Proof of 'God'



 Religions > Atheism > Proof of 'God'

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Greywolf"
Date: 24 Jul 2006 02:50:20 AM
Object: Proof of 'God'
Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you 'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.
You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?
Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?
Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.
Greywolf
.

User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 02:25:34 PM
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in
news:12c8uvdt2a28j4a@corp.supernews.com:

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'?

They won't even go there. They apparently don't need to. They are
totally convinced beyond a sinful doubt that God exists, and no matter
how many times it's been pointed out to them, he does watch over them
and protect them from all those natural disasters. They don't need
proof of God's existence, their unending faith is all the proof they
need. Their belief makes God real. And their unending desire to fix
the death thing keeps them in check.
Not even the tobacco industry has a sweeter deal!
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
The laws that require me to NOT kill people I don't like REALLY bug
me, or there would be many less of YOUR kind.
-John Weatherly
.

User: "leo"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 03:24:19 PM
Greywolf ha escrito:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you 'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.

Greywolf

Have you read, A Brave New World? There was a saying "ten thousand
repetitions make a truth". That's why they are always repeating
sayings about god said this and god said that. They do not need to
prove anything; just to keep repeating is all they need to do.
There is basic reason for this way to work. Human language is a
"conditioned reinforcer". Why? Because, human language at a basic
level is giving you true information about the real world. They can
warned new about sturms, hurricanes, blocked freeways, floods, or
other. Your mum, or your wife, can tell you the lunch is ready, etc.
Anyway, many times, words are telling you something interesting or
pleasant.
Leopoldo
Leopoldo
.

User: "Richo"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 08:58:03 PM
Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you 'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.

Greywolf

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.
The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!
Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.
You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.
And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.
Mark.
.
User: "n4meless0ne"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 11:32:19 AM
Richo wrote:

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.
The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!
Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.

You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.

And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.

Mark.

Well, to fill in some background about myself - I was raised as an
agnostic/atheist, so I wasn't a subject of early religious
conditioning. I converted during a crucial period of my life when I
was under a lot of stress and had a lot of problems. Basically, I was
an emotional wreck, so when counseling didn't do the trick, and no one
else seemed to be there, I was open to Christian invitation.(Quote from
Stephen Colbert in Strangers with Candy: "I'll go anywhere you want
and do anything you say. Just _love_ me!). These were nice people, I
met them through a friend, and they became my friends. (I suppose I
wouldn't say they're not my friends now, I just don't talk to or have
anything to do with them anymore, although some must regard me with
disgust or resentment).
Looking back at it now, I don't know if it was good for me or not - I
did need the emotional support of friends who really cared, but the
extra stuff, i.e., the religious stuff I don't know about. They were
trying to get me to depend on a relationship with God for emotional
strength.
My theory of what happened next is inevitably strange and perhaps hard
to understand. They were praying for God to reveal himself to me, and
then I had a reality altering (psychedelic) experience. All natural by
the way, no drugs or anything, which lent credence to what they were
preaching. As I was sitting in my friends' living room, they were
praying out loud to God, and I was listening and watching the coffee
table and the turned off tv. And then something wonderful happened.
The room around me seemed to become alive as I stared deeply. I felt
the presence of a mind, felt that it saw me, and I realized that it
loved me. And then it was over. I asked them what that was, and they
said it was God. I thought it could be aliens communicating with me,
it was so strange and new, supernatural. But they seemed to know what
was going on, so I accepted what they said.
At that point I was in, and I gobbled it all up - I got a Bible(and
more later), and books about Christianity, and Christian music; I spent
so many nights up late reading and praying, meditating on God,
listening to mp3's and cd's of Christian music. Fellowship with
sincere people who genuinely cared about you; supernatural highs, I was
hooked on all of it.
Well, I had emotional supports but I still was not fully ok. I was
dealing with personal problems that just wouldn't go away; but I guess
my greatest "sin" was disobedience - specifically, doing things for
myself and not for God or others when I felt the compulsion. This was
my downfall. I had no foundation of good works which I could base my
faith on. And without it, I was really unstable. Many times I was
afraid of God's wrath (a fear which is very real for the believer) - an
experience just as intense as His love. I felt guilt, despair, and
later on near the end of my career, externalized hatred and
condemnation. God, the entity on which everything worth anything to me
depended, hated my guts and wanted me to work as hard as possible to
purify my repugnant self, or else die. I saw signs, felt people's
feelings and thoughts. That was the turning point, I think. Why
should I put up with this psycho crap? I didn't sign up for this!
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 01:56:45 PM
"n4meless0ne" <wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153845139.486024.295180@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Richo wrote:

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.


The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!


Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.

You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.

And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.

Mark.



Well, to fill in some background about myself - I was raised as an
agnostic/atheist, so I wasn't a subject of early religious
conditioning. I converted during a crucial period of my life when I
was under a lot of stress and had a lot of problems. Basically, I was
an emotional wreck, so when counseling didn't do the trick, and no one
else seemed to be there, I was open to Christian invitation.(Quote from
Stephen Colbert in Strangers with Candy: "I'll go anywhere you want
and do anything you say. Just _love_ me!). These were nice people, I
met them through a friend, and they became my friends. (I suppose I
wouldn't say they're not my friends now, I just don't talk to or have
anything to do with them anymore, although some must regard me with
disgust or resentment).

Looking back at it now, I don't know if it was good for me or not - I
did need the emotional support of friends who really cared, but the
extra stuff, i.e., the religious stuff I don't know about. They were
trying to get me to depend on a relationship with God for emotional
strength.

My theory of what happened next is inevitably strange and perhaps hard
to understand. They were praying for God to reveal himself to me, and
then I had a reality altering (psychedelic) experience. All natural by
the way, no drugs or anything, which lent credence to what they were
preaching. As I was sitting in my friends' living room, they were
praying out loud to God, and I was listening and watching the coffee
table and the turned off tv. And then something wonderful happened.
The room around me seemed to become alive as I stared deeply. I felt
the presence of a mind, felt that it saw me, and I realized that it
loved me. And then it was over. I asked them what that was, and they
said it was God. I thought it could be aliens communicating with me,
it was so strange and new, supernatural. But they seemed to know what
was going on, so I accepted what they said.

