Religions > Atheism > Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
11 Feb 2006 08:15:02 PM |
| Object: |
Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the pre-born, easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who hold life to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may sway some women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retribution from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal protection cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those who speak in
their behalf.
http://www.lifenews.com/state1398.html
Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally
Williamsburg, VA (LifeNews.com) -- A pro-life student was punched and
knocked down by a pro-abortion woman during a pro-life rally at the College
of William and Mary. Authorities are withholding the girl's name, but she
told campus police she was distributing pro-life literature during the event
when the woman assaulted her.
William and Mary spokesman Bill Walker told the Associated Press the
incident happened Tuesday night and that the student told officials the
woman punched her and pushed her to the ground rather than accept the
literature.
..Abortion advocates have assaulted pro-life students in other settings as
well.
Pro-abortion students at Michigan State University assaulted a male student
who was talking with members of Students for Life in October 2004.
The pro-life group had set up a table with materials and information and a
male student was then talking with members of Students for Life, and had
taken some of the literature and expressed interest from the group.
Two pro-abortion students came up from behind and began harassing the
student, telling him he had no right to an opinion on a woman's issue.
When the male turned around to ask who they were, they snatched the pro-life
literature from his hands, and threw it at him. When he bent over to pick
them up, they kicked his hands.
Then, one of the pro-abortion students tackled the student, knocking him
onto the recruitment table and crushing it.
Pro-life students were also assaulted by NARAL activists during the 2004
elections at a pro-abortion rally to support Democratic presidential
candidate John Kerry. One of the students was dragged across a gravel area
and needed medical attention on the scene for cuts and scrapes on her feet.
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
13 Feb 2006 11:56:05 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retribution from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those who speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to terrorize and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, just days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received letters that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been received by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654 letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Letters were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio, Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel around the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics, law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via U.S. Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks, bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who don't have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
14 Feb 2006 12:05:57 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retribution from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those who speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to terrorize and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, just days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received letters that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been received by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654 letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Letters were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio, Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel around the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics, law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via U.S. Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks, bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who don't have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years if
they don't want to be a father? While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so ever?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten. You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it was
wrong. The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person. Until you can actually say you think
that the violence was wrong, that is the only conclusion one can come
up with since you have not proven my conclusion wrong.
You are a violent person and you support violence.
Go and and do your business as usual and snip out most of what I say
and resort to childish insults, since you can't actually engage on an
issue and you have no other recourse.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
14 Feb 2006 09:44:33 PM |
|
|
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retribution from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, just days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received letters that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been received by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654 letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Letters were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio, Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel around the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics, law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks, bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who don't have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a difference?
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter because it
happened to you.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so ever?
³My wife had a abortion long before we met.² - Osprey, Mon, Mar 24 2003
³My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young² -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
³The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.³ - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray think
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back out now.
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
³And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
³The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and need to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.² - Osprey, Tues, Apr 22 2003
³Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need to
curse or call you names.² - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
³Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs think they
are always right.³ - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
³You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other than
trying to nit pick or call names.³ - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
³It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something to show
for it?³ - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
³What good does it do to call names?³ - Osprey, May 22 2003
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it was
wrong.
It was wrong.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "The only
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken against
[those] person[s]."
Until you can actually say you think
that the violence was wrong, that is the only conclusion one can come
up with since you have not proven my conclusion wrong.
You get proven wrong by the minute.
You are a violent person and you support violence.
And you make up the most unbelievable ***** one could imagine.
Go and and do your business as usual and snip out most of what I say
and resort to childish insults,
From the guy who constant "snips" the posts of others and just accused
Ray of being an "anti-choice, violent, mindless, selfish, cowardly,
bigot."
since you can't actually engage on an
issue and you have no other recourse.
Maybe he just sees you for who you are and doesn't take you seriously?
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 04:52:10 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J =
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the pre=
-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who=
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show=
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may =
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retributio=
n from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal pro=
tection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those w=
ho
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to terro=
rize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, just=
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At =
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received letter=
s that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been receiv=
ed by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and N=
ovember
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654 =
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Letter=
s were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio, Georg=
ia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel arou=
nd the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters =
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious =
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics, l=
aw
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have a=
ctually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via U=
..S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion extrem=
ist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of var=
ious
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass dest=
ruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks, bom=
bings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerated. =
But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student wants=
to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who don't=
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a difference?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter because it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order. Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man would
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so ever?
