Religions > Atheism > "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
11 Aug 2006 09:33:44 AM |
| Object: |
"Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
BWAHAHAHA
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2299968
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent, matching his
low in May. His handling of nearly every issue, from the Iraq war to
foreign policy, contributed to the president's decline around the
nation, even in the Republican-friendly South.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2596 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
| User: "the_blogologist" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Aug 2006 09:05:11 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 11:00:36 AM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
.
|
|
|
| User: "marika" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 11:24:54 PM |
|
|
<American@NumberOne.org> wrote in message
news:ebktv4$p5c$1@reader2.panix.com...
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
but Home depot jacked around residents:
http://www.counterpunch.org/rose10042005.html
mk5000"Thus PM formed "The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition," or
TASSC. Recognizing that the chemical, paper, metal, petroleum and other
environmentally-dubious industries would also be thrilled to have a group of
"committed experts" who would publicly say that scientific warnings against
their activities were not credible, PM invited these industries to join
TASSC."-- http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/158433.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Voracious" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 08:23:49 PM |
|
|
wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
Sounds just like the excuse after 9/11: "No one could've foreseen using
airplanes as missiles." When such was war-gamed in the 70s.
Voracious
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 08:51:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:23:49 GMT, in alt.atheism
Voracious <null@void.org> wrote in
<FavDg.404$q63.300@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>:
American@NumberOne.org wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
Sounds just like the excuse after 9/11: "No one could've foreseen using
airplanes as missiles." When such was war-gamed in the 70s.
The Bush Administration cannot foresee anything.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 03:13:22 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:00:36 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees.
Except for Scientific American, 4 years in advance.
http://auto_sol.tao.ca/node/view/1540
Why are you NeoCons so dishonest?
And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2598 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 02:00:44 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and posting
the following on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:00:36 +0000 (UTC) iin
alt.atheism?
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
Ypu mean other than the Army Corps of Engineers, right? Oh, and the
Louisana National Guard, Office of Emergency Services, the Parish
agencies that maintained the levees, and the City of New Orleans.
Hell, the talking heads in the media were discussing the threat of a
levee breach days before Katrina hit.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 03:54:10 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:00:44 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and posting
the following on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:00:36 +0000 (UTC) iin
alt.atheism?
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media? Like Katrina?
Nobody could have foreseen the breach of those levees. And all things
considered, FEMA did a heck of a good job.
Ypu mean other than the Army Corps of Engineers, right? Oh, and the
Louisana National Guard, Office of Emergency Services, the Parish
agencies that maintained the levees, and the City of New Orleans.
Hell, the talking heads in the media were discussing the threat of a
levee breach days before Katrina hit.
Heads up..they have been talking levee breach for 50 YEARS. Which was
plenty of time for NO to get its act together.
Now about those 200+ drowned school buses....
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the ***** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 08:47:35 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net>
posting the following on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:54:10 GMT iin
alt.atheism?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:00:44 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Ypu mean other than the Army Corps of Engineers, right? Oh, and the
Louisana National Guard, Office of Emergency Services, the Parish
agencies that maintained the levees, and the City of New Orleans.
Hell, the talking heads in the media were discussing the threat of a
levee breach days before Katrina hit.
Heads up..they have been talking levee breach for 50 YEARS. Which was
plenty of time for NO to get its act together.
Except the levees were the responsibilty, in the end, of the Army
Corps of Engineers.
Now about those 200+ drowned school buses....
Yes, about them. What, precisely would you have done? The drivers
were evacuating (and weren't cit employees to begin with,) FEMA had
promised aid (which didn't arrive) and the buses were flooded early
on.
You're the mayor. Where are you going to find 200 qualified bus
drivers?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Aug 2006 09:24:01 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2598 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Aug 2006 11:33:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:24:01 -0700, Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
Well, Secretary Jerkoff is in charge of Homeland Insecurity. Why, right
now, he's saving us from the terror of shampoo, toothpaste, and juice
boxes!
Never mind how many months ago he was warned that bomb parts were snuck
onto planes, past the TSA without a hitch by I believe it was the FBI. It
was only after the British stopped a plot that Jerkoff woke up.
However briefly...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "the_blogologist" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 05:24:44 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane, nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eyeball Kid" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 11:15:18 PM |
|
|
In article <1hjxsfd.ed2uho1kvb2ziN%>,
the_blogologist <> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
Christ. He wants to start a sophomoric argument. What lies weren't
told, troll?
E. K.
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane, nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
--
"You can fool some of the people all of the time,
and those are the ones you want to concentrate on."
