Religions > Atheism > Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2007 12:35:44 AM |
| Object: |
Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
http://www.nbc4i.com/midwest/cmh/news.apx.-content-articles-CMH-2007-12-13-0024.html
Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- As state legislators headed home for the holiday break, a
possible new law is opening eyes. The house passed a resolution that would
mandate doctors to ask a woman if she wants to see an ultrasound before
having an abortion. Neither pro-life or pro-choice groups disagree with the
proposal as it is written. In fact, Planned Parenthood representatives said
they already offer patients a look at an ultrasound before the procedure.
--
J Young
jyoungvisions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 01:49:54 AM |
|
|
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "amused onlooker" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 02:29:38 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_eugenics
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 06:22:41 AM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 9:29 am, "amused onlooker" <n...@void.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfisc...@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
He isn't an anti-abotionist. J Young fully believes in "aborting" the
people who aren't the right race and colour.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
18 Dec 2007 12:51:56 AM |
|
|
amused onlooker <null@void.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
The nazis ran a dictatorship where people were required to do as told by
the state. Just the sort of government he wants.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grizzlie Antagonist" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
18 Dec 2007 12:57:26 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:47676e0c$0$36349$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
amused onlooker <null@void.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
The nazis ran a dictatorship where people were required to do as told by
the state. Just the sort of government he wants.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grizzlie Antagonist" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
18 Dec 2007 12:59:15 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:47676e0c$0$36349$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
amused onlooker <null@void.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
The nazis ran a dictatorship where people were required to do as told by
the state. Just the sort of government he wants.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Just the sort of government that you want, as long as you're in charge of
it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
18 Dec 2007 04:30:19 AM |
|
|
Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanford@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
amused onlooker <null@void.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote
J Young <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Quite the goose-stepping nazi, aren't you?
The Nazi eugenics program supposedly sought to eliminate the weak from the
chain of hereditary so how can you call an anti-abortionist a "nazi"?
The nazis ran a dictatorship where people were required to do as told by
the state. Just the sort of government he wants.
Just the sort of government that you want,
So you're another pro-liar ***** who can't tell the truth about
anything.
What a surprise.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 02:23:18 AM |
|
|
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 04:34:57 AM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 3:23 am, wrote:
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
I think it could change a lot. A mothers natural instinct may just
kick in and go into a defense mode, meaning she wants to defend and
protect her unborn. Once a heartbeat is heard, the whole picture
changes. I don't think that the ultra-sound should be "mandatory".
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 05:14:08 AM |
|
|
On 17 Dez., 11:34, osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Dec 17, 3:23 am, wrote:
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
I think it could change a lot. A mothers natural instinct may just
kick in and go into a defense mode, meaning she wants to defend and
protect her unborn. Once a heartbeat is heard, the whole picture
changes. I don't think that the ultra-sound should be "mandatory".
I don't think we need to add any pressure on the woman. No one decides
to get an abotion for fun. To play with her feelings is manipulative.
Should we sent pictures of criminal teenagers to pregnant women just
to show them what can maybe happen with their babies? Should we send
pictures of Hitler, Stalin and Mao when they were children just to
show that children of today can become dictators of tomorrow?
After all, if it's allowed in one way, why not the other?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 01:30:32 PM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 11:34 am, osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Dec 17, 3:23 am, wrote:
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
I think it could change a lot. A mothers natural instinct may just
kick in
That's *****..."mother's natural instinct," my *****. Some women take
a year after the child's birth to "bond," some don't, some do right
away, so grasing at anything, at this point, to justify your sick
desire to prevent women into making their own decisions is duly
fucking noted.
and go into a defense mode, meaning she wants to defend and
protect her unborn. Once a heartbeat is heard, the whole picture
changes. I don't think that the ultra-sound should be "mandatory".
Take your head out of your *****, for *****'s sake, you ignorant sack of
elephant *****.
By the way - the only abortion that's any of your concern is that of
your wife's out of her own choice.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 12:56:05 PM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 3:34 am, osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Dec 17, 3:23 am, wrote:
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
I think it could change a lot. A mothers natural instinct may just
kick in and go into a defense mode, meaning she wants to defend and
protect her unborn.
"Mother's natural instinct" is pretty much a myth, bobby. There are
plenty of human women who don't have it, and plenty of mammal mothers
who also lack it. It's taught, it isn't innate. All kinds of things
can interfere with the uptake of the meme.
Once a heartbeat is heard, the whole picture
changes.
Not if you don't want a kid in the first place, it doesn't.
I don't think that the ultra-sound should be "mandatory".
