In article <1173411784.989456.25...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 8, 9:42 pm,

In article <1173326252.249763.287...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 7, 9:37 pm,

In article <1173239723.176922.206...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 6, 10:27 pm,

In article <1173153955.447247.282...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 5, 11:52=C2=A0pm,

In article <c66nu29mlfukv5i2966ri8iqh8ba6c0...@4ax.com> Stephen Knight <w=

ool...@comcast.net> writes:

On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<l...@thetruth.com> wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

It's snappier without that first "a".

Indeed:

Cary =3D=3D> Cry

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, but Dung clearly seems t=

o have a

'Boner' for you.

I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. =C2=A0Nutser.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
as a stalker.

Warlord Steve
BAAWA

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"In physical cosmology, dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy
that permeates all of space and has strong negative pressure.[1]
According to the Theory of Relativity, the effect of such a negative
pressure is qualitatively similar to a force acting in opposition to
gravity at large scales. Invoking such an effect is currently the most
popular method for explaining recent observations that the universe
appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, as well as accounting
for a significant portion of the missing mass in the universe.

Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, a
constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[2] and
quintessence, a dynamic field whose energy density can vary in time
and space.
Nature of dark energy

As this NASA chart indicates, roughly 70 percent or more of the
universe consists of dark energy, about which we know next to
nothing.The exact nature of this dark energy is a matter of
speculation. It is known to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is
not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than
gravity. Since it is not very dense=E2=80=94roughly 10=E2=88=9229 grams per=
cubic
centimeter=E2=80=94it is hard to imagine experiments to detect it in the
laboratory (but see the references for a claimed detection). Dark
energy can only have such a profound impact on the universe, making up
70% of all energy, because it uniformly fills otherwise empty space.
The two leading models are quintessence and the cosmological constant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy"

Can you evaluate, how it can be relevant to your new topic subject?

Ummmm....no. And actually, it's Andrew's old Subject: topic.

Dark energy doesn't have to be homogeneous, by the way. There's
some thought afoot of re-visiting a basic principle of colsmolgy,
that the universe itself is homogeneous at very large scales.
That assumption was necessary to make the equations of general
relativity tractable, but observations increasingly indicate
that it may be a bad assumption. In which case, dark energy
may turn out not to be needed at all to explain cosmic
expansion.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

May be due to indescribable quality. In view of continuing the
universe, there should be some balancing mechanism to disturbances/
entropy.

Why? If everything runs down, then everything runs down.

In any event, no one ever said that dark energy would reverse
entropy. Precisely the opposite in fact: an expanding universe
with a fixed energy content represents an increase in entropy.

Furthermore, under some theories of dark energy, the rate of expansion
of space will accelerate until even the atoms are torn apart.
Now THAT's what I call increasing entropy.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Destruction can be followed by new creation and creation by
destruction via maintaince. What can be the entropy and dark energy
just before big bang at big bang? Will entropy and black energy be
maximum just before big bang and at big bang?

Entrypy would be at a minimum at the Big Bang.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

PLs tell about entropy and black energy just before big bang, at big
bang and decreasing/increasing after big bang till next big bang?

At the Big Bang, the total energy in the universe was concentrated
in a tiny volume. As space expands, that energy disperses; that's
increasing entropy.

As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
that covers both topics:

Nobody knows.

In article <1173411784.989456.25...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> "Kumar"=

On Mar 8, 9:42 pm,

In article <1173326252.249763.287...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Ku=

On Mar 7, 9:37 pm,

In article <1173239723.176922.206...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com=

"Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 6, 10:27 pm,

In article <1173153955.447247.282...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups=

On Mar 5, 11:52=3DC2=3DA0pm,

In article <c66nu29mlfukv5i2966ri8iqh8ba6c0...@4ax.com> S=

ool...@comcast.net> writes:

On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<l...@thetruth.com> wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

It's snappier without that first "a".

Indeed:

Cary =3D3D=3D3D> Cry

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><

=3DC2=3DA0 =3DC2=3DA0Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, =

o have a

'Boner' for you.

I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. =3DC2=3DA0N=

=3DC2=3DA0 =3DC2=3DA0I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use =

'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide In=

as a stalker.

Warlord Steve
BAAWA

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"In physical cosmology, dark energy is a hypothetical form =

that permeates all of space and has strong negative pressur=

According to the Theory of Relativity, the effect of such a=

pressure is qualitatively similar to a force acting in oppo=

gravity at large scales. Invoking such an effect is current=

popular method for explaining recent observations that the =

appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, as well as=

for a significant portion of the missing mass in the univer=

Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological con=

constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[2] and
quintessence, a dynamic field whose energy density can vary=

and space.
Nature of dark energy

As this NASA chart indicates, roughly 70 percent or more of=

universe consists of dark energy, about which we know next =

nothing.The exact nature of this dark energy is a matter of
speculation. It is known to be very homogeneous, not very d=

not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces=

gravity. Since it is not very dense=3DE2=3D80=3D94roughly 1=

cubic
centimeter=3DE2=3D80=3D94it is hard to imagine experiments =

laboratory (but see the references for a claimed detection)=

energy can only have such a profound impact on the universe=

70% of all energy, because it uniformly fills otherwise emp=

The two leading models are quintessence and the cosmologica=

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy"

Can you evaluate, how it can be relevant to your new topic =

Ummmm....no. And actually, it's Andrew's old Subject: topic.