G.W. Bush, Gridiron Club dinner, Wash., D.C. March 2001
"I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and
ought to be encouraged." Antonin Scalia, September 28, 2004
"The American Way of Life is not negotiable." ***** Cheney, 2001
"The American Way of Life is heading for extinction." Eyeball Kid, 2006
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 11:06:06 AM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
--
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
| User: "marika" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
13 Aug 2006 11:04:28 PM |
|
|
<EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message
news:ebku9e$p5c$2@reader2.panix.com...
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
same date I saw on CNN the headline ticker
date set for enron's lay
mk5000
"nd hasn't he shown a pattern of poor communication skills, if he's had to
clarify multiple comments he's made that were inflammatory? Doesn't that
make him unfit to sit in the anchor chair? "--radioblogger.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
14 Aug 2006 01:57:20 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:04:28 -0400, "marika" <marika5000@gmail.com>
wrote:
<EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message
news:ebku9e$p5c$2@reader2.panix.com...
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
same date I saw on CNN the headline ticker
date set for enron's lay
mk5000
Odd..seems these folks agreed with bush..long before Bush became
president.
[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman,
Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among
others on October 9, 1998
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors
last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam
Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that
biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back
to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to
develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and
our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe
Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others
"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between
Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to
dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to
permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections;
Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including
chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress
toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint
resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while
retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We
cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline
Albright, 1998
"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and
some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he
has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb
18, 1998
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all
weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to
its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence
reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not
yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002
"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has
chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the
United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture
than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know,
actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear
warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends
in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley
Clark on September 26, 2002
"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents
with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such
weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think
that, over the past four years, in the absence of international
inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques
Chirac, October 16, 2002
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond
today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be
emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his
involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear,
however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to
increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will
keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that
endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the
Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."
-- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back
in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry
into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving
those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in
April of 2003
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass
destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them
against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our
allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades,
Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every
available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He
has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is
trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to
build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to
achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national
security. It should be clear that our national security requires
Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is
united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons
of mass destruction." -- ***** Gephardt in September of 2002
"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf
and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his
access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass
destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should
assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al
Gore, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Bob Graham, December 2002
"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to
deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." --
Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27,
2002
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger,
that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass
destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy,
Sept 27, 2002
"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because
I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his
hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct
2002
"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real,
but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that
war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert
Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build
those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these
weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we
had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." --
John Kerry, October 9, 2002
"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s
response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of
mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations
Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq
disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It
has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry,
Jan 23, 2003
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19,
2002
"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological
weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for
the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002
"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N.
inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear
facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various
reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons
capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear
weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N.
inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is
neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons
against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While
weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no
inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has
continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction."
-- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that
the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of
grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the
development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat
to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons
inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible
intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq
still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and
clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen
bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue
manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of
the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard
gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic
missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial
infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale
chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in
1998
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can
obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that
is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we
have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development
of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a
very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons
before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is
working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial
vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and
U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy
towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s
conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11
years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm
and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear
capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the
mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games
the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and
legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the
United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry
Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the ***** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.
|
|
|
| User: "marika" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
14 Aug 2006 09:53:17 AM |
|
|
"Gunner" <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:5m70e25vpkhjc96n7nup3lk1a9l4mk1tbg@4ax.com...
Odd..seems these folks agreed with bush..long before Bush became
president.
tee hee
mk5000
"Red alert. Put the kettle on!" --monty python
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
14 Aug 2006 09:21:41 AM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman,
Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among
others on October 9, 1998
This is a big reason why I didn't (and still don't) trust those folks.
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors
last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam
Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that
biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back
to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to
develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and
our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe
Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others
This sort of stuff is a big reason why Lieberman got booted, and why lots
of folks agree that he had to go.
Howzabout the ringleader, Cheney? Or his titular Boss-Man, Dubya?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Aug 2006 11:21:33 AM |
|
|
wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
list all 50, I'd like a good list if you have one.
--
"The world holds two classes of men -- intelligent
men without religion, and religious men without
intelligence".
- Abu'l-Ala-Al-Ma'arri (973-1057; Syrian poet)
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 05:27:15 PM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
list all 50, I'd like a good list if you have one.
I don't have a list, so I'd have to search the NYT archives. Try it
youself. Suggested terms would be chemical; biological; mass; nuclear;
mushroom cloud; six days or six weeks; army; and lots more.
--
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 01:53:54 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:06:06 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others,
Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless
using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range
missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological
and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the ***** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 05:31:17 PM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
So he said we wold deny them the capability to develop them, one way or
the other.
Your butt buddy said that Iraq had them already, and could depoly them in
the USA. And he's killed thousands of people because of this stupid lie.
Do you see no difference between the two?