=B3My wife had a abortion long before we met.=B2 - Osprey, Mon, Mar 24 20=
03
Yea and?
=B3My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young=B2 -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
=B3The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.=B3 - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray think
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back out now.
I have no doubt that you, Patrick, and Ray do think it was justified.
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
=B3And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
=B3The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and need to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Apr 22 2003
=B3Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need to
curse or call you names.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
=B3Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs think they
are always right.=B3 - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
=B3You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other than
trying to nit pick or call names.=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
=B3It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something to show
for it?=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
=B3What good does it do to call names?=B3 - Osprey, May 22 2003
What were you saying about people who save quotes and archives? Oh
yea, you claimed people like that were obsessed.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it was
wrong.
It was wrong.
It's about time you admitted it. It only took you about a dozen times
to try.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "The only
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken against
[those] person[s]."
Actually, if you read some of my past postings you would see where I
have said some of the things done in Iraq are wrong.
But you don't read.
Until you can actually say you think
that the violence was wrong, that is the only conclusion one can come
up with since you have not proven my conclusion wrong.
You get proven wrong by the minute.
Not by you or any of the other leftist cowards.
You are a violent person and you support violence.
And you make up the most unbelievable ***** one could imagine.
Go and and do your business as usual and snip out most of what I say
and resort to childish insults,
From the guy who constant "snips" the posts of others and just accused
Ray of being an "anti-choice, violent, mindless, selfish, cowardly,
bigot."
since you can't actually engage on an
issue and you have no other recourse.
Maybe he just sees you for who you are and doesn't take you seriously?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 09:14:28 AM |
|
|
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the
pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those who
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to show
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retribution
from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal
protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to
terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, just
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received letters
that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been received
by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and
November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Letters
were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio,
Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel around
the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics, law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have
actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of
various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass
destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks,
bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who don't
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a difference?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter because it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order.
If I cared.
Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man would
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so ever?
³My wife had a abortion long before we met.² - Osprey, Mon, Mar 24 2003
Yea and?
³My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young² -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
³The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.³ - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You support the "war." You support Bush.
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray think
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back out now.
I have no doubt that you, Patrick, and Ray do think it was justified.
But then, you live in denial. What is the point of asking if you are
just going to deny the answer? Is this how you get through life?
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
³And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
³The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and need to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.² - Osprey, Tues, Apr 22 2003
³Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need to
curse or call you names.² - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
³Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs think they
are always right.³ - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
³You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other than
trying to nit pick or call names.³ - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
³It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something to show
for it?³ - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
³What good does it do to call names?³ - Osprey, May 22 2003
What were you saying about people who save quotes and archives? Oh
yea, you claimed people like that were obsessed.
Hypocrite.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it was
wrong.
It was wrong.
It's about time you admitted it. It only took you about a dozen times
to try.
Nothing makes you happy. Republican.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "The only
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken against
[those] person[s]."
Actually, if you read some of my past postings you would see where I
have said some of the things done in Iraq are wrong.
But you don't read.
"Some?" Why only "some?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 09:26:39 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>=
, J
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the
pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those=
who
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are rout=
inely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to =
show
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that =
may
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal retrib=
ution
from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal
protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to tho=
se who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to
terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998, =
just
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian.=
At
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received le=
tters
that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that cli=
nic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been re=
ceived
by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October a=
nd
November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately =
654
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States. Le=
tters
were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio,
Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel =
around
the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, lett=
ers
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictiti=
ous
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinic=
s, law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters ha=
ve
actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted=
in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services=
, and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent v=
ia U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion ex=
tremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of
various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass
destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentenci=
ng.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.h=
tml
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by vi=
olent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks,
bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be tollerat=
ed. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the artic=
le.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student w=
ants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who d=
on't
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a differenc=
e?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years =
if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter because =
it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order.
If I cared.
Barnes admits he made it up.
Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man would
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so eve=
r?
=B3My wife had a abortion long before we met.=B2 - Osprey, Mon, Mar 2=
4 2003
Yea and?
=B3My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young=
=B2 -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
=B3The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.=B3 - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit m=
an
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignor=
ing
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You support the "war." You support Bush.
I support the war against terrorism. You don't?
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray think
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back out no=
w=2E
I have no doubt that you, Patrick, and Ray do think it was justified.
But then, you live in denial. What is the point of asking if you are
just going to deny the answer? Is this how you get through life?
It's like asking you..what is the point in asking you to back up one of
your claims when you are just going to avoid showing any back up. Is
that how you get through life?
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, =
you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
=B3And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
=B3The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and need=
to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Apr 22 20=
03
=B3Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need to
curse or call you names.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
=B3Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs think th=
ey
are always right.=B3 - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
=B3You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other than
trying to nit pick or call names.=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
=B3It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something to sh=
ow
for it?=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
=B3What good does it do to call names?=B3 - Osprey, May 22 2003
What were you saying about people who save quotes and archives? Oh
yea, you claimed people like that were obsessed.
Hypocrite.
Yes, you are. Especially when nailed with your own statements.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it w=
as
wrong.
It was wrong.
It's about time you admitted it. It only took you about a dozen times
to try.
Nothing makes you happy. Republican.
I am a very happy person, you are the one full of hate.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "The on=
ly
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken against
[those] person[s]."
Actually, if you read some of my past postings you would see where I
have said some of the things done in Iraq are wrong.
But you don't read.
"Some?" Why only "some?"
Because that's my opinion. I am not like you who looks at a persons
party and bases my decisions on that. That is how you think. You are a
racist as well, who judges a person based on their skin color and then
makes your opinion, just like you base a person on their political
party.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 09:45:01 AM |
|
|
In article <1140017199.701453.256670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing the
pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at those
who
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are
routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to
show
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information that may
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal
retribution
from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If equal
protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to those
who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to
terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998,
just
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slepian. At
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received
letters
that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been
received
by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October and
November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximately 654
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States.
Letters
were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio,
Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel
around
the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, letters
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fictitious
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other clinics,
law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters have
actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting services,
and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent via
U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion
extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003 of
various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass
destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by
violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson attacks,
bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be
tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student
wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who
don't
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a difference?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 years if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter because it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order.
If I cared.
Barnes admits he made it up.
Idiot.
Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man would
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so ever?
³My wife had a abortion long before we met.² - Osprey, Mon, Mar 24 2003
Yea and?
³My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young² -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
³The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.³ - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You support the "war." You support Bush.
I support the war against terrorism.
LIAR
€€ OSPREY ADMITS TO TURNING HIS BACK ON U.S.A. €€
Osprey inadvertently admits, on 2/3/2006:
³I was offered a position with Border Patrol about a year and a half
ago. My wife and I both like it here in Delaware though.³
As we all know, the Bush White House states that we are at ³war² and
terrorism needs to be curtailed at the borders. Part of his ³war on
terrorism² is to increase security at the borders by hiring more border
patrol.
The United State Government comes to Osprey and asks him if he will
serve his country and help protect our homeland from terrorism.
Osprey¹s answer, ³No. My comfort is more important than my country.²
So once again, others are taking over for Osprey as he avoids his duty
to his country.
³Ask not, what you can do for your country, ask what your country can
do for you!² - Osprey (Pictured at
http://chiefinstigator.us.tt/spud.php )
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the actions you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray think
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back out now.
I have no doubt that you, Patrick, and Ray do think it was justified.
But then, you live in denial. What is the point of asking if you are
just going to deny the answer? Is this how you get through life?
It's like asking you..what is the point in asking you to back up one of
your claims when you are just going to avoid showing any back up. Is
that how you get through life?
Your comment makes no sense - what a surprise.
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fact, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
³And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
³The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and need to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.² - Osprey, Tues, Apr 22 2003
³Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need to
curse or call you names.² - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
³Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs think they
are always right.³ - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
³You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other than
trying to nit pick or call names.³ - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
³It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something to show
for it?³ - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
³What good does it do to call names?³ - Osprey, May 22 2003
What were you saying about people who save quotes and archives? Oh
yea, you claimed people like that were obsessed.
Hypocrite.
Yes, you are. Especially when nailed with your own statements.
Except I don't "save quotes and archives." And you say you are married
to a murderer.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that it was
wrong.
It was wrong.
It's about time you admitted it. It only took you about a dozen times
to try.
