Religions > Atheism > Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD JesusChrist.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
| Date: |
29 Nov 2007 05:45:18 AM |
| Object: |
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD JesusChrist. |
brother MU wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet hissed:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE may
choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly hypocritical in
asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
.
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 AM |
|
|
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE may
choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly hypocritical in
asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 08:45:12 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2? That would be particularly funny
as it would mean when you ate, you'd nuke a city...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“To die for an idea; it is unquestionably noble.
But how much nobler it would be if men died for
ideas that were true!”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 11:14:58 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2? That would be particularly funny
as it would mean when you ate, you'd nuke a city...
Yes, he is trying to pass that off as support for his contention that
the energy in food is strictly related to its mass.
Apparently, Chungles is unable to tell the difference between the
nuclear potential energy that e=mc^2 describes, and chemical potential
energy which is the caloric content of food.
Now, as I stated previously, I'm no biochemist myself, and to describe
the specific chemical reactions that take place in the process of
human (or any other living entity) metabolism is way, way beyond my
ken. That being said, I know enough to know that metabolism entails
the breakdown (and reassembly) of organic molecules, and has nothing
to do with e=mc^2, except in the occasion that there exists an entity
whose stomach consists of a nuclear supecollider.
That someone with allegedly an MD and a PhD would try to make such a
justification in support of his 2 PD OMER diet^H^H^H^H "APPROACH"
indicates a rather disturbing laziness and incompetence ever-present
in his analytical processes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:52:48 PM |
|
|
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2? That would be particularly funny
as it would mean when you ate, you'd nuke a city...
Yes, he is trying to pass that off as support for his contention that
the energy in food is strictly related to its mass.
Apparently, Chungles is unable to tell the difference between the
nuclear potential energy that e=mc^2 describes, and chemical potential
energy which is the caloric content of food.
Now, as I stated previously, I'm no biochemist myself, and to describe
the specific chemical reactions that take place in the process of
human (or any other living entity) metabolism is way, way beyond my
ken.
But the basics are easy to find via electronic means, of course.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density>
That being said, I know enough to know that metabolism entails
the breakdown (and reassembly) of organic molecules, and has nothing
to do with e=mc^2, except in the occasion that there exists an entity
whose stomach consists of a nuclear supecollider.
That someone with allegedly an MD and a PhD would try to make such a
justification in support of his 2 PD OMER diet^H^H^H^H "APPROACH"
indicates a rather disturbing laziness and incompetence ever-present
in his analytical processes.
He obviously doesn't care if the advice he tries to shove down people's
throats is correct or not:
"I'm a PhD and an MD! Listen to me! I know what I'm talking about!"
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:58:41 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:14:58 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
That someone with allegedly an MD and a PhD would try to make such a
justification in support of his 2 PD OMER diet^H^H^H^H "APPROACH"
indicates a rather disturbing laziness and incompetence ever-present in
his analytical processes.
You mean "a disturbing lack of treatment for his growing schizophrenia".
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You know, I'd get it if people were just looking for a
way to fill the holes. But they want the holes. They wanna
live in the holes. And they go nuts when someone else
pours dirt in their holes.
"Climb out of your holes people!"
- Dr. House, on faith
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 07:33:00 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:14:58 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
That someone with allegedly an MD and a PhD would try to make such a
justification in support of his 2 PD OMER diet^H^H^H^H "APPROACH"
indicates a rather disturbing laziness and incompetence ever-present in
his analytical processes.
You mean "a disturbing lack of treatment for his growing schizophrenia".