And besides, the subject was the New York Times being a mouthpiece of the
Federal Government, not the fact of Bush being as much of a lying scumbag
as someone else.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 08:43:28 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:31:17 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:
In misc.survivalism Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
October 8, 2002: " President Bush declared tonight that Saddam Hussein
could attack the United States or its allies ''on any given day'' with
chemical or biological weapons."
Is one enough, or do you want 50 more?
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
So he said we wold deny them the capability to develop them, one way or
the other.
Your butt buddy said that Iraq had them already, and could depoly them in
the USA. And he's killed thousands of people because of this stupid lie.
Do you see no difference between the two?
And besides, the subject was the New York Times being a mouthpiece of the
Federal Government, not the fact of Bush being as much of a lying scumbag
as someone else.
That was a bit disengenious of you to snip all the other quotes and try
to make your case on parsing one of them. Dishonest in fact
Here..let me restore them
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others,
Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless
using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range
missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological
and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the ***** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 10:26:26 PM |
|
|
In misc.survivalism Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
That was a bit disengenious of you to snip all the other quotes and try
to make your case on parsing one of them. Dishonest in fact
I only read one. The topic was whether or not the NY Times was being a
tool of the establishment, by printing the lies told by the President.
The things said by someone else werre not really responsive.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 03:13:10 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:24:44 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane,
Neither does Louisiana
nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
It's called Federal EMERGENCY Management Agency, you know, like when
there's a huge emergency?
Of course, leave it up to you NeoCon traitors to cover Bush's *****.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2598 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_blogologist" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 11:04:19 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:24:44 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane,
Neither does Louisiana
nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
It's called Federal EMERGENCY Management Agency, you know, like when
there's a huge emergency?
Of course, leave it up to you NeoCon traitors to cover Bush's *****.
What is FEMA supposed to do, build them a new city?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
13 Aug 2006 06:53:29 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:04:19 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:24:44 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane,
Neither does Louisiana
nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
It's called Federal EMERGENCY Management Agency, you know, like when
there's a huge emergency?
Of course, leave it up to you NeoCon traitors to cover Bush's *****.
What is FEMA supposed to do, build them a new city?
How about not fucking up?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2598 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_blogologist" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
13 Aug 2006 10:44:51 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:04:19 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
What is FEMA supposed to do, build them a new city?
How about not fucking up?
The *****-up began a long time ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
13 Aug 2006 12:35:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 08:44:51 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:04:19 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
What is FEMA supposed to do, build them a new city?
How about not fucking up?
The *****-up began a long time ago.
Bzzz.
FEMA worked when Clinton is a around.
Now thanks to Bush, who fell asleep on 911. FEMA, which is supposd to
be there in response to TERRORIST ATTACKS, is now Bush's personal
crony machine.
GOP, the party of treason.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2598 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
-----
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: "Popular War President"... at 33% (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
12 Aug 2006 07:40:25 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:24:44 -0700, the_blogologist wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:11 -0700,
(the_blogologist) wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
An Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted this week found the
president's approval rating has dropped to 33 percent,
You think it might have something to do with the constant bombardment
from the biased mainstream media?
You mean like how the NY Times helped spout Bush's WMD lies, you
traitor?
What lies would those be?
Like Katrina? Even though Lousania and
New Orleans are run by Democrats, they blamed it on Bush.
You mean like how FEMA is run by Bush, *****?
FEMA didn't make the hurricane, nor was it intended to handle disasters
of this scope. But it feels good blaming Bush, doesn't it?
Then they should have told local officials they weren't going to do
anything instead of making promises everybody expected them to keep.
And why are we spending so much money on Homeland Security if they can't
handle anything?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Another War Widow Speaks Out Against Traitor Bush (GOP, the Party of Treason)
#Bush's Iraq War Tax: $20,000 Per American Family (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Sunday DC Pro-War Demonstration Draws All of 400 (GOP, The Party of Treason)
!Sabotage of the Iraq war effort by the democrat party
Pentagon: Iraq Sliding Towards Civil War (GOP, the Party fof Treason)
NeoCon Chickenhawks Raise Only $600 for Their Iraq War (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Geoge F Wills, "This Is a Civil War" (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Bush's gay male hooker at pro-war party
| Osama Plotting Against America, While Bush Plays Fake War in Iraq (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Pentagon to Bush: You Iran War will Fail (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!!!!!! ==> Republican scandals unveil the seamier side of Washington politics == GOP: the war-profiteering American TREASON Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family
Whiny ***** NeoCon Moron Fred Stone in 2003: The Iraq War Will Pay For Itself! (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Republicans Speak Out Against War (GOP, The Party of Treason and Hypocrisy)
Bush Took New Orleans Levee Construction Money for His ***** War in Iraq (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Waht Does MLK Say About AWOL's Fake War? (GOP, The Party of Treason)
|
|
|