At that point I was in, and I gobbled it all up - I got a Bible(and
more later), and books about Christianity, and Christian music; I spent
so many nights up late reading and praying, meditating on God,
listening to mp3's and cd's of Christian music. Fellowship with
sincere people who genuinely cared about you; supernatural highs, I was
hooked on all of it.

Well, I had emotional supports but I still was not fully ok. I was
dealing with personal problems that just wouldn't go away; but I guess
my greatest "sin" was disobedience - specifically, doing things for
myself and not for God or others when I felt the compulsion. This was
my downfall. I had no foundation of good works which I could base my
faith on. And without it, I was really unstable. Many times I was
afraid of God's wrath (a fear which is very real for the believer) - an
experience just as intense as His love. I felt guilt, despair, and
later on near the end of my career, externalized hatred and
condemnation. God, the entity on which everything worth anything to me
depended, hated my guts and wanted me to work as hard as possible to
purify my repugnant self, or else die. I saw signs, felt people's
feelings and thoughts. That was the turning point, I think. Why
should I put up with this psycho crap? I didn't sign up for this!

Wow. But damn if everything you've written wasn't on the money. Reading your
reply made me *mad*. Why? Because you can see exploitation at work in what
you were subjected to. A conscious exploitation and an attempt to get one
over on you. Damn. I'm mad writing this right now. No shame or decency with
these people. And the ironic part is that they feel that they were somehow
'helping' you. Pisses me off.
Anyway, thanks for the input. I think it takes a great deal of mental
'toughness' to escape what you escaped. Good for you.
Greywolf
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 01:59:48 PM
"n4meless0ne" <wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153845139.486024.295180@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Richo wrote:

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.


The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!


Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.

You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.

And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.

Mark.



Well, to fill in some background about myself - I was raised as an
agnostic/atheist, so I wasn't a subject of early religious
conditioning. I converted during a crucial period of my life when I
was under a lot of stress and had a lot of problems. Basically, I was
an emotional wreck, so when counseling didn't do the trick, and no one
else seemed to be there, I was open to Christian invitation.(Quote from
Stephen Colbert in Strangers with Candy: "I'll go anywhere you want
and do anything you say. Just _love_ me!). These were nice people, I
met them through a friend, and they became my friends. (I suppose I
wouldn't say they're not my friends now, I just don't talk to or have
anything to do with them anymore, although some must regard me with
disgust or resentment).

Looking back at it now, I don't know if it was good for me or not - I
did need the emotional support of friends who really cared, but the
extra stuff, i.e., the religious stuff I don't know about. They were
trying to get me to depend on a relationship with God for emotional
strength.

My theory of what happened next is inevitably strange and perhaps hard
to understand. They were praying for God to reveal himself to me, and
then I had a reality altering (psychedelic) experience. All natural by
the way, no drugs or anything, which lent credence to what they were
preaching. As I was sitting in my friends' living room, they were
praying out loud to God, and I was listening and watching the coffee
table and the turned off tv. And then something wonderful happened.
The room around me seemed to become alive as I stared deeply. I felt
the presence of a mind, felt that it saw me, and I realized that it
loved me. And then it was over. I asked them what that was, and they
said it was God. I thought it could be aliens communicating with me,
it was so strange and new, supernatural. But they seemed to know what
was going on, so I accepted what they said.

At that point I was in, and I gobbled it all up - I got a Bible(and
more later), and books about Christianity, and Christian music; I spent
so many nights up late reading and praying, meditating on God,
listening to mp3's and cd's of Christian music. Fellowship with
sincere people who genuinely cared about you; supernatural highs, I was
hooked on all of it.

Well, I had emotional supports but I still was not fully ok. I was
dealing with personal problems that just wouldn't go away; but I guess
my greatest "sin" was disobedience - specifically, doing things for
myself and not for God or others when I felt the compulsion. This was
my downfall. I had no foundation of good works which I could base my
faith on. And without it, I was really unstable. Many times I was
afraid of God's wrath (a fear which is very real for the believer) - an
experience just as intense as His love. I felt guilt, despair, and
later on near the end of my career, externalized hatred and
condemnation. God, the entity on which everything worth anything to me
depended, hated my guts and wanted me to work as hard as possible to
purify my repugnant self, or else die. I saw signs, felt people's
feelings and thoughts. That was the turning point, I think. Why
should I put up with this psycho crap? I didn't sign up for this!

Wow - Wild stuff.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
User: "wcb"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 12:25:17 PM
Robibnikoff wrote:


"n4meless0ne" <wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153845139.486024.295180@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...


Richo wrote:

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.


The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!


Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.

You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.

And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.

Mark.



Well, to fill in some background about myself - I was raised as an
agnostic/atheist, so I wasn't a subject of early religious
conditioning. I converted during a crucial period of my life when I
was under a lot of stress and had a lot of problems. Basically, I was
an emotional wreck, so when counseling didn't do the trick, and no one
else seemed to be there, I was open to Christian invitation.(Quote from
Stephen Colbert in Strangers with Candy: "I'll go anywhere you want
and do anything you say. Just _love_ me!). These were nice people, I
met them through a friend, and they became my friends. (I suppose I
wouldn't say they're not my friends now, I just don't talk to or have
anything to do with them anymore, although some must regard me with
disgust or resentment).

Looking back at it now, I don't know if it was good for me or not - I
did need the emotional support of friends who really cared, but the
extra stuff, i.e., the religious stuff I don't know about. They were
trying to get me to depend on a relationship with God for emotional
strength.

My theory of what happened next is inevitably strange and perhaps hard
to understand. They were praying for God to reveal himself to me, and
then I had a reality altering (psychedelic) experience. All natural by
the way, no drugs or anything, which lent credence to what they were
preaching. As I was sitting in my friends' living room, they were
praying out loud to God, and I was listening and watching the coffee
table and the turned off tv. And then something wonderful happened.
The room around me seemed to become alive as I stared deeply. I felt
the presence of a mind, felt that it saw me, and I realized that it
loved me. And then it was over. I asked them what that was, and they
said it was God. I thought it could be aliens communicating with me,
it was so strange and new, supernatural. But they seemed to know what
was going on, so I accepted what they said.

At that point I was in, and I gobbled it all up - I got a Bible(and
more later), and books about Christianity, and Christian music; I spent
so many nights up late reading and praying, meditating on God,
listening to mp3's and cd's of Christian music. Fellowship with
sincere people who genuinely cared about you; supernatural highs, I was
hooked on all of it.

Well, I had emotional supports but I still was not fully ok. I was
dealing with personal problems that just wouldn't go away; but I guess
my greatest "sin" was disobedience - specifically, doing things for
myself and not for God or others when I felt the compulsion. This was
my downfall. I had no foundation of good works which I could base my
faith on. And without it, I was really unstable. Many times I was
afraid of God's wrath (a fear which is very real for the believer) - an
experience just as intense as His love. I felt guilt, despair, and
later on near the end of my career, externalized hatred and
condemnation. God, the entity on which everything worth anything to me
depended, hated my guts and wanted me to work as hard as possible to
purify my repugnant self, or else die. I saw signs, felt people's
feelings and thoughts. That was the turning point, I think. Why
should I put up with this psycho crap? I didn't sign up for this!


Wow - Wild stuff.


Not at all uncommon though. Lots of people have these conversion
experiences, there is a rather large literature on the phenomenon.
--
Real Christians handle snakes.
Cheerful Charlie
.


User: "Richo"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 08:13:05 PM
n4meless0ne wrote:

Richo wrote:

There are two powerful forces that 99% of the time trump rational
thought.
One is *early* conditioning - tell a child something often and in
multiple ways and full of emotional potency before they are 6 or 7
tears old and it will in general "stick".
What we learn at our Momma's breast is what we keep till the grave -
the message gets modified built on and usually reinforced.


The second powerful force that generally trumps rational thought is
emotional attachment.
Underneath our advanced clever ape brain with its big cerebrum - deep
down in the basement is the amygdala - our reptile brain This is where
our drives come from - our desire for food and sex our fear and
aggression. This is the powerhouse of reinforcement and revulsion.
We are social animals - when we do things that bond us to the group our
amygdala rewards us with positive reinforcement.
Whatch the audience in a church when the preaching is hot and the
"spirit" is high.
The music the chanting the group feeling... Halleluya!


Religion is built on rewarding belief and punishing doubt and dissent.
So is the cultish behaviour in Jihadis and Hitler youth and Red Guards.
Its humans following their human nature.

You *can* escape from this stuff - but its not easy and its not
possible for everyone.

And generally rational argument is the pathetic pop-gun up against the
cruise missile of emotional need.
Atheism will lose most of the time - it would be irrational to expect
anything else.

Mark.



Well, to fill in some background about myself - I was raised as an
agnostic/atheist, so I wasn't a subject of early religious
conditioning. I converted during a crucial period of my life when I
was under a lot of stress and had a lot of problems. Basically, I was
an emotional wreck, so when counseling didn't do the trick, and no one
else seemed to be there, I was open to Christian invitation.(Quote from
Stephen Colbert in Strangers with Candy: "I'll go anywhere you want
and do anything you say. Just _love_ me!). These were nice people, I
met them through a friend, and they became my friends. (I suppose I
wouldn't say they're not my friends now, I just don't talk to or have
anything to do with them anymore, although some must regard me with
disgust or resentment).

Looking back at it now, I don't know if it was good for me or not - I
did need the emotional support of friends who really cared, but the
extra stuff, i.e., the religious stuff I don't know about. They were
trying to get me to depend on a relationship with God for emotional
strength.

My theory of what happened next is inevitably strange and perhaps hard
to understand. They were praying for God to reveal himself to me, and
then I had a reality altering (psychedelic) experience. All natural by
the way, no drugs or anything, which lent credence to what they were
preaching. As I was sitting in my friends' living room, they were
praying out loud to God, and I was listening and watching the coffee
table and the turned off tv. And then something wonderful happened.
The room around me seemed to become alive as I stared deeply. I felt
the presence of a mind, felt that it saw me, and I realized that it
loved me. And then it was over. I asked them what that was, and they
said it was God. I thought it could be aliens communicating with me,
it was so strange and new, supernatural. But they seemed to know what
was going on, so I accepted what they said.

At that point I was in, and I gobbled it all up - I got a Bible(and
more later), and books about Christianity, and Christian music; I spent
so many nights up late reading and praying, meditating on God,
listening to mp3's and cd's of Christian music. Fellowship with
sincere people who genuinely cared about you; supernatural highs, I was
hooked on all of it.

Well, I had emotional supports but I still was not fully ok. I was
dealing with personal problems that just wouldn't go away; but I guess
my greatest "sin" was disobedience - specifically, doing things for
myself and not for God or others when I felt the compulsion. This was
my downfall. I had no foundation of good works which I could base my
faith on. And without it, I was really unstable. Many times I was
afraid of God's wrath (a fear which is very real for the believer) - an
experience just as intense as His love. I felt guilt, despair, and
later on near the end of my career, externalized hatred and
condemnation. God, the entity on which everything worth anything to me
depended, hated my guts and wanted me to work as hard as possible to
purify my repugnant self, or else die. I saw signs, felt people's
feelings and thoughts. That was the turning point, I think. Why
should I put up with this psycho crap? I didn't sign up for this!

Very interesting story.
I understand the needing to belong thing - the only time I ever came
close to converting was when I was in my late teens and all my best
friends at High School where all becoming born again. The guys I most
liked and admired - the guy i most wanted to *be* - found Jesus - and I
am talking Seventh Day Adventism - fundamentalist bible literalalism.
I so wanted to be part of it - but my rational mind just couldn't
swallow the claptrap.
But i certainly felt the *pull* - the emotional attraction - and that
is why I can understand why people can believe weird stuff.
I sometimes wonder if my friends had converted to some milder , more
reasonable, faith whether I would have followed them?
I would probably make a good Quaker.
8-)
Mark.
.
User: "Lucifer"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 26 Jul 2006 03:08:06 AM
I can remember many a rock gig, standing in a packed crowd (up to 50000
strong), chanting throwing the sign of the horns, full iof
anticipation, the power of the moment, and every single other person
there is with you, and you feel together.
And when the band comes onto the stage, begins playing, everyone is
singing along, going absolutely mental over four or five normal guys
with guitars, for that night, they are in charge, and you surrender
yourself to the music and the atmosphere.
The difference between rock and roll and religion though, is that rock
and roll doesn't tell you how to live your life, and, more importantly,
doesn't tell you how to live other peoples for lives for them. It's
just the music, nothing more.
But it's certainly a powerful feeling, and no doubt religions try to
exploit that togertheness as mcuha s they can.
.