That too.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 11:07:59 AM |
|
|
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the
2PD-OMER non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of
a substance is a measure of its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it? If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human stomach
were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to know
that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear potential
energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy content is not
absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken --
your good old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat &
Carbohydrate Counter" will henceforth be required to
add relativistic corrections. For example, a 70-gram
apple which formerly listed in at 100 calories will
now, given the energy implicit in its mass at rest,
be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the
2PD-OMER approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these
apples a day, for a daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about
restrictions such as that.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 11:51:16 AM |
|
|
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the
2PD-OMER non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of
a substance is a measure of its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it? If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human stomach
were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to know
that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear potential
energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy content is not
absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken --
your good old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat &
Carbohydrate Counter" will henceforth be required to
add relativistic corrections. For example, a 70-gram
apple which formerly listed in at 100 calories will
now, given the energy implicit in its mass at rest,
be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the
2PD-OMER approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these
apples a day, for a daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about
restrictions such as that.
What's more, the most disturbing aspect is that, presumably, in the
process of getting his various degrees, Chung most certainly would
have taken at the very least one organic chemistry course, which would
entail not only doing textbook exercises demonstrating an amount of
energy captured or released, respectively, in an endothermic or
exothermic reaction--he would have done numerous laboratory
experiments thereby experiencing tangibly such reactions, and then
quantifying the data by recording it in the required lab report
writeup.
It shows either further evidence of a clear and deteriorating
psychotic break, or else complete and utter intellectual dishonesty.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Flying Rat, Quackologist" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 02:05:05 PM |
|
|
In article <l4j0l3djjf6n6a8ltrffq1e3i5jfp93t2j@4ax.com>,
archie@antispam.ham says...
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the
2PD-OMER non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of
a substance is a measure of its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it? If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human stomach
were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to know
that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear potential
energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy content is not
absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken --
your good old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat &
Carbohydrate Counter" will henceforth be required to
add relativistic corrections. For example, a 70-gram
apple which formerly listed in at 100 calories will
now, given the energy implicit in its mass at rest,
be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the
2PD-OMER approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these
apples a day, for a daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about
restrictions such as that.
What's more, the most disturbing aspect is that, presumably, in the
process of getting his various degrees, Chung most certainly would
have taken at the very least one organic chemistry course, which would
entail not only doing textbook exercises demonstrating an amount of
energy captured or released, respectively, in an endothermic or
exothermic reaction--he would have done numerous laboratory
experiments thereby experiencing tangibly such reactions, and then
quantifying the data by recording it in the required lab report
writeup.
It shows either further evidence of a clear and deteriorating
psychotic break, or else complete and utter intellectual dishonesty.
or in Chung's case, both.
FR
--
"The ejaculate from satan has the consistency and smell of emesis." --
Andrew B Chung confirming he has sucked the Devil's *****
Message-ID: <1165858390.674057.91940@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:57:35 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:51:16 +0000, Archie Leach wrote:
What's more, the most disturbing aspect is that, presumably, in the
process of getting his various degrees, Chung most certainly would have
taken at the very least one organic chemistry course, which would entail
not only doing textbook exercises demonstrating an amount of energy
captured or released, respectively, in an endothermic or exothermic
reaction--he would have done numerous laboratory experiments thereby
experiencing tangibly such reactions, and then quantifying the data by
recording it in the required lab report writeup.
It shows either further evidence of a clear and deteriorating psychotic
break, or else complete and utter intellectual dishonesty.
You must be a new viewer of the Chung Comedy Hour. <g>
Years back, when he first showed up after being canned in Florida, he
sounded pretty rational if a bit of a religious freak. And, for that
matter, in the year or so I've had him killfiled, he's apparently just
gotten loopier.
The whole thing looks like schizophrenia which, I understand (but I'm no
shrink) isn't that unusual to begin in the 20s in males. Based on what
little his former (and only) employers had to say, I'd bet it started--
but went undiagnosed--in his grad school years or there abouts.
His Usenet trip has been one long, strange ride...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The one permanent emotion of the inferior man is
fear - fear of the unknown, the complex, the inexplicable.
What he wants above everything else is safety.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:41:58 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote:
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the
2PD-OMER non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of
a substance is a measure of its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it? If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human stomach
were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to know
that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear potential
energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy content is not
absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken --
your good old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat &
Carbohydrate Counter" will henceforth be required to
add relativistic corrections. For example, a 70-gram
apple which formerly listed in at 100 calories will
now, given the energy implicit in its mass at rest,
be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the
2PD-OMER approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these
apples a day, for a daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about
restrictions such as that.