Nothing makes you happy. Republican.
I am a very happy person, you are the one full of hate.
Yeah - You sound REAL happy.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "The only
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken against
[those] person[s]."
Actually, if you read some of my past postings you would see where I
have said some of the things done in Iraq are wrong.
But you don't read.
"Some?" Why only "some?"
Because that's my opinion.
So beating up a "pro-life" student might be acceptable if, in my
opinion, that was needed.
I am not like you who looks at a persons
party and bases my decisions on that.
What do you think is happening in Iraq?
That is how you think. You are a
racist as well, who judges a person based on their skin color and then
makes your opinion, just like you base a person on their political
party.
Oh, brother. From the guy who posts hate mail on the gay newsgroups.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 11:23:12 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140017199.701453.256670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com=
,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.=
com>, J
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing=
the
pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at t=
hose
who
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are
routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting=
to
show
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information t=
hat may
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal
retribution
from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If e=
qual
protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to=
those
who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used =
to
terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 19=
98,
just
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett Slep=
ian. At
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received
letters
that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that=
clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been
received
by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, Octob=
er and
November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002, approximat=
ely 654
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States.
Letters
were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohi=
o,
Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no r=
eturn
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic person=
nel
around
the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders, =
letters
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included fic=
titious
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other cl=
inics,
law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letter=
s have
actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has resu=
lted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting serv=
ices,
and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters se=
nt via
U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion
extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 200=
3 of
various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of m=
*****
destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting sent=
encing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthr=
ax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by
violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson atta=
cks,
bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be
tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the a=
rticle.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" stude=
nt
wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men w=
ho
don't
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring =
from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the pro=
-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a diffe=
rence?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18 ye=
ars if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter beca=
use it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order.
If I cared.
Barnes admits he made it up.
Idiot.
You are the one that makes up this *****, and can't back it up when
questioned. That makes YOU the idiot.
Face it, you got busted in yet one of your many lies. You said
"because it happened to you".
Yet, you can't support what you said.
Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man wo=
uld
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so=
ever?
=B3My wife had a abortion long before we met.=B2 - Osprey, Mon, M=
ar 24 2003
Yea and?
=B3My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was yo=
ung=B2 -
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
=B3The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man=
, the
abortion doctor.=B3 - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a h=
it man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus =
and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pa=
y a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else doe=
s it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are i=
gnoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You support the "war." You support Bush.
I support the war against terrorism.
LIAR
ahh we see Barnes typical child like foot stamping when he gets
frustrated...read below and witness his nonsense.
=80=80 OSPREY ADMITS TO TURNING HIS BACK ON U.S.A. =80=80
Osprey inadvertently admits, on 2/3/2006:
=B3I was offered a position with Border Patrol about a year and a half
ago. My wife and I both like it here in Delaware though.=B3
As we all know, the Bush White House states that we are at =B3war=B2 and
terrorism needs to be curtailed at the borders. Part of his =B3war on
terrorism=B2 is to increase security at the borders by hiring more border
patrol.
The United State Government comes to Osprey and asks him if he will
serve his country and help protect our homeland from terrorism.
Osprey=B9s answer, =B3No. My comfort is more important than my country.=
=B2
So once again, others are taking over for Osprey as he avoids his duty
to his country.
=B3Ask not, what you can do for your country, ask what your country can
do for you!=B2 - Osprey (Pictured at
http://chiefinstigator.us.tt/spud.php )
You seem to approve of this
action because you appear to think that it justifies the action=
s you
feel others take against women.
Actually, I have no doubt whatsoever that either Patrick or Ray t=
hink
this was justified. You are just too deep in the ***** to back ou=
t now.
I have no doubt that you, Patrick, and Ray do think it was justifie=
d=2E
But then, you live in denial. What is the point of asking if you are
just going to deny the answer? Is this how you get through life?
It's like asking you..what is the point in asking you to back up one of
your claims when you are just going to avoid showing any back up. Is
that how you get through life?
Your comment makes no sense - what a surprise.
When the truth be known, you don't support women at all. In fa=
ct, you
are a bigot. A mindless, selfish, cowardly, bigot.
