convicted neighbor David Silvermans (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silvermans (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:

friend Rod wrote:

I am proof of what Andrew has said, and if you need more

proof

then
write me at my email and I will provide that which you
require SHORT of doing an autopsy on me while still
breathing.

Upon asking for "proof" we find:

" I can see that very little of any evidence I can provide to
you here
will matter. Your goal is to make a liar of anyone that
that

may

be
able to refute your claims. When you reveal to me your name
and personal info by email, and give me the opportunity to
verify

what

you've given me then we will proceed from there. However, my
personal info is coded into every post I make. You show me

goodwill

by email and I will reciprocate by telling you how to decode
my info. There is no reason for either of us to trust the
other with our personal info, so the first move is yours, as
you are totally anonymous."

To provide "proof" one needs access to your doctor for

consultation

as to exactly what he understands the two pound diet to be as
you relayed it to him and to which you claim he agrees.

All the above is stalling and hand waving. You offered your
doc

as

the expert you consulted as to the two pound diet. Ok, let's

have

at him for confirmation.

Beyond the two pound bit, did you discuss with your doctor
what those pounds should contain? Did you come to an
agreement with

him

what the diet has to do with exercise? Did you discuss with
him why this is any different then any other calorie
restriction scheme? Did you discuss with him how andrew cane
by way of lone ranger bible reading his opinion of a diet?

As important for me is the part you snipped, sent again for
your consideration below. You seem to place great stock in
andrew for his religious views and how that reflects upon his
two pound diet notion. Again if you please:

As for your confidence in and assumed common religious views
concerning andrew chung, do you think he commits sin? Did
you reply to those false teachings I outlined for you
previously he presents?

As for your views of me, do you think them false witness
considering the minimal information you have of me?

God bless.

I stated my terms. I will not turn my personal info over to
a
complete stranger even if you are stupid enough to expect that
I would. Comply with my terms or continue your hand waving and

crying

foul.

If satan were to leave his shadows of deceit to comply with
your terms, he would find himself cast into that lake of fire
that

awaits

him, his sockpuppets (corporeal demons) and his demons (lying
spirits).

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier
(hungrier) than ever:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/PressRelease

The spirit of something devious certainly is using him.
Andrew, I
have traced his posts and they are coming from Carnegie Mellon
University. I have contacted them by email and will be talking
with them tomorrow by
phone. This guy is evidently in violation of the acceptable use

policy

due to his spamming the news group in responses to you. His
devious practices have earned him a complaint tonight.

Rod

Do let us know if you get a reply, and what that reply says. If
you do not report it, it can be taken that they didn't even bother
to reply.

My

money is on them not bothering with your complaint, with short
odds against them telling you to grow the ***** up.

Matthew 7:1-2 comes to mind here.

The words you have heard from Emory University in response to
**your** false complaints have likely given you tinnitus when they
have rung true :-)

I have not complained to Emory University.

That is not what I know. Still count many at Emory to be friends who
keep me posted about your antics:

Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote in
news:P2DAi.6951$924.2795@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net to alt.atheism:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper)
wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:

friend Rod wrote:

I am proof of what Andrew has said, and if you need
more proof then
write me at my email and I will provide that which you
require SHORT of doing an autopsy on me while still
breathing.

Upon asking for "proof" we find:

" I can see that very little of any evidence I can provide
to

you

here
will matter. Your goal is to make a liar of anyone that
that may be
able to refute your claims. When you reveal to me your name
and personal info by email, and give me the opportunity to
verify what you've given me then we will proceed from
there. However,

my

personal info is coded into every post I make. You show me
goodwill by email and I will reciprocate by telling you how
to decode my info. There is no reason for either of us to
trust the other with our personal info, so the first move
is yours, as you are totally anonymous."

To provide "proof" one needs access to your doctor for
consultation as to exactly what he understands the two
pound

diet

to be as you relayed it to him and to which you claim he
agrees.

All the above is stalling and hand waving. You offered
your doc as the expert you consulted as to the two pound
diet. Ok, let's have at him for confirmation.

Beyond the two pound bit, did you discuss with your doctor
what those pounds should contain? Did you come to an
agreement with him what the diet has to do with exercise?
Did you discuss with him why this is any different then any
other calorie restriction scheme? Did you discuss with him
how andrew cane by way of lone ranger bible reading his
opinion of a diet?

As important for me is the part you snipped, sent again for
your consideration below. You seem to place great stock in
andrew

for

his religious views and how that reflects upon his two
pound

diet

notion. Again if you please:

As for your confidence in and assumed common religious
views concerning andrew chung, do you think he commits sin?
Did you reply to those false teachings I outlined for you
previously he presents?

As for your views of me, do you think them false witness
considering the minimal information you have of me?

God bless.

I stated my terms. I will not turn my personal info over
to a
complete stranger even if you are stupid enough to expect
that I would. Comply with my terms or continue your hand
waving and crying foul.

If satan were to leave his shadows of deceit to comply with
your terms, he would find himself cast into that lake of fire
that awaits him, his sockpuppets (corporeal demons) and his
demons (lying spirits).

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier

(hungrier)

than ever:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/PressRelease

The spirit of something devious certainly is using him.
Andrew, I
have traced his posts and they are coming from Carnegie Mellon
University. I have contacted them by email and will be talking
with them tomorrow by
phone. This guy is evidently in violation of the acceptable
use policy due to his spamming the news group in responses to
you. His devious practices have earned him a complaint
tonight.


Rod

Do let us know if you get a reply, and what that reply says. If
you do not report it, it can be taken that they didn't even
bother to reply. My money is on them not bothering with your
complaint, with short odds against them telling you to grow the
***** up.

This attitude only goes further to demonstrate liberal bias
and a
lack of social values that determine personal behavior in public
areas.

Your tendency towards being an animal is nothing new
David....

Now, you're just whining.

Whatever it takes to ease your conscience........

Q,E.D.

Mine is clear. Q,E.D.

Rest assured that just as GOD has the last word in Bob Pastorio's
death, HE will have the last word when David Silverman dies.

I look forward to better times ahead with God!


]

Thanks for that, Rod. You just allayed any qualms I might have about
tarring you with the same brush as Andy. Welcome to hell.


--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper)
wrote:

friend Rod <kc0oeb@att.net> wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

friend Rod wrote:

satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:

friend Rod wrote:

I am proof of what Andrew has said, and if you need
more proof then
write me at my email and I will provide that which you
require SHORT of doing an autopsy on me while still
breathing.

Upon asking for "proof" we find:

" I can see that very little of any evidence I can provide
to

you

here
will matter. Your goal is to make a liar of anyone that
that may be
able to refute your claims. When you reveal to me your name
and personal info by email, and give me the opportunity to
verify what you've given me then we will proceed from
there. However,

my

personal info is coded into every post I make. You show me
goodwill by email and I will reciprocate by telling you how
to decode my info. There is no reason for either of us to
trust the other with our personal info, so the first move
is yours, as you are totally anonymous."

To provide "proof" one needs access to your doctor for
consultation as to exactly what he understands the two
pound

diet

to be as you relayed it to him and to which you claim he
agrees.

All the above is stalling and hand waving. You offered
your doc as the expert you consulted as to the two pound
diet. Ok, let's have at him for confirmation.

Beyond the two pound bit, did you discuss with your doctor
what those pounds should contain? Did you come to an
agreement with him what the diet has to do with exercise?
Did you discuss with him why this is any different then any
other calorie restriction scheme? Did you discuss with him
how andrew cane by way of lone ranger bible reading his
opinion of a diet?

As important for me is the part you snipped, sent again for
your consideration below. You seem to place great stock in
andrew

for

his religious views and how that reflects upon his two
pound

diet

notion. Again if you please:

As for your confidence in and assumed common religious
views concerning andrew chung, do you think he commits sin?
Did you reply to those false teachings I outlined for you
previously he presents?

As for your views of me, do you think them false witness
considering the minimal information you have of me?

God bless.

I stated my terms. I will not turn my personal info over
to a
complete stranger even if you are stupid enough to expect
that I would. Comply with my terms or continue your hand
waving and crying foul.

If satan were to leave his shadows of deceit to comply with
your terms, he would find himself cast into that lake of fire
that awaits him, his sockpuppets (corporeal demons) and his
demons (lying spirits).

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier

(hungrier)

than ever:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/PressRelease

The spirit of something devious certainly is using him.
Andrew, I
have traced his posts and they are coming from Carnegie Mellon
University. I have contacted them by email and will be talking
with them tomorrow by
phone. This guy is evidently in violation of the acceptable
use policy due to his spamming the news group in responses to
you. His devious practices have earned him a complaint
tonight.


Rod

Do let us know if you get a reply, and what that reply says. If
you do not report it, it can be taken that they didn't even
bother to reply. My money is on them not bothering with your
complaint, with short odds against them telling you to grow the
***** up.

This attitude only goes further to demonstrate liberal bias
and a
lack of social values that determine personal behavior in public
areas.

Your tendency towards being an animal is nothing new
David....

Now, you're just whining.

Whatever it takes to ease your conscience........

Q,E.D.

Mine is clear. Q,E.D.

Rest assured that just as GOD has the last word in Bob Pastorio's
death, HE will have the last word when David Silverman dies.

I look forward to better times ahead with God!

Thanks for that, Rod. You just allayed any qualms I might have about
tarring you with the same brush as Andy. Welcome to hell.

Don't get the idea that I hope for your death, as that isn't the
meaning of what I was saying. I do believe that God will take a life,
but I do not seek it nor do I believe Andrew seeks it either.

would be an emotional exaggeration on anyones part to make that
assumption, but I do have hope for better times when this kind of strife
is not present in anyones life. Nevertheless I have seen your other post
pertaining to painting with a broad brush, so do as you will for it
is you that reap the consequences of your impulsive actions, not I.