Did Andy bother to post a refutation of this 33 order-of-magnitude
discrepancy?
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 07:10:26 PM |
|
|
In article <301120071741582385%erfc@caballista.org> Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> writes:
Cary Kittrell <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote:
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because Chung
is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing to
blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I should
take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the
2PD-OMER non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of
a substance is a measure of its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it? If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human stomach
were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to know
that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear potential
energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy content is not
absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken --
your good old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat &
Carbohydrate Counter" will henceforth be required to
add relativistic corrections. For example, a 70-gram
apple which formerly listed in at 100 calories will
now, given the energy implicit in its mass at rest,
be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the
2PD-OMER approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these
apples a day, for a daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about
restrictions such as that.
Did Andy bother to post a refutation of this 33 order-of-magnitude
discrepancy?
Not to the discerning.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MU" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:11:31 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 07:39:32 PM |
|
|
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 11:58:38 PM |
|
|
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
Hi, Tholen!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 06:13:25 PM |
|
|
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 06:49:06 PM |
|
|
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 07:13:24 PM |
|
|
Archie Leach <leach@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
| User: "John \C" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 07:26:31 PM |
|
|
"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:011220071813249713%erfc@caballista.org...
Archie Leach <leach@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org> wrote:
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified
caloric
intakes.
A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications
for
the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
densities of food vary greatly.
Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
caloric value. Get it?
Yes, true, next.....
If your table of calories
lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
worthless information -- because the pound of
butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
you consumed.
Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body
for calorc
use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being
constantly
hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the
energy
needed for elite-level endurance sports.
No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
and creative detractors could not come with something
this whack.
Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here.
you won't
b/c you can't.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
immodesty compels me to re-post my response <ahem>
<ahem>:
Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling,
honest argument
is.
If you are honest. and you are not.
<tholen>
How ironic.
</tholen>
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Tholen!
Hi, Pedo Deco!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 07:33:28 PM |
|
|
John C wrote:
"Art Deco"
Hi, Pedo Deco!
http://NetCabal.com
:-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:03:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000, Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <EI6dnRcJQr1lvM3anZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
(newsgroups de-Chungified)
"Jesus The Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
sockpuppet MU wrote:
Archie Leach, who Chung calls "satan via a sockpuppet" because
Chung is a gutless coward, wrote:
Andrew, convicted by the Holy Spirit, unboldly wrote:
And God's "foreknowledge" is his, not mankind's--not any man's.
GOD gives HIS foreknowledge to HIS prophets and whomoever else HE
may choose.
God certainly does that.
So are you one of His Prophets, Jesus the Chung?
Or are you just merely one of His "Informers"?
Are you, Archie Leach, one of the truly interested or truly
hypocritical in asking?
It is simply a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) since unwisely choosing
to blaspheme against the Holy Spirit. Such is the sad state of the
eternally condemned.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Since I have Chunkers in the killfile, I missed that one. Maybe I
should take him out for a laugh?
I take it he was yapping about e=mc^2?
Yep. Trying to tie the idea of weighing your food (for the 2PD-OMER
non-diet) in with the fact that the mass of a substance is a measure of
its energy content.
It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring that knowing
the calorie ratings of foods is worthless. Why? Because if you eat the
food, then you can't also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to
detrmine its caloric value. Get it?
Not sober.
If your table of calories lists a
pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's worthless information --
because the pound of butter they tested isn't the pound of butter you
consumed.
No, I am not making this up.
Oh, I believe you. I had Chunkers in the killfile for some time now and
only just thought of seeing how far off the cliff of sanity he's gone now.
Apparently, he's losing his mind at relativistic speeds now.
Chung's most gifted and creative
detractors could not come with something this whack.
Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this, immodesty compels me
to re-post my response <ahem> <ahem>:
"archie leach" had written:
E=MC^2 would be relevant to human metabolism only if the human
stomach were, say, a nuclear reactor.