User: ""

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 09:53:34 AM
Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you 'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

I used to be a born-again Christian(the real kind) but now consider
myself an atheist or just someone who avoids religion as much as
possible. You might ask why I am responding to this post, then...
Well, I guess I'm bored and want to escape the unpleasantness which
surrounds me at the moment. Anyway,
Nobody has ever given a literal, non-metaphorical definition of God
that is reducible to sense perception. Perhaps due to the nature of
the concept, no one can. E.g., he is infinite and therefore
indefinite; he is immaterial and spiritual, beyond this world. There
is the possibility of an ostentive definition that points to a
subjective experience a person may have, like "God is the entity I just
experienced when some Christians were praying for me."
There are some problems with this though. There is an inference
involved between the subjective experience itself and the conclusion
that it was caused by the Biblical God of Christianity, which may or
may not be valid. Also, the experience itself is hard to communicate
or understand in a literal or objective sense; "the world opened up to
me," "I felt truly alive," "I saw a mind, and it saw me, and I felt
loved." A looser, less definite kind of thinking is required, one that
often violates the law of identity and relies on the principle that if
two subjects share a predicate in common, they are interchangeable(Von
Domarus' principle) or the same instance.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

According to his portrayal in the Bible, God is a (relatively)
benevolent tyrant. He is not omni-benevolent, given his particular
kind of justice(God's hatred of many things and God's favor for
particular people). But he is all-powerful and could do anything he
wants to, yet adheres to a policy that will produce the largest number
of enlightened voluntary followers as possible. In addition, God likes
to foster interdependence among people. The positive side of this
would be enriched community life, esp. in the face of common hardship;
the downside would be that if one or some individuals are out of sync,
or sin or something, the entire community would have to deal with the
consequences. Hence supposedley God initiated disasters such as the
Flood, which fundamentalists then blame on certain groups of people.

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

I agree with you on this, but taking the Christian perspective I'd have
to say that
Hide and Seek is more fun. That is, if Christian Spirit is a
commodity, then making it rarer and harder to achieve increases its
value, esp. to those who do find it. Unfair, or unfortunate as it may
be.

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.

I don't think Christians can satisfactorily answer the questions you're
presenting. As a former believer, I guess all I can say is that once
you've had certain intense, special, reality-altering private
experiences, and you accept them as evidence of God, there is no
question of doubt or belief anymore.

--n4melessone
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 06:28:15 PM
<wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153752814.356250.127340@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How
about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you
'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.


I used to be a born-again Christian(the real kind) but now consider
myself an atheist or just someone who avoids religion as much as
possible. You might ask why I am responding to this post, then...
Well, I guess I'm bored and want to escape the unpleasantness which
surrounds me at the moment. Anyway,

Nobody has ever given a literal, non-metaphorical definition of God
that is reducible to sense perception.

Big problem here. How can any individual have some sort of 'experience' that
to them seems 'profound' and turn to an atheist and say with absolute
certainty that 'God' was behind that experience? It's so absolutely
subjective and baseless as to almost laugh at. Mind you now; as you well
know these people claim that 'God' is behind the 'experience' with absolute
certainty without looking to other possible causes for the effect -- such as
some neurological effect that they are completely unaware of.
I know what I'm saying here doesn't apply to you. I'm still mystified that
what is often described as a 'religious experience' is taken as some sort of
proof for the existence of 'God' when, other than this self-analysis, there
is absolutely nothing to co-oberated this claim -- and *can* be explained
with a different explanation for their 'experience'. They've got a lot of
nerve claiming that 'God' was behind their epiphany and not something else
altogether.
Perhaps due to the nature of

the concept, no one can. E.g., he is infinite and therefore
indefinite; he is immaterial and spiritual, beyond this world.

How can *anyone* come up with such assertions without the tiniest shred of
evidence to support that? Where did such absolute *knowledge* come from?
From whence is it derived? The fact that there is so much diversity within
the Christian community suggests to me that there is NO absolutes here. It
is all so subjective (except in a 'bare-bones' sort of way) that there is
nothing to 'hang one's hat on', as it were, when it comes to the claims of
the fundamentalists. One group insists that drinking wine, for example, is a
'sin'. Another group of Christians will claim that that is untrue and point
to the 'Cana' miracle to support their position. Both sides cannot be right.
Hence, the skeptic can rightfully claim neither is. It is all based in
fantasy and is subjective as hell.
There

is the possibility of an ostentive definition that points to a
subjective experience a person may have, like "God is the entity I just
experienced when some Christians were praying for me."

That isn't even within miles of proving 'God' exists. It's all subjective as
it gets.

There are some problems with this though. There is an inference
involved between the subjective experience itself and the conclusion
that it was caused by the Biblical God of Christianity, which may or
may not be valid. Also, the experience itself is hard to communicate
or understand in a literal or objective sense; "the world opened up to
me," "I felt truly alive," "I saw a mind, and it saw me, and I felt
loved." A looser, less definite kind of thinking is required, one that
often violates the law of identity and relies on the principle that if
two subjects share a predicate in common, they are interchangeable(Von
Domarus' principle) or the same instance.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God
fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?


According to his portrayal in the Bible, God is a (relatively)
benevolent tyrant.

And a documented murderer and serial killer as well. 'God' is also the
'godfather' of mass-murder and infantacide as well, it could rightfully be
said -- if one wants to take the bible literally. Why then, worship and
adore such a vile creature? He's reprehensible as all get-out!
He is not omni-benevolent, given his particular

kind of justice(God's hatred of many things and God's favor for
particular people). But he is all-powerful and could do anything he
wants to, yet adheres to a policy that will produce the largest number
of enlightened voluntary followers as possible.

In other words, mindless slaves. Again, why worship and adore such a
creature?
In addition, God likes

to foster interdependence among people.

Not really. From my understanding of this creature it's, 'believe in me and
kiss my supernatural ***** or hit the highway ... to Hell. Independence?
The positive side of this

would be enriched community life, esp. in the face of common hardship;

I certainly see how a shared faith helps to bring people together in dire
times. But I think most peole would do what 'Christians' do, anyway.

the downside would be that if one or some individuals are out of sync,
or sin or something, the entire community would have to deal with the
consequences. Hence supposedley God initiated disasters such as the
Flood, which fundamentalists then blame on certain groups of people.

And without the tiniest bit of proof to support their accusations.


Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?


I agree with you on this, but taking the Christian perspective I'd have
to say that
Hide and Seek is more fun.

I think I get what you're saying here. But I also that is called being in
'denial'.
That is, if Christian Spirit is a

commodity, then making it rarer and harder to achieve increases its
value, esp. to those who do find it. Unfair, or unfortunate as it may
be.

Self-delusion and 'denial', it seems to me.


Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.


I don't think Christians can satisfactorily answer the questions you're
presenting. As a former believer, I guess all I can say is that once
you've had certain intense, special, reality-altering private
experiences, and you accept them as evidence of God, there is no
question of doubt or belief anymore.

--n4melessone

That is exactly what bothers me.
Again, thanks for your reply. It has given me lots to think about.
Greywolf
.

User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 12:35:23 PM
<wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153752814.356250.127340@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How
about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you
'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.


I used to be a born-again Christian(the real kind) but now consider
myself an atheist or just someone who avoids religion as much as
possible. You might ask why I am responding to this post, then...
Well, I guess I'm bored and want to escape the unpleasantness which
surrounds me at the moment. Anyway,

Nobody has ever given a literal, non-metaphorical definition of God
that is reducible to sense perception. Perhaps due to the nature of
the concept, no one can. E.g., he is infinite and therefore
indefinite; he is immaterial and spiritual, beyond this world. There
is the possibility of an ostentive definition that points to a
subjective experience a person may have, like "God is the entity I just
experienced when some Christians were praying for me."

There are some problems with this though. There is an inference
involved between the subjective experience itself and the conclusion
that it was caused by the Biblical God of Christianity, which may or
may not be valid. Also, the experience itself is hard to communicate
or understand in a literal or objective sense; "the world opened up to
me," "I felt truly alive," "I saw a mind, and it saw me, and I felt
loved." A looser, less definite kind of thinking is required, one that
often violates the law of identity and relies on the principle that if
two subjects share a predicate in common, they are interchangeable(Von
Domarus' principle) or the same instance.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God
fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?


According to his portrayal in the Bible, God is a (relatively)
benevolent tyrant. He is not omni-benevolent, given his particular
kind of justice(God's hatred of many things and God's favor for
particular people). But he is all-powerful and could do anything he
wants to, yet adheres to a policy that will produce the largest number
of enlightened voluntary followers as possible. In addition, God likes
to foster interdependence among people. The positive side of this
would be enriched community life, esp. in the face of common hardship;
the downside would be that if one or some individuals are out of sync,
or sin or something, the entire community would have to deal with the
consequences. Hence supposedley God initiated disasters such as the
Flood, which fundamentalists then blame on certain groups of people.


Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?


I agree with you on this, but taking the Christian perspective I'd have
to say that
Hide and Seek is more fun. That is, if Christian Spirit is a
commodity, then making it rarer and harder to achieve increases its
value, esp. to those who do find it. Unfair, or unfortunate as it may
be.


Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.


I don't think Christians can satisfactorily answer the questions you're
presenting. As a former believer, I guess all I can say is that once
you've had certain intense, special, reality-altering private
experiences, and you accept them as evidence of God, there is no
question of doubt or belief anymore.

--n4melessone

Dang, if this isn't the best response I've 'heard' in some time when it
comes to trying to understand the 'fundamentalist' mind-set. (I *do* realize
that you are speaking as a 'former' believer.) This is terrific stuff. I am
going to print out your reply, go over it at my leisure, digest it, and see
where the old noodle takes me with it. Thanks for your thoughts. Hope
'things' get better for you. Boredom. That's one thing I've never suffered
from, really. At least I can't think of the last time I was 'bored'. I'm
going to enter into the mind of a (former) Christian fundamentalist and get
a good look-see. Cool.
Greywolf
.
User: "leo"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 04:30:12 PM
Greywolf ha escrito:

<wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153752814.356250.127340@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How
about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you
'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.


I used to be a born-again Christian(the real kind) but now consider
myself an atheist or just someone who avoids religion as much as
possible. You might ask why I am responding to this post, then...
Well, I guess I'm bored and want to escape the unpleasantness which
surrounds me at the moment. Anyway,

Nobody has ever given a literal, non-metaphorical definition of God
that is reducible to sense perception. Perhaps due to the nature of
the concept, no one can. E.g., he is infinite and therefore
indefinite; he is immaterial and spiritual, beyond this world. There
is the possibility of an ostentive definition that points to a
subjective experience a person may have, like "God is the entity I just
experienced when some Christians were praying for me."

There are some problems with this though. There is an inference
involved between the subjective experience itself and the conclusion
that it was caused by the Biblical God of Christianity, which may or
may not be valid. Also, the experience itself is hard to communicate
or understand in a literal or objective sense; "the world opened up to
me," "I felt truly alive," "I saw a mind, and it saw me, and I felt
loved." A looser, less definite kind of thinking is required, one that
often violates the law of identity and relies on the principle that if
two subjects share a predicate in common, they are interchangeable(Von
Domarus' principle) or the same instance.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God
fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?


According to his portrayal in the Bible, God is a (relatively)
benevolent tyrant. He is not omni-benevolent, given his particular
kind of justice(God's hatred of many things and God's favor for
particular people). But he is all-powerful and could do anything he
wants to, yet adheres to a policy that will produce the largest number
of enlightened voluntary followers as possible. In addition, God likes
to foster interdependence among people. The positive side of this
would be enriched community life, esp. in the face of common hardship;
the downside would be that if one or some individuals are out of sync,
or sin or something, the entire community would have to deal with the
consequences. Hence supposedley God initiated disasters such as the
Flood, which fundamentalists then blame on certain groups of people.


Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?


I agree with you on this, but taking the Christian perspective I'd have
to say that
Hide and Seek is more fun. That is, if Christian Spirit is a
commodity, then making it rarer and harder to achieve increases its
value, esp. to those who do find it. Unfair, or unfortunate as it may
be.


Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got 'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff. Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.


I don't think Christians can satisfactorily answer the questions you're
presenting. As a former believer, I guess all I can say is that once
you've had certain intense, special, reality-altering private
experiences, and you accept them as evidence of God, there is no
question of doubt or belief anymore.

--n4melessone


Dang, if this isn't the best response I've 'heard' in some time when it
comes to trying to understand the 'fundamentalist' mind-set. (I *do* realize
that you are speaking as a 'former' believer.) This is terrific stuff. I am
going to print out your reply, go over it at my leisure, digest it, and see
where the old noodle takes me with it. Thanks for your thoughts. Hope
'things' get better for you. Boredom. That's one thing I've never suffered
from, really. At least I can't think of the last time I was 'bored'. I'm
going to enter into the mind of a (former) Christian fundamentalist and get
a good look-see. Cool.

Greywolf

Hi wolf:
The experience of this man is not that extraordinary. I see this
experience as something related to enhanced state of subjectivism.
Individual are more or less affected by subjectivism. If one is raised
as an objectivist can become a scientist of any sort, or a hardworker
man, a business man, en engineer, or other that lives a strong relation
with facts.
But we are made the way our parents made us. And sometimes, they
raises us with a high component of communal subjectivism. This
subjectivism is often a religion, but can be also a political ideology,
that is more or less the same thing.
The same way you can argue with a Christian fundi, you can argue with a
freak full of political ideas. It is about a very similar situation.
I remember one day on a group somewhere, and an Indian came and told
me, "you fucking westerns don't see in India other than poverty and
misery, but there is muich more than you can though your eyes; there is
a great deal of spirituality."
This guy stopped me suddenly in my tracks, and I wondered, "what the
***** is this *****, spirituality?"
I went for the COD dictionary and looked,
"Spiritual, adj.
1 of or concerning the spirit as opposed to matter.
2 concerned with sacred or religious things; holy; divine; inspired
(the spiritual life; spiritual songs).
3 (of the mind etc.) refined, sensitive; not concerned with the
material.
4 (of a relationship etc.) concerned with the soul or spirit etc., not
with external reality (his spiritual home).
So, I wondered, what the ***** is an spirit? I have to confess that I
never watched in my life any spirit whatever. I had seen a dude that
told me "the spirit of my father appeared before me in the cemetery".
I did not believed him, because he was trying to challenging my
assertion about me not believing in witches. Because he as telling me
a story about a witch that came to the yard of his mother's home, sat
on a flying carpet. He was child when he saw that. Well, I do not
believe that crap.
I am a materialist. I believe in materials and facts. But many people
is nursed to believ in unnatural stories, is nursed to believe in
"human testimonies" as a sustitute for facts. It is indiferent if we
are before a religion or a political party. The core of all this
systemes are made out of words, many of this words are nothing but fake
doctrines. The systeme runs because the members of the community, or
church, give the impresion that you are not alone in believing this
doctrine. So, you feel not that weird, you are not that crazy. There
is a lot of people around you "chanting praises to Lord" or just
repeating the political slogans of your doctrine. So there is a sense
of community because they inspire you of the idea that outside are
camping the enemies. People that hate your god, or your doctrine, or
you party. We are surrounded by enemies that hate us, because we are
in possesion of the truth. We are good people, they are mean bastards,
and so on.
So many of us, have a faint vein of subjective thinking. It is only a
question of someone to reinforce in you this "feeling" of subjectivity.
To approach and hook you, they have to be like the JW, or the Mormons.
They have to behave in a polite way, and be surprised that a dude "as
natural as you are could be so smart and clever". So they have to feed
you with sweet words, and hope that you would have the neccessary
degree of "inmaterial subjectivism". The subjectivism is paramount to
enter into a religion or political party. To push one on the side of
group subjectivism, they have to reinforce the subjective thinking.
At first is not important what sort of subjective thinking you have.
They have to enhance the subjective thought in you. it is much later
that have to tame you into a "canonical subjectivims". You cannot be
subjective in extreme, or you are going to wander stray out of the
realm of the Church. That is the reason for the Pope saying recently,
"they are trying to combat the tyrany of relativism". Relativism is a
form of rejecting a dogma. It is as you were saying, "there are so
many dogmas that I ***** them all". You cannot be as much subjective as
to reject the true doctrine of God and produce out a new doctrine of
God of your own. This is an anatheme before the eyes of the Lord.
Leopoldo
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 11:46:27 AM
"leo" <leopoldo.perdomo@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153776612.060824.162690@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...


Greywolf ha escrito:

<wishsong@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153752814.356250.127340@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human
being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one? How
about
not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something
about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly
loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do you
'see'
this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm and
say,
'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.


I used to be a born-again Christian(the real kind) but now consider
myself an atheist or just someone who avoids religion as much as
possible. You might ask why I am responding to this post, then...
Well, I guess I'm bored and want to escape the unpleasantness which
surrounds me at the moment. Anyway,

Nobody has ever given a literal, non-metaphorical definition of God
that is reducible to sense perception. Perhaps due to the nature of
the concept, no one can. E.g., he is infinite and therefore
indefinite; he is immaterial and spiritual, beyond this world. There
is the possibility of an ostentive definition that points to a
subjective experience a person may have, like "God is the entity I just
experienced when some Christians were praying for me."

There are some problems with this though. There is an inference
involved between the subjective experience itself and the conclusion
that it was caused by the Biblical God of Christianity, which may or
may not be valid. Also, the experience itself is hard to communicate
or understand in a literal or objective sense; "the world opened up to
me," "I felt truly alive," "I saw a mind, and it saw me, and I felt
loved." A looser, less definite kind of thinking is required, one that
often violates the law of identity and relies on the principle that if
two subjects share a predicate in common, they are interchangeable(Von
Domarus' principle) or the same instance.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God
fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it
is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a
whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?