I don't think what women do is any of your business.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 02:52:59 PM |
|
|
"skyeyes" <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote in message
news:673fa0da-1c55-4ef8-9e6d-d7c68d43d2b5@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 17, 3:34 am, osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Dec 17, 3:23 am, wrote:
On 17 Dez., 07:35, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
What would it change? Don't you think that women who decide to get an
abortion don't know what it is about?
I think it could change a lot. A mothers natural instinct may just
kick in and go into a defense mode, meaning she wants to defend and
protect her unborn.
"Mother's natural instinct" is pretty much a myth, bobby.
Except medical experts disagree with you.
There are
plenty of human women who don't have it, and plenty of mammal mothers
who also lack it. It's taught, it isn't innate. All kinds of things
can interfere with the uptake of the meme.
Once a heartbeat is heard, the whole picture
changes.
Not if you don't want a kid in the first place, it doesn't.
I don't think that the ultra-sound should be "mandatory".
I don't think what women do is any of your business.
As long as abortion is an election issue..it's my business.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 03:57:45 PM |
|
|
In article <-Nadnf2UJvMxfPvanZ2dnUVZ_tmhnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"skyeyes" <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote in message
news:673fa0da-1c55-4ef8-9e6d-d7c68d43d2b5@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
[...]
I don't think what women do is any of your business.
As long as abortion is an election issue..it's my business.
osprey's obsession with controlling women is legendary.
--
"You tried to steal the identity of a James G. Keegan Jr. who did in fact
author a book, and you're trying to convince people that you are the same
person." -- corrupt prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" in an effort
to cover-up his earlier lie that i was not an author <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in <v4qdndNQW_fFAMXanZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@comcast.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
18 Dec 2007 03:35:52 AM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 9:52 pm, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
As long as abortion is an election issue..it's my business.
And your wives and daughters' abortions are mine.
Idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 06:23:05 AM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 7:35 am, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
And, yet, you want all of the Jews dead.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 07:11:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
http://www.nbc4i.com/midwest/cmh/news.apx.-content-articles-CMH-2007-12-13-0024.html
Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- As state legislators headed home for the holiday break, a
possible new law is opening eyes. The house passed a resolution that would
mandate doctors to ask a woman if she wants to see an ultrasound before
having an abortion. Neither pro-life or pro-choice groups disagree with the
proposal as it is written. In fact, Planned Parenthood representatives said
they already offer patients a look at an ultrasound before the procedure.
I STILL can't understand the "logic" of being anti-abortion. Now that the
RCC has decided that unborn children do NOT get sent to Hell or Limbo for
the crime of dying without accepting Jesus as their Lord and Savior, and
in light of the Christian belief that this life is a preamble to an even
better life in the here-after, could someone please explain how it is not
the act of ultimate charity to give the fetus a ticket to go directly to
Heaven?
Either I'm missing something here, or the religious anti-abortionists are
contradicting their own beliefs. And I don't think I'm missing something.
--
MarkA
(My OTHER sig line is clever)
.
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 12:58:23 PM |
|
|
On Dec 17, 6:11 am, MarkA <t...@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
http://www.nbc4i.com/midwest/cmh/news.apx.-content-articles-CMH-2007-...
Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- As state legislators headed home for the holiday break, a
possible new law is opening eyes. The house passed a resolution that would
mandate doctors to ask a woman if she wants to see an ultrasound before
having an abortion. Neither pro-life or pro-choice groups disagree with the
proposal as it is written. In fact, Planned Parenthood representatives said
they already offer patients a look at an ultrasound before the procedure.
I STILL can't understand the "logic" of being anti-abortion. Now that the
RCC has decided that unborn children do NOT get sent to Hell or Limbo for
the crime of dying without accepting Jesus as their Lord and Savior, and
in light of the Christian belief that this life is a preamble to an even
better life in the here-after, could someone please explain how it is not
the act of ultimate charity to give the fetus a ticket to go directly to
Heaven?
Either I'm missing something here, or the religious anti-abortionists are
contradicting their own beliefs. And I don't think I'm missing something.
It isn't really about the fetus at all. It's about punishing women
for having sex by forcing them to give birth to children they don't
want.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 04:26:45 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“A metaphysician is one who, when you remark
that twice two makes four, demands to know what
you mean by twice, what by two, what by makes,
and what by four. For asking such questions
metaphysicians are supported in oriental luxury
in the universities, and respected as educated
and intelligent men. ”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 12:14:20 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They just
don't force the patient to look at them.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 07:44:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The larger the mob, the harder the test....when the
field is nationwide...then all the odds are on the man
who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre--
the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the
notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.
“The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men.
As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more
and more closely, the inner soul of the people.
“We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their
heart's desire at last, and the White House will be
adorned by a downright moron.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
17 Dec 2007 07:55:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I vote he be forced to _undergo_ several hours of hemorrhoid surgeries.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
http://www.zazzle.com/fmayhar*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
18 Dec 2007 09:08:42 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:55:10 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I vote he be forced to _undergo_ several hours of hemorrhoid surgeries.
No point until they remove his head from his *****...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Evolution is both fact and theory.
Creationism is neither.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
18 Dec 2007 11:11:46 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:08:42 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:55:10 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient
and yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several
hours of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I vote he be forced to _undergo_ several hours of hemorrhoid surgeries.
No point until they remove his head from his *****...
How could they tell the difference? Odds are they would have
accidentally beheaded him before noticing the eyes, nose and mouth on
that one.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
http://www.zazzle.com/fmayhar*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
18 Dec 2007 12:01:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:11:46 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:08:42 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:55:10 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient
and yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several
hours of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I vote he be forced to _undergo_ several hours of hemorrhoid
surgeries.
No point until they remove his head from his *****...
How could they tell the difference? Odds are they would have
accidentally beheaded him before noticing the eyes, nose and mouth on
that one.
I dunno how they could tell the difference but with that thing jammed up
there, there sure ain't any point in hemorrhoid surgeries.
Then again, if they beheaded him, could we tell the difference?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“A Sunday school is a prison in which children do
penance for the evil conscience of their parents. ”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
17 Dec 2007 07:54:33 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I was wondering if Rush Limbaugh had videos of his cyst removals.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
18 Dec 2007 09:08:19 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:33 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I was wondering if Rush Limbaugh had videos of his cyst removals.
I believe that qualifies you for a severe rubber chicken thwhacking...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions
are identical to those of a universe without God, you have
nothing left to defend." - Free Lunch
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
18 Dec 2007 05:54:08 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:08:19 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:33 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient and
yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several hours
of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I was wondering if Rush Limbaugh had videos of his cyst removals.
I believe that qualifies you for a severe rubber chicken thwhacking...
One should remember the rabid hawk and drug addicted loud mouth,
Russell Limbaugh, escaped the draft because he had several of those
cysts on his fat *****. He could have done the right thing and allowed
the military to remove them, free for charge.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds BeforeAbortions |
19 Dec 2007 11:31:05 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:54:08 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:08:19 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:33 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient
and yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several
hours of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I was wondering if Rush Limbaugh had videos of his cyst removals.
I believe that qualifies you for a severe rubber chicken thwhacking...
One should remember the rabid hawk and drug addicted loud mouth, Russell
Limbaugh, escaped the draft because he had several of those cysts on his
fat *****. He could have done the right thing and allowed the military to
remove them, free for charge.
Either way, suggesting videos of Lush Limpdick's fat ***** is a felony. Or
if it isn't, it should be...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“A metaphysician is one who, when you remark
that twice two makes four, demands to know what
you mean by twice, what by two, what by makes,
and what by four. For asking such questions
metaphysicians are supported in oriental luxury
in the universities, and respected as educated
and intelligent men. ”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Proposed Law Would Require Option For Ultrasounds Before Abortions |
19 Dec 2007 07:24:05 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:31:05 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:54:08 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:08:19 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:33 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:04 -0600, in alt.abortion, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:14:20 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:5gvh35-vb4.ln1@eac.exists.not...
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:35:44 -0500, J Young wrote:
This procedure should be mandatory. Lives are at stake!
Oh? And what other medical procedures will our Fuhrer demand?
Lot of abortion clinics do ultrasounds prior to the procedure. They
just don't force the patient to look at them.
Next Young will want them to throw bloody baby parts on the patient
and yell, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT????"
In the mean time, I think Young should be forced to watch several
hours of hemorrhoid surgeries...
I was wondering if Rush Limbaugh had videos of his cyst removals.
I believe that qualifies you for a severe rubber chicken thwhacking...
One should remember the rabid hawk and drug addicted loud mouth, Russell
Limbaugh, escaped the draft because he had several of those cysts on his
fat *****. He could have done the right thing and allowed the military to
remove them, free for charge.
Either way, suggesting videos of Lush Limpdick's fat ***** is a felony. Or
if it isn't, it should be...
Obscenity is what it would be called.
He is a poster boy for gastric by-pass surgery.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