=B3And please, if you are going to act like a child and call me
names...come up with something better. - Osprey, Mon, Aug 23 2004
=B3The fact that you are not confident in your own argument and =
need to
use smokescreens because your not comfortable, and having to call
names again because your argument is weak is not my problem. You=
are
the one who is resorting to that, not I.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Apr 2=
2 2003
=B3Do you see me calling you names? No you don't. I don't need=
to
curse or call you names.=B2 - Osprey, Tues, Mar 4 2003
=B3Go figure. It is ok for libs to call names because libs thin=
k they
are always right.=B3 - Osprey, Mon, Mar 15 2004
=B3You are a idiot ... you are not interested in anything other t=
han
trying to nit pick or call names.=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Jan 30 2004
=B3It is easy to call names, but do you actually have something t=
o show
for it?=B3 - Osprey, Fri, Feb 28 2003
=B3What good does it do to call names?=B3 - Osprey, May 22 2003
What were you saying about people who save quotes and archives? Oh
yea, you claimed people like that were obsessed.
Hypocrite.
Yes, you are. Especially when nailed with your own statements.
Except I don't "save quotes and archives." And you say you are married
to a murderer.
A person was beaten, and I have YET to see one of you say that =
it was
wrong.
It was wrong.
It's about time you admitted it. It only took you about a dozen tim=
es
to try.
Nothing makes you happy. Republican.
I am a very happy person, you are the one full of hate.
Yeah - You sound REAL happy.
The only conclusion can be is that you support the violent
action taken against this person.
You don't say the beatings that take place in Iraq are wrong. "Th=
e only
conclusion can be is that you support the violent action taken ag=
ainst
[those] person[s]."
Actually, if you read some of my past postings you would see where I
have said some of the things done in Iraq are wrong.
But you don't read.
"Some?" Why only "some?"
Because that's my opinion.
So beating up a "pro-life" student might be acceptable if, in my
opinion, that was needed.
I am not like you who looks at a persons
party and bases my decisions on that.
What do you think is happening in Iraq?
That is how you think. You are a
racist as well, who judges a person based on their skin color and then
makes your opinion, just like you base a person on their political
party.
Oh, brother. From the guy who posts hate mail on the gay newsgroups.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
15 Feb 2006 08:37:54 PM |
|
|
In article <1140024192.804493.10120@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140017199.701453.256670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f0e549$0$58089$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article
<a7KdnbWrlteuB3PenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J
Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The sad reality is that those who approve of killing
the
pre-born,
easily
justify to themselves acts of violence directed at
those
who
hold
life
to be
sacred. Peaceful rallies outside abortion mills are
routinely
subjected to
nazi-like tactics, for doing no more than attempting to
show
these
prospective mothers pictures and other information
that may
sway
some
women
to spare their baby's life. Students brave brutal
retribution
from
pro-abortionists while police turn a blind eye. If
equal
protection
cannot
be applied to the pre-born, at least let it apply to
those
who
speak
in
their behalf.
Letters threatening anthrax poisoning were first used to
terrorize
and
disrupt reproductive health care clinics in October 1998,
just
days
after the murder of abortion provider Dr. Barnett
Slepian. At
that
time, about a dozen clinics across the country received
letters
that
claimed to contain anthrax toxin. They threatened that
clinic
personnel
exposed to the letters would die.
Since then, additional anthrax threat letters have been
received
by
clinics in February and June 1999, January 2000, October
and
November
2001, and January 2002. As of January 2002,
approximately 654
letters
have been received by clinics across the United States.
Letters
were
postmarked from various places including Kentucky, Ohio,
Georgia, New
York, and Washington, DC. Early letters contained no
return
addresses,
but after law enforcement agents advised clinic personnel
around
the
country to avoid opening mail from anonymous senders,
letters
started
arriving with phony return addresses that included
fictitious
medical
supply companies, the department of taxation, other
clinics,
law
enforcement agencies, and pro-choice organizations.
While investigation has proven that none of the letters
have
actually
contained anthrax toxin, virtually every case has
resulted in
frightening clinic staff and patients, disrupting
services,
and
wasting
valuable law enforcement resources. The 554 letters sent
via
U.S.
Mail
and FedEx in 2001 have been attributed to anti-abortion
extremist
Clayton Waagner. Waagner was convicted in December 2003
of
various
charges including threatening the use of a weapon of mass
destruction
for sending the letters. He is in prison awaiting
sentencing.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/anthrax.html
"Rudolph gets life for Birmingham clinic attack."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/18/rudolph.sentencing/
Abortion clinics, federal agents on alert:
<http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7507549/>
Best of all:
"[t]here has been "over $13 million in damage caused by
violent
anti-abortion groups since 1982 in over 150 arson
attacks,
bombings,
and shootings."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
All of the above actions are wrong and shouldn't be
tollerated. But
that doesn't excuse you from ignoring the issue of the
article.
The issue being what?
A pro-life student being beaten.
And what of the suffering and deaths that "pro-life" student
wants to
inflict upon pregnant women?
What about the suffering and deaths you like to put on men who
don't
have a
***** Heishman slings ***** and lies and runs away.
Business as usual.
What about the suffering that the pro-life student is enduring
from
being beaten? Do you support that action taken against the
pro-life
student?
I heard it was an Air Marshal who did it. Does that make a
difference?
Actually I heard it was a lawyer. I am sure you approve.
Do you support men having no choice and having to pay for 18
years if
they don't want to be a father?
That isn't what normally happens. Maybe you are just bitter
because it
happened to you.
You are more than welcome to try and find a court order.
If I cared.
Barnes admits he made it up.
Idiot.
You are the one that makes up this *****, and can't back it up when
questioned. That makes YOU the idiot.
Face it, you got busted in yet one of your many lies. You said
"because it happened to you".
Yet, you can't support what you said.
By getting you to admit to it.
Let me clue
you in, you will not find one because I took the road that a man would
take and I stood by my wife and children, and didn't runout like a
coward like you would have done. You would have preferred she killed
the unborn child.
While a woman can just pay someone to
kill the unborn and escape any financial responsibility what so
ever?
³My wife had a abortion long before we met.² - Osprey, Mon, Mar 24
2003
Yea and?
³My wife had an abortion long before her and I met. She was young²
-
Osprey, Thurs, Jan 20 2005
Yea and?
³The woman wants the fetus dead right? So she pays the hit man, the
abortion doctor.³ - Osprey, Thurs, May 1 2003
Yea and?
A mother can go and pay someone to abort, kind of like hiring a hit
man
to do the dirty work. - Osprey, Fri, Apr 9 2004
Yea and?
So tell me, how can a person be charged with murdering the fetus and
the "hit" man isn't charged? - Osprey, Tues, Sep 27 2005
Still no point?
Now, give me a very logical reason why it is ok for a woman to pay a
hit man (abortionist) to kill the fetus, but if someone else does
it
they go to jail. - Sun, Sep 14 2003
Yea and?
Yea and?
You, like Humphrey and the other leftist cowards in here, are
ignoring
the fact that a human being was beaten.
Something you do daily.
Not at all, like most rational people I read the news and I have an
opinion on the issues.
You jump to conclusions and make up your own news.
You support the "war." You support Bush.
I support the war against terrorism.
LIAR
ahh we see Barnes typical child like foot stamping when he gets
frustrated...read below and witness his nonsense.
Yeah - Read Below
€€ OSPREY ADMITS TO TURNING HIS BACK ON U.S.A. €€
Osprey inadvertently admits, on 2/3/2006:
³I was offered a position with Border Patrol about a year and a half
ago. My wife and I both like it here in Delaware though.³
As we all know, the Bush White House states that we are at ³war² and
terrorism needs to be curtailed at the borders. Part of his ³war on
terrorism² is to increase security at the borders by hiring more border
patrol.
The United State Government comes to Osprey and asks him if he will
serve his country and help protect our homeland from terrorism.
Osprey¹s answer, ³No. My comfort is more important than my country.²
So once again, others are taking over for Osprey as he avoids his duty
to his country.
³Ask not, what you can do for your country, ask what your country can
do for you!² - Osprey (Pictured at
http://chiefinstigator.us.tt/spud.php )
Others can make sacrifices, Osprey just sits on his big fat ***** and
condones the deaths of thousands.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Pro-Life Student Assaulted at William and Mary College During Abortion Rally |
16 Feb 2006 02:58:54 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140024192.804493.10120@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140017199.701453.256670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1140000730.832047.141640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com=
,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1139897157.848227.179890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups=
..com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43f10526$0$58063$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
< | | | | | | | | | | |
