| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
28 Jun 2004 02:04:07 PM |
| Object: |
Proof that god exists |
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Dan Lowe" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 06:38:01 PM |
|
|
NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black Bean Sauce wrote:
"Dan Lowe" <dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote in message
news:g_%Dc.295$Ik4.266@newsfe3-gui...
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the URL
but because your name is only marginly different to my ex-girlfriend's.
Could of been nasty.
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
*ouch*
Dan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 07:24:53 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:03 +1000, "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black
Bean Sauce" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonyemail.com> said in alt.atheism:
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
You're an ex-beer-drinker? Shame on you, Clayton.
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black Bean Sauce" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 01:48:09 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:jld1e0tocjsu0801v1ukl0ir62a2nr8e54@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:03 +1000, "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black
Bean Sauce" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonyemail.com> said in alt.atheism:
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
You're an ex-beer-drinker? Shame on you, Clayton.
Beer eater! ;-D
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 10:12:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:03 +1000, "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black
Bean Sauce" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonyemail.com> wrote:
"Dan Lowe" <dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote in message
news:g_%Dc.295$Ik4.266@newsfe3-gui...
kathrynahunter@btinternet.com wrote:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the URL
but because your name is only marginly different to my ex-girlfriend's.
Could of been nasty.
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
Jenny Heineken?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 08:38:36 AM |
|
|
In article <ben1e0h3if8sg44mi3dh5hqlc9am1sg3k6@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:03 +1000, "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black
Bean Sauce" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonyemail.com> wrote:
"Dan Lowe" <dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote in message
news:g_%Dc.295$Ik4.266@newsfe3-gui...
kathrynahunter@btinternet.com wrote:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the URL
but because your name is only marginly different to my ex-girlfriend's.
Could of been nasty.
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
Jenny Heineken?
Gretel Warsteiner?
--------------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr Dave W" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 10:04:16 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
news:wheEc.6990$H4.245@www.newsranger.com:
In article <ben1e0h3if8sg44mi3dh5hqlc9am1sg3k6@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs
says...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:03 +1000, "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black
Bean Sauce" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonyemail.com> wrote:
"Dan Lowe" <dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote in message
news:g_%Dc.295$Ik4.266@newsfe3-gui...
kathrynahunter@btinternet.com wrote:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure
its
soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the
URL but because your name is only marginly different to my
ex-girlfriend's. Could of been nasty.
How do you think I feel...my ex's last name was Beer!
Jenny Heineken?
Gretel Warsteiner?
<if no one else will..>
Bud Weiser.
--
Dave W a.a.#1967
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Day" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 10:28:05 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
Gretel Warsteiner?
--------------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
St. Pauli Girl?
Colin Day
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 07:21:30 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:21:59 +0100, Dan Lowe
<dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote:
kathrynahunter@btinternet.com wrote:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the URL
but because your name is only marginly different to my ex-girlfriend's.
Could of been nasty.
I know how you feel. I almost ran into one of my blind dates at the
Supermarket. I hid in the Produce section for ten minutes.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 08:03:12 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:21:30 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net> in
news message <6nd1e01menq78j8ri33svvfsjnag5luuo7@4ax.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:21:59 +0100, Dan Lowe
<dan@deletethisbinlaid.com> wrote:
[-----]
Christ, you put the fear of god into me there, not because of the URL
but because your name is only marginly different to my ex-girlfriend's.
Could of been nasty.
I know how you feel. I almost ran into one of my blind dates at the
Supermarket. I hid in the Produce section for ten minutes.
Disguising yourself as a cucumber, no doubt.
Überwench #658 Now a *real* atheist!
Dame Liz the Undaunted Ath.D BAAWA
Charter Member of SMASH
and Queen of the known universe
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 03:18:56 PM |
|
|
In article <cbpq37$qrn$1@hercules.btinternet.com>,
kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com says...
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
I can do better.
The sky would fall if there were no God.
The sky is not falling.
Therefore, there is a God.
Thank you, thank you. Now for my next trick, I'll prove my divinity by
walking on water. Anyone know where an ice rink is?
--
Enkidu - AA# 2165
"Today, the theory of evolution is an accepted fact for
everyone but a fundamentalist minority, whose objections
are based not on reasoning but on doctrinaire adherence
to religious principles"
James D. Watson
http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1962/watson-bio.html
"The Astonishing Hypothesis is that `You,' your joys and
your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your
sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no
more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells
and their associated molecules."
Francis Crick
http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1962/crick-bio.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 02:13:01 PM |
|
|
In article <cbpq37$qrn$1@hercules.btinternet.com>,
says...
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
It's just an attempt to combine bible verses and science (and no, I didn't read
too far) - All conjecture.
Afraid it doesn't prove that any gods exist.
--------------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 03:35:57 PM |
|
|
On Mon 28 Jun 2004 02:04:07p, "kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> kicked back with a beer,
ruminated at length, fell asleep, woke up, lit up a joint, then fell
asleep again after thoughtfully blurting out:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Wow. Yes. It seems that they've proven that the universe is controlled
by a guiding force by observing the fact that atoms combine to form
molecules. The proof goes like this:
P1: Atoms combine to form molecules
P2: It is an undeniable fact that atoms couldn't possibly do this
without help
Conclusion: Godidit! WOOOOO!
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Beowulf" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 09:17:28 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC),
"kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> ejaculated:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Why is it that it is always rhetoric and double-talk that is offered
when talk of proving god's existence comes up? For Christ's sake,
just show me the evidence. Oh wait, you mean there isn't any? Then
shut the ***** up.
Also, why does this nimrod use JPGs with text in them instead of just
writing the text as text? It seems that this was probably scanned out
of a booklet of some sort. I guess it's ok to violate copyright laws
for the Lard.
--
Our eyes may deceive us but our god never will.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 02:11:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC), "kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Does the name "George Hammond" appear anywhere?
Does it mention eigenvectors in the first paragraph?
--
/Apostate
atheist #(e^7.5657933) I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer
EAC Supernumerary Deputy Director, Department of Redundancy Department
plonked by Lani_girl, first post; billions served!
I doubt, therefore I might be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 02:41:40 PM |
|
|
Apostate wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC), "kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Does the name "George Hammond" appear anywhere?
Does it mention eigenvectors in the first paragraph?
Nope - we've now got two Scientific Proofs of God. This one says God must
exist because water doesn't spontaneously convert itself into sulphuric
acid.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "NO.23: Stirfried Clayton In Black Bean Sauce" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 06:09:31 PM |
|
|
"Kevin Anthoney" <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cf273$40e07474$51569c09$7503@nf1.news-service-com...
Apostate wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC),
"kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Does the name "George Hammond" appear anywhere?
Does it mention eigenvectors in the first paragraph?
Nope - we've now got two Scientific Proofs of God. This one says God must
exist because water doesn't spontaneously convert itself into sulphuric
acid.
*boggle*
Ok...makes sense to me!?!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 09:52:48 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:11:38 -0400 in episode
<l9r0e0tl6atn8dfgvpctaj5k3mrt8fmvh8@4ax.com> we saw our hero Apostate
<Apostate.invalid@yeehaw.org>:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC), "kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Does the name "George Hammond" appear anywhere?
Does it mention eigenvectors in the first paragraph?
Nope. And it's not quite in Hammond's class either. This "godproven" guy
hates math (it's from Satan you know). So you don't get all the great,
incoherent formulas and stuff.
(And he needs more diagrams of his perpetual motion machine)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barry OGrady" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
29 Jun 2004 07:05:42 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC), "kathrynahunter@btinternet.com"
<kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com> wrote:
No really!
It's 84 pages and I couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its soundly
based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Its nothing more than the old "There must be a God 'cause all this can't have happened
by itself."
In other words its nothing new.
-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.optusnet.com.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 09:51:16 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:07 +0000 in episode
<cbpq37$qrn$1@hercules.btinternet.com> we saw our hero
"kathrynahunter@btinternet.com" <kathrynahunterlosethis@btinternet.com>:
no really!
It's 84 pages and i couldnt be bothered reading it, but I'm sure its
soundly based in fact and science.
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
It's worth a skim. Especially for arguments like, "the planets are moving,
therefore god." And the sporadic rants about gays, blacks, and, well, just
about everybody. Not to mention the Government Conspiracy keeping
perpetual motion machines suppressed...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Proof that god exists |
28 Jun 2004 11:38:57 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach kathrynahunter@btinternet.com:
http://www.godproven.com/godproven_001.htm
Yawn. Wake me up when the circular argument is over.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
It's my funeral and I'll fry if I want to...
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