I'm no organic chemist nor am I a biologist, but I know enough to
know that it is caloric energy content and not total nuclear
potential energy which fuels metabolism, and that caloric energy
content is not absolutely and strictly related to simply the mass
of the food only.
Now, now, don't try to fight it; The Chung has spoken -- your good
old reliable ""The Doctors Pocket Calorie, Fat & Carbohydrate
Counter" will henceforth be required to add relativistic
corrections. For example, a 70-gram apple which formerly listed in
at 100 calories will now, given the energy implicit in its mass at
rest, be listed as containing
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Of coure, since it still weighs only 70 grams, under the 2PD-OMER
approach you will be allowed to eat 13 of these apples a day, for a
daily nutritional allowance of
194,308,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories.
Even the worst glutton could hardly complain about restrictions such
as that.
14,946,770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 calories!
Don't tell the TSA...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The older I grow the more I distrust the familiar
doctrine that age brings wisdom.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MU" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 02:13:28 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 04:07:02 AM |
|
|
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:15 -0600, Archie Leach wrote:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
I'm truly interested in seeing Dr. Andy cobble together some
cockamamie rationalization for his claim that Einstein's equation
relates to human metabolism.
But of course, Dr. Andy won't, because he's a coward, and besides,
he's already labelled me "sockpuppet of satan", which he does to those
who expose his fraudulence all too clearly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 04:24:50 AM |
|
|
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
brother MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
I'm truly interested in seeing Dr. Andy cobble together some
cockamamie rationalization for his claim that Einstein's equation
relates to human metabolism.
Did not make any such claim:
"Afterall, the energy contained in all matter is solely dependent on
the mass.
E=MC**2" -- Andrew, in the Holy Spirit.
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f59bcaacf6737b06?
Truth is simple...
.... and will defeat the untruthful every time.
In the gloriously awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, I rebuke you yet
again before an ever-growing cloud of witnesses, satan.
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Archie Leach" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 11:25:07 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
brother MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
I'm truly interested in seeing Dr. Andy cobble together some
cockamamie rationalization for his claim that Einstein's equation
relates to human metabolism.
Did not make any such claim:
"Afterall, the energy contained in all matter is solely dependent on
the mass.
E=MC**2" -- Andrew, in the Holy Spirit.
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f59bcaacf6737b06?
Thereby showing that either you have absolutely NO concept of the
actual process of metabolism, or else you are willfully ignoring what
you must have learned many, many times in the biology and organic
chemistry courses that I'm assuming you must have been required to
take along the way towards getting your MD and PhD.
Furthermore, this attempt to rationalize your theory, that energy in
matter is strictly related to its mass, by using Einstein's equation
shows you have no concept of the idea of nuclear potential energy,
which should also have been drilled into your thick skull repeatedly
during at least one (if not all) of the physics courses I'm sure you
were required to take as an undergrad also.
I'm sure the Medical Board for the State of Georgia would be very
concerned to see one of its physicians spouting in public such
irresponsibly dishonest interpretations of known scientific processes.
(And never mind getting banned from SERNO after two weeks......)
Truth is simple...
Just keep telling yourself that, Jesus The Chung.
... and will defeat the untruthful every time.
Which is why you'll win another Weird Science award if you keep this
up, Chungles.
In the gloriously awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, I rebuke you yet
again before an ever-growing cloud of witnesses, satan.
Rebuke away. It's not going to magically turn anyone's stomach into a
nuclear generator.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 06:39:46 PM |
|
|
Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc12@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
brother MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
I'm truly interested in seeing Dr. Andy cobble together some
cockamamie rationalization for his claim that Einstein's equation
relates to human metabolism.
Did not make any such claim:
"Afterall, the energy contained in all matter is solely dependent on
the mass.
E=MC**2" -- Andrew, in the Holy Spirit.
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f59bcaacf6737b06?
Thereby showing that either you have absolutely NO concept of the
actual process of metabolism, or else you are willfully ignoring what
you must have learned many, many times in the biology and organic
chemistry courses that I'm assuming you must have been required to
take along the way towards getting your MD and PhD.
Furthermore, this attempt to rationalize your theory, that energy in
matter is strictly related to its mass, by using Einstein's equation
shows you have no concept of the idea of nuclear potential energy,
which should also have been drilled into your thick skull repeatedly
during at least one (if not all) of the physics courses I'm sure you
were required to take as an undergrad also.
I'm sure the Medical Board for the State of Georgia would be very
concerned to see one of its physicians spouting in public such
irresponsibly dishonest interpretations of known scientific processes.
(And never mind getting banned from SERNO after two weeks......)
Truth is simple...
Just keep telling yourself that, Jesus The Chung.
... and will defeat the untruthful every time.
Which is why you'll win another Weird Science award if you keep this
up, Chungles.
In the gloriously awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, I rebuke you yet
again before an ever-growing cloud of witnesses, satan.
Rebuke away. It's not going to magically turn anyone's stomach into a
nuclear generator.
Hydrogen bonds versus hydrogen fusion -- do you think Andy's empty
stomach can tell the difference?
My theory is that low blood sugar due to inadequate nutrition has
severely impaired his already limited reasoning capacity.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ferd Farkel" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 07:35:22 PM |
|
|
On Nov 30, 7:39 pm, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
Hydrogen bonds versus hydrogen fusion -- do you think Andy's empty
stomach can tell the difference?
My theory is that low blood sugar due to inadequate nutrition has
severely impaired his already limited reasoning capacity.
Protein deficiency. The body consumes itself to stay alive,
starting with those organs least essential for survival.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MU" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 02:11:08 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:35:22 -0800 (PST), Ferd Farkel wrote:
Protein deficiency. The body consumes itself to stay alive,
starting with those organs least essential for survival.
What a bunch of hogwash trying to pass this hokey off for being a eunuch.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MUs Sockpuppet" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ. |
01 Dec 2007 06:14:11 PM |
|
|
MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:35:22 -0800 (PST), Ferd Farkel wrote:
Protein deficiency. The body consumes itself to stay alive,
starting with those organs least essential for survival.
What a bunch of hogwash trying to pass this hokey off for being a eunuch.
Shuttup, impostor.
--
02D2D2
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fears the brethren of LORDJesus Christ. |
30 Nov 2007 12:06:49 PM |
|
|
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
brother MU <moo@moo.com> wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) feebly hissed:
Still waiting for your explanation about how Einstein's equation has
anything to do whatsoever with human metabolism, Chungquake.
Still waiting for you, Archie Leach, to answer are you one of the truly
interested or truly hypocritical in asking?
I'm truly interested in seeing Dr. Andy cobble together some
cockamamie rationalization for his claim that Einstein's equation
relates to human metabolism.
Did not make any such claim:
"Afterall, the energy contained in all matter is solely dependent on
the mass.
E=MC**2" -- Andrew, in the Holy Spirit.
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f59bcaacf6737b06?
Thereby showing that either you have absolutely NO concept of the
actual process of metabolism, or else you are willfully ignoring what
you must have learned many, many times in the biology and organic
chemistry courses that I'm assuming you must have been required to
take along the way towards getting your MD and PhD.
Did not write that the equation predicted the amount of potential
chemical energy in food. Instead, it remains illustrative of the
utility of knowing mass (i.e. weight) of all matter, which includes
food, in the setting of measuring quantity.
Bottom line:
Lying remains your native language, satan.
May your suffering be excruciatingly and infinitely worse that you
ever imagined possible for the rest of eternity when you are thrown
into that lake of fire that is being prepared for you.
Thus, in the gloriously holy and awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, I
rebuke you yet again before an ever growing cloud of witnesses who are
cheering both here and in heaven.
All the glory here is being given to LORD Almighty GOD.
May your situation serve well as a warning to those who are unwisely
considering your pattern of foolishly blaspheming against the Holy
Spirit.
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
