on the exact same bill.
Originally Bush was against it, even as Kerry voted for it. The
bill including roughly $20 billion in totally unaccounted for
spending to rebuild Iraq. Problem is, only about half the necessary
rebuilding was a result of war damage, the other half being the
result of more than 10 years of sanctions. The original version,
the one Kerry voted for, made half of the $10 a loan that Iraq
would have to repay.
Many members of congress -- Kerry included -- didn't think the
American taxpayer, all alone, should pay for the damage caused
by U.N. sanctions. Bush disagreed. Bush thought that even though
money was tight here in the United States -- at least on this kind
of spending -- the American taxpayers should lavish cash on the
Iraqi people.
Bush promised to veto the bill.
Later the Republicans amended the bill, turning all of the $20
billion into a gift to the people of Halliburton....errr... "Iraq."
Kerry switched sides, voting against it. Bush switched sides,
now supporting it and even signing it into law.
Both Bush & Kerry each held two positions on the exact same
bill.
....then Bush took on a third position. Bush decided that anyone
who didn't offer their unconditional support for the bill -- just as
he refused his unconditional support -- was against the troops
and a flip-flopper.
Moral of the story: You can't get "Educated" on the issues if you
only listen to political ads and am radio talk shows.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry |
13 Aug 2004 10:11:46 AM |
|
|
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:o0soh09ljidfadjbh3qdt06rh0rhfcsd0j@4ax.com...
President Bush's campaign for re-election has an easy job running
anti-Kerry ads. All it has to do is quote John Kerry.
Cheney should try quoting Bush:
"Precisely because America is powerful, we must be sensitive about
expressing our power and influence. Our goal is to patiently build the
momentum of freedom, not create resentment for America itself. We pursue our
goals; we will listen to others; we want strong friends to join us, not weak
neighbors to dominate. In all our dealings with other nations, we will
display the modesty of true confidence and strength."
-George W. Bush, Commissioning of the USS Ronald Reagan
http://www.reagan.navy.mil/bush_speech.htm
--
-My Real Name
*******************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "GlennGlenn" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry |
13 Aug 2004 06:53:31 PM |
|
|
Mr. N wrote:
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:o0soh09ljidfadjbh3qdt06rh0rhfcsd0j@4ax.com...
President Bush's campaign for re-election has an easy job running
anti-Kerry ads. All it has to do is quote John Kerry.
Cheney should try quoting Bush:
"Precisely because America is powerful, we must be sensitive about
"Sensitive"? Sounds like girly-man talk to me. That Kerry...
expressing our power and influence. Our goal is to patiently build the
momentum of freedom, not create resentment for America itself. We pursue our
goals; we will listen to others;
"listen to others"? Not US! That Kerry...
we want strong friends to join us, not weak
neighbors to dominate. In all our dealings with other nations, we will
display the modesty
"modesty"? Not US! We prefer strutting around in a flight-suit
announcing Mission Accomplished whenever we want to! That Kerry....
of true confidence and strength."
-George W. Bush, Commissioning of the USS Ronald Reagan
Whaaaa...? Bush? I thought this was Kerry!
GlennGlenn
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "commutator" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry |
14 Aug 2004 12:11:23 PM |
|
|
Dave Middleton <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message news:<o0soh09ljidfadjbh3qdt06rh0rhfcsd0j@4ax.com>...
Bush Fights Kerry With Kerry
President Bush's campaign for re-election has an easy job running
anti-Kerry ads. All it has to do is quote John Kerry.
The most laughed-about quotation in the new TV commercial about the
Massachusetts Democrat's flip-flop on Iraq: "I actually did vote for
his $87 billion, before I voted against it."
Kerry's campaign responded by raging that "America continues to
falter."
By the way, still no comment from Kerry's handlers on his ringing
endorsement from radical anti-Jewish zealot Mahathir "Final Victory"
Mohamad.
Changing your mind on a number is not the same as changing your mind
on an ISSUE. Besides, when has it become 'unpresidential' to admit
one's made a mistake (not hat Kerry did do that). This flip-flop
argument is just lame.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