Dark energy doesn't have to be homogeneous, by the way. Ther=

some thought afoot of re-visiting a basic principle of colsmo=

that the universe itself is homogeneous at very large scales.
That assumption was necessary to make the equations of general
relativity tractable, but observations increasingly indicate
that it may be a bad assumption. In which case, dark energy
may turn out not to be needed at all to explain cosmic
expansion.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

May be due to indescribable quality. In view of continuing the
universe, there should be some balancing mechanism to disturban=

entropy.

Why? If everything runs down, then everything runs down. =20

In any event, no one ever said that dark energy would reverse
entropy. Precisely the opposite in fact: an expanding universe
with a fixed energy content represents an increase in entropy.

Furthermore, under some theories of dark energy, the rate of expa=

of space will accelerate until even the atoms are torn apart.
Now THAT's what I call increasing entropy.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Destruction can be followed by new creation and creation by
destruction via maintaince. What can be the entropy and dark energy
just before big bang at big bang? Will entropy and black energy be
maximum just before big bang and at big bang?

Entrypy would be at a minimum at the Big Bang.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

PLs tell about entropy and black energy just before big bang, at big
bang and decreasing/increasing after big bang till next big bang?

At the Big Bang, the total energy in the universe was concentrated
in a tiny volume. As space expands, that energy disperses; that's
increasing entropy.

As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
that covers both topics:

Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody ...

read more =BB- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In article <1173411784.989456.25...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> "Kumar"=

On Mar 8, 9:42 pm,

In article <1173326252.249763.287...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Ku=

On Mar 7, 9:37 pm,

In article <1173239723.176922.206...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com=

"Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> writes:

On Mar 6, 10:27 pm,

In article <1173153955.447247.282...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups=

On Mar 5, 11:52=3DC2=3DA0pm,

In article <c66nu29mlfukv5i2966ri8iqh8ba6c0...@4ax.com> S=

ool...@comcast.net> writes:

On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<l...@thetruth.com> wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

It's snappier without that first "a".

Indeed:

Cary =3D3D=3D3D> Cry

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><

=3DC2=3DA0 =3DC2=3DA0Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, =

o have a

'Boner' for you.

I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. =3DC2=3DA0N=

=3DC2=3DA0 =3DC2=3DA0I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use =

'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide In=

as a stalker.

Warlord Steve
BAAWA

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"In physical cosmology, dark energy is a hypothetical form =

that permeates all of space and has strong negative pressur=

According to the Theory of Relativity, the effect of such a=

pressure is qualitatively similar to a force acting in oppo=

gravity at large scales. Invoking such an effect is current=

popular method for explaining recent observations that the =

appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, as well as=

for a significant portion of the missing mass in the univer=

Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological con=

constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[2] and
quintessence, a dynamic field whose energy density can vary=

and space.
Nature of dark energy

As this NASA chart indicates, roughly 70 percent or more of=

universe consists of dark energy, about which we know next =

nothing.The exact nature of this dark energy is a matter of
speculation. It is known to be very homogeneous, not very d=

not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces=

gravity. Since it is not very dense=3DE2=3D80=3D94roughly 1=

cubic
centimeter=3DE2=3D80=3D94it is hard to imagine experiments =

laboratory (but see the references for a claimed detection)=

energy can only have such a profound impact on the universe=

70% of all energy, because it uniformly fills otherwise emp=

The two leading models are quintessence and the cosmologica=

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy"

Can you evaluate, how it can be relevant to your new topic =

Ummmm....no. And actually, it's Andrew's old Subject: topic.

Dark energy doesn't have to be homogeneous, by the way. Ther=

some thought afoot of re-visiting a basic principle of colsmo=

that the universe itself is homogeneous at very large scales.
That assumption was necessary to make the equations of general
relativity tractable, but observations increasingly indicate
that it may be a bad assumption. In which case, dark energy
may turn out not to be needed at all to explain cosmic
expansion.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

May be due to indescribable quality. In view of continuing the
universe, there should be some balancing mechanism to disturban=

entropy.

Why? If everything runs down, then everything runs down. =20

In any event, no one ever said that dark energy would reverse
entropy. Precisely the opposite in fact: an expanding universe
with a fixed energy content represents an increase in entropy.

Furthermore, under some theories of dark energy, the rate of expa=

of space will accelerate until even the atoms are torn apart.
Now THAT's what I call increasing entropy.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Destruction can be followed by new creation and creation by
destruction via maintaince. What can be the entropy and dark energy
just before big bang at big bang? Will entropy and black energy be
maximum just before big bang and at big bang?

Entrypy would be at a minimum at the Big Bang.

-- cary- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

PLs tell about entropy and black energy just before big bang, at big
bang and decreasing/increasing after big bang till next big bang?

At the Big Bang, the total energy in the universe was concentrated
in a tiny volume. As space expands, that energy disperses; that's
increasing entropy.

As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
that covers both topics:

Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody ...

read more =BB- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -