| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
19 Dec 2004 10:15:36 AM |
| Object: |
Proof for gods |
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 10:45:11 AM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Ah, but what if a does *not* equal -22/91?
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:28:17 PM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Ah, but what if a does *not* equal -22/91?
You don't get gods, you get Richard Simmons.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
21 Dec 2004 06:14:02 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:28:17 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE (Fredric
L. Rice) wrote:
Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Ah, but what if a does *not* equal -22/91?
You don't get gods, you get Richard Simmons.
I'm not sure which is the lesser of two weasels.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fatman" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 06:42:26 PM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Ah, but what if a does not equal -22/91?
Yes, but, "you know in your heart it does".
Fatman
--
No I am not an EAC Commando......There is no such thing.......I am a
temporary janitor filling in for Pete.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 12:36:57 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god,
who am I supposed to kill?
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting
adults if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:28:16 PM |
|
|
(The Last Liberal) wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god,
who am I supposed to kill?
Anybody you want to.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 07:34:30 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE (Fredric L.
Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god, who am I
supposed to kill?
I'll tell you but *first you must donate all your money to this
organization I happen to run.
No, no, don't worry, the money is for a *holy *mission. Really. Stop
asking questions. God will be very, very angry if you ask questions.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ Covert text file
server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting adults
if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 07:36:43 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <EZmdnaDaCauMSVvcRVn-uQ@megapath.net>, Mark K. Bilbo
lept out of the bushes shouting:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE (Fredric
L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god, who am
I supposed to kill?
I'll tell you but *first you must donate all your money to this
organization I happen to run.
No, no, don't worry, the money is for a *holy *mission. Really. Stop
asking questions. God will be very, very angry if you ask questions.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ Covert text file
server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting adults
if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
Scratch that. I reread that quote half a dozen times and it made me dizzy.
Anyway...
Just for *consenting adults? Is he implying rape will be allowed?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 10:43:57 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In our last episode <EZmdnaDaCauMSVvcRVn-uQ@megapath.net>, Mark K. Bilbo
lept out of the bushes shouting:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
< snip >
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting adults
if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
Scratch that. I reread that quote half a dozen times and it made me dizzy.
Anyway...
Just for *consenting adults? Is he implying rape will be allowed?
Well, it's only a misdemeanor in the Bible, and they were a lot stricter
back then, so why not?
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 05:20:40 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <32odqfF3neoqrU1@individual.net>, Tukla Ratte lept out
of the bushes shouting:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In our last episode <EZmdnaDaCauMSVvcRVn-uQ@megapath.net>, Mark K. Bilbo
lept out of the bushes shouting:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
< snip >
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting
adults if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
Scratch that. I reread that quote half a dozen times and it made me
dizzy.
Anyway...
Just for *consenting adults? Is he implying rape will be allowed?
Well, it's only a misdemeanor in the Bible, and they were a lot stricter
back then, so why not?
That's true, just a minor fine for rape. And no punishment for lesbianism.
(Truly Yahweh was male)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 04:59:44 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:36:43 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <EZmdnaDaCauMSVvcRVn-uQ@megapath.net>, Mark K. Bilbo
lept out of the bushes shouting:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE (Fredric
L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god, who am
I supposed to kill?
I'll tell you but *first you must donate all your money to this
organization I happen to run.
No, no, don't worry, the money is for a *holy *mission. Really. Stop
asking questions. God will be very, very angry if you ask questions.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ Covert text file
server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting adults
if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
Scratch that. I reread that quote half a dozen times and it made me dizzy.
What else can be expected from fundies, certainly not coherence.
Anyway...
Just for *consenting adults? Is he implying rape will be allowed?
Must be, since the Bible authorizes it.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:43:58 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:34:30 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found
god, who am I supposed to kill?
I'll tell you but *first you must donate all your money to this
organization I happen to run.
No, no, don't worry, the money is for a *holy *mission. Really. Stop
asking questions. God will be very, very angry if you ask questions.
"What does god need with a starship?"
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting adults
if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
He was serious, by the way.
Of course men usually end up paying for sex anyhow.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
---
http://lastliberal.org
I am referring to the modern branches of science which call God
a liar, and which call His Word a lie. Archeology, paleontology,
and astronomy to name a few. They all claim the Earth and Universe
are billions of years old in direct conflict with the Biblical
record. Between God's Word and man's word, I'll believe God's
Word any day: - Bill Kochman (He's serious, by the way.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 05:20:02 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <32oaaaF3pruojU1@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:34:30 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <32m02iF3n466nU2@individual.net>, The Last Liberal
lept out of the bushes shouting:
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found
god, who am I supposed to kill?
I'll tell you but *first you must donate all your money to this
organization I happen to run.
No, no, don't worry, the money is for a *holy *mission. Really. Stop
asking questions. God will be very, very angry if you ask questions.
"What does god need with a starship?"
<snork>
It was the *only thing worthwhile outta that movie.
(On the other hand, the South Park episode with the 700 Club building a
starship, that was pretty good <g>)
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting
adults if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
<blink>
Well, so much for the species...
He was serious, by the way.
Of course men usually end up paying for sex anyhow.
Heh. Reminds me of a Ron White bit when he got to talking about the
DeBeers commercial "take her breath away." His comment was why not say
what they really mean...
"Diamonds, that'll shut her up."
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 08:15:41 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:36:57 GMT, (The Last
Liberal) wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god,
who am I supposed to kill?
Something innocent, just not a fetus. That's sacred.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting
adults if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
--
zamboni
#2139
BAAWA Administrator of Obfuscation
EAC Dispenser of Justice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 05:29:18 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:15:41 -0600,
said in alt.atheism:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:36:57 GMT, (The Last
Liberal) wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god,
who am I supposed to kill?
Something innocent, just not a fetus. That's sacred.
Not an elephant either. They're as sacred to some people as fetuses
are to fundy Christians.
---
CellPhonesEtc at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 08:47:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:15:41 -0600,
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:36:57 GMT, (The Last
Liberal) wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
So God = 0, I thought so.
Excellent! Thank you. I am convinced. Now that I have found god,
who am I supposed to kill?
Something innocent, just not a fetus. That's sacred.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
---
http://lastliberal.org
Personally, I vote that there be fines and arrests for consenting
adults if they are not married--heterosexual or otherwise. - Mark Fox
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 10:28:58 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hector Plasmic" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 11:53:49 AM |
|
|
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Oh, man, there's an epiphany here waiting to happen, I just *know* it!
:-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:28:15 PM |
|
|
"Hector Plasmic" <hec@hectorplasmic.com> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Oh, man, there's an epiphany here waiting to happen, I just *know* it!
:-)
Hopefully it comes in the form of a swift kick to the neither regions.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 07:37:29 AM |
|
|
In our last episode
<1103478829.072021.82210@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Hector Plasmic
lept out of the bushes shouting:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Oh, man, there's an epiphany here waiting to happen, I just *know* it!
:-)
Shhhh! Wait for it...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 07:37:16 AM |
|
|
In our last episode
<slrncsbb29.n7p.The-Central-Scrutinizer@linux.client.comcast.net>, TCS
lept out of the bushes shouting:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice
<FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
<shading eyes>
Wow, you can just see the contrail...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 11:32:52 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:28:58 -0600, TCS
<The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
It seems God was a classical/renaissance architect.
Michelangelo perhaps?
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:28:14 PM |
|
|
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
Those of us with the minimal amount of intelligence and education to
understand it, obviously.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Looks like you couldn't work it out, huh?
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 10:00:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:28:14 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
Those of us with the minimal amount of intelligence and education to
understand it, obviously.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Looks like you couldn't work it out, huh?
You joking right? This isn't exactly calculus.
a7=-22/13.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
21 Dec 2004 06:38:27 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:00:52 -0600, TCS
<The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:28:14 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
Those of us with the minimal amount of intelligence and education to
understand it, obviously.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Looks like you couldn't work it out, huh?
You joking right? This isn't exactly calculus.
a7=-22/13.
22/13 is a close approximation to a ratio known as "The Golden Mean"
It is a ratio that is aesthetically pleasing to the eye and was
used in Classical times and rediscovered by renaissance artists and
architects such Da Vinci and Michelangelo.
It was Lucas Pacolini a renaissance mathematician who defined it
as approximately 8 to 13
http://www.vashti.net/mceinc/golden.htm
It has no religious significance whatsover.
At least that is what the original poster refers to. It might
be just coincidental to something else.
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
21 Dec 2004 06:42:17 PM |
|
|
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:28:14 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
Those of us with the minimal amount of intelligence and education to
understand it, obviously.
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
Looks like you couldn't work it out, huh?
You joking right? This isn't exactly calculus. a7=-22/13.
<groan> Someone else please explain it to this poor guy, would ya?
I find that I don't have the strength to go on. }:-}
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
19 Dec 2004 10:46:07 PM |
|
|
TCS wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
WHOOSH!
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 09:35:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:46:07 -0500, Olrik
<olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote:
TCS wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
WHOOSH!
Yes, and he didn't even duck.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
---
http://lastliberal.org
I have less tolerance for pagan women because they seem to
particularly lack respect for men and thereby depart from God
even further than do pagan men. - (Jim Staal, Promise Keeper)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof for gods |
20 Dec 2004 05:31:03 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:35:33 GMT, (The Last
Liberal) said in alt.atheism:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:46:07 -0500, Olrik
<olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote:
TCS wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:36 GMT, Fredric L. Rice <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote:
a7 + 22 / 13 = 0
There. Proof for gods.
Whose that supposed to impress?
that's just proof of failing to complete sixth grade.
WHOOSH!
Yes, and he didn't even duck.
No problem - there was nothing functional above the larynx anyway.
---
CellPhonesEtc at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