According to his portrayal in the Bible, God is a (relatively)
benevolent tyrant. He is not omni-benevolent, given his particular
kind of justice(God's hatred of many things and God's favor for
particular people). But he is all-powerful and could do anything he
wants to, yet adheres to a policy that will produce the largest number
of enlightened voluntary followers as possible. In addition, God likes
to foster interdependence among people. The positive side of this
would be enriched community life, esp. in the face of common hardship;
the downside would be that if one or some individuals are out of sync,
or sin or something, the entire community would have to deal with the
consequences. Hence supposedley God initiated disasters such as the
Flood, which fundamentalists then blame on certain groups of people.


Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right
here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God', he'd
surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What would
be
the point of *that*? Hmmmm?


I agree with you on this, but taking the Christian perspective I'd have
to say that
Hide and Seek is more fun. That is, if Christian Spirit is a
commodity, then making it rarer and harder to achieve increases its
value, esp. to those who do find it. Unfair, or unfortunate as it may
be.


Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me
that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What
makes
my
belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at
an
*honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got
'faith'
bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her stuff.
Real,
down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look at.


I don't think Christians can satisfactorily answer the questions you're
presenting. As a former believer, I guess all I can say is that once
you've had certain intense, special, reality-altering private
experiences, and you accept them as evidence of God, there is no
question of doubt or belief anymore.

--n4melessone


Dang, if this isn't the best response I've 'heard' in some time when it
comes to trying to understand the 'fundamentalist' mind-set. (I *do*
realize
that you are speaking as a 'former' believer.) This is terrific stuff. I
am
going to print out your reply, go over it at my leisure, digest it, and
see
where the old noodle takes me with it. Thanks for your thoughts. Hope
'things' get better for you. Boredom. That's one thing I've never
suffered
from, really. At least I can't think of the last time I was 'bored'. I'm
going to enter into the mind of a (former) Christian fundamentalist and
get
a good look-see. Cool.

Greywolf


Hi wolf:

Hi back. Meant to respond sooner but am having a horrid time with the
computer. (A program is taking forever to accomplish it's task.) Okay, let's
see what's on the menu.

The experience of this man is not that extraordinary. I see this
experience as something related to enhanced state of subjectivism.
Individual are more or less affected by subjectivism. If one is raised
as an objectivist can become a scientist of any sort, or a hardworker
man, a business man, en engineer, or other that lives a strong relation
with facts.
But we are made the way our parents made us. And sometimes, they
raises us with a high component of communal subjectivism.

No doubt about that. To go outside of communal 'norms' takes enormous
'gumption'. Especially when the 'norm' is considered 'normal', decent, moral
and just downright 'good'.
This

subjectivism is often a religion, but can be also a political ideology,
that is more or less the same thing.

With you there, partner.

The same way you can argue with a Christian fundi, you can argue with a
freak full of political ideas. It is about a very similar situation.
I remember one day on a group somewhere, and an Indian came and told
me, "you fucking westerns don't see in India other than poverty and
misery, but there is muich more than you can though your eyes; there is
a great deal of spirituality."
This guy stopped me suddenly in my tracks, and I wondered, "what the
***** is this *****, spirituality?"

The same damn question I've been asking for years. All you get is a bunch of
crap as an answer. I understand what 'feeling' the 'spiritualists' are
talking about. I've experienced those feelings myself. But 'spirituality'?
Hah. I could use another word or two to describe those very same feelings
without having resort to the supernatural to adequately describe them. But,
oh, doesn't 'spirituality' sound OOOoooo soooo 'mystical'?

I went for the COD dictionary and looked,
"Spiritual, adj.
1 of or concerning the spirit as opposed to matter.
2 concerned with sacred or religious things; holy; divine; inspired
(the spiritual life; spiritual songs).
3 (of the mind etc.) refined, sensitive; not concerned with the
material.
4 (of a relationship etc.) concerned with the soul or spirit etc., not
with external reality (his spiritual home).

So, I wondered, what the ***** is an spirit? I have to confess that I
never watched in my life any spirit whatever.

I have, far too often! Ooops. You *did* say 'spirit', didn't you? I watched
full bottles of vodka, 'spirits', beckoning me to partake. After a couple of
1.75 liter bottles of the stuff I was feeling 'spirit-filled'.
I had seen a dude that

told me "the spirit of my father appeared before me in the cemetery".
I did not believed him, because he was trying to challenging my
assertion about me not believing in witches. Because he as telling me
a story about a witch that came to the yard of his mother's home, sat
on a flying carpet. He was child when he saw that. Well, I do not
believe that crap.
I am a materialist. I believe in materials and facts. But many people
is nursed to believ in unnatural stories, is nursed to believe in
"human testimonies" as a sustitute for facts. It is indiferent if we
are before a religion or a political party. The core of all this
systemes are made out of words, many of this words are nothing but fake
doctrines. The systeme runs because the members of the community, or
church, give the impresion that you are not alone in believing this
doctrine.

Dead on, Leo.
So, you feel not that weird, you are not that crazy. There

is a lot of people around you "chanting praises to Lord" or just
repeating the political slogans of your doctrine. So there is a sense
of community because they inspire you of the idea that outside are
camping the enemies. People that hate your god, or your doctrine, or
you party. We are surrounded by enemies that hate us, because we are
in possesion of the truth. We are good people, they are mean bastards,
and so on.
So many of us, have a faint vein of subjective thinking. It is only a
question of someone to reinforce in you this "feeling" of subjectivity.

This reminds me of the times when, away from the 'group', I've had
Christians practically in tears because I was hammering away at their
belief-system -- and using the bible to no end to do it. What happens? They
scamper back to the 'group' where an 'elder' (or whatever) will take them
aside and systematically restore the 'truth' of the lies they had originally
been fed. After a day or two, they're back to their good old brainwashed
ways -- and feeling better about it. But I am of the opinion that the
falseness of their beliefs I exposed to them will eventually re-emerge and
make them realize that they had been 'used'. At least I hope so.

To approach and hook you, they have to be like the JW, or the Mormons.
They have to behave in a polite way, and be surprised that a dude "as
natural as you are could be so smart and clever". So they have to feed
you with sweet words, and hope that you would have the neccessary
degree of "inmaterial subjectivism". The subjectivism is paramount to
enter into a religion or political party. To push one on the side of
group subjectivism, they have to reinforce the subjective thinking.
At first is not important what sort of subjective thinking you have.
They have to enhance the subjective thought in you. it is much later
that have to tame you into a "canonical subjectivims". You cannot be
subjective in extreme, or you are going to wander stray out of the
realm of the Church. That is the reason for the Pope saying recently,
"they are trying to combat the tyrany of relativism". Relativism is a
form of rejecting a dogma. It is as you were saying, "there are so
many dogmas that I ***** them all". You cannot be as much subjective as
to reject the true doctrine of God and produce out a new doctrine of
God of your own. This is an anatheme before the eyes of the Lord.
Leopoldo

Mental laziness and an all-too-eager to subject oneself to 'authority'.
Whether that 'authority' is 'right' or not; well I'll leave that for others
to argue. I am just satisfied not to think about it too much. It makes my
brain hurt. (And someone like this could end up killing or dying for their
'faith'. Depressing as all hell.)
Greywolf
.




User: "MarkA"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 04:56:11 PM
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:50:20 -0500, Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one?
How about not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do
you 'see' this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm
and say, 'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God',
he'd surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What
would be the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at
an *honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got
'faith' bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her
stuff. Real, down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look
at.

Greywolf

It is an undeniable quirk of human psychology that some people are so
invested in their belief in 'God', that any question of his non-existence
causes their rational minds to instantly shut down. It's kind of like
scramming a nuclear reactor that is overheating. Only people who are
willing to consider the possibility that God does not exist can be
reasoned with.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 25 Jul 2006 01:47:43 PM
"MarkA" <toor@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.24.21.56.05.874604@nowhere.com...

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:50:20 -0500, Greywolf wrote:

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one?
How about not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly
dribbling
something about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but
he
certainly loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where
do
you 'see' this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm
and say, 'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God
fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God',
he'd surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What
would be the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at
an *honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got
'faith' bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her
stuff. Real, down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look
at.

Greywolf


It is an undeniable quirk of human psychology that some people are so
invested in their belief in 'God', that any question of his non-existence
causes their rational minds to instantly shut down. It's kind of like
scramming a nuclear reactor that is overheating. Only people who are
willing to consider the possibility that God does not exist can be
reasoned with.

--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)

An old member of alt.atheism turned me on to the concept of 'cognitive
dissonance' (from that famous bit of footage in the movie, '2001, A Space
Odyssey where the astronaut's brain can't deal with the sights he is
seeing). I understand the concept and it *does* seem to explain the behavior
of Christian fundamentalists exposed to 'proofs' that 'God' is merely a
powerful and persuasive figment of their imagination. The question that
remains is: How in the hell could the human mind get *that* twisted by the
clergy? Wow.
Greywolf
.


User: "Bill M"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 09:19:57 AM
You make some very good points.
There is NO 'proof' that any gods exist. There is a wealth of objective
verifable evidence that NO gods exist except in the minds of man.
Religious/god beliefs are man's psychological mental opiate to help him deal
with the fear of the finality of death.
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12c8uvdt2a28j4a@corp.supernews.com...

Think about it theists. Think long and hard about it. Not *one* single
human being has ever proven 'God' exists. Did I say not a *single* one?
How about not even *close*? Yet there you theists go; constantly dribbling
something about 'God' this and 'God' that. 'God' doesn't like this, but he
certainly loves that. What in the hell is wrong with you theists? Where do
you 'see' this 'God' of yours? Why can't you grab us atheists by the arm
and say, 'Lookee over here, *this* is proof that 'God' exists.

You say he's a 'loving' God but many of you call yourselves 'God fearing'.
When a devastating flood, mudslide, earthquake, tsunami, avalanche,
hurricane, tornado or any other calamitous natural disaster hits, it is
often called an 'act of God'. Where's Mr. Love God then? Taking a whizz?
Asleep on the job? Missing in action? Doin' the 'Wild Thing' with Mrs.
'God'. What?

Isn't there *any* part of your theist brain that says something isn't
right here? Isn't there a part of you that says, 'If there was a 'God',
he'd surely reveal himself to everyone.' Why play 'Hide n' Seek? What
would be the point of *that*? Hmmmm?

Ask yourselves, 'How can I be sure there's a 'God'? What is it in me that
says that there can be no question as to 'him' *not* existing? What makes
my belief in 'God' so absolutely irrefutably true. When you've arrived at
an *honest* answer, how about sharing it? The truth now. No I've got
'faith' bologna. No Aunt Mildred got the hiccups and 'God' cured her
stuff. Real, down to earth answers a skeptic can take a hard, close look
at.

Greywolf

.
User: "Greywolf"

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 12:39:14 PM
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:XF4xg.25426$iP1.3912@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

You make some very good points.

There is NO 'proof' that any gods exist. There is a wealth of objective
verifable evidence that NO gods exist except in the minds of man.

Religious/god beliefs are man's psychological mental opiate to help him
deal with the fear of the finality of death.

Yep. And if that was all there was to it, there wouldn't be a *major*
problem. But when these mindless people become 'used' by the clergy,
politicians, and corporate America, it most certainly becomes one.
Greywolf
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Proof of 'God' 24 Jul 2006 04:47:57 PM
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:39:14 -0500, "Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com>
wrote:


"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:XF4xg.25426$iP1.3912@bignews2.bellsouth.net...

You make some very good points.

There is NO 'proof' that any gods exist. There is a wealth of objective
verifable evidence that NO gods exist except in the minds of man.

Religious/god beliefs are man's psychological mental opiate to help him
deal with the fear of the finality of death.

Yep. And if that was all there was to it, there wouldn't be a *major*
problem. But when these mindless people become 'used' by the clergy,
politicians, and corporate America, it most certainly becomes one.

Greywolf

What else is a con game for?
Sunyata
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles