On Mar 21, 9:28 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote in Re: White Pride Christian David Ford And His KKK Christian
Theology:

On 21 Mar 2007 17:44:57 -0700,

On Mar 21, 8:34 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:

[snip]

Yang, I just posted a post, the contents of which are:

Re: white-pride racist Charles Darwin on crossing of "two races, both
low in the scale"

Too bad you are full of *****:

Unlike your Christian Southern Baptists, Darwin was against Slavery

"Darwin was against Slavery" on what grounds?

OTOH:

http://www.kkk.bz/howtoget.htm

"We emphasize ONE requirement for every person who decides to
associate with The Knights, and that is that they conduct themselves
with CHRISTIAN character. We want our Klansmen and Klanswomen to live
their lives as honorable, decent, dignified WHITE people."

from
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/comm/Books/Taylor.html
Professor Huxley on the Negro Question
Ladies London Emancipation Society 1864
Mrs. P. A. Taylor

[3] The following extracts have been selected as
bearing especial reference to the Negro, from the
Reader's report of the last two lectures given by
Professor Huxley, on "The Structure and
Classification of the Mammalia," delivered at the
Royal College of Surgeons.

In the eighth lecture, on Feb. 18th, Professor
Huxley commenced a sketch of the principal
variations in form and proportion which are met with
in the human body under the different
circumstances which have given rise to the various
races of men. This interesting and fertile subject,
he observed, has unfortunately been cultivated
hitherto to a very small extent, and with very little of
the precision which its importance demands. From

the best series of the measurements of skeletons of
the two races extant, that made by Dr. Humphry, it
appears that the average height of the negro is less
than that of the European; the arms are
proportionately longer, particularly the fore-arm and
hand, and, in the lower extremity, while the femur
retains nearly the same relative length as in the
European, the tibia and foot are considerably
increased. In these deviations from the European

standard, the Australian and other low races agree
with the negro. There is no real evidence to show
[4] that the hallux, or great toe, is differently
constructed, or more movable, among the lower
than the higher races of men, though in the latter
the practice of wearing tight and hard shoes rarely
allows its proper development. The alleged
uniformly greater flatness of foot, and increased

length of heel of the negro, are equally hypothetical.
The modifications of the colour of the skin in
different races are well known; we speak of white or
black people, but in reality there are various shades
of brown, darker or lighter; a true black skin,
according to Professor Huxley's observations,
scarcely exists. In the character as well as the
colour of the hair, men vary much. The transverse
section of the hair of certain races is flattened, in
others it is oval, and, again, in others it is nearly

circular. It has been asserted, but not on sufficient
evidence, that the first form is characteristic of the
negro, the second of the Aryan, and the third of the
Mongolian races. In some hair of the first form, the
long axis of the diameter gradually changes its
position in the length of the hair, causing a crisp
curl, or spiral twist.

In the ninth lecture, on Feb. 20th, Professor Huxley
continued the description of the principal variations
of the human structure. It was first shown that the
position of the occipital foramen, and of the
condyles by which the skull rests upon the first
vertebrae of the neck, varies greatly both in
individuals and races; but as a general rule they are
placed further back in the lower than the higher
races.
==
There seems to be no relation between the
projection of this lobe and the position of the
individual in the scale of human beings; on the
whole, it seems as great, or greater among the
lower than in the higher races.
==
A considerable range may be observed in the
complexity of the convolutions in different brains.
On the whole, the convolutions in the lower have a
greater simplicity and symmetry than in the higher
races.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
1938 Shull: "Admixture of white blood is...related to
professional...success of the Negro."
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1142222711.810377.220200%40j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com

Huxley on The Aryan Question
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1141703715.940457.279720%40i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com

Di Gregorio, Mario A. _T. H. Huxley's Place in Natural Science_ (New
Haven: Yale University Press), 253pp. On 183:
In other words, it is racist to introduce value
judgments into zoological surveys of physical
differences detectable in mankind. In that sense of
the word, with the possible exception of J. S. Mill,
nearly everyone whose voice was heard on race
and nation during the nineteenth century was racist
and nationalistic. That was partly because of
confusion between the concept of _race_ and the
highly abstract and scientifically indefinable concept
of _nation_. Anthropology and ethnology were
constantly entangled with nationalism, exacerbating
the degree to which value judgment became part of
science.

[Di Gregorio]"confusion between the concept of _race_ and the...
concept of _nation_"
Compare:

Jackel, Eberhard. 1969, 1972, 1981. _Hitler's World View: A
Blueprint
for Power_, translated from the German by Herbert Arnold (Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press), 140pp. About the book:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0674404254/sr=1-1/qid=1137613851/ref=sr_1_1/102-9779996-9934505?
On 88:
Hitler used "people" and "race," as
well as "tribe," "kindred," and
"nation," as virtually synonymous
terms.

Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com

1859 Darwin vs. the Judeo-Christian conception of the unity of man
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1120016676.023811.113660%40g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com

is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com

Hitler & Darwin URLs
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1140576033.123225.228290%40o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com