Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements;



 Religions > Atheism > Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements;

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 30 Nov 2006 03:27:12 AM
Object: Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements;
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=76874
[excerpt]
Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements;
Judgmental Rhetoric Does Not Follow Teachings of Jesus
11/29/2006 3:33:00 PM
To: National Desk
Contact: Stephen Rockwell, 215-317-1865 or steve@crossleft.org, Frank
Cocozzelli, 516-435-3800 or frank@crossleft.org, both of the Institute for
Progressive Christianity/ CrossLeft
WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ --James Dobson, head of Focus on the
Family, made a number of highly inaccurate statements on matters of faith,
sexuality, liberalism and the United States Constitution in on CNN's Larry
King Live, November 22, 2006.
The Institute for Progressive Christianity, a think tank comprising
mainstream liberal Christians is issuing a correction of Dobson's crackpot
assertions.
[end excerpt]
---
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the US and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements; 30 Nov 2006 08:51:32 AM
<buckeye-elo@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:qs8tm2hk09pf5juvvf1m1ub6stg4e0mui4@4ax.com...

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=76874
[excerpt]

Progressive Christians Respond to James Dobson's Inaccurate Statements;
Judgmental Rhetoric Does Not Follow Teachings of Jesus

And they know this how? Are they suggesting that the Jesus character didn't
indulge in judgmental rhetoric?

11/29/2006 3:33:00 PM

To: National Desk

Contact: Stephen Rockwell, 215-317-1865 or steve@crossleft.org, Frank
Cocozzelli, 516-435-3800 or frank@crossleft.org, both of the Institute for
Progressive Christianity/ CrossLeft

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ --James Dobson, head of Focus on the
Family, made a number of highly inaccurate statements on matters of faith,

How does one go about making highly inaccurate statements on matters of
faith? Aren't they always accurate, by definition, no matter what they are?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER